- Runic transliteration and transcription
Runic transliteration and transcription are part of analysing a runic inscription. Usually scholars both transliterate the runes into Latin letters, transcribe into a normalized spelling in the language of the inscription and translate the inscription into the language they write in.
There is a long standing practice to write transliterations in
boldfaceand to transcribe the text in " Italic type" since the two forms of rendering a runic text have to be kept distinct.Antonsen, Elmer H. (2002). "Runes and Germanic Linguistics". New York, Berlin: de Gruyter. ISBN: 3-110-17462-6 p. 85]
By not only showing the original inscription, but also transliterating, transcribing and translating, scholars present the analysis in a way that allows the reader to follow their interpretation of the runes. Every step has its challenges, but most
Younger Futharkinscriptions are quite easy to interprete. Most Scandinavians can learn to read runic inscriptions with a little training. The Elder Futharkinscriptions, however, are much more challenging and they demand a great deal of knowledge in historical linguistics. Standard works such as Sveriges runinskriftercontain extensive presentations of the ways inscriptions have been interpreted throughout the centuries. [http://www.raa.se/cms/extern/kulturarv/arkeologi_och_fornlamningar/runstenar/att_lasa_runor_och_runinskrifter.html "Att läsa runor och runinskrifter"] on the site of the Swedish National Heritage Board, retrieved May 10, 2008.]
Transliteration means that the runes are represented by a corresponding Latin letter in bold. No consideration is given to the sound the rune represented in the actual inscription, and a good example of this is the ansuz rune , which could vary greatly in shape. In the oldest Younger Futhark inscriptions, it always represented a nasal a, as in French "an", but later it came to represent other phonemes such as /o/. However, some
runemasters continued to use the ansuz rune for an "a" phoneme. The ansuz rune is always transliterated as o from the Younger Futhark, and consequently, the transliteration mon represents Old Norse "man" in a runestone from Bällsta, and hon represents Old Norse "han" in the Frösö Runestone, while forþom represents Old Norse "forðom" in an inscription from Replösa.
Sometimes the runes are "dotted" which means that a dot has been added, and in transliterations dotted runes are treated differently from ordinary runes. Dotted u, k and i are transliterated as y, g and e in spite of the fact that they are rather variations of the non-dotted runes than runes in their own right.
Bind runes are marked with an arch. Some bind runes look in a way that makes it impossible to know which rune preceded the other, and then the scholar has to test the various combinations that give a comprehensible word. Thus all transliterations of bind runes are scholarly interpretations.
Transcription or normalization
The runes are transcribed into normalized spellings of the languages the runes were written in, and normalizations are rendered with italics. Since a single rune may represent several different phonemes, normalizations can differ greatly from transliterations. The þ rune can represent both the Old Norse letter "ð" (as in English "the") or "þ" (as in English "thing").
Notes and references
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Runic inscription N 351 — s.Transcription*þo=rir * ræist * runa=r * þessa=r * þan * olaus*mess*o=æpþa=n ¶ ...r han * fo=r * he=r um ¶ ÷ bæþe= =ge=rþo= =no=(r)ne=r * uæl * o=k * il=la * mikla * møþe ¶ g skapaþu * þær merTransliteration*Þórir reist rúnar þessar þann… … Wikipedia
Östergötland Runic Inscription 224 — The south side of inscription Ög 224. The north side of inscription Ög 224 … Wikipedia
Alu (runic) — Alu is a Germanic charm word appearing on numerous runic inscriptions found in Central and Northern Europe dating from between 200 and 800 CE. The word – the most common of the early runic charm wordsMacleod (2006:1009).] – usually appears either … Wikipedia
Snottsta and Vreta stones — The Snottsta and Vreta stones are individual runestones known as U 329, U 330, U 331 and U 332. They are found on the homesteads of Snottsta (also spelled Snåttsta) and Vreta, and they tell in Old Norse with the younger futhark about the family… … Wikipedia
Danish Runic Inscription 66 — Runestone Name Mask Stone … Wikipedia
Hargs bro runic inscriptions — Main article: Jarlabanke Runestones The Hargs bro runic inscriptions, or U 309, U 310 and U 311, are 11th century Younger Futhark inscriptions in Old Norse on bedrock in Skånela Parish, Uppland, Sweden. U 309 and U 310 constitute a twin monument… … Wikipedia
Danish Runic Inscription 107 — The runestone from Egå. Danish Runic Inscription 107 or DR 107 is the Rundata listing for a Viking Age memorial runestone that was found at Egå, Denmark. Contents … Wikipedia
Danish Runic Inscription 48 — Drawing of DR 48 published in 1868. Danish Runic Inscription 48 or DR 48 is the Rundata catalog number for a Viking Age memorial runestone from Hanning, which is about eight kilometers north of Skjern, Denmark. Th … Wikipedia
Östergötland Runic Inscription 43 — Inscription Ög 43 in Ingelstad, Östergötland, Sweden. Östergötland Runic Inscription 43 or Ög 43 is the Rundata catalog number for a Viking Age runic inscription that is carved on a rockface in Ingelstad, which is just north of No … Wikipedia
Uppland Rune Inscriptions 101, 143 and 147 — Main article Jarlabanke Runestones The runestones known as U 101, U 143 and U 147, are located in south western Täby, in the parishes of Sollentuna and Täby, in Uppland, Sweden. They are all in the style Pr4 and thus dated to the period 1060 1100 … Wikipedia