Battle of Nisibis (217)

Battle of Nisibis (217)

Infobox Military Conflict
conflict=Battle of Nisibis

partof= Caracalla's Parthian War
place=Nisibis, Southern Turkey
result=Tactical draw,
Parthian strategic victory
combatant1=Parthian Empire
combatant2=Roman Empire
commander1=Artabanus IV
The Battle of Nisibis was fought in the summer of 217 between the armies of the Roman Empire under the newly ascended emperor Macrinus and the Parthian army of King Artabanus IV. It lasted for three days, and resulted in a bloody draw, with both sides suffering large casualties. As a result of the battle, Macrinus was forced to seek peace, paying the Parthians a huge sum and abandoning the invasion of Mesopotamia that Caracalla had begun a year before.


For centuries, Rome and Parthia had dominated the Middle East and antagonized each other. During that period, several invasions of Parthian territory were led by Roman leaders, most notably the failed campaign of Crassus and the conquest of Mesopotamia by Trajan. In the early 210s, a civil war broke out in the Parthian Empire, where Artabanus IV rose up against his brother Vologases VI. Artabanus quickly established control of most of the western territories, bringing him into contact with the Roman Empire.Rawlinson, Ch. XXI] At this point, the Roman emperor Caracalla, who considered himself a second Alexander, decided to take advantage from the Parthian conflict. He proposed an alliance to Artabanus, and even asked to marry his daughter. [Herodian, IV.10.1-2] When the alliance was agreed upon, Caracalla with his army entered Mesopotamia unopposed, ostensibly to meet his ally and future father-in-law. [Herodian, IV.11.1-2] But when he came upon Artabanus and his court, Caracalla treacherously attacked and slew many of them. [Herodian, IV.11.5-7] Artabanus escaped, but the Romans were free to plunder the lands east of the Tigris before returning to Edessa for the winter. However, on 8 April 217, Caracalla fell victim to a plot by his praetorian prefect, Marcus Opellius Macrinus and was murdered. [Herodian, IV.13] Macrinus became emperor, but already Artabanus was approaching, having gathered a large army in order to avenge himself for the Romans' treacherous attack. The situation was summed up well by Macrinus himself in the speech he delivered to his army, as delivered by Herodian:

At first Macrinus, having no military experience and wishing to avoid a battle, tried to placate and reach an accommodation with Artabanus, offering to return all prisoners. Artabanus rejected this, demanding financial compensation, the rebuilding of the destroyed towns and the cession of the Roman provinces of northern Mesopotamia, only recently conquered by Septimius Severus. These terms were unacceptable to the Romans, and so Macrinus rejected them.

The battle

The two enemies exemplified two different approaches to warfare: the Roman army was traditionally infantry-based, relying on its excellent legions, while the Parthians were excellent horsemen, employing the heavy shock "cataphract" cavalry, mounted on horses or camels, in combination with large numbers of horse-archers. The two armies met near the Roman city of Nisibis (the exact date is unclear). According to Cassius Dio, the first skirmish occurred over the possession of a watering-place. [Cassius Dio, "Roman History", Book LXXIX.26] On the first day of battle, the Romans deployed in a typical formation, with their infantry in the centre and their cavalry and light troops (Moorish javelin throwers) at the wings to protect their flanks. At the same time, between the gaps left by the heavy infantry cohorts, they placed light infantry ("lanciarii" [These were legionaries armed with light javelins ("lancea"). From gravestone inscriptions we know of the existence of "lanciarii" at least in one legion, "Legio II Parthica", which fought at Nisibis.] ), which could skirmish forward and then withdraw to the safety of the heavier formations if necessary. [Herodian, IV.15.1]

The Parthians attacked at sunrise, firing volleys of arrows, while the cataphracts, supported by lancers on dromedaries, charged the Roman front. The light infantry covering it suffered casualties, but as the Parthians drew near, they withdrew, leaving large numbers of caltrops behind them, with fatal results. The Parthians' horses and camels stepped on them and fell, taking their riders with them and breaking the momentum of the advance. In the resulting close-quarters fighting, the Romans had the advantage. [Herodian, IV.15.2-3]

The Parthians launched several assaults with little result until night fell, when both sides withdrew to their camps. The second day was a repeat of the first, but on the third day, the Parthians, using their greater numbers and superior mobility, tried to outflank the Roman line. The Romans responded by abandoning their customary "deep" formation in several lines (the "triplex acies") and extended their front by deploying in a single line. [Herodian, IV.15.4] Thus, and maneuvering their cavalry and light troops to protect the wings, they avoided being outflanked and encircled. [It is noteworthy that this tactic was advised by Cassius to Crassus against the Parthians at Carrhae, but Crassus did not follow it.]

By that time, casualties on both sides were so great that "the entire plain was covered with the dead; bodies were piled up in huge mounds, and the dromedaries especially fell in heaps". [Herodian, IV.15.5] At this point, Macrinus, with his army on the verge of breaking, sent another embassy to Artabanus, informing him of Caracalla's demise and offering a substantial compensation. The Parthian army had also suffered large casualties, and moreover, since it was not a professional but a feudal militia force, it started becoming restive at the prolonged campaign. [Cassius Dio, "Roman History", Book LXXIX.27] Thus Artabanus agreed to a peace, after receiving 200 million sesterces. [Herodian, IV.15.7-8]


In June 218, Macrinus was defeated by the forces supporting Elagabalus outside Antioch, while Artabanus faced the uprising of the Persian Sassanid clan under Ardashir I. Nisibis was thus the last major battle between Rome and Parthia, as the Parthian dynasty would in a few years be overthrown by Ardashir. However, warfare between Rome and Persia would soon resume, as Ardashir and Alexander Severus fought over Mesopotamia, and continued intermittently until the Muslim conquests.



*Herodian, " [ Roman History] ", Book IV, 10-15
*George Rawlinson, [ "The Seven Great Monarchies of the Ancient Eastern World" - VI. Parthia] , Chapter XXI

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Battle of Nisibis — The name Battle of Nisibis can refer to one of two battles fought near the city of Nisibis in northern Mesopotamia:* The Battle of Nisibis (217) between the Romans and the Parthians * The first Siege of Nisibis (338) by the Sassanids under Shapur …   Wikipedia

  • List of battles before 601 — List of battles: before 601 601 1400 1401 1800 1801 1900 1901 2000 2001 current See also: List of Roman battles Before 500 BC5th century BC4th century BC*398 BC Siege of Motya Phoenician city Motya sacked. *397 BC Battle of Messene Ionian Greek… …   Wikipedia

  • List of Roman battles — The following is a list of Roman Battles fought by the Roman Kingdom, the Roman Republic, the Roman Empire, and sometimes the Byzantine Empire, organized by date. The list is not exhaustive. For the complete list see List of battles, for other… …   Wikipedia

  • List of military commanders — See also: Military History Antiquity Albania*Agron (250 BC 230 BC) The first king to unite the Illyrian tribes together and form a kingdom. During his rule Illyria was a strong kingdom which had a strong military force, especially naval. He… …   Wikipedia

  • Список сражений Древнего Рима —   Это служебн …   Википедия

  • List of conflicts in the Near East — This article is about past conflicts in the Near East. For modern conflicts, see List of modern conflicts in the Middle East. A geographical map showing territories commonly considered part of the Near East. The area known as the Near East is… …   Wikipedia

  • ancient Rome — ▪ ancient state, Europe, Africa, and Asia Introduction       the state centred on the city of Rome. This article discusses the period from the founding of the city and the regal period, which began in 753 BC, through the events leading to the… …   Universalium

  • Campaign history of the Roman military — This article is part of the series on: Military of ancient Rome (portal) 753 BC – AD 476 Structural history Roman army (unit types and ranks …   Wikipedia

  • Roman–Persian Wars — Infobox Military Conflict conflict=Roman ndash;Persian Wars partof= date=92 BC ndash; 627 AD place=Mesopotamia, Transcaucasus, Atropatene, Asia Minor, Syria, Palestine, Egypt result=Status quo ante bellum territory=Roman acquisition of upper… …   Wikipedia

  • Mesopotamia, history of — ▪ historical region, Asia Introduction  history of the region in southwestern Asia where the world s earliest civilization developed. The name comes from a Greek word meaning “between rivers,” referring to the land between the Tigris and… …   Universalium