- Solomon's Temple
Solomon's Temple ( _he. בית המקדש, transliterated "Beit HaMikdash"), also known as the First Temple, was, according to the
Bible , the firsttemple of the ancient religion of the biblical Israelites inJerusalem .According to the Bible, it functioned as a religious focal point for worship and the sacrifices known as the "
korbanot " in ancientJudaism . Completed in 960 BCE, it was destroyed by theBabylonians in 586 BCE. The reconstructed temple in Jerusalem, which stood between 516 BCE and 70 CE, was theSecond Temple . However, some modern studies, such asThe Bible Unearthed question the historical accuracy of the Biblical account of King Solomon and aUnited Monarchy .Biblical account
According to the biblical account, David's first action as king of Israel was to conquer Jebus (Jerusalem) and declare it the capital of his kingdom. Even though the city was not the perfect choice from many points of view, a geopolitical constraint dictated this choice. Mount Moriah is an important place where
Abraham boundIsaac and thus the Temple was to be built there. David conquered Jerusalem at the end of the 11th century BCE, then chose it as the center of his new government. [ [http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/History/History+of+Israel/HISTORY-%20Biblical%20Times/ HISTORY: Biblical Times ] ] He brought theArk of the Covenant to the city. Jerusalem became the political and spiritual nexus of the ancient Hebrews. King David was instructed by God not to build the Temple, leaving the task to his sonSolomon . The concentration of religious ritual at the Temple made Jerusalem a place of pilgrimage and an important commercial center.The city served as the capital of the united kingdom of Israel, but became the capital of the less powerful of the two kingdoms (Judah) after the death of
Solomon and the division of the country into two kingdoms. It regained its central status after the conquest and destruction of the northern Kingdom of Israel by theAssyria ns in 722 BCE. In 586 BCE the city was captured by theBabylonian s. At the order of KingNebuchadnezzar II the city was torched, the Temple was razed, and the people were taken into exile. Jewish tradition holds this incident to be the first exile of the Jewish nation.Raids and destruction
According to the Bible, the temple was pillaged many times during the course of its history (dates before Ahaz are approximate):
#by king Shishak of Egypt, c.933 BCE (1 Kings 14:25, 26);
#by kingAsa of Judah, c.900 BCE in order to persuade Ben-Hadad I ofDamascus to come to his aid against Baasha of Israel (1 Kings 15:9-24);
#by kingJehoash of Judah , c. 825 BCE, in order to payHazael of Damascus, who was besieging the city (2 Kings 12:17-18);
#by king Joash of Israel, c.790 BCE (2 Kings 14:14);
#by kingAhaz of Judah, 734 BCE, to persuadeTiglath-pileser III of Assyria to come to his aid againstPekah of Israel and Rezin II of Damascus (2 Kings 16:8, 17, 18);
#by kingHezekiah of Judah, 712 BCE, to pay kingSennacherib of Assyria, who was besieging the city (2 Kings 18:15, 16);
#by kingNebuchadnezzar II of Babylon who pillaged it twice — once in 597 BCE, and again in 586 BCE, after which he destroyed it (2 Kings 24:13; 2 Chr. 36:7). He burned the temple, and carried all its treasures with him toBabylon (2 Kings 25:9-17; 2 Chr. 36:19; Isaiah 64:11).These sacred vessels were, at the end of the Babylonian Captivity, restored to the Jews by Cyrus, in 538 BCE (Ezra 1:7-11).
Location
The Temple is believed to have been situated upon the hill which forms the site of the present-day
Temple Mount , in the center of which area is theDome of the Rock . Under theJebusites the site was used as a threshing floor. 2 Sam. 24 describes its consecration during David's reign. Two other, slightly different sites for the Temple have also been proposed, on this same hill. One places the stone altar at the location of the rock which is now beneath the gilded dome, with the rest of the temple to the west. TheWell of Souls was, in this theory, a pit for the remnants of the blood services of the "korbanot". The other theory places the Holy of Holies atop this rock.Archaeological evidence
Israeli archaeologist
Eilat Mazar has conjectured that archaelolgical evidence supports the possible historical existence of Solomon's Temple. This evidence includes remains taken from refuse from an extensive construction project performed on the Temple Mount by the Islamicwaqf in November 1999. [ [http://www.israelnationalnews.com/news.php3?id=80176 Exclusive: Dumped Temple Mount Rubble Yields Jewish Artifacts - Jewish World - Israel News - Arutz Sheva ] ] [ [http://www.har-habayt.org/ The Temple Mount Archaeological Destruction ] ] The second was discovered in the summer of 2007, as archeologists overseeing construction at the site reported “evidence of human activity” most likely belonging to the first temple period. [ [http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/10/071023-jerusalem-artifacts_2.html Solomon's Temple Artifacts Found by Muslim Workers ] ] In January 2008 Israeli archaeologist Mazar publicized theShelomit seal .According to
Israel Finkelstein , the archaeological remains considered to date from the time of Solomon reflect an unabated continuation of Canaanite material culture and do not show a magnificent empire or cultural development. Finkelstein suggests that comparing pottery from areas traditionally assigned to Israel with that of the Philistines points to the Philistines having been significantly more sophisticated. Finkelstein conjectured that due to religious prejudice, later writers (i.e. the Biblical authors) suppressed the achievements of theOmrides (whom the Bible describes as beingpolytheist ), and instead pushed them back to a supposed golden age of godly rulers (i.e. monotheist, andYahweh worshiping). [Finkelstein, Israel, and Silberman, Neil Asher, "The Bible Unearthed : Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts", Simon & Schuster 2002, ISBN 978-0684869131]Description
The detailed descriptions provided in the
Tanakh and educated guesses based on the remains of other temples in the region are the sources for reconstructions of its appearance. Technical details are lacking, since the scribes who wrote the books were not architects or engineers.De Vaux, 1961.] Reconstructions differ; the following enumeration is largely based on "Easton's Bible Dictionary " and theJewish Encyclopedia :*The
Kadosh Kadoshim , the Temple'sMost Holy Place (1 Kings 6:19; 8:6), called also the "inner house" (6:27), and the "Holy of Holies" (Heb. 9:3). It was 20cubit s in length, breadth, and height. The usual explanation for the discrepancy between its height and the 30-cubit height of the temple is that its floor was elevated, like the "cella " of other ancient temples. It was floored and wainscotted with Cedar of Lebanon (1 Kings 6:16), and its walls and floor were overlaid withgold (6:20, 21, 30). It contained twocherub im of olive-wood, each 10 cubits high (1 Kings 6:16, 20, 21, 23-28) and each having outspread wings 10 cubits from tip to tip, so that, since they stood side by side, the wings touched the wall on either side and met in the center of the room. There was a two-leaved door between it and the holy place overlaid with gold (2 Chr. 4:22); also a veil of bluepurple andcrimson and finelinen (2 Chr. 3:14; compareExodus 26:33).It had no windows (1 Kings 8:12). It was considered the dwelling-place of God.The reason for the color scheme of the veil was symbolic. In Jewish tradition, blue represented the heavens, while red or crimson represented the earth. Purple, a combination of the two colors, represents a meeting of the heavens and the earth. Thus, purple can also be a representation of the Holy Messiah in Jewish and Christian traditions.
*TheHekhal : the holy place, 1 Kings 8:8-10, called also the "greater house" (2 Chr. 3:5) and the "temple" (1 Kings 6:17); the word also means "palace". It was of the same width and height as the Holy of Holies, but 40 cubits in length. Its walls were lined with cedar, on which were carved figures of cherubim, palm-trees, and open flowers, which were overlaid with gold. Chains of gold further marked it off from the Holy of Holies. The floor of the Temple was of fir-wood overlaid with gold. The door-posts, of olive-wood, supported folding-doors of fir. The doors of the Holy of Holies were of olive-wood. On both sets of doors were carved cherubim, palm-trees, and flowers, all being overlaid with gold (1 Kings 6:15 et seq.)
*The Ulam: the porch or entrance before the temple on the east (1 Kings 6:3; 2 Chr. 3:4; 9:7). This was 20 cubits long (corresponding to the width of the Temple) and 10 cubits deep (1 Kings 6:3). 2 Chr. 3:4 adds the curious statement (probably corrupted from the statement of the depth of the porch) that this porch was 120 cubits high, which would make it a regular tower. The description does not specify whether a wall separated it from the next chamber. In the porch stood the two pillarsJachin and Boaz (1 Kings 7:21; 2 Kings 11:14; 23:3), which were 18 cubits in height and surmounted by capitals of carved lilies, 5 cubits high.
*The chambers, which were built about the temple on the southern, western and northern sides (1 Kings 6:5-10). These formed a part of the building and were used for storage. They were probably one story high at first; two more may have been added later.According to biblical tradition, round about the building were:
*The court of the priests (2 Chr. 4:9), called the "inner court" (1 Kings 6:36), which was separated from the space beyond by a wall of three courses of hewn stone, surmounted by cedar beams (1 Kings 6:36).
*The great court, which surrounded the whole temple (2 Chr. 4:9). Here the people assembled to worship God (Jeremiah 19:14; 26:2).The inner court of the Priests contained the Altar of burnt-offering (2 Chr. 15:8), the brazen Sea (4:2-5, 10) and ten lavers (1 Kings 7:38, 39). 2 Kings 16:14 says that a brazen altar stood before the Temple, 2 Chr. 4:1 gives its dimensions as 20 cubits square and 10 cubits high.
The brazen Sea (Laver), 10 cubits wide brim to brim, 5 cubits deep and with a circumference of 30 cubits around the brim, rested on the backs of twelve oxen (1 Kings 7:23-26). The Book of Kings gives its capacity as "2,000 baths" (24,000 US gallons), but Chronicles inflates this to three thousand baths (36,000 US gallons) (2 Chr. 4:5-6) and states that its purpose was to afford opportunity for the purification by immersion of the body of the priests. (According to
Talmud tractateMikwaoth , a "bath" of 40seah s is the minimum permissible size for aMikvah ).The lavers, each of which held "forty baths" (1 Kings 7:38), rested on portable holders made of bronze, provided with wheels, and ornamented with figures of
lion s,cherub im, and palm-trees. The author of the books of the Kings describes their minute details with great interest (1 Kings 7:27-37).Josephus reported that the vessels in the Temple were composed ofOrichalcum in "Antiquities of the Jews". According to 1 Kings 7:48 there stood before the Holy of Holies a golden altar ofincense and a table forshowbread . This table was of gold, as were also the five candlesticks on each side of it. The implements for the care of the candles—tongs, basins, snuffers, and fire-pans—were of gold; and so were the hinges of the doors.Comparison with other temples
According to De Vaux, the Temple has recognizable similarities to other regions. Syro-Phoenician, Egyptian, and Mesopotamian influences are visible, and a plaza or courtyard surrounding the sacred residence of the god, marked with stones, is a feature common throughout ancient Semitic religions. De Vaux found earlier evidence of this practice among the Hebrews surviving in the two stones that
Joshua placed atGilgal (Joshua 4:20) and the marking ofMount Sinai by Moses (Ex. 19:12), and in the forbidden zone surrounding the tent which was the predecessor of the Temple. According to De Vaux, contemporary Muslims' designation of certain areas, especially that surroundingMecca , as inviolate "haram " represents a comparable practice.The Biblical text states that Solomon received aid from
Hiram , the King of Tyre, in the construction of his buildings. This aid involved not only material (cedar-wood, etc.), but architectural direction and skilled craftsmen. According to De Butt, the tripartite division of the Temple is similar to that found in 13th century BCE temples atAlalakh inSyria and Hazor in the upperGalilee , a 9th century BCE temple atTell Tayinat also follows this plan. Phoenician temples varied somewhat in form, but were similarly surrounded by courts. Fact|date=May 2007Among the details which according to Specify|date=May 2007 were probably copied from Tyre were the two pillars Jachin and Boaz.
Herodotus (ii. 44) says that the temple at Tyre contained two such, one of old tin. In the same way the ornamentation ofpalm tree s and cherubim were probably derived from Tyre, because Ezekiel (28:13, 14) represents the King of Tyre, who was high priest also, as being in the "garden of God." Probably both at Tyre and at Jerusalem the cherubim and palm-tree ornaments were survivals of an earlier conception—that the abode of God was a "garden of Eden." The Tyrians, therefore, in their temple imitated to some extent the primitive garden, and Solomon borrowed these features. Fact|date=May 2007Similarly, according to Specify|date=May 2007, the bronze altar was a Phoenician innovation, and probably the same is true of the bronze implements which were ornamented with palm-trees and cherubim. The Orthodox Israelitish altar was of earth or unhewn stone. The
Decalogue of Ex. 20 prohibited the making of graven images, while that of Ex. 34 prohibited the making of molten gods; and the Deuteronomic expansions prohibited the making of any likeness whatever. All these are, to be sure, later than Solomon's time; but there is no reason to believe that before that time the Hebrews had either the skill or the wealth necessary to produce ornamentation of this kind.Fact|date=May 2007Other Near Eastern temples
Several temples in
Mesopotamia , many in Egypt, and some of the Phoenicians are now known. In Babylonia the characteristic feature was aziggurat , or terraced tower, evidently intended to imitate the mountains on which the gods resided. The chamber for the divine dwelling was at its top. The early Egyptian temples consisted of buildings containing two or three rooms, the innermost of which was the abode of the deity. A good example is the granite temple near the sphinx atGiza . The Middle Kingdom (12th dynasty) addedobelisk s and pylons, and theNew Kingdom (18th dynasty)hypostyle halls. Solomon's Temple was not a copy of any of these, nor of the Phoenician buildings, but embodied features derived from all of them. It was on the summit of a hill, like the altar ofBa'al on Mount Carmel and the sanctuaries ofMount Hermon , and like the Babylonian idea of the divine abode. It was surrounded by courts, like the Phoenician temples and the splendid temple of Der al-Bakri at Thebes. Its general form is reminiscent of Egyptian sanctuaries and closely matches that of other temples in the region, as described above. Fact|date=May 2007According to Specify|date=May 2007, the two pillars Jachin and Boaz had their parallel not only at Tyre but at
Byblos ,Paphos , and Telloh . In Egypt the obelisks expressed the same idea. TheJewish Encyclopedia stated that "All these were phallic emblems, being survivals of the primitive Hamito-Semitic "maẓẓebah", [W. R. Smith, "Rel. of Sem." 2d ed., p. 208, and Schmidt, "Solomon's Temple," pp. 40 et seq.] Jachin and Boaz were really isolated columns, as Schick has shown ["Die Stiftshütte, der Tempel in Jerusalem," etc., pp. 82 et seq.] , and not, as some have supposed, a part of the ornamentation of the building. Their tops were crowned with ornamentation as if they were lamps; and W. R. Smith supposed (l.c. p. 488 Specify|date=May 2007) that they may have been used as fire-altars, positing that they may have contained cressets for burning the fat.A miniature world
The chambers which surrounded the Holy Place in Solomon's Temple are said in 1 Chr. 28:12 to have been storehouses for the sacred treasure. According to Specify|date=June 2007, these are paralleled in Babylonian and Egyptian temples by similar chambers, which surrounded the "naos", or hypostyle hall, and were used for similar purposes. The "molten sea" finds its parallel in Babylonian temples in a great basin called the "
apsu " ('deep'). As the ziggurat typified a mountain, so the "apsu" typified the sea. Specify|date=May 2007 thus characterizes the Temple as "a miniature world". Fact|date=May 2007 In Babylonian temples, an apsu was used as early as the time ofGudea and continued in use till the end of Babylonian history; it was made of stone and was elaborately decorated . According to Specify|date=May 2007, in Solomon's Temple there was nothing to correspond to the hypostyle hall of an Egyptian temple; but this feature was introduced into Solomon's palace. Specify|date=May 2007 states that the "house of the forest of Lebanon" and the "porch of pillars" are strongly reminiscent of the outer and the inner hypostyle hall of an Egyptian temple. Fact|date=May 2007Modern influences and events
The structure of this temple and its successor built by
Herod the Great was an influence inJuan Bautista de Toledo 's design for theEscorial Monastery in Spain (1563-1584) [http://sapiens.ya.com/jrcuadra/jringles.htm Simbology [sic] and projective genesis in architecture: El Escorial and the Temple of Solomon] , by Juan Rafael de la Cuadra Blanco, Ph. Dr. Architect.] .Modern temple architecture ofThe Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has influences from Christian interpretations of biblical descriptions of Solomon's Temple. Each of the 125 operating temples has abaptismal font which is supported by 12 oxen patterned after the brazen Sea described in 1 Kings 7:23-26. Three of the church's early temples exteriors were patterned loosely on the design of Solomon's Temple. The layout ofMasonic Lodge s is also based on the layout of King Solomon's Temple.On December 27, 2004 it was reported that the
Israel Museum inJerusalem had alleged that the ivory pomegranate that some scholars believed had once adorned a sceptre used by the high priest in Solomon's Temple may not be related to the Temple. This artifact was the most important item of biblical antiquities in its collection; it had been part of a traveling exhibition at theCanadian Museum of Civilization in 2003. The report described the thumb-sized pomegranate, which is a mere 44 millimetres in height, as being inscribed "... with ancient Hebrew letters said to spell out the words 'Sacred donation for the priests in the House ofYHVH .'" The Israel Museum now believes that the artifact actually dates back to the 14th or 13th century BCE, and there is much dispute over the age of the inscription. Some experts fear that this discovery is part of an international fraud in antiquities; Israeli authorities have charged five people. [ [http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/30/international/middleeast/30mideast.html "The New York Times", December 30, 2004] (subscription required)]On May 3, 2007, in Jerusalem, a group of American, French and Israeli scholars met in attempt to resolve differences over whether the Ivory Pomegranate Inscription was authentic or a forgery, with no conclusion resulting. [ [http://bib-arch.org/pomegranate/bas-pomegranate.pdf "Pomegranate Inscription: Forgery or Authentic?", May 3, 2007] ]
ee also
;General:
* Most Holy Place
*Second Temple Period
*Solomonic column
*Temple in Jerusalem
*Temple Mount
*Western Wall
*Melekeh
*The Bible Unearthed ;Persons: Prominent personalities of the First Temple period
*Isaiah
*Jeremiah
*King David
* King Hezekiah
*King Solomon ;Places: Sites and places of the First Temple period
*City of David
*Hezekiah's Tunnel
*Mount Moriah
*Siloam Inscription Notes
References
*cite book|first=Israel |last=Finkelstein|coauthors=Neil Asher Silberman|title=David and Solomon: In Search of the Bible's Sacred Kings and the Roots of the Western Tradition|publisher=Free Press|year=2006|id=ISBN 0-7432-4362-5
*cite book|first=Israel |last=Finkelstein|coauthors=Neil Asher Silberman|title=The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New VisionExternal links
General references
* Telushkin, Joseph, " [http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Judaism/The_Temple.html The Temple] ". Jewish Literacy (Jewish Virtual Library).
* [http://www.aiwaz.net/Temple-of-SOLOMON/c17 Mystical composition of the Temple of Solomon] .
* Larkin, George, " [http://www.johnbunyan.org/text/bun-solomon.htm Solomon's Temple Spiritualized] ". London, Two Swans without Bishopgate. 1688.
* Nat, Arnold vander, " [http://orion.it.luc.edu/~avande1/jerusalem/accounts/index.htm The Temple of Jerusalem] ".
* Wells, Steve, " [http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/ The Skeptic's Annotated Bible] ".
* [http://www.dinur.org/resources/resourceCategoryDisplay.aspx?categoryid=418&rsid=478 Resources > Biblical History > Jerusalem, The First Temple] Project of the Dinur Center for Research in Jewish History, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
*Jewish Encyclopedia [http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=129&letter=T Temple of Solomon] .
*Roland De Vaux (tr. John McHugh), "Ancient Israel: Its Life and Institutions" (NY, McGraw-Hill, 1961).
*Benjamin Mazar , "The Mountain of the Lord" (Doubleday, NY, 1975) ISBN 0-385-04843-2.
* Hamblin, William andDavid Seely , "Solomon's Temple: Myth and History" (Thames and Hudson, 2007) ISBN 0500251339
*eastons
*JewishEncyclopediaWebsites
* [http://koti.phnet.fi/petripaavola/The_temple_of_Solomon The model of temple of Solomon]
* [http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1381124,00.html News report on forgery of biblical artifacts found in Israel]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.