- Authority (textual criticism)
The authority of a text is its reliability as a witness to the
author's intentions. These intentions could be initial, medial or final, but intentionalist editors (most notably represented by Fredson Bowersand G. Thomas Tanselleediting school) generally attempt to retrieve final authorial intentions. The concept is of particular importance for textual critics, whether they believe that authorial intention is recoverable, or whether they think that this recovery is impossible.
Here are some examples of authority:
* The only authority for the works of the Roman poet
Catullusderives from a lost manuscript, of which three copies reside in the National Library in Paris, the Bodleian Libraryat Oxford, and the Vatican Libraryin Rome(the "Codex Vaticanus"). No one knows, or can ever know, how close this manuscript comes to Catullus' intentions—in other words, how great its authority is.
* It is generally thought that the Q1 ('
Bad quarto') editionof Shakespeare's " Hamlet" is a pirated copy, reconstructed from memory by one of the actors. If this is so, then it has some authority, but much less than the first authorized quarto, Q2 ( 1602). In comparison, however, it might be a useful authority to the cuts and adaptations made in the performance it was based on.
First Folioedition of " Julius Caesar" ( 1623) is the only authoritative source, since it is the copy-text of all future editions.
diarywhich is probably authentic has total authority.
A text's authority is made more problematic when it has more than one author, when it falsely asserts itself to be someone else's work, or when it is revised many times. For instance:
* The forged diaries of
Adolf Hitlerhave no authority as the work of their supposed author, but they do have authority as a witness to the intentions of Konrad Kujau, the forger.
* A page on
Wikipediacould be said to indicate the intentions of the aggregate of users who have edited it up to that point: it has multiple authority. But many of its editors will disagree with one another about what the page should contain. The idea of 'final intention' does not easily apply, since the page is never complete, and since a recent change (e.g. a piece of vandalism) might not be satisfactory to any of the other editors except the one who made it.
quartoedition of Shakespeare's King Leardiffers from the later folioedition in many ways. Most modern versions collate the two, preferring one edition in one passage and the other in another. But some editors, such as Stanley Wells, argue they are separate works with different artistic intentions, and that neither of them has more authority.
Authority can also be related to a particular
edition, especially if this edition reaches a degree of popularity.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Textual criticism — Carmina Cantabrigiensia, Manuscript C, folio 436v, 11th century Textual criticism (or lower criticism) is a branch of literary criticism that is concerned with the identification and removal of transcription errors in the texts of manuscripts.… … Wikipedia
textual criticism — n. the scholarly study of the text of a written work, often, specif., in an effort to determine the original or most authoritative form of that work * * * Introduction the technique of restoring texts as nearly as possible to their original … Universalium
Criticism of Christianity — This article is about criticism of the doctrines and practices of Christianity. For negative attitudes towards Christians, see Anti Christian sentiment. For acts committed against Christians because of their faith, see Persecution of Christians.… … Wikipedia
Criticism of the Bible — This article is about criticisms made against the Bible as a source of reliable information or ethical guidance. For the academic treatment of the bible as a historical document, see Biblical criticism. The Gutenberg Bible, the first printed… … Wikipedia
textual harassment — noun a) Sexual harassment in writing She places the textual harassment experienced by all women writers at her own disposal as evidence of her grace, and hence her authority. b) Aggressive, distorting literary or textual criticism Moneypenny… … Wiktionary
Source criticism — This entry is about source evaluation (or information evaluation) in an interdisciplinary context and thus not limited to some discipline specific understanding of the term source criticism . A source (an information source) may be a document, a… … Wikipedia
Cognitive authority — Patrick Wilson (1983) developed the cognitive authority theory from social epistemology in his book, Second hand Knowledge: An Inquiry into Cognitive Authority. The fundamental concept of Wilson’s cognitive authority is that people construct… … Wikipedia
Biblical Criticism — Biblical Criticism (Textual) † Catholic Encyclopedia ► Biblical Criticism (Textual) The object of textual criticism is to restore as nearly as possible the original text of a work the autograph of which has been lost. In this textual… … Catholic encyclopedia
Biblical Criticism (Higher) — Biblical Criticism (Higher) † Catholic Encyclopedia ► Biblical Criticism (Higher) Biblical criticism in its fullest comprehension is the examination of the literary origins and historical values of the books composing the Bible, with… … Catholic encyclopedia
literary criticism — Discipline concerned with philosophical, descriptive, and evaluative inquiries about literature, including what literature is, what it does, and what it is worth. The Western critical tradition began with Plato s Republic (4th century BC). A… … Universalium