Fate of the unlearned

Fate of the unlearned

The fate of the unlearned (or destiny of the unevangelized) is an eschatological question about the ultimate destiny of people who have not been exposed to a particular theology or doctrine and thus have no opportunity to embrace it. The question is whether those who never hear of requirements issued through divine revelations will be punished for failure to abide by those requirements.

It is sometimes addressed in combination with the similar question of the fate of the unbeliever. Differing faith traditions have different responses to the question; in Christianity the fate of the unlearned is related to the question of Original sin. As some suggest that rigid readings of religious texts require harsh punishment for those who have never heard of that religion, it is sometimes raised as an argument against the existence of God, and is generally accepted to be an extension or sub-section of The Problem of Evil.



Catholic tradition

The Catholic Church believes that Jesus Christ attained salvation "for all men" by his death on the cross.[1] It teaches that salvation comes from "God alone," but that the Church is the "mother" and "teacher" of the faithful.[2] Specifically, it teaches that Christian baptism is generally necessary for salvation.[3]

However, Catholic teaching also allows for the salvation of one with genuine ignorance of Christian teaching, who "seeks the truth and does the will of God in accordance with his understanding of it."[4][5] Unbaptized catechumens are saved, in the Catholic view, because the desire to receive the sacrament of baptism, together with sincere repentance for one's sins, assures salvation.[6] In the case of the righteous unlearned, "It may be supposed that such persons would have desired Baptism explicitly if they had known its necessity" and, by extension, they will attain salvation.[7] See Baptism of desire

Dante attempted to answer this question with the first level of Hell in the Divine Comedy, where the virtuous pagans live. They are described as those who lived before the time of Jesus and therefore unable to enter Purgatory or Heaven. Amongst them is Virgil, Dante's guide through Hell and Purgatory.

Protestant tradition

In Christian evangelical belief, the issue centers on whether those who have not heard the Gospel receive salvation or damnation.[8][9]

Under a strict exclusivist position, those who died without an opportunity to learn of or understand the Christian message are destined to Hell, which may include those who lived before Jesus' time, those who lived in remote places and never learned of it, those who die in infancy or before birth, and the mentally disabled. Some Protestants agree with Augustine that people in these categories will be damned to Hell for original sin, whereas others argue that God needs no human help in delivering salvation.[8][9] The French reformer John Calvin, writing his Institutes of the Christian Religion at the time of the Reformation, wrote "beyond the pale of the Church no forgiveness of sins, no salvation, can be hoped for" [IV.i.iv]. Calvin wrote also that "those to whom he is a Father, the Church must also be a mother," echoing the words of the originator of the Latin phrase himself, Cyprian: "He can no longer have God for his Father who has not the Church for his mother." The idea is further affirmed in the Puritan, Anglican Westminster Confession of Faith of 1647 that "the visible Church ... is the Kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ, the house and family of God, out of which there is no ordinary possibility of salvation."

Despite this, it is not necessarily a commonly held belief within modern Protestantism, especially Evangelicalism and those denominations which believe in the autonomy of the local church. The dogma is related to the universal Protestant dogma that the church is the body of all believers and debates within Protestantism usually centre on the meaning of "church" (ecclesiam) and "apart" (extra). Theologian John Sanders noted that "Although God's decision on this issue is final, the church has never agreed on the nature of that decision."[8] Sanders and Clark Pinnock propose a position known as "inclusivism", under which many of the unevangelized will receive salvation because they have faith in God as they know him (as Hindus or Muslims, for example), and they are saved by Christ's work.[10]

Latter-day Saint tradition

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, or Mormonism, teaches that those who die without knowledge of LDS theology will have the opportunity to receive a knowledge of the gospel of Jesus Christ in the spirit world. In Mormon belief, only "sons of perdition" who chose to reject Jesus are destined for Hell, a form of universalism that assisted the early rise of the Mormon faith.[11] Latter-day Saints believe that God has provided a way so that all of mankind will have an opportunity to hear the message of the gospel, and can thereby choose whether to accept it or not. Latter-day Saints cite biblical passages found in 1 Peter.

1 Peter 3:
18 For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:
19 By which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison;
1 Peter 4:
6 For this cause was the gospel preached also to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the spirit.

Since Latter-day Saints believe that all must receive the proper ordinances in order to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven, today members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints participate in a massive genealogical effort to compile names of their kindred dead, and then to perform sacred ordinances, such as baptism, in behalf and as proxies for their deceased ancestors in sacred temples, which are found throughout the world.

"Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? Why are they then baptized for the dead?"  — 1 Corinthians 15:29


A similar issue exists in Islam, as different authorities within the faith have issued different theories as to the destiny of those who do not know of Muhammad or Allah. In contrast to Christianity, Islam generally rejects the possibility that those who have never heard of the revelations embodied in the Qur'an might automatically merit punishment.[12]

According to Qur'an, the basic criteria for salvation in afterlife are the belief in one God, Last Judgment, acceptance and obedience of what is in the Qur'an and ordained by the prophet and good deeds.[13] As the Qur'an states:

Surely those who believe (Muslims) and those who are Jews and the Sabians and the Christians whoever believes in Allah (God) and the last day and does good-- they shall have no fear nor shall they grieve.[14]

The Qur'an also asserts that those who reject the Messengers of God with their best knowledge are damned in afterlife[13] and if they reject in front of the Messenger of God, then they also face dreadful fate in this world and in afterlife (see Itmam al-hujjah). Conversely, a person who discovers monotheism without having been reached by a messenger is called Hanif. But it should be remembered, Islam also states every community in the world, no matter how isolated, had been sent at least one prophet to teach them. So, this belief limits the possibility of people never heard of God's message. Prophet Ibrahim(Abraham)'s story also indicates[citation needed] every man is capable of finding one true God by his own common sense.

To reduce the broad scope of the Islamic tradition to a single answer, however, would be as problematic as to do the same for Christianity – different Muslims have answered this question in different ways at different times. Some Muslims have maintained – and still do – that paradise is only available to those who accept Islam as is suggested by some verses of the Qur'an, and this is a very commonly held view. It is also believed that following religions such as Judaism or Christianity is acceptable only prior to the advent of Islam and only in their original unaltered form in the way they were revealed to their messengers without any distortion or idolatry like present day Christianity.[citation needed]

One view is that "A person who has never heard of Islam or the Prophet... and who has never heard the message in its correct and true form, will not be punished by Allah if he dies in a state of disbelief. If it were asked what his fate will be, the answer will be that Allah will test him on the Day of Resurrection: if he obeys, he will enter Paradise and if he disobeys he will enter Hell."[15] But, even those who have not heard the message will be held to some standard of conduct: "Because everyone is a born Muslim, those who have never heard of Islam are only responsible for not doing what common sense tells him or her to do. Those who knowingly violate God's laws will be punished for their wrongdoing."[16] Under this view, those who have not heard the message are "excused," and Allah "rewards such people for the good they have done, and they enjoy the blessings of Paradise."[12] A similar view is that "if such people find the Creator through the use of reason, even though they do not know His Names or Attributes, they will be saved. If they do not do this, they will not be saved."[12]

Some would extend this mercy to the incompetently evangelized, that is, to people "who have been reached by the name of Muhammad but who have been given a false account," and for whom it is then said that they "have not rejected true Islam but only a distorted version of it and they will therefore be judged in the same category as those people who never heard of Islam in the first place."[16]

The more complicated question of what will happen, for example, to people of religions other than Judaism and Christianity is significantly more controversial. There is particularly controversy over the meaning of the word "Sabians". The long presence of Islam in South Asia, however, has engendered many debates about the status of Hindus, which has run the whole gamut between a more standard dismissal of Hinduism as shirk, or polytheism, to some Muslims, such as Mirza Mazhar Jan-e-Janaan[17] even going so far as to recognize Rama and Krishna as Prophets of Islam not explicitly mentioned in Muslim scripture – thereby making Hindus equivalent to Christians or Jews.

Non-theistic traditions

The problem of the unevangelized does not arise in religious or spiritual traditions such as Deism, Pandeism, and Pantheism, which do not include any revelation or require obedience to revealed rules. In Deism, some believe that individuals will be judged by one's obedience to natural laws of right and wrong to be obtained by the exercise of reason alone, and so, failure to exercise reason in the effort to make this determination is itself the cause for punishment.

In Buddhism, all souls, whether evangelized or not, will continue to be reincarnated until they have achieved Nirvana. However, Buddhist scholars have said that "any suggestion that enlightenment is immediately available to anyone who really wants it, even if he has never heard of Buddhism, is likely to be received with incredulity or even resentment."[18]

See also


  1. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., para. 1741
  2. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., para. 169.
  3. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., para. 1257 et seq.
  4. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., para. 1260.
  5. ^ Evangelical Alliance Commission on Unity and Truth among Evangelicals (2000). The Nature of Hell. Acute, Paternoster (London). 
  6. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., para. 1259
  7. ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd ed., para. 1260.
  8. ^ a b c Sanders, John (14 May 1990). "The Perennial Debate". Christianity Today (Christianity Today International). http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2000/aprilweb-only/12.0a.html. 
  9. ^ a b Stackhouse Jr., John G. (8 September 1993). "No Other Name: An Investigation into the Destiny of the Unevangelized. – book reviews". Christian Century. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1058/is_n25_v110/ai_13275791/. Retrieved 9 January 2010. [dead link]
  10. ^ Stackhouse Jr., John G. (3 September 2001). "What Has Jerusalem to Do with Mecca?". Christianity Today. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2001/september3/12.92.html. 
  11. ^ Mohler Jr., R. Albert (30 May 2005). "The Cults as Theological Judgment". The Christian Post. http://www.christianpost.com/article/20050530/the-cults-as-theological-judgment/pageall.html. Retrieved 9 January 2010. 
  12. ^ a b c Fethullah Gülen (2006). Questions & Answers About Islam, Volume 1‎. (London). 
  13. ^ a b Moiz Amjad. Will Christians enter Paradise or go to Hell?. Renaissance – Monthly Islamic journal 11(6), June, 2001.
  14. ^ [Quran 5:69]
  15. ^ Muhamm Abdul-Rahman (2003). Islam: Questions and Answers, Volume 1‎‎. 
  16. ^ a b Abubakr Asadulla (2005). Islam Vs. West: Fact Or Fiction?‎‎‎. 
  17. ^ Mirza Mazhar Jan-e-Janaan Biography, Biography of Urdu Writers
  18. ^ Buddhist Society (London, England)The Middle way, 1943, Volumes 45–47, p. 18.

External links

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • List of topics about the Latter Day Saint movement — In an effort to bring together pages on various religions, below is a list of articles that are about or reference Latter Day Saint movement topics. As a rule, the links below should direct to existing articles, not empty pages (non existent… …   Wikipedia

  • My Life in the Bush of Ghosts (novel) — My Life in the Bush of Ghosts   Author(s) Amos Tutuola Language …   Wikipedia

  • Existentialism — The …   Wikipedia

  • Argument from morality — The argument from morality is one of many arguments for the existence of God. It comes in different forms, all aiming to support the claim that God exists with observations about morality. Its counterpoint is generally the Problem of evil.… …   Wikipedia

  • Cosmological argument — The cosmological argument is an argument for the existence of a First Cause (or instead, an Uncaused cause) to the universe, and by extension is often used as an argument for the existence of an unconditioned or supreme being, usually then… …   Wikipedia

  • Mysticism — The goddess Persephone, from the great Eleusinian relief in the National Archaeological Museum in Athens …   Wikipedia

  • Christological argument — The Christological argument for the existence of God is based on certain claims about Jesus. The argument, which exists in several forms, holds that if these claims are valid, one should accept God exists. There are three main threads: Argument… …   Wikipedia

  • Ontological argument — The ontological argument for the existence of God (or simply ontological argument) is an a priori proof for the existence of God. The ontological argument was first proposed by the eleventh century monk Anselm of Canterbury, who defined God as… …   Wikipedia

  • Outline of theology — The following outline is presented as an overview of and topical guide to theology: Theology – systematic and rational study of religion and its influences and of the nature of religious truths, or the learned profession acquired by completing… …   Wikipedia

  • Problem of evil — Part of a series on God General conceptions …   Wikipedia