- Implicit and explicit atheism
Implicit atheism and explicit atheism are subcategories of
atheismcoined by George H. Smith(1979, p.13-18). "Implicit atheism" is defined by Smith as "the absence of theistic belief without a conscious rejection of it" (i.e., those who have not thought about the existence of deities, let alone decided against it, are "de facto" atheists). "Explicit atheism" is defined as "the absence of theistic belief due to a conscious rejection of it" (those who have thought about the existence of deities and have purposely decided against it), which, according to Smith, is sometimes characterized as " antitheism".cite book |url=http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/smith.htm |title=Atheism: The Case Against God |first=George H. |last=Smith |location=Buffalo, New York |year=1979 |publisher=Prometheus |id= ISBN 0-87975-124-X |pages=13–18]
For Smith, explicit atheism is subdivided further according to whether or not the rejection is made on rational grounds. The term "critical atheism" is used to label the view that belief in god is irrational, and is itself subdivided into:
*a) the view usually expressed by the statement "I do not believe in the existence of a god or supernatural being";
*b) the view usually expressed by the statement "God does not exist" or "the existence of God is impossible"; and
*c) the view which "refuses to discuss the existence or nonexistence of a god" because "the concept of a god is unintelligible" (p.17).
Ernest Nagelrejects Smith's definition of atheism as merely "absence of theism", acknowledging only explicit atheism as true "atheism", his tripartite classification of "rejectionist atheism"—commonly found in the philosophical literature—is identical to Smith's "critical atheism" typology.
Other typologies of atheism
The difference between Nagel on the one hand and d'Holbach and Smith on the other has been attributed to the different concerns of professional philosophers and layman proponents of atheism (see Smith (1990, Chapter 3, p.51-60 [cite book |url=http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/smithdef.htm |title=Atheism, Ayn Rand, and Other Heresies |last=Smith |first=George H. |year=1990 |pages=51-60] ), for example, but also alluded to by others).
Everitt (2004) makes the point that professional philosophers are more interested in the grounds for giving or withholding assent to propositions:
We need to distinguish between a "biographical" or "sociological" enquiry into why some people have believed or disbelieved in God, and an "
epistemological" enquiry into whether there are any good reasons for either belief or unbelief... We are interested in the question of what "good reasons" there are for or against God's existence, and no light is thrown on that question by discovering people who hold their beliefs without having good reasons for them. (p.10) [Everitt, Nicholas (2004). "The Non-existence of God: An Introduction". London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-30107-6.]
So, in philosophy (Flew and Martin notwithstanding), atheism is commonly defined along the lines of "rejection of theistic belief". This is often misunderstood to mean only the view that there is no God, but it is conventional to distinguish between two or three main sub-types of atheism in this sense. However, writers differ in their characterization of this distinction, and in the labels they use for these positions.
The terms "weak atheism" and "strong atheism" (or "negative atheism" and "positive atheism") are often used as synonyms of Smith's less-well-known "implicit" and "explicit" categories. However, the original and technical meanings of implicit and explicit atheism are quite different and distinct from weak and strong atheism, having to do with conscious rejection and unconscious rejection of theism rather than with positive belief and negative belief.
People who do not use the broad definition of atheism as "absence of theism", but instead use the most common definition "disbelief in or denial of the existence of God or gods", [cite web |url=http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=atheism |title=Dictionary.com/atheism |accessdate=2006-03-05] would not recognize mere absence of belief in deities (implicit atheism) as a type of atheism at all, and would tend to use other terms, such as "skeptic" or "agnostic", or even the heavy-handed "non-atheistic non-theism", for this position.fact|date=June 2008|skeptics & agnostics (at least those who are NOT also theists) are (to some extent at least) withholding or rejecting belief - this is NOT IMPLICIT atheism
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Negative and positive atheism — A diagram showing the relationship between the definitions of weak/strong and implicit/explicit atheism. Explicit strong/positive atheists (in purple on the right) assert that at least one deity exists is a false statement. Explicit weak/negative … Wikipedia
Weak and strong atheism — Strong atheism is a term generally used to describe atheists who accept as true the proposition, gods do not exist . Weak atheism refers to any other type of non theism. Historically, the terms positive and negative atheism have been used for… … Wikipedia
Atheism — Atheism, as an explicit position, can be either the affirmation of the nonexistence of gods, [The Oxford American Dictionary defines atheist as a person who does not believe in the existence of a god or gods. New York: Avon Press, 1980.] or the… … Wikipedia
implicit atheism — a condition of being without theistic beliefs; an absence of belief in the existence of gods, thus contrasting with theism. This definition includes both those who assert that there are no gods and those who have no beliefs at all regarding the… … Mini philosophy glossary
Atheism — a condition of being without theistic beliefs; an absence of belief in the existence of gods, thus contrasting with theism. This definition includes both those who assert that there are no gods and those who have no beliefs at all regarding the… … Mini philosophy glossary
implicit agnosticism — the philosophical view that the truth values of certain claims particularly theological claims regarding the existence of God, gods, or deities are unknown, inherently unknowable, or incoherent, and therefore, (some agnostics may go as far to… … Mini philosophy glossary
explicit agnosticism — the philosophical view that the truth values of certain claims particularly theological claims regarding the existence of God, gods, or deities are unknown, inherently unknowable, or incoherent, and therefore, (some agnostics may go as far to… … Mini philosophy glossary
Criticism of atheism — Part of a series on Atheism … Wikipedia
Demographics of atheism — Part of a series on Atheism … Wikipedia
New Atheism — Part of a series on Atheism … Wikipedia