- Quantum gravity
**Quantum gravity**is the field oftheoretical physics attempting to unifyquantum mechanics , which describes three of the fundamental forces of nature (electromagnetism, weak interaction, and strong interaction), withgeneral relativity , the theory of the fourth fundamental force: gravity. One ultimate goal hoped to emerge as a result of this is a unified framework for all fundamental forces— called a "theory of everything " (TOE).**Overview**Much of the difficulty in merging these theories at all energy scales comes from the different assumptions that these theories make on how the universe works.

Quantum field theory depends on particle fields embedded in the flat space-time ofspecial relativity .General relativity models gravity as a curvature within space-time that changes as a gravitational mass moves. Historically, the most obvious way of combining the two (such as treating gravity as simply another particle field) ran quickly into what is known as therenormalization problem. In the old-fashioned understanding of renormalization, gravity particles would attract each other and adding together all of the interactions results in many infinite values which cannot easily be cancelled out mathematically to yield sensible, finite results. This is in contrast withquantum electrodynamics where, while the series still do not converge, the interactions sometimes evaluate to infinite results, but those are few enough in number to be removable via renormalization.**Effective field theories**In recent decades, however, this antiquated understanding of

renormalization has given way to the modern idea ofeffective field theory . All quantum field theories come with some high-energy cutoff, beyond which we do not expect that the theory provides a good description of nature. The "infinities" then become large but finite quantities proportional to this finite cutoff scale, and correspond to processes that involve very high energies near the fundamental cutoff. These quantities can then be absorbed into an infinite collection of coupling constants, and at energies well below the fundamental cutoff of the theory, to any desired precision; only a finite number of these coupling constants need to be measured in order to make legitimate quantum-mechanical predictions. This same logic works just as well for the highly successful theory of low-energypion s as for quantum gravity. Indeed, the first quantum-mechanical corrections tograviton -scattering andNewton's law of gravitation have been explicitly computed (although they are so astronomically small that we may never be able to measure them), and any more fundamental theory of nature would need to replicate these results in order to be taken seriously. In fact, gravity is in many ways a much better quantum field theory than theStandard Model , since it appears to be valid all the way up to its cutoff at thePlanck scale . (By comparison, the Standard Model is expected to start to break down above its cutoff at the much smaller scale of around 1000GeV .)While confirming that quantum mechanics and gravity are indeed consistent at reasonable energies (in fact, the complete structure of gravity can be shown to arise automatically from the quantum mechanics of spin-2 massless particles), this way of thinking makes clear that near or above the fundamental cutoff of our effective quantum theory of gravity (the cutoff is generally assumed to be of order the Planck scale), a new model of nature will be needed. That is, in the modern way of thinking, the problem of combining quantum mechanics and gravity becomes an issue only at very high energies, and may well require a totally new kind of model.

**Quantum gravity theory for the highest energy scales**The general approach taken in deriving a theory of quantum gravity that is valid at even the highest energy scales is to assume that the underlying theory will be simple and elegant and then to look at current theories for symmetries and hints for how to combine them elegantly into an overarching theory. One problem with this approach is that it is not known if quantum gravity will be a simple and elegant theory (that resolves the conundrum of special and general relativity with regard to the uniformity of acceleration and gravity, in the former case and

spacetime curvature in the latter case).Such a theory is required in order to understand those problems involving the combination of very large mass or energy and very small dimensions of space, such as the behavior of

black hole s, and the origin of the universe.**Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity****The graviton**At present, one of the deepest problems in theoretical physics is harmonizing the theory of

general relativity , which describes gravitation, and applies to large-scale structures (stars ,planets ,galaxies ), withquantum mechanics , which describes the other threefundamental forces acting on theatomic scale. This problem must be put in the proper context, however. In particular, contrary to the popular claim that quantum mechanics and general relativity are fundamentally incompatible, one can demonstrate that the structure of general relativity essentially follows inevitably from the quantum mechanics of interactingtheoretical spin-2 massless particles (calledgravitons ).While there is no concrete proof of the existence of gravitons, all quantized theories of matter necessitate their existence.Fact|date=February 2008 Supporting this

theory is the observation that all otherfundamental forces have one or moremessenger particles , "except" gravity, leading researchers to believe that at least one most likely does exist; they have dubbed these hypothetical particles "gravitons". Many of the accepted notions of a unified theory of physics since the 1970s, includingstring theory ,superstring theory ,M-theory ,loop quantum gravity , all assume, and to some degree depend upon, the existence of the graviton. Many researchers view the detection of the graviton as vital to validating their work.CERN plans to dedicate a large timeshare to search for the graviton using theLarge Hadron Collider Fact|date=July 2008.**Nonrenormalizability of gravity**Historically, many believed that general relativity was in fact fundamentally inconsistent with quantum mechanics. General relativity, like

electromagnetism , is aclassical field theory . One might expect that, as with electromagnetism, there should be a correspondingquantum field theory .However, gravity is

nonrenormalizable . For a quantum field theory to be well-defined according to this understanding of the subject, it must be asymptotically free or asymptotically safe. The theory must be characterized by a choice of "finitely many" parameters, which could, in principle, be set by experiment. For example, inquantum electrodynamics , these parameters are the charge and mass of the electron, as measured at a particular energy scale.On the other hand, in quantizing gravity, there are "infinitely many independent parameters" needed to define the theory. For a given choice of those parameters, one could make sense of the theory, but since we can never do infinitely many experiments to fix the values of every parameter, we do not have a meaningful physical theory:

* At low energies, the logic of therenormalization group tells us that, despite the unknown choices of these infinitely many parameters, quantum gravity will reduce to the usual Einstein theory ofgeneral relativity .

* On the other hand, if we could probe very high energies where quantum effects take over, then "every one" of the infinitely many unknown parameters would begin to matter, and we could make no predictions at all.As explained below, there is a way around this problem by treating QG as aneffective field theory .Any meaningful theory of quantum gravity that makes sense and is predictive at all energy scales must have some deep principle that reduces the infinitely many unknown parameters to a finite number that can then be measured.

* One possibility is that normalperturbation theory is not a reliable guide to the renormalizability of the theory, and that there really "is" aUV fixed point for gravity. Since this is a question ofnon-perturbative quantum field theory, it is difficult to find a reliable answer, but some people still pursue this option.

* Another possibility is that there are new symmetry principles that constrain the parameters and reduce them to a finite set. This is the route taken bystring theory , where all of the excitations of the string essentially manifest themselves as new symmetries.**QG as an effective field theory**In an

effective field theory , all but the first few of the infinite set of parameters in a nonrenormalizable theory are suppressed by huge energy scales and hence can be neglected when computing low-energy effects. Thus, at least in the low-energy regime, the model is indeed a predictive quantum field theory [http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9512024 [gr-qc/9512024 Introduction to the Effective Field Theory Description of Gravity ] ] . (A very similar situation occurs for the very similar effective field theory of low-energy pions.) Furthermore, many theorists agree that even the Standard Model should really be regarded as an effective field theory as well, with "nonrenormalizable" interactions suppressed by large energy scales and whose effects have consequently not been observed experimentally.**pacetime background dependence**A fundamental lesson of general relativity is that there is no fixed spacetime background, as found in

Newtonian mechanics andspecial relativity ; the spacetime geometry is dynamic. While easy to grasp in principle, this is the hardest idea to understand about general relativity, and its consequences are profound and not fully explored, even at the classical level. To a certain extent, general relativity can be seen to be arelational theory , [*cite book*] in which the only physically relevant information is the relationship between different events in space-time.

last = Smolin

first = Lee

title = Three roads toquantum gravity

publisher = Basic Books

date = 2001

pages = 20-25

isbn = 0-465-08735-4 Pages 220-226 are annotated references and guide for further reading.On the other hand, quantum mechanics has depended since its inception on a fixed background (non-dynamical) structure. In the case of quantum mechanics, it is

time that is given and not dynamic, just as in Newtonian classical mechanics. In relativistic quantum field theory, just as in classical field theory,Minkowski spacetime is the fixed background of the theory.**tring theory**s in the

Standard Model or aworld sheet swept up by closed strings in string theory]String theory started out as a generalization of quantum field theory where instead of point particles, string-like objects propagate in a fixed spacetime background. Although string theory had its origins in the study ofquark confinement and not of quantum gravity, it was soon discovered that the string spectrum contains thegraviton , and that "condensation" of certain vibration modes of strings is equivalent to a modification of the original background. In this sense, string perturbation theory exhibits exactly the features one would expect of a perturbation theory that may exhibit a strong dependence on asymptotics (as seen, for example, in theAdS/CFT correspondence) which is a weak form of background dependence.**Background independent theories**Loop quantum gravity is the fruit of an effort to formulate abackground-independent quantum theory.Topological quantum field theory provided an example of background-independent quantum theory, but with no local degrees of freedom, and only finitely many degrees of freedom globally. This is inadequate to describe gravity in 3+1 dimensions which has local degrees of freedom according to general relativity. In 2+1 dimensions, however, gravity is a topological field theory, and it has been successfully quantized in several different ways, includingspin networks .**Fields vs particles**Quantum field theory on curved (non-Minkowskian) backgrounds, while not a quantum theory of gravity, has shown that some of the assumptions of quantum field theory cannot be carried over to curved spacetimeFact|date=February 2008, let alone to full-blown quantum gravity. In particular, the vacuum, when it exists, is shown to depend on the path of the observer through space-time (seeUnruh effect ).Also, some argue that in curved spacetime, the field concept is seen to be fundamental over the particle concept (which arises as a convenient way to describe localized interactions). However, since it appears possible to regard curved spacetime as consisting of a condensate of gravitons, there is still some debate over which concept is truly the more fundamental.

**Points of tension**There are two other points of tension between quantum mechanics and general relativity.

*First, classical general relativity breaks down at singularities, and quantum mechanics becomes inconsistent with general relativity in a neighborhood of singularities (however, no one is certain that classical general relativity applies near singularities in the first place).

* Second, it is not clear how to determine the gravitational field of a particle, since under theHeisenberg uncertainty principle of quantum mechanics its location and velocity cannot be known with certainty. The resolution of these points may come from a better understanding of general relativity [*[http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0506506 [astro-ph/0506506 Singularity-Free Collapse through Local Inflation ]*] .**Candidate theories**There are a number of proposed quantum gravity theories. [

*A timeline and overview can be found in Harvnb|Rovelli|2000.*] Currently, there is still no complete and consistent quantum theory of gravity, and the candidate models still need to overcome major formal and conceptual problems. They also face the common problem that, as yet, there is no way to put quantum gravity predictions to experimental tests, although there is hope for this to change as future data from cosmological observations and particle physics experiments becomes available. [*E.g. Harvnb|Ashtekar|2007, Harvnb|Schwarz|2007.*]**tring theory**One suggestive starting point are ordinary quantum field theories which, after all, are successful in describing the other three basic fundamental forces in the context of the

standard model ofelementary particle physics . However, while this leads to an acceptable effective (quantum) field theory of gravity at low energies, [*See Harvnb|Donoghue|1995.*] gravity turns out to be much more problematic at higher energies. Where, for ordinary field theories such asquantum electrodynamics , a technique known asrenormalization is an integral part of deriving predictions which take into account higher-energy contributions, [*Cf. chapters 17 and 18 of Harvnb|Weinberg|1996.*] gravity turns out to benonrenormalizable : at high energies, applying the recipes of ordinary quantum field theory yields models that are devoid of all predictive power. [*Cf. Harvnb|Goroff|Sagnotti|1985.*]One attempt to overcome these limitations is to replace ordinary quantum field theory, which is based on the classical concept of a

point particle , with a quantum theory of one-dimensional extended objects:string theory . [*An accessible introduction at the undergraduate level can be found in Harvnb|Zwiebach|2004; more complete overviews can be found in Harvnb|Polchinski|1998a and Harvnb|Polchinski|1998b.*] At the energies reached in current experiments, these strings are indistinguishable from point-like particles, but, crucially, differentmodes of oscillation of one and the same type of fundamental string appear as particles with different (electric and other)charge s. In this way, string theory promises to be a unified description of all particles and interactions. [*E.g. Harvnb|Ibanez|2000.*] The theory is successful in that one mode will always correspond to agraviton , themessenger particle of gravity; however, the price to pay are unusual features such as sixextra dimension s of space in addition to the usual three. [*For the graviton as part of the string spectrum, e.g. Harvnb|Green|Schwarz|Witten|1987|loc=sec. 2.3 and 5.3; for the extra dimensions, ibid sec. 4.2.*] In what is called thesecond superstring revolution , it was conjectured that both string theory and a unification of general relativity andsupersymmetry known assupergravity [*E.g. Harvnb|Weinberg|2000|loc=ch. 31.*] form part of a hypothesized eleven-dimensional model known asM-theory , which would constitute a uniquely defined and consistent theory of quantum gravity. [*E.g. Harvnb|Townsend|1996, Harvnb|Duff|1996.*]**Loop quantum gravity**Another approach to quantum gravity starts with the

canonical quantization procedures of quantum theory. Starting with the initial-value-formulation of general relativity (cf. the section on evolution equations, above), the result is an analogue of theSchrödinger equation : theWheeler-deWitt equation which, regrettably, turns out to be ill-defined. [*Cf. section 3 in Harvnb|Kuchař|1973.*] A major break-through came with the introduction of what are now known asAshtekar variables , which represent geometric gravity using mathematical analogues of electric andmagnetic field s. [*See Harvnb|Ashtekar|1986, Harvnb|Ashtekar|1987.*] The resulting candidate for a theory of quantum gravity isLoop quantum gravity , in which space is represented by a network structure called aspin network , evolving over time in discrete steps. [*For a review, see Harvnb|Thiemann|2006; more extensive accounts can be found in Harvnb|Rovelli|1998, Harvnb|Ashtekar|Lewandowski|2004 as well as in the lecture notes Harvnb|Thiemann|2003.*]**Other candidates**There are a number of other approaches to quantum gravity. The approaches differ depending on which features of general relativity and quantum theory are accepted unchanged, and which features are modified [

*See e.g. the systematic expositions in Harvnb|Isham|1994 and Harvnb|Sorkin|1997.*] . Examples include:*

Acoustic metric and other analog models of gravity

*An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything

* Causal Dynamical Triangulation

* Dynamical triangulations, [*See Harvnb|Loll|1998.*]

*Causal set s, [*See Harvnb|Sorkin|2005.*]

* The Omega Point and the quantum gravity Theory of Everything

*Noncommutative geometry

* path-integral based models ofquantum cosmology . [*Cf. Harvnb|Hawking|1987.*]

*Regge calculus

*Supergravity

*Twistor models [*See ch. 33 in Harvnb|Penrose|2004 and references therein.*]**Weinberg-Witten theorem**There is a theorem in

quantum field theory called theWeinberg-Witten theorem which places some constraints on theories ofcomposite gravity /emergent gravity .**In popular culture*** The famous spoof of

postmodernism byAlan Sokal (seeSokal Affair ) was entitled "Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity".

* Quantum gravity is said to be the reason behind the dual realities in theanime filmThe Place Promised in Our Early Days .

*Hard science fiction authorGreg Egan proposed in his short story " [*http://www.gregegan.net/PLANCK/Complete/Planck.html The Planck Dive*] " a concept of quantum gravity in whichspacetime itself is a function of networks of all possibleworld lines and gravity is merely the alteration of probabilities associated with individual worldlines according the increased or decreased incidences of quantumphase shift due totime dilation which is a result of interactions withvirtual particle s.**See also**

*Centauro event

*Hawking Radiation

*M-theory

*Quantum field theory in curved spacetime

*Semiclassical gravity

*List of quantum gravity researchers

*Abraham-Lorentz force

*Invariance mechanics

*Black hole electron **Notes****References***Citation

last=Ashtekar

first=Abhay

authorlink=Abhay Ashtekar

title=Loop Quantum Gravity: Four Recent Advances and a Dozen Frequently Asked Questions

id=arXiv|0705.2222

year=2007

*Citation

last=Ashtekar

first=Abhay

authorlink=Abhay Ashtekar

first2=Jerzy

last2=Lewandowski

title=Background Independent Quantum Gravity: A Status Report

journal=Class. Quant. Grav.

volume=21

year=2004

pages=R53–R152

id=arxiv|gr-qc|0404018

doi=10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/R01

*Citation

last=Ashtekar

first=Abhay

authorlink=Abhay Ashtekar

title=New variables for classical and quantum gravity

journal=Phys. Rev. Lett.

volume=57

pages=2244–2247

year=1986

doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2244

*Citation

last=Ashtekar

first=Abhay

authorlink=Abhay Ashtekar

title=New Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity

journal=Phys. Rev.

volume=D36

pages=1587–1602

year=1987

doi=10.1103/PhysRevD.36.1587

*Citation

last=Carlip

first=Steven

title=Quantum Gravity: a Progress Report

journal=Rept.Prog.Phys.

volume=64

year=2001

pages=885

id=arxiv|gr-qc|0108040

doi=10.1088/0034-4885/64/8/301

*Citation

last = Donoghue

first=John F.

contribution=Introduction to the Effective Field Theory Description of Gravity

year=1995

id=arxiv|gr-qc|9512024

editor-last=Cornet

editor-first=Fernando

title=Effective Theories: Proceedings of the Advanced School, Almunecar, Spain, 26 June–1 July 1995

isbn=9810229089

*Citation

last=Duff

first=Michael

authorlink=Michael Duff

title=M-Theory (the Theory Formerly Known as Strings)

journal=Int. J. Mod. Phys.

volume=A11

year=1996

pages=5623–5642

id=arxiv|hep-th|9608117

*Citation

last=Goroff

first=Marc H.

last2=Sagnotti

first2=Augusto

title=Quantum gravity at two loops

year=1985

journal=Phys. Lett.

volume=160B

pages=81–86

*Citation

last=Hawking

first=Stephen W.

authorlink=Stephen Hawking

contribution=Quantum cosmology

pages =631–651

editor2-last=Israel

editor2-first=Werner

editor1-last=Hawking

editor1-first=Stephen W.

title=300 Years of Gravitation

publisher=Cambridge University Press

year=1987

isbn=0-521-37976-8

*Citation

last=Ibanez

first=L. E.

title=The second string (phenomenology) revolution

journal=Class. Quant. Grav.

volume=17

year=2000

pages=1117–1128

id=arxiv|hep-th|9911499

doi=10.1088/0264-9381/17/5/321

*Citation

last=Isham

first=Christopher J.

contribution=Prima facie questions in quantum gravity

editor-last=Ehlers

editor-first=Jürgen

editor2-last=Friedrich

editor2-first=Helmut

title=Canonical Gravity: From Classical to Quantum

year=1994

publisher=Springer

isbn=3-540-58339-4

*Citation

last=Kuchař

first=Karel

contribution=Canonical Quantization of Gravity

editor-last=Israel

editor-first=Werner

title=Relativity, Astrophysics and Cosmology

year=1973

publisher=D. Reidel

pages=237–288

isbn=90-277-0369-8

*Citation

last=Loll

first=Renate

title=Discrete Approaches to Quantum Gravity in Four Dimensions

journal=Living Rev. Relativity

volume=1

year=1998

url=http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-1998-13

access-date=2008-03-09

*Citation

last=Polchinski

first=Joseph

authorlink=Joseph Polchinski

year=1998a

title=String Theory Vol. I: An Introduction to the Bosonic String

publisher=Cambridge University Press

isbn=0-521-63303-6

*Citation

last=Polchinski

first=Joseph

authorlink=Joseph Polchinski

year=1998b

title=String Theory Vol. II: Superstring Theory and Beyond

publisher=Cambridge University Press

isbn=0-521-63304-4

*Citation |title=Quantum Gravity | last=Rovelli

first=Carlo | authorlink=Carlo Rovelli

url=http://books.google.com/books?id=HrAzTmXdssQC&pg=PA179&dq=%22relativistic+%22+Lagrangian+OR+Hamiltonian&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=ACfU3U3TLyr3CXsHYKFUGDe1dpq5ZWm_kg#PPA98,M1

isbn=0521837332 |year=2004 |publisher=Cambridge University Press

*Citation

last=Rovelli

first=Carlo

authorlink=Carlo Rovelli

year=2000

title=Notes for a brief history of quantum gravity

id=arxiv|gr-qc|0006061

*Citation

last=Rovelli

first=Carlo

authorlink=Carlo Rovelli

title=Loop Quantum Gravity

journal=Living Rev. Relativity

volume=1

year=1998

url=http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-1998-1

access-date=2008-03-13

*Citation

last=Schwarz

first=John H.

title=String Theory: Progress and Problems

year=2007

id=arXiv|hep-th|0702219

*Citation

last=Sorkin

first=Rafael D.

authorlink= Rafael Sorkin

contribution=Causal Sets: Discrete Gravity

id=arxiv|gr-qc|0309009

editor-first=Andres

editor-last=Gomberoff

editor2-first=Donald

editor2-last=Marolf

title=Lectures on Quantum Gravity

year=2005

publisher=Springer

isbn=0-387-23995-2

*Citation

last=Sorkin

first=Rafael D.

authorlink= Rafael Sorkin

title=Forks in the Road, on the Way to Quantum Gravity

id=arxiv|gr-qc|9706002

journal=Int. J. Theor. Phys.

volume=36

year=1997

pages=2759–2781

doi=10.1007/BF02435709

*Citation

last=Thiemann

first=Thomas

title=Loop Quantum Gravity: An Inside View

year=2006

id=arxiv|hep-th|0608210

*Citation

last=Thiemann

first=Thomas

title=Lectures on Loop Quantum Gravity

year=2003

journal=Lect. Notes Phys.

volume=631

pages=41–135

*Citation

last=Townsend

first=Paul K.

title=Four Lectures on M-Theory

year=1996

id=arxiv|hep-th|9612121

*Citation

last=Trifonov

first=Vladimir

title=GR-friendly description of quantum systems

year=2008

journal=Int. J. Theor. Phys.

volume=47 (2)

pages=492–510

doi=10.1007/s10773-007-9474-3

*Citation

last=Weinberg

first=Steven

authorlink=Steven Weinberg

title=The Quantum Theory of Fields II: Modern Applications

publisher=Cambridge University Press

year=1996

isbn=0-521-55002-5

*Citation

last=Zwiebach

first=Barton

authorlink= Barton Zwiebach

title=A First Course in String Theory

publisher=Cambridge University Press

year=2004

isbn=0-521-83143-1**External links*** [

*http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/Outreach/What_We_Research/Quantum_Gravity/ Quantum Gravity*] Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics

* [*http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9310031 Prima facie questions in quantum gravity*] Chris J. Isham

* [*http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/quantum-gravity/ Quantum Gravity*] in [*http://plato.stanford.edu Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy*]

* [*http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18725101.800 The shape of things to come*]New Scientist , July 30 2005

* [*http://xstructure.inr.ac.ru/x-bin/theme2.py?arxiv=gr-qc&level=4&index1=0 Quantum gravity articles*]

* [*http://www.qgravity.org/ Quantum Gravity pages by Lee Smolin*] (no longer active, archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20060428001322/http://www.qgravity.org/)

*Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.*

### Look at other dictionaries:

**quantum gravity**— noun : a quantum theory of the gravitational field ; specifically : a theory thought by physicists to be possible which would combine general relativity with quantum mechanics … Useful english dictionary**quantum gravity**— noun A branch of theoretical physics aiming to unite quantum mechanics with general relativity … Wiktionary**quantum gravity**— The theory that would unify gravitational physics with modern quantum field theory … Dictionary of automotive terms**Quantum gravity epoch**— In physical cosmology, the quantum gravity epoch is the first era in the history of the Universe according to the standard Big Bang cosmology. In this era, the effects of quantum gravity such as fluctuating topology of space are commonplace. The… … Wikipedia**Loop quantum gravity**— Not to be confused with the path integral formulation of LQG, see spin foam. This article is about LQG in its Canonical formulation.. Beyond the Standard Model … Wikipedia**History of loop quantum gravity**— General relativity is the theory of gravitation published by Albert Einstein in 1915. According to it, the force of gravity is a manifestation of the local geometry of spacetime. Mathematically, the theory is modelled after Bernhard Riemann s… … Wikipedia**List of quantum gravity researchers**— This is a list of (some of) the researchers in quantum gravity.* Jan Ambjørn: Expert on dynamical triangulations who helped develop the causal dynamical triangulations approach to quantum gravity. * Abhay Ashtekar: Inventor of the Ashtekar… … Wikipedia**Loop Quantum Gravity**— Die Theorie der Schleifenquantengravitation (engl. loop quantum gravity), auch Loop Quantengravitation oder Loop Theorie genannt, ist ein Ansatz für eine Theorie der Quantengravitation, d. h. eine Theorie zur Vereinigung der Quantenphysik mit der … Deutsch Wikipedia**Classical and Quantum Gravity**— Abbreviated title (ISO) … Wikipedia**Classical and Quantum Gravity**— Titre abrégé Class. Quantum Gravity Discipline Gravitation Langue Anglais … Wikipédia en Français