Criticism of the Seventh-day Adventist Church

Criticism of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
Part of a series on
Seventh-day Adventism
James and Ellen White
Other Adventists
Seventh-day Adventist portal
This box: view · talk · edit

Since its founding in the mid-19th century, the Seventh-day Adventist Church has been receiving criticism from various individuals and groups. These criticisms include objections to its teachings, structure, and practices.


Major critics

One of the most prominent early critics of the church was D. M. Canright, an early leader who later left the movement in the late 19th century and became a Baptist pastor.

In the middle of the 20th century, evangelical Walter Martin and the Christian Research Institute concluded that the Seventh-day Adventist church is a legitimate Christian body with some heterodox doctrines.[1] However, other scholars disagreed and continued to classify the church as a cult. One such scholar was Anthony A. Hoekema, who grouped Seventh-day Adventism with Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses and Christian Science in his book The Four Major Cults.[2]

Prominent contemporary critics include former Adventist pastor and academy teacher Dale Ratzlaff, who left the church in the 1980s and later founded Life Assurance Ministries [1].[citation needed]

In the intense debates regarding the inspiration of Ellen White during the 1970s, Adventists Walter T. Rea[3] and Ronald Numbers[4] wrote material critical of Ellen White.

Church doctrine

Trinitarian views

Some Christian critics of Adventism contend that the current Adventist view of the Trinity is not orthodox and/or constitutes Tritheism.[5][6][7][8]

Several Seventh-day Adventist scholars have acknowledged that the Adventist view of the Trinity is different from the historic, orthodox Christian doctrine. The following are some quotations from these Adventist leaders:

"She [Ellen G. White] taught that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are three distinct individuals, which is not true of the medieval doctrine of the Trinity."[9]
"Ellen White's view did change—she was raised trinitarian, came to doubt some aspects of the trinitarianism she was raised on, and eventually came to a different trinitarian view from the traditional one. [...] In her earliest writings she differed from some aspects of traditional trinitarianism and in her latest writings she still strongly opposed some aspects of the traditional doctrine of the Trinity. (4) It appears, therefore, that the trinitarian teaching of Ellen White's later writings is not the same doctrine that the early Adventists rejected.11 Rather, her writings describe two contrasting forms of trinitarian belief, one of which she always opposed, and another that she eventually endorsed."[10]
"But I would like to say, I think there were seven non-orthodox, which means those who did not hold their brand of Trinitarianism, which we reject today, along with them. So, we probably would have been branded as Arian by the orthodox."[11]
"What James [SDA co-founder James White, husband of Ellen White] and the other men were opposed to, we are just as opposed to as they were. Now, their solution to that, at that time, they didn't see any solution by retaining the Trinity concept, and getting rid of its distortions. But, in reality, we have been faithful to their commitment, and I know of nothing that they were objecting to, in objecting to Trinitarianism, that we have not also objected to."[12]
"A major development [in Adventism] since 1972 has been the quest to articulate biblical presuppositions grounding a biblical doctrine of the Trinity, clearly differentiated from the dualistic presuppositions that undergird the traditional creedal statements."[13]
"In many ways the philosophical assumptions and presuppositions of our worldview are different from traditional Christianity and bring different perspectives on some of these old issues. We do not accept the traditional Platonic dualistic worldview and metaphysics that were foundational to the church fathers' theology of the Trinity, one of these being the concept of the immortality of the soul."[14]


It has been alleged by the Christian Research Institute that traditional Adventism teaches that Christ had a sinful nature.[15] Many Adventists [16] covering the nature of Christ, state that Jesus Christ was born with Adam's fallen nature that has been passed on to all of humanity.[17] Such a belief is based on the following texts:

"For what the law could not do in that it was weak through the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, on account of sin: He condemned sin in the flesh" (Romans 8:3 NKJV)
"For we do not have a High Priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin." (Hebrews 4:15 NKJV)
"...concerning his Son (Jesus), who was descended from David according to the flesh..." (Romans 1:3 ESV)
"Therefore, in all things He had to be made like His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people." (Hebrews 2:17 NKJV)

Many Adventists believe that Jesus was beset with all of the moral weaknesses and frailties that ordinary humans experience, including the inclination to sin. Despite this, he managed to resist temptation both from within and without, and lived a perfectly obedient life. Jesus is therefore set forth as the supreme Example in whose footsteps Christians must follow. The fact that he overcame sin completely, despite having no advantage over other human beings, demonstrates that we too can live a life of complete obedience by trusting in him. Ellen White states "The Lord Jesus came to our world, not to reveal what a God could do, but what a man could do, through faith in God’s power to help in every emergency. Man is, through faith, to be a partaker in the divine nature, and to overcome every temptation wherewith he is beset."[18]


"Notwithstanding that the sins of a guilty world were laid upon Christ, notwithstanding the humiliation of taking upon Himself our fallen nature, the voice from heaven declared Him to be the Son of the Eternal"

Ellen White, The Desire of Ages, p. 112.

Investigative judgment and salvation

The Investigative Judgment doctrine is defined in the Church's list of fundamental beliefs.[19] In reviewing this uniquely Seventh-day Adventist doctrine, non-Adventist critics agree that it contradicts Biblical teaching.

Adventists answer that the Investigative Judgment doctrine is not about celestial geography, that a judgment of works is compatible with the gospel, and that Scriptures like 1 Peter 4:17 and Matthew 25 teach an end-time judgment of the Church. They believe that the "end time gospel" of Revelation 14:6-12 did not sound in the first century but applies to our time. Also, many Adventist scholars interpret the references in Hebrews as to do with inauguration of the heavenly sanctuary, taking Hebrews 6:19-20 as parallel to Hebrews 10:19-20, a view shared with certain biblical scholars of other faiths,[20] instead of the Day of Atonement event as interpreted by critics.

The essence of Old Testament sanctuary typology that Adventists rely on for their eschatology may be summarized as follows:

The sanctuary services emphasized three aspects of Christ’s work for us: sacrifice, mediation, and judgment.

As to the 1844 date, Walter Martin wrote:

Lest anyone reading the various accounts of the rise of "Millerism" in the United States come to the conclusion that Miller and his followers were "crackpots" or "uneducated tools of Satan," the following facts should be known: The Great Advent Awakening movement that spanned the Atlantic from Europe was bolstered by a tremendous wave of contemporary biblical scholarship. Although Miller himself lacked academic theological training, actually scores of prophetic scholars in Europe and the United States had espoused Miller's views before he himself announced them. In reality, his was only one more voice proclaiming the 1843/1844 fulfilment of Daniel 8:14, or the 2300-year period allegedly dating from 457 B.C. and ending in A.D. 1843-1844.[21]

Catholicism In Eschatology

Like many reformation-era Protestant leaders, some writings of Ellen White speak against the Catholic Church in preparation for a nefarious eschatological role as the antagonist against God's remnant church (the Seventh-day Adventist Church) and that the pope is the antichrist. Many Protestant reformers such as Martin Luther, John Knox, William Tyndale and others held similar beliefs about the Catholic Church and the papacy when they broke away from the Catholic Church during the reformation.[22]

Ellen White writes,

His word has given warning of the impending danger; let this be unheeded, and the Protestant world will learn what the purposes of Rome really are, only when it is too late to escape the snare. She is silently growing into power. Her doctrines are exerting their influence in legislative halls, in the churches, and in the hearts of men. She is piling up her lofty and massive structures in the secret recesses of which her former persecutions will be repeated. Stealthily and unsuspectedly she is strengthening her forces to further her own ends when the time shall come for her to strike. All that she desires is vantage ground, and this is already being given her. We shall soon see and shall feel what the purpose of the Roman element is. Whoever shall believe and obey the word of God will thereby incur reproach and persecution.[23]


And let it be remembered, it is the boast of Rome that she never changes. The principles of Gregory VII and Innocent III are still the principles of the Roman Catholic Church. And had she but the power, she would put them in practice with as much vigor now as in past centuries. Protestants little know what they are doing when they propose to accept the aid of Rome in the work of Sunday exaltation. While they are bent upon the accomplishment of their purpose, Rome is aiming to re-establish her power, to recover her lost supremacy. Let the principle once be established in the United States that the church may employ or control the power of the state; that religious observances may be enforced by secular laws; in short, that the authority of church and state is to dominate the conscience, and the triumph of Rome in this country is assured.[23]

Ellen G. White

The Seventh-day Adventist Church considers the ministry and writings of Ellen G. White as manifesting the gift of prophecy, as evidenced in fundamental belief 18.[19] A common criticism of Ellen White, widely popularized by Walter T. Rea and others, is that she plagiarized material from other authors.[24][3][4] A Roman Catholic lawyer, Vincent L. Ramik, undertook a study of Ellen G. White's writings during the early 1980s, and concluded that they were "conclusively unplagiaristic."[25] When the plagiarism charge ignited a significant debate during the late 1970s and early 1980s, the Adventist General Conference commissioned a major study by Dr. Fred Veltman. The ensuing project became known as the "'Life of Christ' Research Project." The results are available at the General Conference Archives.[26] Dr. Roger W. Coon,[27] David J. Conklin,[28] Dr. Denis Fortin,[29][30] King and Morgan,[31] among others, undertook the refutation of the accusations of plagiarism. At the conclusion of Ramik's report, he states:

"It is impossible to imagine that the intention of Ellen G. White, as reflected in her writings and the unquestionably prodigious efforts involved therein, was anything other than a sincerely motivated and unselfish effort to place the understandings of Biblical truths in a coherent form for all to see and comprehend. Most certainly, the nature and content of her writings had but one hope and intent, namely, the furthering of mankind's understanding of the word of God. Considering all factors necessary in reaching a just conclusion on this issue, it is submitted that the writings of Ellen G. White were conclusively unplagiaristic."[32]

Critics have especially targeted Ellen White's book The Great Controversy arguing in contains plagiarized material.[33] However in her introduction she wrote...

In some cases where a historian has so grouped together events as to afford, in brief, a comprehensive view of the subject, or has summarized details in a convenient manner, his words have been quoted; but in some instances no specific credit has been given, since the quotations are not given for the purpose of citing that writer as authority, but because his statement affords a ready and forcible presentation of the subject. In narrating the experience and views of those carrying forward the work of reform in our own time, similar use has been made of their published works.

The Great Controversy, p. xi.4 1911 edition


  1. ^ Walter Martin (1960). The Truth About Seventh-Day Adventism. Zondervan. 
  2. ^ Anthony A. Hoekema (1963). The Four Major Cults: Christian Science, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormonism, Seventh-day Adventism. Eerdmans. ISBN 0853640947. 
  3. ^ a b Rea 1983.
  4. ^ a b Numbers 1976.
  5. ^ Tinker, Colleen; Tinker, Richard (2010). Paul Carden. ed. 10 Questions & Answers on Seventh-day Adventism. Rose Publishing. p. 4. ISBN 978-159636-422-6. 
  6. ^ Ratzlaff, Dale (2007). Truth about Adventist "Truth". LAM Publications, LLC. p. 28. ISBN 0-9747679-4-8. 
  7. ^ Wiebe, Elmer (2006). Who Is the Adventist Jesus?. Xulon Press. ISBN 1-59781-328-1. 
  8. ^ Tinker, Colleen (March/April 2007). "Discovering the Adventist Jesus" (PDF). Proclamation! (Life Assurance Ministries, Inc.) 8 (2): 10–17. Retrieved 2011-01-12. 
  9. ^ From SDA Seminary professor Dr. Jerry Moon's presentation at the Adventist Theological Society’s 2006 "Trinity Symposium."
  10. ^ Moon, Dr. Jerry (Spring 2006). "The Quest for a Biblical Trinity: Ellen White's "Heavenly Trio" Compared to the Traditional Doctrine" (PDF). Journal of the Adventist Theological Society (Adventist Theological Society) 17 (1): 140–159. Retrieved 2011-01-12. 
  11. ^ SDA scholar and author A. LeRoy Moore, at the panel Q&A Session at the ATS 2006 "Trinity Symposium."
  12. ^ From a Q&A session at the ATS 2006 "Trinity Symposium."
  13. ^ Whidden, Woodrow; Moon, Jerry; Reeve, John W. (2002). The Trinity: Understanding God's Love, His Plan of Salvation, and Christian Relationships. Review and Herald Publishing Association. p. 201. ISBN 0-8280-1684-4. 
  14. ^ Fortin, Dr. Denis (Spring 2006). "God, the Trinity, and Adventism: An Introduction to the Issues" (PDF). Journal of the Adventist Theological Society (Adventist Theological Society) 17 (1): 4–10. Retrieved 2011-01-12. 
  15. ^ (Christian Research Journal, Summer 1988, p. 13)
  16. ^ Half Adam? a sermon by Larry Kirkpatrick
  17. ^ Christ's Human Nature by Joe Crews
  18. ^ [Ellen G. White, 7BC p. 929 par. 6]
  19. ^ a b "Fundamental Beliefs". General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists. Retrieved 2006-06-06. 
  20. ^ Paul Ellingworth (1993). The Epistle to the Hebrews (NIGTC). p. 518. 
  21. ^ Walter Martin (1997). The Kingdom of the Cults (Revised ed.). p. 522. ISBN 0871233002. 
  22. ^ The Antichrist and the Protestant Reformation
  23. ^ a b White, Ellen G. (1999) [1888]. "Enmity Between Man and Satan". The Great Controversy: Between Christ and Satan. The Ellen G. White Estate. p. 581. ISBN 0-8163-1923-5. Retrieved 2006-06-06. 
  24. ^ Canright, D. M. (1919). Life of Mrs. E.G. White, Seventh-day Adventist Prophet: Her False Claims Refuted. Retrieved 2006-06-06. [dead link]
  25. ^ The Ramik Report Memorandum of Law Literary Property Rights 1790 - 1915
  26. ^ General Conference Archives of the Seventh-day Adventist Church
  27. ^ Ellen G. White as a Writer: Part III - The Issue of Literary Borrowing
  28. ^ An Analysis of the Literary Dependency of Ellen White
  29. ^ Ellen G. White as a Writer: Case Studies in the Issue of Literary Borrowing
  30. ^ The Ellen G. White Encyclopedia
  31. ^ E. Marcella Anderson King and Kevin L. Morgan (2009). More Than Words: A Study of Inspiration and Ellen White's Use of Sources in The Desire of Ages. Honor Him Publishers. 
  32. ^ Also appears in Review article
  33. ^ See Criticism of Ellen White
  • Numbers, Ronald L. (1976). Prophetess of health: a study of Ellen G. White. Harper & Row. ISBN 0-06-066325-1. 
  • Rea, Walter T. (1983). The White Lie. Moore. ISBN 0-9607424-0-9. 

External links

Opposition to Adventism
Addressing opposition claims

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Government of the Seventh-day Adventist Church — Part of a series on Seventh day Adventism Background …   Wikipedia

  • Independent ministries of the Seventh-day Adventist Church — The Seventh day Adventist Church has a number of supporting, parachurch, independent, self supporting and other such organisations that work adjunct to, in support of, or sometimes non supportive of the official church. Supporting Supporting… …   Wikipedia

  • Seventh-day Adventist Church — Classification Protestant Orientation Adventist Polity Modified presbyterian polity Geographical …   Wikipedia

  • Seventh-day Adventist theology — The theology of the Seventh day Adventist Church largely resembles that of mainstream Protestant Christianity, and in particular evangelicalism. Most significantly, Adventists believe in the authority of Scripture and teach that salvation comes… …   Wikipedia

  • Seventh-day Adventist interfaith relations — This article describes the relations between the Seventh day Adventist Church and other Christian denominations and movements, and other religions. According to one church document,: The ecumenical movement as an agency of cooperation has… …   Wikipedia

  • Hope International (Seventh-day Adventist) — This article is about the independent Seventh day Adventist organization. For the university, see Hope International University. Hope International is an independent organization, operated by members of the Seventh day Adventist Church who hold… …   Wikipedia

  • Criticism of the Catholic Church — This article is about the church headquartered in Vatican City, an enclave within Rome. For Criticism of the Christian Church, see Criticism of Christianity. Part of a series on …   Wikipedia

  • Criticism of the Bible — This article is about criticisms made against the Bible as a source of reliable information or ethical guidance. For the academic treatment of the bible as a historical document, see Biblical criticism. The Gutenberg Bible, the first printed… …   Wikipedia

  • Criticism of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — This article is about criticism of the modern LDS church. For criticism of the early years of Mormonism, see Criticism of the Latter Day Saint movement. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints has been the subject of criticism since it… …   Wikipedia

  • Criticism of the Quran — Part of a series on the Quran …   Wikipedia

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.