- Junkers Ju 87
name = Junkers Ju 87
manufacturer = Junkers
caption = A Ju 87 B-2
first flight =
17 September 1935
introduction = avyear|1936
retired = avyear|1945 ("Luftwaffe")
number built = 5,752ref label|Note1|a|a
status = Retired
unit cost =
variants with their own articles =
primary user = Luftwaffe
more users =
The Junkers Ju 87 or Stuka (from "Sturzkampfflugzeug", "
dive bomber") was a two-seat (pilot and rear gunner) German ground-attack aircraftof World War II. Designed by Hermann Pohlmann, the Stuka first flew in 1935 and made its combat début in 1936 as part of the " Luftwaffe's" Condor Legionduring the Spanish Civil War.
The aircraft was easily recognizable by its inverted
gull wings, fixed spatted undercarriage and its infamous "Jericho-Trompete" ("Jericho Trumpet") wailing siren, becoming the propagandasymbol of German air power and the Blitzkriegvictories of 1939-1942. The Stuka's design included several innovative features, including automatic pull-up dive brakes under both wings to ensure that the plane recovered from its attack dive even if the pilot blacked out from the high acceleration.Although sturdy, accurate, and very effective, the Ju 87 was vulnerable to modern fighter aircraft, like many other dive-bombers of the war. Its poor manoeuvrability, speed and defensive armament caused the "Stuka" to require heavy protection from German fighters. The Ju 87's flaws became apparent as early as the Battle of Britain, when it was withdrawn from service after unacceptable and unsustainable losses.
The "Stuka" operated with further success after the Battle of Britain, and its potency as a precision ground attack aircraft became valuable to the German war effort in the
Balkans Campaign, the African and Mediterranean Theatres and the early stages of the Eastern Front campaigns where Allied fighter resistance was disorganised and in short supply.However, once the "Luftwaffe" had lost Air superiorityon all fronts the Ju 87 once again became easy targets for enemy fighter aircraft. In spite of this, and lacking a successor, the type continued to be produced until 1944. By the end of the conflict the "Stuka" was largely replaced by ground attack versions of the Focke-Wulf Fw 190, but some units, like " Sturzkampfgeschwader 2"Immelmann" operated the Ju 87 to the last day of the war. 5,752 Ju 87 of all versions were built between 1936 and August 1944. Hans-Ulrich Rudelwas the most notable Stuka ace and was the most highly decorated German serviceman of World War II.
The Ju 87s principal designer, Hermann Pohlmann, held the opinion that any dive-bomber design needed to be simple and robust. This led to many technical innovations, like retractable undercarriage, being removed from the design, and also led to one of the "Stuka's" distinctive features, its fixed and "spatted" undercarriage. Pohlmann continued to carry on developing and adding to his and Karl Plauth's ideas (Plauth was killed in a flying accident in November 1927), and produced the Ju A 48 which underwent testing on
29 September 1928. [Griehl 2001, p. 37.] The military version (designation) of the Ju A 48 was the Ju K 47.
In the early 1920s the Dessau-based Junkers "Flugzeugwerke" "AG" had concentrated upon military rather than civil aircraft, although these machines as yet had "uncranked" wings and twin tail-fin units. Because of the Versaille Treaty of 1919, which stated that Germany was not permitted to produce warplanes, the Ju K 48 was assembled and rebuilt to K 47 outside Germany by Junkers-owned subsidiaries, such as AB Flygindustri in Malmo, Sweden.
Naziscame to power the design was given priority. Despite initial competition from the Henschel Hs 123the " Reichsluftfahrtministerium" (RLM; "Aviation Ministry"), turned to the designs of Herman Pohlmann of Junkers and co-designer of the K 47, Kark Plauth.
During the trials with the K 47 in 1932, the double
vertical stabilizers were introduced to give the rear gunner a better field of fire. The main, and what was to be the most iconic feature of the Ju 87, was its double-spar gull wings.
After Plauth's death, Pohlmann continued the development of the Junkers dive-bomber. The Ju A 48 registration D-ITOR, was originally fitted with a BMW Hornet engine, producing some convert|450|kW|hp|abbr=off. The machine was also fitted with
dive brakes for dive testing. The aircraft was given a good evaluation and "exhibited very good flying characteristics". [Griehl 2001, p. 37.]
The advent of the Ju 87
Design of the Ju 87 had begun in 1933 as part of the "Sturzbomber-programm". The first Ju 87 prototype, which was initially built by AB Flygindustri in Sweden and secretly brought to Germany in late 1934, was to have been completed in April 1935, but due to the inadequate strength of the airframe, construction was not completed until October 1935. However the mostly complete Ju 87 V1 Wrk nr. 4921 (minus nonessential parts) took off for its maiden flight on
17 September 1935. The aircraft originally did not carry any registration, but later was given the registration D-UBYR. [Griehl 2001, p. 40.] The flight report, by "Hauptmann" Willi Neuenhofen, stated the only problem was with the small radiator, which caused the Kestrel engine to overheat. [Griehl 2001, p. 41.] However, the project began poorly. The Ju 87 V1, powered by a Rolls-Royce Kestrelengine V12 cylinder liquid cooled engine, and sporting a twin-tail crashed on 24 January 1936, killing its pilot Willy Neuenhofen. [Ward 2004, p. 28.] Square twin fins and rudders proved too weak and during dive testing they collapsed and the aircraft crashed. The accident happened after the aircraft entered into a inverted spin during the testing of the terminal dynamic pressure in a dive. [Mondey 1996, p. 111-118] , which prompted a change of tail design to single Vertical stabilizer. To withstand heavy forces during the dive, heavy plating was fitted, along with brackets riveted to the frame and stringer, to the fuselage.Other early additions included the installation of hydraulic dive brakes that were fitted under the leading edge, that could rotate 90 degrees. [Ward 2004, p. 27.] The "RLM" was still not interested in the Ju 87, and was not impressed that it relied on a British Rolls-Royce powerplant. In late 1935, Junkers suggested fitting a DB 600 in-line engine, while the final variant would be equipped with the Jumo 210. This was accepted by the "RLM" as an interim solution. The reworking of the design began on 1 January 1936. The test flight could not be carried for over two months for a lack of adequate aircraft. The crash of the 24 January at Kleutsch near Dresdenhad already destroyed one machine and killed Junkers' chief test pilot, Willi Neuenhofen and his engineer Heinrich Kreft. The second prototype was also beset by problems in the design. It had its twin stabilisers removed and a single tail fin installed due to fears over stability. Due to shortages of powerplants, instead of a DB 600, a BMW "Hornet" engine was fitted. All these delays set back the testing until 25 February 1936. [Ward 2004, p. 41.] By March 1936 the second prototype, the V2, was finally fitted with the Jumo 210Aa powerplant, which a year later was changed in favour of a Jumo 210 G (WrkNr. 19310). Although the testing went well, and the pilot, a Flight Captain Hesselbach, praised its performance, Wolfram von Richthofentold the Junkers representative and Construction Office chief engineer Ernst Zindel that the Ju 87 stood little chance of becoming the "Luftwaffe's" main dive-bomber aircraft, as it was underpowered, in his opinion. [Griehl 2001, pp 42 - 44.] On 9 June 1936, the "RLM" ordered the cessation of development, in favour of the Heinkel He 118, a rival design. Apparently the next day Ernst Udetcancelled the order, and development continued.On 27 July 1936Udet crashed the He 118 prototype, He 118 V1 D-UKYM. [Ward 2004, p. 31.] On the very day that Udet crashed the He 118, Charles Lindberghhad been visiting Ernst Heinkel, and as a result Heinkel could only communicate with Udet by telephone. According to this version of the story, Heinkel warned Udet about the propeller's fragility. Udet failed to consider this, so when in a dive the engine oversped and the propeller broke away. [Griehl 2001, p. 44.] Immediately after this incident, Udet announced the Stuka as the winner of the development contest. [Ward 2004, p. 31.]
Honing the design
Despite its victory over the He 118, the design was Still lacking and drew frequent criticism from Wolfram von Richthofen. Testing of the V4 prototype (A Ju 87A-0) in early 1937 revealed several problems. The Ju 87 could take off in just 250 metres and climb to 6,000 ft in just eight minutes with a 250kg bomb load, and its cruising speed was 250 kph (150 mph) . However Richthofen pushed for a more powerful engine. [Griehl 2001, p. 46.] According to the test pilots, the
Heinkel He 50had a better acceleration rate, and could climb away from the target area much quicker, avoiding enemy ground and air defences. Richthofen stated that any maximum speed under 350 kph was unacceptable for those reasons. Pilots also complained that navigation and powerplant instruments were mixed together, and were not easy to read, especially in combat. Despite this pilots praised its handling qualities and strong airframe. [Griehl 2001, p. 47.] These problems were to be resolved by installing the DB 600 engine, but delays in development forced the installation of the Jumo 210 Da in-line engine. Flight testing began on 14 August 1936. The subsequent testing and progress fell short of Richthofen's hopes, although the machine's speed was increased to 280 kph at ground level and 290 kph at 4,000 feet, while maintaining its good handling ability. [Griehl 2001, p. 52-53.]
The second prototype had a redesigned single vertical stabiliser and a 610 PS (602 hp, 449 kW)
Junkers Jumo 210A engine installed, and later the Jumo 210 Da.The first A series variant, the A-0, was of all metal construction, with an enclosed cockpit. To ease the difficulty of mass production the leading edge of the wing was straightened out and the ailerons two aerofoil sections and had smooth leading and trailing edges. The pilot could adjust the elevator and rudder trim tabs in flight, and the tail was connected to the landing flaps, which were positioned in two parts between the ailerons and fuselage. The A-0 also had a flatter engine cowling, which gave the pilot a much better field of vision. In order for the engine cowling to "flattened", the engine was set down nearly 10 inches (0.25 metres). The fuselage was also lowered along with the gunner's position, allowing the gunner a better field of fire. [Griehl 2001, p. 50.]
The "RLM" ordered seven A-0s initially, but then increased the order to 11. During early 1937 the A-0 was tested with varied bomb loads. The underpowered Jumo 210 A, as correctly pointed out by von Richthofen, was insufficient, and was quickly replaced with the Jumo 210 D powerplant.
The A-1s differed form the A-0s only slightly. As well as the installation of the Jumo 210 D, the A-1 HAD two 220 litre fuel tanks built into the inner wing, but it was not armoured or protected. The A-1 was also intended to be fitted with two MG 17 machine guns in each wing, but this was dropped due to excessive weight. The two that remained would be fed a total of 500 rounds of ammunition, that was stored in the undercarriage "spats". The pilot would rely on the Revi C 21C gunsight for the two MG 17s. The gunner had only a single MG 15, with 14 drums of ammunition, each containing 75 rounds. This represented a 150 round increase in this position from the Ju 87 A-0. [Griehl 2001, p. 52.] The A-1 was also fitted with a larger 3.3 metre propeller. The Ju 87 was capable of carrying a 500 kg bomb if the aircraft was not carrying the rear gunner/radio operator. This was due to the fact, that even with the Jumo 210 D powerplant, the Ju 87 was still underpowered for operations with more than a 250 kg bombload. All Ju 87As were restricted to 250 kg weapons (although during the
Spanish Civil Warmissions were conducted without the guner). [Griehl 2001, p. 53.] The Ju 87A-2 was retrofitted with the Jumo 210Da fitted with a two-stage supercharger. The only further significant difference between the A-1 and A-1 was the H-PA-III propeller Controllable pitch propeller. [Griehl 2001, p. 54.] By the summer of 1938 262 Ju 87As had been produced, 192 from the Junkers factory at Dessau, and a further 70 from Bremen. The new more powerful Ju 87B model started to replace the Ju 87A at this time. [Griehl 2001, p. 57.]
* Ju 87 V1 : Wrk Nr 4921 Flown on
17 September 1935
* Ju 87 V2 : Wrk Nr 4922, registration D-IDQR. Flown on
25 February 1936. Flown again as registration D-UHUH on 4 June 1937
* Ju 87 V3 : Wrk Nr 4923 Flown on
27 March 1936
* Ju 87 V4 : Wrk Nr 4924 Flown on
20 June 1936
* Ju 87 V5 : Wrk Nr 4925 Flown on
14 August 1936
* Ju 87 A-0 : Ten pre-production aircraft, powered by a 640 PS (631 hp, 471 kW) Jumo 210C piston engine..
* Ju 87 A-1 : Initial production version.
* Ju 87 A-2 : Production version fitted with an improved 680 PS (671 hp, 500 kW) Jumo 210E piston engine.
The Ju 87B series was to be the first mass produced variant. The first variant, the Ju 87 B-0, was produced in small numbers. A total of six Ju 87B-0s were produced, built from Ju 87 A airframes. [Griehl 2001, p. 63.] Test flights began from the summer of 1937. A small number, at least three, served as conversion Cs or Es for potential naval variants. Most of the prototypes were conversions from the Ju 87 A-1. The next major variant was the Ju 87 B-1 with a considerably larger engine, its
Junkers Jumo 211D generating 1,200 PS (1,184 hp, 883 kW), and the fuselage and landing gear were completely redesigned. This new design was again tested in Spain, and after proving its abilities there, production was ramped up to 60 per month. As a result, by the outbreak of World War IIthe " Luftwaffe" had 336 Ju 87 B-1s on hand. The Ju 87 B-2s that followed had some improvements and were built in a number of variants that included ski-equipped versions, and at the other end, with a tropical operation kit called the Ju 87 B-2 trop. Italy's Regia Aeronauticareceived a number of the B-2s and named them the "Picchiatello", while others went to the other members of the Axis, including Hungary, Bulgariaand Romania.
A long range version of the Ju 87B was also built, known as the Ju 87R. They were primarily intended for anti-shipping missions. Internal fuel capacity was increased by adding some inner-wing tanks and by using two 300-liter under-wing drop tanks. Bomb carrying ability was reduced to a single 250 kg bomb if the aircraft was fully loaded with fuel. The naval variant of the Ju 87B was known as the Ju 87C, and these were built to operate from the aircraft carrier "Graf Zeppelin". In any case the carrier was never completed, and all of these were converted back to the Ju 87B standard.
The tropicalised versions were initially named the Ju 87 B-2/U1. This was eventually designated the Ju 87 B-2 trop, equipped with tropical emergency equipment and sand filters for the powerplant.
* Ju 87 V6 : Wrk Nr 0870027 Flown on
14 June 1937(A-0 to B-0 conversion)
* Ju 87 V7 : Wrk Nr 0870028 Prototype of the Ju 87B, powered by a 1,000 PS (986 hp, 735 kW) Jumo 211A piston engine. Flown on
23 August 1937(A-0 to B-0 conversion)
* Ju 87 V8 : Wrk Nr 4926 Flown on
11 November 1937
* Ju 87 V9 : Wrk Nr 4927 Flown on
16 February 1938as D-IELZ. Flown again as WL-IELZ on 16 October 1939. [Griehl 2001, p. 49.]
* Ju 87 V15: Wrk Nr 0870321. Registration D-IGDK. Destroyed in a crash in 1942.
* Ju 87 V16: Wrk Nr 0870279. Registration GT+AX.
* Ju 87 V17 and Ju 87 V18 may never have been built. [Griehl 2001, p. 63.]
Despite having its vulnerability to enemy fighters exposed during the
Battle of Britain, the " Luftwaffe" had no choice but to continue the Stuka's development as there was no replacement aircraft in sight. [Mondey 1996, p. 114] The result was the D-series. The Ju 87 D-series received better streamlined oil and water coolers, and an aerodynamically refined cockpit with better visibility and space. In addition, armor protection was increased and a new dual-barrel 7.92 mm MG 81Z machine gun with an extremely high rate of fire was installed in the rear defensive position. The engine power was increased again, the Jumo 211 J-1 now delivering 1,420 PS (1,401 hp, 1,044 kW).
Production of the D-1 variant started in 1941 with 476 deliveries, rising to 917 D-1 and D-3 in 1942. The D-series saw extensive use in the Eastern Front and the Middle East. Bomb carrying ability was massively increased from 500 kg in the B-version to 1,800 kg in the D-version (max load for short ranges, overload condition), a typical bomb load ranged from 500 to 1,200 kg.
The D-2 was a variant used as a glider tug by converting older D-series airframes. The D-3 was an improved D-1 with more armor for its ground-attack role. The D-4 designation applied to a prototype torpedo-bomber version. The Ju 87 D-5 was another ground-attack variant that appeared in mid 1943; it had the outer wing panels extended, the dive brakes were removed, and the wing-mounted 7.92 mm
MG 17 machine guns were replaced by 20 mm MG 151 cannons.
The D-6, according to "Operating instructions, works document 2097", a limited number were built, to train pilots on "rationalised versions". However due to shortages in raw materials it did not go into mass production [Griehl 2001, p. 101. ] . The D-7 was another ground attack aircraft based on D-1 airframes upgraded to D-5 standard (armor, wing cannons, extended wing panels), while the D-8 was similar to the D-7 but based on D-3 airframes. Griehl 2001, p. 101. ] It's a common myth that the D-7 and D-8 were specifically designed and built for night fighting as they were solely based on converted airframes and used for multiple mission types. However, both were fitted with flame dampers, and could have conducted night operations.
The Ju 87E and F proposals were never built, and Junkers went straight onto the next variant. Another variant derived from the Ju 87D airframe was called the Ju 87H, and saw service as a dual-control trainer.
In January 1943 a variety of Ju 87 Ds became a "test bed" for the Ju 87 G variants. At the start of 1943 the "Luftwaffe" test centre at Tarnewitz tested this combination from a static position. "
Oberst" G. Wolfgang Vorwald noted the experiments were not successful, and suggested the cannon be installed on the Me 410. Griehl 2001, p. 284. ] However, testing continued, and on 31 January 1943Ju 87 D-1 Wrk Nr 2552 was tested by a " Hauptmann" Hans-Karl Steppnear the Briansktraining area. Stepp noted the increase in drag, and reduction in speed was considerable, and reduced the aircrafts speed to 162 mph. Stepp also noted that the performance in agility was also less agile than the existing D variants. D-1 and D-3 variants operated in combat with the BK 37mm cannon in 1943.
* Ju 87 V 21. Registration D-INRF. Wrk Nr 0870536. Airframe conversion from B-1 to D-1. First flown on
1 March 1941.
* Ju 87 V 22 Registration SF+TY. Wrk Nr 0870540. Also airframe conversion from B-1 to D-1. First flown on
1 March 1941.
* Ju 87 V 23 Registration PB+UB. Wrk Nr 0870542. Also airframe conversion from B-1 to D-1. First flown on
1 March 1941.
* Ju 87 V 24 Registration BK+EE. Wrk Nr 0870544. Also airframe conversion from B-1 to D-1/D-4. First flown on
1 March 1941.
* Ju 87 V 25 Registration BK+EF. Wrk Nr 0870530. Also airframe conversion from B-1 to D-4 trop. First flown on
1 March 1941.
* Ju 87 V 30 is the only known prototype of the Ju 87 D-5. Wrk Nr 2296. First flown on
20 June 1943.
* Ju 87 V 26-28, Ju 87 V 31, and V 42-47 were experiments of unknown variants. [Griehl 2001, p. 49.]
The change in German military fortunes after 1943 and the appearance of huge numbers of well armoured Soviet tanks caused Junkers to adapt the existing design to combat this new threat. The Hs 129 B had proved a potent ground attack weapon, but its large fuel tanks made it vulnerable to enemy fire, prompting the RLM to say "that in the shortest possible time a replacement of the Hs 129 type must take place". [Griehl 2001, p. 274.] With Soviet tanks the priority targets, the development of a further variant as a successor to the Ju 87 D began in November 1942. On 3 November
Erhard Milchraised the question of replacing the Ju 87, or redesigning it altogether. It was decided to keep the design as it was, but the powerplant would be upgraded to a Jumo 211J, and two 30mm weapons added. The variant would also be designed to enable it to carry a 1,000kg free-fall (bomb) load. Furthermore the armoured protection of the "Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik" was copied, to protect the crew from ground fire now that the Ju 87 would be asked to conduct low level attacks. [Griehl 2001, p. 274-275.]
With the G variant the aging airframe of the Ju 87 found new life as an anti-tank aircraft. This was the final operational version of the Stuka and was deployed on the Eastern Front starting in the early months of 1943, carrying out its first combat sortie on
18 March 1943. The Ju 87G was armed with two 37 mm cannons mounted in under-wing gondolas, each loaded with a 6-round magazine of armour piercing tungstenammunition. With these weapons the "Kanonenvogel" ("cannon-bird"), as it was nicknamed, proved spectacularly successful at the hands of the "Luftwaffe" ace Hans-Ulrich Rudel. The G-1 was converted from older D-series airframes retaining the smaller wing but without the dive brakes. The G-2 was similar to the G-1 except using the extended wing of the D-5 with 208 G-2 new built and at least 22 more converted from D-3 airframes [ http://www.luftwaffe.no/SIG/RLM/RLMMar44.html Luftwaffe aircraft production March 1944] . During the Battle of Kurskonly a handful of production Gs were committed, although a significant number of Ju 87 D variants were installed with the 37mm cannon, and operated as unofficial Ju 87 Gs during the battle. The exact number of cannon equipped Ju 87s that operated at Kursk is unknown. [Griehl 2001, p. 284]
While still slow, its stable attitude, large wings and low stall speed were valuable in the acquisition of slow moving targets, such as assault boats and ground vehicles. The G-1 even influenced the design of the
A-10 Thunderbolt II, with Hans Rudel's book, "Stuka Pilot", being required reading for all members of the A-X project. [Coram 2004, p. 235 ]
Flying at 4,600 meters (15,000 ft), the pilot located his target through a bombsight window in the cockpit floor. After opening the dive brakes, retarding his throttle, and closing the coolant flaps, he then rolled the aircraft 180°, automatically nosing the aircraft into a dive. Red tabs protruded from the upper surfaces of the wing as a visual indicator to the pilot that in case of a "g" induced black-out, the automatic dive recovery system would be activated. The Stuka dived at a 60 - 90 degree angle, accelerating to 600 km/h (350 mph).
When the aircraft was reasonably close to the target, a light on the contact
altimetercame on to indicate the bomb-release point, usually at a minimum height of 450 m (1,500 ft). The pilot released the bomb by depressing a knob on the control column to release weapons and to initiate the automatic pull-out mechanism. An elongated U-shaped crutch located under the fuselage would swing the bomb out of the way of the propeller, and the aircraft would automatically begin a 6 "g" pullout.
Once the nose was above the horizon, dive brakes were retracted, the throttle was opened, and the propeller was set to climb. The pilot regained control and resumed normal flight. The coolant flaps had to be reopened quickly.
In his book "Wings of the Luftwaffe", Royal Navy test pilot
Eric "Winkle" Brownreported that a captured Ju 87 D-3 he test-flew after the war felt "absolutely right" diving at a 90° straight down angle, and stated that he had no doubt of the Stuka's ability in its assigned role.
Ju 87 aircraft constructed until 30 November 1944:
Condor Legionand the Spanish Civil War
Among the many German aircraft designs that participated in the Spanish Civil War, a single Ju 87 A-0 (the V4 prototype) was allocated serial number 29-1 and was assigned to the VJ/88, the experimental "Staffel" of the Legion's fighter wing. The aircraft was secretly loaded onto the Spanish ship "Usaramo" and departed
Hamburgharbor on the night of 1 August 1936, arriving in Cadiz five days later.
The only known information pertaining to its combat career in
Spainis that it was piloted by "Unteroffizier" Herman Beuer, and took part in the Nationalist offensive against Bilbao in 1937. Presumably the aircraft was then secretly returned to Germany. [Weal 1997, p. 15.]
In January 1938 three Ju 87 A-s arrived. Several problems became evident - the spatted undercarriage sank into muddy airfield surfaces, and the spats were temporarily removed. In addition, the maximum 500 kg (1100 lb) bomb load could only be carried if the gunner vacated his seat, and the bomb load was therefore restricted to 250 kg (550 lb). These aircraft supported the Nationalist forces and carried out anti-shipping missions until they returned to Germany in October 1938. [Weal 1997, p. 15.]
The A-1s were replaced by five Ju 87 B-1s. With the war coming to an end they found little to do and were used to support
Heinkel He 111s attacking Republican positions. As the Ju 87 A-0 had been, the B-1s were returned discreetly to the "Reich". [Weal 1997, p. 15 - 16.]
The experience of the Spanish Civil War had been invaluable - air and ground crews perfected their skills, and equipment was evaluated under combat conditions. Although no Ju 87s had been lost in Spain, however, the Ju 87 had not been tested against numerous and well-coordinated fighter opposition, and this lesson was to be learned later at great cost to the Stuka crews. [Weal 1997, p. 17.]
econd World War
1 September 1939the Wehrmachtinvaded Polandtriggering World War Two."Generalquartiermeister der Luftwaffe" records indicate a total force of 366 Ju 87 A and Bs were available for operations on the 31 August 1939. [Griehl 2001, p. 61.] At exactly 0426 hours a "Kette" of Ju 87s of 3./StG 1 led by " Staffelkapitän" " Oberleutnant" Bruno Dilly carried out the first bombing attack of the war. The aim was to destroy the Polish demolitioncharges wired to the bridges over the Vistula River. However, the mission failed and the Poles destroyed the bridge before the Germans could reach it.
A Ju 87 achieved the first air victory during World War II on
1 September 1939, when "Rottenführer" " Leutnant" Frank Neubert of I./ StG 2"Immelmann" shot down a Polish PZL P.11c fighter piloted by Captain Mieczysław Medwecki, who was killed in the engagement. [Weal 1997, p. 22.]
The "Luftwaffe" had a few anti-shipping naval units such as 4.(St)/TrGr 186. This unit performed effectively, sinking the 1540-ton destroyer
ORP Wicherand minelayer ORP Gryfof the Polish Navy.
On one occasion six Polish divisions trapped by enscircling German forces were forced to surrender after a relentless four-day bombardment by StG 51, 76 and 77. Employed in this assault were the 50-kg fragmentation bombs which caused appalling casualties to the Polish ground troops. Demoralized, the Poles surrendered. The Stukas also participated in the
Battle of Bzurawhich resulted in the breaking of Polish resistance. The "Sturzkampfgeschwader" alone dropped 388 tonnes of bombs during this battle. [E.R Hooton 2007, p. 91]
Once again, enemy air opposition was light, the "Stukawaffe" (Stuka force) losing just 31 aircraft during the campaign. [Weal 1997, p. 34.]
Operation "Weserübung" began on
9 April 1940with the invasions of Norwayand Denmark, Denmark capitulated within the day whilst Norway continued to resist with British and French help.
The campaign was not the classic
Blitzkriegof fast moving armoured divisions supported by air-power as the mountainous terrain ruled out close Panzer/Stuka cooperation. Instead the Germans relied on " Fallschirmjäger" (paratroops), airborne troops transported by Junkers Ju 52s and specialised ski troops. The strategic nature of the operation made the "Stuka" essential. The Ju 87s were given the role of ground attack and anti-shipping missions. The "Stuka" was to prove the most effective weapon in the "Luftwaffe"'s armoury carrying out the latter.
On 9 April StG 1 caught and hit the 600-ton Norwegian torpedo boat "Aeger" in the engine room. The "Aeger" was run aground and scuttled.Weal 1997, p. 35.] The "Stukageschwader" were now equipped with the new Ju 87R, which differed from the Ju 87B by having increased internal fuel capacity and two 300l underwing drop tanks for more range.
The first "Stukas" took off at 10.59 hours from occupied airfields to destroy
Oscarsborg Fortress, after the loss of the heavy cruiser"Blücher" which caused disruption of the amphibious landings in Oslothrough Oslofjord.
The "Stukas" however had numerous successes against Allied Naval vessels. HMS "Bittern" was sunk on
30 April. The French super-destroyer "Bison" was sunk along with HMS "Afridi" by "Sturzkampfgeschwader 1" on 3 May 1940.
France and the Low Countries
The "Stukawaffe" had learned some lessons from the Polish and Norwegian campaigns. The failures of Poland and the "Stukas" of I.StG 1 to silence the Oscarborg fort ensured even more attention was paid to pin-point bombing during the "Phoney War" period. This was to pay off in the Western campaign.
Fall Gelb" began on 10 May 1940the Stuka helped swiftly neutralise the fortress of Eben Emael. The HQ of the Commander responsible for ordering the destruction of the bridges along the Albert Canalwas stationed in the village of Lanaeken (14 km to the north). However the "Stuka" demonstrated its accuracy when the small building was destroyed after receiving four direct hits. As a result only one of the three bridges was destroyed allowing the German Army to rapidly advance.
The "Sturzkampfgeschwader" were also instrumental in achieving the breakthrough at Sedan. The "Stukawaffe" flew 300 sorties against French positions, with StG 77 alone flying 201 individual missions [Weal 1997, p. 46.] .
The "Luftwaffe" also benefited from excellent ground-to-air communications throughout the campaign. Radio equipped forward liaison officers could call upon the Stukas and direct them to attack enemy positions along the axis of advance. In some cases the Stukas responded to requests in 10-20 minutes. "
Oberstleutnant" Hans Seidemann(Richthofen's Chief of Staff) said that "never again was such a smoothly functioning system for discussing and planning joint operations achieved" [E.R Hooton 2007, p. 67] .
Battle of Dunkirk89 merchantmen (of 126,518 grt) were lost, and the Royal Navylost 29 of its 40 destroyers (6 sunk, 23 damaged and out of service), mostly at the hands of the Ju 87s [E.R Hooton 2007, p.74.] . Enemy air power was ineffective and disorganised, and as a result the "Stuka" losses were mainly due to ground fire. Some 120 machines, one-third of the Stuka force, were destroyed or damaged to all causes [Weal 1997, p. 55] .
Battle of Britain
For the Battle of Britain the "Luftwaffe's"
Order of battleconsisted of five "Geschwader" equipped with the Ju 87. Lehrgeschwader 2's IV.(St), "Sturzkampfgeschwader 1's" "III. Gruppe" and " Sturzkampfgeschwader 2's" "III. Gruppe", "Sturzkampfgeschwader 51" and "Sturzkampfgeschwader 3's" "I. Gruppe" were committed to the battle. As an anti-shipping weapon the Ju 87 proved a potent weapon in the early stages. On 4 July 1940StG 2 struck success when it attacked a convoy in the English Channelsinking four frieghters, the "Britsum", the "Dallas City", the "Deucalion" and "Kolga". Six more were damaged. That afternoon 33 Ju 87s delivered the single most deadly air assault on British territory in history, when 33 Ju 87s of III./StG 51, avoiding RAF interception, sank "HMS Foylebank" in Portland Harbourkilling 176 of its 298-strong crew. One of "Foylebank's" gunners, Leading Seaman John F. Mantle continued to fire on the "Stukas" as the ship sank. He was awarded a posthumous Victoria Crossfor remaining at his post despite being mortally wounded. Mantle may have been responsible the single Ju 87 lost during the raid. [Ward 2004, p. 94.] [Weal 1997, p. 66 -67.]
During August, the Ju 87s also had some success. On
13 August Bf 109s of JG 26were sent out in advance of the main strike and successfully drew off RAF fighters, allowing 86 Ju 87s of StG 1 to attack RAF Detlingunhindered. The attack killed the station commander, destroyed 20 RAF aircraft on the ground and a great many of the airfields many buildings. However Detling was not an RAF Fighter Commandstation. [Ward 2004, p. 105.] The Battle of Britain proved for the first time that the Junkers Ju 87 was vulnerable in hostile skies against well organised and determined fighter opposition. The Ju 87 was slow and possessed inadequate defences. Furthermore, it could not be effectively protected by fighters, because of its low speed and the very low altitudes at which it ended its dive bomb attacks. The Stuka depended on air superiority, the very thing being contested over Britain. It was withdrawn from attacks on Britain in August after prohibitive losses, leaving the Luftwaffe without precision ground-attack aircraft. [Bungay 2000, pp.251-257.]
Steady losses had occurred throughout their participation in the battle. On
18 August, a day known as the 'hardest day' as both sides suffered heavy losses, the Stuka was withdrawn after 16 were destroyed and many others damaged [Weal 1997, p. 83.] . According to the "Generalquartiermeister der Luftwaffe" 59 "Stukas" were destroyed and 33 damaged, to varying degrees, in six weeks of operations. Over 20 percent of the total "Stuka" strength had been lost between 8 Augustand 18 August. [Ward 2004, p. 108-109.] The myth of the "Stuka" was shattered [Weal 1997, p. 66.] [Ward 2004, p. 108 - 109.] .
The Ju 87 did reappear over Britain later in the year, and flew small scale missions against British shipping off the
United Kingdom's south coast.
North Africa and the Mediterranean
In response to the Italian defeats in
Greeceand North Africathe Oberkommando der Wehrmachtordered the deployment of some German forces to these theatres. Amongst the "Luftwaffe" contingent deployed was the "Geschwaderstab" StG 3 which touched down in Sicilyin December 1940. In the next few days two "Gruppen"—some 80 "Stukas"—were deployed under X. Fliegerkorps".The first task of the "Korps" was to attack British shipping passing between Sicilyand Africa. The Ju 87s first made their presence by subjecting the British aircraft carrier HMS "Illustrious" to heavy attack. The crews were confident that they could sink it as the flight deck had an area of about 7,000 square metres.
10 January1941 the "Stuka" crews were told that four direct hits with 500 kg bombs would be enough to sink the carrier. The Ju 87s delivered six and three damaging near-misses [Weal 1998, p. 9.] , but the ship's engines remained untouched and she made for the besieged harbour of Malta.
Many ex-"Luftwaffe" Ju 87s were handed over to their Italian ally, the "
Regia Aeronautica" and re-named the "Picchiatello". Some of the "Picchiatelli" saw action in the opening phase of the Italian invasion of Greece in October 1940. The number was ineffective and the Italian forces were quickly pushed back. By early 1941 the Greeks had pushed into Italian occupied Albania. Once again Hitler decided to send military aid to his allies.
In March the pro-German Yugoslav government was toppled. A furious Hitler ordered the attack to be expanded to include
Yugoslavia. Operation "Marita" commenced on 7 April. The "Luftwaffe" committed StG 1, 2 and 77 to the campaign. [Ward 2004, p. 120.] The "Stuka" once again spearheaded the air assault with a front line strength of 300 machines, against minimal Yugoslav resistance in the air, giving the "Stukas" a fearsome reputation in this region. Operating unmolested they took a heavy toll of ground forces, suffering only light losses to ground fire. The effectiveness of the dive-bombers helped bring about Yugoslav capitulation in just ten days.
The "Stukas" also took a peripheral part in Operation "Punishment" - Hitler's retribution bombing of
Belgrade. The dive-bombers were to attack airfields and known anti-aircraft gun positions whilst the level bombers struck civilian targets. Belgrade was badly damaged, and 15,000 people were reported killed or injured.
In Greece, despite British aid, little air opposition was encountered. As the Allies withdrew and resistance collapsed, the Allies began evacuating to
Crete. The "Stukas" proved effective in inflicting severe damage on Allied shipping. On 22 Aprilthe 1,389 ton destroyers "Psara" and "Ydra" were sunk. In the next two days the Greek Naval base at Piraeuslost 23 vessels to "Stuka" attack [Weal 1998, p. 32.] .
Battle of Cretethe Ju 87s also played a significant role.On 21/22 May 1942, the Germans attempted to send in reinforcements to Crete by sea, but lost 10 vessels to "Force D" under the command of Rear-AdmiralGlennie. The force consisting of HMS "Dido", HMS "Orion" and HMS Ajax forced the remaining German ships to retreat. The "Stukas" were called upon to deal with the British Naval threat. [Ward 2004, p. 121.] On 21 MayHMS "Juno" was sunk, and the next day battleship HMS "Warspite" was damaged and the cruiser HMS "Gloucester" was sunk with the loss of 45 officers and 648 ratings. The Ju 87s also crippled HMS "Fiji" that morning, (she was later finished off by Bf 109fighter bombers) whilst destroying HMS "Greyhound" with a single hit. As the Battle of Cretedrew to a close the Allies began yet another withdrawal.On 23 Maythe Royal Navyalso lost HMS "Kashmir", HMS "Kelly" sunk followed by HMS "Hereward" on the 26 May. HMS "Orion" and HMS "Dido" were also severely damaged [Weal 1998, p. 38-39.] . "HMS Orion" had been evacuating 1,100 soldiers to North Africa and lost 260 of them killed and another 280 wounded during the attacks. [Ward 2004, p. 123.]
The "Sturzkampfgeschwader" faithfully supported "
Generalfeldmarschall" Erwin Rommel's " Deutsches Afrikakorps" in its two year campaign in North Africa, helping it achieve considerable success. However as the tide turned and Allied air power grew in the autumn of 1942, the Ju 87 became very vulnerable, and losses were heavy. The entry of the Americans into North Africa during Operation "Torch" made the situation far worse: the "Stuka" was obsolete in what was now a fighter-bomber's war. The Bf 109and Fw 190could at least fight on equal terms after dropping their ordnance, but the "Stuka" could not. The Junkers' vulnerability was demonstrated on 11 November 1942when 15 Ju 87Ds were all shot down by USAF P-40Fs in minutes [Weal 1998, p. 65.] .
1943, the Allies enjoyed total air superiority in North Africa. The Ju 87s ventured out in "Rotte" strength only, often jettisoning their bombs at the first sight of enemy aircraft and making "a run for home".
The dive-bombers continued to support operations in Southern Europe; after the Italian surrender in September 1943 the Ju 87 helped Germany achieve the last campaign-sized victory over the
Western Allies. The Greek DodecaneseIslands had been occupied by the British; the "Luftwaffe" reacted by committing 75 "Stukas" (of StG 3 with bases in Megara and Rhodos) to recover the Islands. With the RAFbases some 500 km away the Ju 87 helped the German landing forces to achieve a rapid conquest of the Islands. [Weal 1998, p. 82 - 83.] .
After the Battle of Leros the "I. Gruppe" of StG 3 was transferred to the Eastern Front (Dorpat). The remaining "Stuka" units continued to operate during the
Italian campaign, but mainly at night to avoid Allied fighters.
22 June 1941the Wehrmachtcommenced Operation "Barbarossa", the invasion of the Soviet Union. The "Luftwaffe" order of battle of 22 June 1941contained four different "Sturzkampfgeschwader". "Fliegerkorps VIII" under the command of "General der Flieger" Wolfram von Richthofenwas equipped with units "Stab", II., and III./StG 1. Also included were "Stab", I., II., and III. of " Sturzkampfgeschwader 2" "Immelmann". Attached to "Fliegerkorps II", under the Command of "General der Flieger" Bruno Loerzer, were "Stab", I., II., and III. of StG 77. " Luftflotte 5", under the command of "Generaloberst" Hans-Jürgen Stumpff, operating from Norway's Arctic Circle, were alloted IV. "Gruppe" (St)/LG 1 [Bergström 2007 ("Barbarossa" title), p. 131] .
The first Stuka loss on the Soviet-German front occurred early at 03.40-03.47 in the morning of the 22 June. While being escorted by
Bf 109s from JG 51to attack a fortress at Brest, "Oberleutnant" Karl Führing of "StG 77" was shot down by a I-153[Bergström 2007 ("Barbarossa" title), p. 18] . The "Sturzkampfgeschwader" had suffered only two losses on the opening day of "Barbarossa". As a result of the "Luftwaffe"'s attention, the Soviet Air Force in the Western Soviet Unionwas nearly destroyed. The official report claimed 1,489 Soviet aircraft destroyed. Göring ordered this checked. After picking their way through the wreckages across the front, "Luftwaffe" officers found that the tally exceeded 2,000 [Bergström 2007 ("Barbarossa" title), p. 20] . In the following two days the Soviets reported the loss of another 1,922 aircraft [Bergström 2007 ("Barbarossa" title), p. 23] . Soviet aerial resistance, whilst it continued, ceased to be effective, and the "Luftwaffe" maintained air superiority until the end of the year.
The Ju 87 took a huge toll on Soviet ground forces, helping to break up counter-attacks of Soviet armour, eliminating strong points, and disrupting the enemy supply lines. An example of the "Stuka"'s effectiveness occurred on 5 July when StG 77 knocked out 18
trainsand 500 vehicles [Bergström 2007 ("Barbarossa" title), p. 89] . As "Panzergruppe" 1 and 2 forged bridgeheads across the Dnieperriver and closed in on Kievthe Ju 87s again rendered invaluable support. On 13 September"Stukas" from StG 1 destroyed all the rail networks in the vicinity as well as inflicting heavy casualties on escaping Red Armycolumns, for the loss of a single Ju 87 [Bergström 2007 ("Barbarossa" title), p. 69] . Days later, on 23 September, Hans-Ulrich Rudel(who to become the most decorated serviceman in the Wehrmacht) of StG 2, sank the Soviet battleshipMarat, during an air attack on Kronstadtharbor in the Leningradarea, with a hit to the bow with a 1,000 kg bomb [Just 1986, p. 19] .Also during this action Leutnant Egbert Jaekel sank the destroyer "Minsk", while the destroyer "Steregushchiy" and submarine M-74 were also sunk. The Stukas also crippled the battleship "Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya" and the destroyers "Silnyy" and "Grozyashchiy" in exchange for two Ju 87s shot down [Bergström 2007 ("Barbarossa" title), p. 85] .
Elsewhere on the Eastern front the Junkers assisted Army Group Centre in its drive toward Moscow. From 13-22 December 420 vehicles and 23 tanks were destroyed by StG 77, greatly improving the morale of the German infantry, who were by now on the defensive [Bergström 2007 ("Barbarossa" title), p. 112-113] . StG 77 finished the campaign as the most effective "Sturzkampfgeschwader". It had destroyed 2,401 vehicles, 234 tanks, 92 artillery batteries and 21 trains for the loss of 25 Ju 87s to hostile action [Bergström 2007 ("Barbarossa" title), p. 115] .
At the end of "Barbarossa", StG 1 had lost 60 "Stukas" in aerial combat and one on the ground. StG 2 lost 39 Ju 87s in the air and two on the ground, StG 77 lost 29 of their dive-bombers in the air and three on the ground (25 to enemy action). IV.(St)/LG1 operating from Norway lost 24 Ju 87s, all in aerial combat [Bergström 2007 ("Barbarossa" title), p. 119] .
In early 1942 the Ju 87s were to give the Germany Army ("Heer") yet more valuable support. On 29 December 1941 the Soviet 44th Army landed on the Kerch Peninsula. The "Luftwaffe" was only able to dispatch meager reinforcements of four "Kampfgruppen" (note: not "Kampfgeschwader") and two "Sturzkampfgruppen", belonging to StG 77. With air-superiority the Ju 87s operated with impunity. In the first ten days half the landing force was destroyed, while sea supply lines were cut off by the "Stukas" inflicting heavy losses on Soviet shipping. The Ju 87s effectiveness against Soviet armour was not yet potent. Later versions of the
T-34tank could withstand "Stuka" attack, in general, unless a direct hit was scored, but the Soviet 44th Army had only obsolescent types with thin armour which were nearly all destroyed [Bergström 2007 ("Stalingrad" title), p. 30] .
Battle of Sevastopolthe "Stukas" mercilessly bombed the trapped Soviet forces. Some Ju 87 pilots flew up to 300 sorties against the Soviet defenders. " Luftflotte 4"'s StG 77 flew 7,708 combat sorties dropping 3,537 tonnes of bombs on the city. Their efforts help secure the capitulation of Soviet forces on 4 July [Bergström 2007 ("Stalingrad" title), p. 46] .
For the German summer offensive,
Fall Blau, the "Luftwaffe" had concentrated 1,800 aircraft into "Luftflotte 4" making it the largest and most powerful single air-command in the world [Bergström 2007 ("Stalingrad" title), p. 122] . The "Stukawaffe" strength stood at 151 [Bergström 2007 ("Stalingrad" title), p. 49] .
Battle of Stalingrad"Stukas" flew thousands of sorties against Soviet positions in the city. StG 1, 2 and 77 flew 320 individual sorties on 14 October1942. As the German Sixth Army pushed the Soviets into a 1,000 yard enclave on the West bank of the Volga river, 1,208 Stuka sorties were flown against this small strip of land. However the intense air attack, though causing horrific losses on Soviet units, failed to destroy them [Bergström 2007 ("Stalingrad" title), p. 84] . The "Luftwaffe's" "Sturzkampfgeschwader" made maximum effort during this phase of the war. They flew an average of 500 sorties per day and caused heavy losses among Soviet forces, losing an average of only one Stuka per day [J. Hayward 2001, p. 211.] .
The Battle of Stalingrad marked the high point in the fortunes of the Junkers Ju 87 "Stuka". As the strength of the Soviet Air Forces grew, they gradually wrestled control of the skies from the "Luftwaffe". From this point onward the vulnerability of the "Stuka" to fighter attack caused losses to increase.
The Stuka was also heavily involved in Operation "Citadel", the
Battle of Kursk. The Luftwaffe committed I, II, III./St.G 1 and III./StG 3 under the command of " Luftflotte 6". I., II, III. of StGs 2 and 3 were committed under the command of Hans Seidemanns "Fliegerkorps VIII" [Bergström 2007, p. 123-24 ("kursk title"] .Hauptmann Rudel's cannon-equipped Ju 87 Gs had a devastating effect on Soviet armour at Oreland Belgorod. The Ju 87s participated in a huge aerial counter-offensive lasting from 16 July - 31 July against a Soviet offensive at Khotynets and saved two German armies from encirclement, reducing the attacking Soviet 11th Guard Army to just 33 tanks by 20 July. The Soviet offensive had been completely halted from the air [Bergström 2007, p. 109. ("Kursk title")] .However losses were considerable. "Fliegerkorps VIII" lost eight Ju 87s on 8 July, six on 9 July, six on 10 July and another eight on 11 July. The "Stuka" arm also lost eight of their Knight's Crossholders. StG 77 lost 24 Ju 87s in the period 5-31 July (StG had lost 23 in July-December 1942) while StG 2 lost another 30 machines in the same period. In September 1943 three of the "Stuka" units were re-equipped with the Fw 190"Schlachtgeschwader" [Bergström 2007, p. 118. ("Kursk title")] .In the face of overwhelming air opposition the dive-bomber needed heavy protection from German fighters. Some units like StG 2 "Immelmann" continued to operate with great success throughout 1943-45 operating the Ju 87 G variants equipped with 37 mm cannons, which became effective tank-killers, although in increasingly small numbers. [Griehl 2001, p. 279.]
In the wake of the defeat at Kursk, the Ju 87s played a vital "fire-fighting role" on the southern wing of the eastern front. To combat the "Luftwaffe" the Soviets could deploy three air armies, the 2nd Air Army, 5th Air Army and 16th Air Army with some 3,000 fighter aircraft, as a result the "Stukas" suffered heavily. "StG 77" lost 30 Ju 87s in August 1943 as did StG 2 "Immelmann", who also reported the loss of 30 machines in combat. [Bergström 2008, p. 25-26] Despite these losses the Ju 87s helped the "29. Armeekorps" break out of an encirclement near the Sea of Azov. [Bergström 2008, p. 27.] The Battle of Kiev also included substantial effort by Ju 87 units. Although again, unsuccessful. The "Stuka" units were now, with the loss of air superiority, coming vulnerable on the ground as well. On
17 November 1943the "Luftwaffe" lost two "Stuka" aces on the ground, when and were killed, while taking off from Bolshaya Kostromka airfield, by 15 IAP Yak 1s led by Kpt Leontiy. [Bergström 2008, p. 30] By early 1944 the number of Ju 87 units and operational aircraft entered into terminal decline.Toward the end of the war the Ju 87 was replaced by ground-attack versions of the Fw 190, as the "Stuka" was no longer capable of operating under the conditions of Allied air superiority. [Griehl 2001, p. 179.] " Gefechtsverband Kuhlmey", a mixed aircraft unit, which included large numbers of "Stuka" dive bombers, was rushed to the Finnish front in the summer of 1944, and was instrumental in halting the Soviet fourth strategic offensive.
Night-harassment variants and wings
The Soviet practice of harassing German ground forces using antiquated
Polikarpov Po-2biplanes at night, dropping flares and fragmentation bombs inspired the Luftwaffe to form its own "Störkampfstaffeln" (Harassment squadrons). On 23 July 1942Junkers offered the Ju 87 B-2, R-2 and R-4s with "Flammenvernichter" ("flame eliminators"). On 10 November 1943the RLM GL/C-E2 Division finally authorised the design in directive No. 1117. [Griehl 2001, p. 209.] This new equipment made the Ju 87 more difficult to detect from the ground in darkness. Pilots were also asked to complete the new "Blind Flying Certificate 3", which was especially introduced for this new type of operation. Pilots were trained at night, over unfamiliar terrain, and forced to rely on their instruments for direction. The Ju 87s standard Revi C12D gunsight was also replaced for the new "Nachtrevi" ("Nightrevi") C12N. On some Ju 87s the Revi 16D was exchanged for the Nightrevi 16D. [Griehl 2001, p. 210.] To ease the pilot's ability to see his instrument panel a violet light was installed.From 15 November 1942the Auxiliary "Staffel" were created. By the summer of 1943 " Luftflotte 1" was given four "Staffeln" while " Luftflotte 4" and "Luftwaffe Kommando Ost" (Luftwaffe Command East) were given six and two respectively. In the first half of 1943 12 "Nachtschlachtgruppen" had been formed, flying a multitude of different types of aircraft, including the Ju 87, which proved itself ideally suited to the low-level slow flying needed.
The concept of dive bombing became so popular among the leadership of the "Luftwaffe", that it became almost obligatory in new aircraft designs. Later bomber models like the
Junkers Ju 88and the Dornier Do 217were fitted for dive bombing. Even the giant Heinkel He 177bomber was initially supposed to have dive bombing capabilities — a requirement that contributed much to the failure of the design.
Once the Stuka became too vulnerable to growing fighter opposition on all fronts, work was done to develop a replacement. None of the dedicated close-support designs on the drawing board progressed far due to the war situation and technological difficulties, and the "Luftwaffe" decided to settle on the
Focke-Wulf Fw 190fighter aircraft, with the Fw 190F becoming the dedicated ground-attack version. The Fw 190F started to replace the Ju 87 as close-support aircraft for day missions in 1943, but the Ju 87 continued to be used as a night-nuisance raider until the end of the war.
Bulgarian Air Forceref label|Note2|b|b;CZS
Czechoslovakian Air Forceoperated captured aircraft postwar.ref label|Note2|b|b;flag|Germany|Nazi
Hungarian Air Forceref label|Note2|b|b;flag|Italy|1861-state
Regia Aeronautica" ;flag|Japan
Imperial Japanese Army Air Forceref label|Note2|b|b ;flag|Romania
Romanian Air Forceref label|Note2|b|b;flagicon|Slovakia|1938 Slovak Republic
*Slovak Air Forceref label|Note2|b|b;flag|Croatia|1941
Air Force of the Independent State of Croatiaref label|Note2|b|b ;YUG
SFR Yugoslav Air Forceoperated captured aircraft postwar
Two intact Ju 87s survived and a few more wrecks are on display today.
* The Chicago Museum of Science and Industry has a Ju 87 R-2/Trop., captured in
Libyain 1941 and subsequently sent to the US.
* A Ju 87 G-2, captured by British troops in Germany in 1945, is displayed in the
RAF Museumin London.
Deutsches Technikmuseumin Berlinhas the wreckage of two complete aircraft that were recovered from separate crash sites near Murmanskin 1990 and 1994.
Sinsheim Auto & Technik Museumdisplays the remains of an aircraft that crashed near Saint-Tropezin 1944 and was raised from the seabed in 1989.
* In October 2006, another Stuka was found underwater, near
Rhodes[ [http://koti.welho.com/msolanak/news.html Hellenic Aviation News ] ]
*Junkers Ju-87B-2 "9801" (serila number: 0406) under reconstruction at
Yugoslav Aeronautical Museum.
pecifications (Ju 87 B-2)
ref=Ju 87 B-2 Betriebsanleitung, Juni 1940 (D.(Luft) T.2335/1)
plane or copter?=plane
jet or prop?=prop
length main= 11.00 m
length alt=36 ft 1.07 in
span main=13.8 m
span alt=45 ft 3.30 in
height main=4.23 m
height alt=13 ft 10.53 in
area main= 31.90 m²
area alt= 343 ft² 53.09 in²
empty weight main=3,205 kg
empty weight alt= 7,086 lb
loaded weight main=4,320 kg
loaded weight alt=9,524 lb
useful load main=
useful load alt=
max takeoff weight main= 5,000 kg
max takeoff weight alt= 11,023 lb
Junkers Jumo 211D
type of prop= liquid-cooled inverted-vee
number of props=1
power main= 1200 PS
power alt= 1184 hp, 883 kW
propeller or rotor?=propelller
number of propellers per engine=1
propellers=Three-bladed Junkers VS 5
propeller diameter main=3.4 m
propeller diameter alt=11 ft 1.85 in
max speed main= 242 mph @ 13,410 ft or
max speed alt=390 km/h @ 4,400 m
max speed more=
cruise speed main=
cruise speed alt=
stall speed main=
stall speed alt=
never exceed speed main= 600 km/h
never exceed speed alt= 373 mph
range main= 500 km
range alt=311 mi
range more=with 500 kg (1,102 lb) bomb load
ferry range main=
ferry range alt=
ferry range more=
ceiling main= 8,200 m
ceiling alt= 26,903 ft
ceiling more= with 500 kg (1,102 lb) bomb load
climb rate main=
climb rate alt=
guns= 2× 7.92 mm
MG 17forward, 1× 7.92 mm MG 15to rear
bombs= Normal load = 1× 250 kg (551 lb) bomb beneath the fuselage and 2× 50 kg (110 lb) bombs underneath each wing.
Differences in variants
* Ju 187
* Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik - to the Ju87G as a ground attack aircraft, not a divebomber.
* Douglas SBD Dauntless
* Curtiss SB2C Helldiver
* Aichi D3A "Val"
Heinkel He 118
Henschel Hs 123
Henschel Hs 129- to the Ju-87G as a ground attack aircraft, not as a divebomber.
Ar 81 -
Ju 85 -
Ju 86 -Ju 87 -
Ju 88 -
Ju 89 -
List of military aircraft of Germany
List of bomber aircraft
Please note: Some titles appear next to citations. This is because some authors have more than one source cited and published in the same year.
*note label|Note1|a|a Figures are debated. Griehl cites additions of Chief engineer Pichon's list. This indicates 5,930 produced. Griehl points out this number may include all machines, even those that were incomplete or unassembled. Junkers records give only 5,126 aircraft delivered to the "Luftwaffe". [Griehl 2001, p. 129 - 130.]
* Bulgaria received 12 Ju 87 R-2 and R-4s and 40 Ju 87 D-5s. [Griehl 2001, p. 135.] Japan received the Ju 87 A-1 (called a Ju 87 K-1). The Croats received a number of Ju 87s, delivered to the "Lucko" bomber unit in January 1944. The Romanians received just 90 Ju 87 D-3 and D-5s. [Griehl 2001, p. 150.] Hungary received 33/34 Ju 87 D-3/D-5s and 11/12 B-1 and B-2s. [Griehl 2001, p. 151 - 152.] The Slovaks received unknown numbers of Ju 87s. After the war it is claimed five Ju 87 D-5s, registrations OK-XAA - OK-XAE, were operated by the Cechs after the war as "B-37" registration OK-KAC. [Griehl 2001, p. 156.]
* Bergström, Christer (2007). "Barbarossa - The Air Battle: July-December 1941". London: Chervron/Ian Allen. ISBN 978-1-85780-270-2.
* Bergström, Christer (2007). "Stalingrad - The Air Battle: November 1942 - February 1943". London: Chervron/Ian Allen. ISBN 978-1-85780-276-4 .
* Bergström, Christer (2007). "Kursk - The Air Battle: July 1943". London: Chervron/Ian Allen. ISBN 978-1-903223-88-8.
* Bergström, Christer. (2008). "Bagration to Berlin - The Final Air Battles in the East: 1944 - 1945", Ian Allen. ISBN 978-1-903223-91-8
* Bungay, Stephen. "The Most Dangerous Enemy: A History of the Battle of Britain". London: Aurum Press 2000. ISBN 1-85410-721-6(hardcover), ISBN 1-85410-801-8 (paperback 2002)
* Coram, Robert (2004) "Boyd: The Fighter Pilot Who Changed the Art of War", Back Bay Books. ISBN 0316796883
* Griehl, Manfred (2001) "Junker Ju 87 Stuka". Airlife Publishing/Motorbuch, London/Stuttgart. ISBN 1-84037-198-6
* Hayward, Joel S. (2001). "Stopped at Stalingrad: The Luftwaffe and Hitler's Defeat in the East 1942-1943". University Press of Kansas. ISBN 0-7006-1146-0
* Hooton, E.R. (2007) "Luftwaffe at War; Blitzkrieg in the West: Vol. 2", London: Chervron/Ian Allen, . ISBN 978-1-85780-272-6.
* Just,Gunther (1986) "Stuka Pilot Hans Ulrich Rudel", Schiffer Military History, 1986, ISBN 0-88740-252-6
* Mondey, David. (1996) "Axis Aircraft of World War II". London: Chancellor Press. ISBN 1-85152-996-7
* Ward, John. (2004). "Hitler's Stuka Squadrons: The Ju 87 at war, 1936 - 1945". Eagles of War. London. ISBN 1-86227-246-8
* Weal, John, (1997). "Junkers Ju 87 Stukageschwader 1937-41". Oxford: Osprey. ISBN 1-85532-636-1
* Weal, John (1998). "Junkers Ju 87 Stukageschwader of North Africa and the Mediterranean". Oxford: Osprey, ISBN 1-85532-722-8
* [http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/LRG/ju87.html "Luftwaffe" Resource Group]
* [http://www.ww2incolor.com/gallery/movies/stuka_movie "Stuka" Color Footage]
* [http://www.bellum.nu/basics/concepts/Ju87tactics.html "Stuka" Operational Details including Pre-Dive Checklist Diagrams Sound Effects etc]
* [http://airliners.net/search/photo.search?front=yes&maxres=500&keywords=Junkers+Ju+87 Some high quality and high-res photos, including replicas and surviving aircraft in museums]
* [http://www.sound-effect.com/sounds1/airplane/stuka.wav Sound of flying "Stuka"]
* [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cU6OK1zSxKg Test flight and combat debut of the "Kanonenvogel" - wartime video]
* [http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=1C2ED841963734E1 German WWII newsreels, showing "Stukas" in combat]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Junkers — Co was a major German aircraft manufacturer. It produced some of the world s most innovative and well known airplanes over the course of its fifty plus year history in Dessau, Germany. It was founded there in 1895 by Hugo Junkers, initially… … Wikipedia
Junkers 52 — Junkers Ju 52/3m … Deutsch Wikipedia
Junkers 88 — Junkers Ju 88 … Deutsch Wikipedia
Junkers F.13 — Junkers F 13 … Deutsch Wikipedia
Junkers J 13 — Junkers F 13 … Deutsch Wikipedia
Junkers Ju 52 — Junkers Ju 52/3m … Deutsch Wikipedia
Junkers Ju 52 3m — Junkers Ju 52/3m … Deutsch Wikipedia
Junkers & Co. — Junkers Logo Die Firma Junkers Co. Warmwasser Apparatefabrik wurde 1895 von Hugo Junkers in Dessau gegründet. Junkers Gasgeräte wie Badeöfen, Heizgeräte und andere Erfindungen des Gründers wurden in der Firma produziert. Die Marke Junkers gehört… … Deutsch Wikipedia
Junkers J4 — Junkers J.I Typ … Deutsch Wikipedia
Junkers J9 — Junkers D.I … Deutsch Wikipedia
Junkers J 4 — Junkers J.I Typ … Deutsch Wikipedia