Iran-Contra affair


Iran-Contra affair

The Iran-Contra affair was a political scandal which was revealed in November 1986 as a result of earlier events during the Reagan administration. It began as an operation to increase U.S.-Iranian relations, wherein Israel would ship weapons to a moderate, politically influential group of Iranians opposed to the Ayatollah Khomeini; the U.S. would reimburse Israel for those weapons and receive payment from Israel. The moderate Iranians agreed to do everything in their power to achieve the release of six U.S. hostages, who were being held by Hezbollah. The plan eventually deteriorated into an arms-for-hostages scheme, in which members of the executive branch sold weapons to Iran in exchange for the release of the American hostages, without the direct authorization of President Ronald Reagan. Large modifications to the plan were conjured by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council in late 1985. In North's plan, a portion of the proceeds from the weapon sales was diverted to fund anti-Sandinista and anti-communist rebels, or Contras, in Nicaragua. [cite web|author=Hart, Robert|title=NYT's apologies miss the point|publisher=The Consortium for Independent Journalism, Inc|date=June 2, 2004|url=http://www.consortiumnews.com/2004/060204.html|accessdate=2008-06-07] While President Ronald Reagan was a supporter of the Contra cause, [Reagan, Ronald (1990), p. 542] there has not been any evidence uncovered showing that he authorized this plan.cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/213195.stm|title=Reagan's mixed White House legacy|date=June 6, 2004|accessdate=2008-04-22|publisher=BBC]

After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Ronald Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages.cite web |author=Reagan, Ronald|authorlink=Ronald Reagan|title=Address to the Nation on the Iran Arms and Contra Aid Controversy|publisher=Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation|date=November 13, 1986|url=http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1986/111386c.htm|accessdate=2008-06-07] The investigation was compounded when large volumes of documents relating to the scandal were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials.cite web|title=Excerpts From the Iran-Contra Report: A Secret Foreign Policy|work=The New York Times|date=1994|url=http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/29/reviews/iran-transcript.html|accessdate=2008-06-07] On March 4, 1987, Reagan returned to the airwaves in a nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for any actions that he was unaware of, and admitting that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages."cite web|author=Reagan, Ronald|authorlink=Ronald Reagan|title =Address to the Nation on the Iran Arms and Contra Aid Controversy|publisher=Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation|date=March 4, 1987|url=http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/1987/030487h.htm|accessdate=2008-06-07]

Many investigations ensued, including those by the United States Congress and the three-man, Reagan-appointed Tower Commission. Neither could find any evidence that Reagan himself knew of the extent of the multiple programs. In the end, fourteen administration officials were charged with crimes, and eleven convicted, including then-Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger. [cite news|work=Business Week|url=http://www.businessweek.com/1997/25/b353254.htm|title=Pointing a Finger at Reagan|accessdate=2008-04-22|author=Dwyer, Paula] They were all pardoned in the final days of the George H. W. Bush presidency, who had been vice-president at the time. [cite web|url=http://www.usdoj.gov/pardon/bushgrants.htm|title=Pardons and Commutations Granted by President George H. W. Bush|accessdate=2008-04-22|publisher=United States Department of Justice]

The affair

The affair is composed of two matters: arms sales to Iran, and funding of Contra militants in Nicaragua. Direct funding of the Nicaraguan rebels had been made illegal through the Boland Amendment.cite web|url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/PS157/assignment%20files%20public/congressional%20report%20key%20sections.htm|title=The Iran-Contra Report|accessdate=2008-05-17|publisher=The American Presidency Project] The affair emerged when a Lebanese newspaper reported that the U.S. sold arms to Iran through Israel in exchange for the release of hostages by Hezbollah. Letters sent by Oliver North to John Poindexter support this.cite web|url=http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/episodes/18/archive/|title=Iran-Contra: White House e-mail|publisher=CNN|accessdate=2008-06-07] The Israeli ambassador to the U.S. says that the reason weapons were eventually sold directly to Iran was to establish links with elements of the military in the country. The Contras did not receive all of their finances from arms sales, but also through drug trafficking.cite web| title=The Contras, cocaine, and covert operations: Documentation of official U.S. knowledge of drug trafficking and the Contras|publisher= The National Security Archive/George Washington University|url=http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB2/nsaebb2.htm|accessdate=2008-06-07]

Hostage taking

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, the Middle East was faced with frequent hostage-taking incidents by hostile organizations. In 1979, Iranian students took hostage 52 employees of the United States embassy in Iran. On January 20, 1981, the day Ronald Reagan became President, the hostages were freed following the Algiers Accords. This was not the end of hostage taking in the Middle East. In 1983, members of Al-Dawa, an exiled Iraqi political party turned militant organization, were imprisoned for their part in a series of truck bombs in Kuwait. In response to the imprisonment, Hezbollah, an ally of Al-Dawa, took 30 Western hostages between 1982 and 1992, many of whom were American. [cite news| last = Seden| first = Gil | title = Who is Hezbollah? | date = July 14, 2006 | url =http://www.ajn.com.au/news/news.asp?pgID=1113|accessdate=2008-06-11|work=The Australian Jewish News]

Arms transactions

Michael Ledeen, a consultant of National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane, requested assistance from Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres for help in the sale of arms to Iran. At the time, Iran was in the midst of the Iran–Iraq War and could find few Western nations willing to supply it with weapons.cite web|title=Military history of the Iran–Iraq War, 1980-1988|publisher=GlobalSecurity.org|date=2005|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/iran-iraq.htm|accessdate=2008-06-07] The idea behind the plan was for Israel to ship weapons through an intermediary (identified as Manucher Ghorbanifar) to a moderate, politically influential Iranian group opposed to the Ayatollah Khomeni; after the transaction, the U.S. would reimburse Israel with the same weapons, while receiving monetary benefits. The Israeli government required that the sale of arms meet high level approval from the United States government, and when Robert McFarlane convinced them that the U.S. government approved the sale, Israel obliged by agreeing to sell the arms.cite web|title=The Iran-Contra affair|publisher=The American-Israeli Cooperative Enterprise|url=http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/Iran_Contra_Affair.html|accessdate=2008-06-07]

In 1985, President Reagan entered Bethesda Naval Hospital for colon cancer surgery. While the President was recovering in the hospital, McFarlane met with and told him that Representatives from Israel had contacted the National Security Agency to pass on confidential information from a sect of moderate, politically influential Iranians opposed to the Ayatollah.Reagan, Ronald (1990), p. 504] These Iranians sought to establish a quiet relationship with the United States, before establishing formal relationships upon the death of the Ayatollah. McFarlane told Reagan that the Iranians, to demonstrate their seriousness, offered to persuade the Hezbollah terrorists to release the seven U.S. hostages.Reagan, Ronald (1990), p. 505] Reagan allowed McFarlane to meet with the Israeli intermediaries because he believed that establishing relations with a strategically located country, and preventing the Soviet Union from doing the same, was a beneficial move. [ [http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/chap_24.htm Walsh Iran / Contra Report - Chapter 24 The Investigation of State Department Officials: Shultz, Hill and Platt ] Retrieved on 2008-06-07]

Following the Israeli-U.S. meeting, Israel requested permission from the U.S. to sell a small number of TOW antitank missiles (Tube-launched, Optically-tracked, Wire-guided) to the moderate Iranians, saying that it would demonstrate that the group actually had high-level connections to the U.S. government. Reagan initially rejected the plan, until Israel sent information to the U.S. showing that the moderate Iranians were opposed to terrorism and had fought against it. [Reagan, Ronald (1990), p. 506] Now having a reason to trust the moderates, Reagan approved the transaction, which was meant to be between Israel and the moderates in Iran, with the U.S. reimbursing Israel. In his 1990 autobiography "An American Life", Reagan states that he was deeply committed to securing the release of the hostages; it was this compassion that motivated his support for the arms initiatives. The president requested that the moderate Iranians do everything in their capability to free the hostages held by Hezbollah. [cite news|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE6DB1531F934A15752C1A96E948260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all|title=Arms for Hostages — Plain and Simple|date=November 27, 1988|work=The New York Times|author=Butterfield, Fox|accessdate=2008-04-22]

According to "The New York Times", the United States supplied the following arms to Iran: [ [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE3DB173EF93AA25752C1A961948260 "Iran-Contra Report; Arms, Hostages and Contras: How a Secret Foreign Policy Unraveled" March 16, 1984] . Retrieved on 2008-06-07]
*August 20, 1985. 96 TOW anti-tank missiles
*September 14, 1985. 408 more TOWs
*November 24, 1985. 18 Hawk anti-aircraft missiles
*February 17, 1986. 500 TOWs
*February 27, 1986. 500 TOWs
*May 24, 1986. 508 TOWs, 240 Hawk spare parts
*August 4, 1986. More Hawk spares
*October 28, 1986. 500 TOWs

First arms sale

In July 1985, Israel sent American-made BGM-71 TOW antitank missiles to Iran through an arms dealer named Manucher Ghorbanifar, a friend of Iran's Prime Minister. Hours after receiving the weapons, one hostage, the Reverend Benjamin Weir was released.

Arrow Air 1285 crash

After a botched delivery of Hawk missiles, and a failed London meeting between McFarlane and Manucher Ghorbanifar, Arrow Air Flight 1285, a plane containing nearly 250 American servicemen, crashed in Newfoundland on December 12, 1985. On the day of the crash, responsibility was claimed by the Islamic Jihad Organization, a wing of Hezbollah that had taken credit for the kidnapping of the very Americans in Lebanon whom the Reagan administration sought to have released. [cite news|author=Watson, Laurie|title=Errors By Crew Reportedly Cited In Gander Crash|publisher="The Philadelphia Inquirer"|work=United Press International|date=November 6, 1988|page=A33|accessdate=2008-05-17] The crash came on the fourth anniversary of another attack for which Islamic Jihad took credit: the near-simultaneous bombings of six targets in Kuwait, the French and American Embassies among them. Members of Hezbollah had participated in, and were jailed for, those attacks, but most of the conspirators were members of al-Dawa. The accident was investigated by the Canadian Aviation Safety Board (CASB), and was determined to have been caused by the aircraft's unexpectedly high drag and reduced lift condition, which was most likely due to ice contamination.cite news|url=http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2005/12/12/Air-Arrow-051212.html|title=Ceremonies mark anniversary of deadly Newfoundland air crash|publisher=CBC|date=December 12, 2005|accessdate=2008-06-11] However, a 2007 article presents evidence of Iran's complicity.cite web|last=Thrall|first=Nathan|title=How the Reagan Administration Taught Iran the Wrong Lessons|publisher=Middle East Review of International Affairs|month=June|year=2007|url=http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2007/issue2/jv11no2a5.html|accessdate=2007-06-11]

Modifications in plans

Robert McFarlane resigned on December 5, 1985,cite web|title=United States v. Robert C. McFarlane|publisher=Independent Council for Iran/Contra Matters|date=1993|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/reports/1993/walsh/chap_01.htm|accessdate=2008-06-07] citing that he wanted to spend more time with his family; [Reagan, Ronald (1990), p. 509] he was replaced by Admiral John Poindexter.

Two days later, Reagan met with his advisors at the White House, where a new plan was introduced. This one called for a slight change in the arms transactions: instead of the weapons going to the moderate Iranian group, they would go to moderate Iranian army leaders.Reagan, Ronald (1990), p. 510] As the weapons were delivered from Israel by air, the hostages held by Hezbollah would be released. Israel would still pay the United States for reimbursing the weapons. Though staunchly opposed by Secretary of State George Shultz and Secretary of Defense Caspar Weinberger, Reagan authorized the plan, stating that, "We were "not" trading arms for hostages, nor were we negotiating with terrorists." [Reagan, Ronald (1990), p. 512] Now retired National Security Advisor McFarlane flew to London to meet with Israelis and Ghorbanifar in an attempt to persuade the Iranian to use his influence to release the hostages before any arms transactions occurred; this plan was rejected by Ghorbanifar.

On the day of McFarlane's resignation, Oliver North, a military aide to the United States National Security Council (NSC), proposed a new plan for selling arms to Iran, which included two major adjustments: instead of selling arms through Israel, the sale was to be direct, and a portion of the proceeds would go to Contras, or Nicaraguan guerilla fighters opposed to communism, at a markup. North proposed a $15 million markup, while contracted arms broker Ghorbanifar added a 41% markup of his own. [cite web|last=Walsh|first=Lawrence|title=Vol. I: Investigations and prosecutions|work=Final report of the independent counsel for Iran/Contra matters|publisher=Independent Council for Iran/Contra Matters|date=1993-08-04|url=http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/chap_16.htm|accessdate=2008-06-07] Other members of the NSC were in favor of North's plan; with large support, Poindexter authorized it without notifying President Reagan, and it went into effect.cite web|last=Avery|first=Steve|title=Irangate: Iran-Contra affair, 1985-1992|publisher=U-S-History.com|date=2005|url=http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1889.html|accessdate=2008-06-07] At first, the Iranians refused to buy the arms at the inflated price because of the excessive markup imposed by North and Ghorbanifar. They eventually relented, and in February 1986, 1,000 TOW missiles were shipped to the country. From May to November 1986, there were additional shipments of miscellaneous weapons and parts.

Both the sale of weapons to Iran, and the funding of the Contras, attempted to circumvent not only stated administration policy, but also the Boland Amendment. Administration officials argued that regardless of the Congress restricting the funds for the Contras, or any affair, the President (or in this case the administration) could carry on by seeking alternative means of funding such as private entities and foreign governments.cite journal|author=Fisher, Louis|date=October 1989|title=How Tightly Can Congress Draw the Purse Strings?|journal=American Journal of International Law|volume=83|issue=4|pages=758–766|url=http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9300(198910)83%3A4%3C758%3AHTCCDT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-N|accessdate=2006-10-10|month=Oct|year=1989|doi=10.2307/2203364] Funding from one foreign country, Brunei, was botched when North's secretary, Fawn Hall, transposed the numbers of North's Swiss bank account number. A Swiss businessman, suddenly $10 million richer, alerted the authorities of the mistake. The money was eventually returned to the Sultan of Brunei, with interest.cite web
last =
first =
authorlink =
coauthors =
title = Iran Contra Hearings; Brunei Regains $10 Million
work =
publisher = New York Times
date = 1987-07-22
accessdate = 2008-03-28
url = http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DEED7133DF931A15754C0A961948260
]

On January 7, 1986, John Poindexter proposed to the president a modification of the approved plan: instead of negotiating with the moderate Iranian political group, the U.S. would negotiate with moderate members of the Iranian government.Reagan, Ronald (1990), p. 516] Poindexter told Reagan that Ghorbanifar had important connections within the Iranian government, so with the hope of the release of the hostages, Reagan approved this plan as well. Throughout February 1986, weapons were shipped directly to Iran by the United States (as part of Oliver North's plan, without the knowledge of President Reagan) and none of the hostages were released. Retired National Security Advisor McFarlane conducted another international voyage, this one to Tehran. He met directly with the moderate Iranian political group that sought to establish U.S.-Iranian relations in an attempt to free the four remaining hostages.Reagan, Ronald (1990), pp. 520-521] This meeting also failed. The members requested demands such as Israel's withdrawal from the Golan Heights, which the United States rejected.

"Operation Donation"

"Operation Donation" involved systematic Insurance fraud; planes and boats needed by the Contras "disappear," allowing owners to claim insurance.cite news | first=Sam Smith (journalist)/Sam Smith | last= | coauthors= | title=Arkansas Connections 1950- 1989 | date= | publisher= | url =http://www.prorev.com/connex.htm | work =Progressive Review | pages = | accessdate = 2008-07-07 | language = ]

ubsequent dealings

In late July 1986, Hezbollah released another hostage, Father Lawrence Martin Jenco, former head of Catholic Relief Services in Lebanon. Following this, William Casey, head of the CIA, requested that the U.S. authorize sending a shipment of small missile parts to Iranian military forces as a way of expressing gratitude. Casey also justified this request by stating that the contact in the Iranian government might otherwise lose face, or be executed, and hostages killed. Reagan authorized the shipment to ensure that those potential events would not occur.Reagan, Ronald (1990), p. 523]

In September and October 1986 three more Americans — Frank Reed, Joseph Ciccipio, Edward Tracy — were abducted in Lebanon by a separate terrorist group. The reasons for their abduction are unknown, although it is speculated that they were kidnapped to replace the freed Americans. [Ranstorp, Magnus, Hizb'allah in Lebanon: The Politics of the Western Hostage Crisis, New York, St. Martins Press, 1997 pp. 98-99] One more original hostage, David Jacobsen, was later released. The captors promised to released the remaining two, but the release never happened. [Reagan, Ronald (1990), pp. 526-527]

Discovery and scandal

After a leak by Iranian radical Mehdi Hashemi, the Lebanese magazine "Ash-Shiraa" exposed the arrangement on November 3, 1986.cite web | last = Cave | first = George | title = Why Secret 1986 U.S.-Iran “Arms for Hostages” Negotiations Failed | publisher = Washington Report on Middle Eastern Affairs | accessdate = 2007-01-09 | url = http://www.wrmea.com/backissues/0994/9409008.htm] This was the first public reporting of the weapons-for-hostages deal. The operation was discovered only after an airlift of guns was downed over Nicaragua. Eugene Hasenfus, who was captured by Nicaraguan authorities, initially alleged in a press conference on Nicaraguan soil that two of his coworkers, Max Gomez and Ramon Medina, worked for the Central Intelligence Agency.cite news|url=http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50717F83B5E0C718DDDA90994DE484D81&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fOrganizations%2fC%2fCentral%20Intelligence%20Agency%20|title = IN SUMMARY; Nicaragua Downs Plane and Survivor Implicates C.I.A|work=The New York Times|accessdate=2008-06-07] He later said he did not know whether they did or not.cite news|url=http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50714FD3D550C708CDDA80994DE484D81&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fOrganizations%2fC%2fCentral%20Intelligence%20Agency%20|title = Hasenfus Tempers Comments on CIA|work=The New York Times|accessdate=2008-06-07] The Iranian government confirmed the "Ash-Shiraa" story, and ten days after the story was first published, President Ronald Reagan appeared on national television from the Oval Office. In his speech on November 13, Reagan confirmed the transactions and stated the reasons for them:

"My purpose was... to send a signal that the United States was prepared to replace the animosity between [the U.S. and Iran] with a new relationship... At the same time we undertook this initiative, we made clear that Iran must oppose all forms of international terrorism as a condition of progress in our relationship. The most significant step which Iran could take, we indicated, would be to use its influence in Lebanon to secure the release of all hostages held there."

The scandal was compounded when Oliver North destroyed or hid pertinent documents between November 21 and November 25, 1986. During North's trial in 1989, his secretary Fawn Hall testified extensively about helping North alter, shred, and remove official United States National Security Council (NSC) documents from the White House. According to "The New York Times", enough documents were put into a government shredder to jam it. North's explanation for destroying some documents was to protect the lives of individuals involved in Iran and Contra operations. North said that he gathered documents that indicated he had sufficient authority for his actions. He took more than a dozen notebooks containing 2617 pages of names, phone conversations, meetings, lists of action items, and details on operations recorded from January 1, 1984 to November 25, 1986, including highly classified information. It wasn't until years after the trial that North's notebooks were made public, and only after the National Security Archive and Public Citizen sued the Office of the Independent Council under the Freedom of Information Act.cite web|last=Walsh|first=Lawrence|title=Vol. I: Investigations and prosecutions|work=Final report of the independent counsel for Iran/Contra matters|publisher=Independent Council for Iran/Contra Matters|date=August 4, 1993|url=http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh/chap_16.htm|accessdate=2008-06-07]

During the trial North testified that on November 21, 22, or 24, he witnessed Poindexter destroy what may have been the only signed copy of a presidential covert-action finding that sought to authorize CIA participation in the November 1985 Hawk missile shipment to Iran. US Attorney General Edwin Meese admitted on November 25 that profits from weapons sales to Iran were made available to assist the Contra rebels in Nicaragua. On the same day, John Poindexter resigned, and Oliver North was fired by President Reagan.cite news|url=http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F5071FFD3C550C758EDDA80994DE484D81&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fPeople%2fP%2fPoindexter%2c%20John%20M%2e|title=White House Shake-Up: A Task is Handed to State Dept.; Poindexter and North Have Limited Options|work=The New York Times|accessdate=2008-06-07] Poindexter was replaced by Frank Carlucci on December 2, 1986.cite web|title=Timeline of Ronald Reagan's life|publisher=PBS|date=2000|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reagan/timeline/index_5.html|accessdate=2008-06-07]

Tower Commission

On November 25, 1986, President Reagan announced the creation of a Special Review Board to look into the matter; the following day, he appointed former Senator John Tower, former Secretary of State Edmund Muskie, and former National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft to serve as members. This Presidential Commission took effect on December 1 and became known as the "Tower Commission". The main objectives of the commission were to inquire into "the circumstances surrounding the Iran-Contra matter, other case studies that might reveal strengths and weaknesses in the operation of the National Security Council system under stress, and the manner in which that system has served eight different Presidents since its inception in 1947."cite web|title=Tower commission report excerpts|work=The Tower Commission Report|url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/PS157/assignment%20files%20public/TOWER%20EXCERPTS.htm|accessdate=2008-06-07] The commission was the first presidential commission to review and evaluate the National Security Council.

President Reagan appeared before the Tower Commission on December 2, 1986, to answer questions regarding his involvement in the affair. When asked about his role in the authorizing the arms deals, he first stated that he had; later, he appeared to contradict himself by stating that he had no recollection of doing so.cite news|work=Time|url=http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,963668,00.html|title=Tower of Judgement|author=Church, George J|accessdate=2008-04-22] In his 1990 autobiography, "An American Life", Reagan acknowledges authorizing the shipments to Israel. [Reagan, Ronald (1990), p. 501]

The report published by the Tower Commission was delivered to the President on February 26, 1987. The Commission had interviewed 80 witnesses to the scheme, including Reagan, and two of the arms trade middlemen: Manucher Ghorbanifar and Adnan Khashoggi. The 200 page report was the most comprehensive of any released, criticizing the actions of Oliver North, John Poindexter, Caspar Weinberger, and others. It determined that President Reagan did not have knowledge of the extent of the program, especially not the diversion of funds to the Contras, although it argued that the President ought to have had better control of the National Security Council staff. The report heavily criticized Reagan for not properly supervising his subordinates or being aware of their actions. A major result of the Tower Commission was the consensus that Reagan should have listened to his National Security Advisor more, thereby placing more power in the hands of that chair.

The Democratic-controlled United States Congress issued its own report on November 18, 1987, stating that "If the president did not know what his national security advisers were doing, he should have." The congressional report wrote that the president bore "ultimate responsibility" for wrongdoing by his aides, and his administration exhibited "secrecy, deception and disdain for the law." [cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,3858,5211614-103677,00.html|title=Nixon's Empire Strikes Back|author=Blumenthal, Sidney|work=The Guardian|date=June 9, 2005|accessdate=2008-06-06] It also read in part: "The central remaining question is the role of the President in the Iran-contra affair. On this critical point, the shredding of documents by Poindexter, North and others, and the death of Casey, leave the record incomplete."

Aftermath

Reagan expressed regret regarding the situation during a nationally televised address from the White House Oval Office on March 4, 1987; Reagan had not spoken to the American people directly for three months amidst the scandal.cite web|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reagan/filmmore/reference/primary/irancontra.html|title=Speech about Iran Contra|date=March 4, 1987|accessdate=2008-04-23|publisher=PBS] President Reagan told the American people the reason why he did not update them on the scandal:

"The reason I haven't spoken to you before now is this: You deserve the truth. And as frustrating as the waiting has been, I felt it was improper to come to you with sketchy reports, or possibly even erroneous statements, which would then have to be corrected, creating even more doubt and confusion. There's been enough of that."

He then took full responsibility for his actions and those of his administration:

"First, let me say I take full responsibility for my own actions and for those of my administration. As angry as I may be about activities undertaken without my knowledge, I am still accountable for those activities. As disappointed as I may be in some who served me, I'm still the one who must answer to the American people for this behavior."

Finally, the president stated that his previous assertions that the U.S. did not trade arms for hostages were incorrect:

"A few months ago I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and the evidence tell me it is not. As the Tower board reported, what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages. This runs counter to my own beliefs, to administration policy, and to the original strategy we had in mind."

Domestically, the scandal precipitated a drop in President Reagan's popularity as his approval ratings saw "the largest single drop for any U.S. president in history", from 67% to 46% in November 1986, according to a "New York Times"/CBS News poll. [Mayer, Jane and Doyle McManus, "Landslide: The Unmaking of The President, 1984-1988". Houghton Mifflin, (1988) p.292 and 437] The "Teflon President", as Reagan was nicknamed by critics, [cite news|url=http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=235102|accessdate=2008-06-10|publisher="The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel"|work=The Washington Post|date=June 7, 2004|title=Teflon president not a compliment] survived the scandal, however, and by January 1989 a Gallup poll was "recording a 64% approval rating," the highest ever recorded for a departing President at that time. [cite web| url= http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/poll_reagan010806.html|title=Improving With Age: Reagan Approval Grows Better in Retrospect|author=Sussman, Dalia|date=2001-08-06 |publisher=ABC|accessdate=2007-04-08]

Internationally the damage was more severe. Magnus Ranstorp wrote, "U.S. willingness to engage in concessions with Iran and the Hezbollah not only signalled to its adversaries that hostage-taking was an extremely useful instrument in extracting political and financial concessions for the West but also undermined any credibility of U.S. criticism of other states' deviation from the principles of no-negotiation and no concession to terrorists and their demands. [Ranstorp, Magnus, "Hizb'allah in Lebanon: The Politics of the Western Hostage Crisis", New York, St. Martins Press, 1997 p.203]

In Iran Mehdi Hashemi, the leaker of the scandal, was executed in 1987, allegedly for activities unrelated to the scandal. Though Hashemi made a full video confession to numerous serious charges, some observers find the coincidence of his leak and the subsequent prosecution highly suspicious. [Abrahamian, "Tortured Confessions", University of California, (1999), pp 162-166]

Convictions, pardons, and reinstatements

Oliver North and John Poindexter were indicted on multiple charges on March 16, 1988.cite news|url=http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0716F63B5B0C748DDDAA0894D0484D81&n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fPeople%2fP%2fPoindexter%2c%20John%20M%2e|title=North, Poindexter and 2 Others Indicted on Iran-Contra Fraud and Theft Charges|author=Shenon, Philip|work=The New York Times|accessdate=2008-06-07] North, indicted on 16 counts, was found guilty by a jury of three minor counts. The convictions were vacated on appeal on the grounds that North's Fifth Amendment rights may have been violated by the indirect use of his testimony to Congress which had been given under a grant of immunity. In 1990, Poindexter was convicted on several felony counts of conspiracy, lying to Congress, obstruction of justice, and altering and destroying documents pertinent to the investigation. His convictions were also overturned on appeal on similar grounds. Arthur L. Liman served as chief counsel for the Senate during the Iran-Contra Affair. [cite news|work=The New York Times|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DEED71E38F93BA25754C0A961958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all|title=Arthur L. Liman, a Masterly Lawyer, Dies at 64|author=Haberman, Clyde|date=July 18, 1997|accessdate=2008-06-06]

The Independent Counsel, Lawrence E. Walsh, chose not to re-try North or Poindexter. Caspar Weinberger was indicted for lying to the Independent Counsel but was later pardoned by President George H. W. Bush. [cite news|date=December 25, 1992|accessdate=2008-06-06|title=Bush Pardons 6 in Iran Affair, Aborting a Weinberger Trial; Prosecutor Assails 'Cover-Up'|work=The New York Times|url=http://www.nytimes.com/books/97/06/29/reviews/iran-pardon.html|author=Johnston, David]

In 1992 George H. W. Bush pardoned six convicted administration officials, namely Elliott Abrams, Duane R. Clarridge, Alan Fiers, Clair George, Robert McFarlane, and Caspar Weinberger. [cite web|last=Bush|first=George H.W.|title=Proclamation 6518 - Grant of Executive Clemency|publisher=The American Presidency Project|url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/print.php?pid=20265|date=December 24, 1992|accessdate=2008-04-23]

George W. Bush selected some individuals that served under Reagan for high-level posts in his presidential administration.cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/story/0,7369,469208,00.html|title=Bush nominees under fire for link with contras|publisher="The Guardian"|author=Campbell, Duncan|accessdate=2006-10-12] cite web|url=http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,856095,00.html|title=Return of the Iran-Contra brigade|publisher="The Observer"|accessdate=2006-10-12] They include:

*Elliott Abrams:cite web|title=Personnel Announcement |url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050202-10.html|publisher=The White House|accessdate= 2006-10-10] under Bush, the Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director on the National Security Council for Near East and North African Affairs; in Iran-Contra, pleaded guilty on two counts of unlawfully withholding information, pardoned.

*Otto Reich:cite web|title=Biography: Otto Juan Reich|url=http://uruguay.usembassy.gov/bioreicheng.htm|accessdate= 2008-06-10|date=January 16, 2002|publisher=United States Embassy to Uruguay] head of the Office of Public Diplomacy under Reagan.

*John Negroponte:cite web|title=President Congratulates America's First Director and Deputy Director of National Intelligence|url=http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/05/20050518.html|publisher = The White House|accessdate= 2006-10-10] under Bush, served as the Ambassador to Iraq, the National Intelligence Director, and the Deputy Secretary of State.

*Admiral John Poindexter:cite news|title=No more Mr Scrupulous Guy|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4358017,00.html|author=Sutherland, John|publisher= The Guardian|accessdate=2006-10-10] under Bush, Director of the Information Awareness Office; in Iran-Contra, found guilty of multiple felony counts for conspiracy, obstruction of justice, lying to Congress, defrauding the government, and the alteration and destruction of evidence, convictions reversed.

In Poindexter's hometown of Odon, Indiana, a street was renamed to John Poindexter Street. Bill Breedan, a former minister, stole the street's sign in protest of the Iran-Contra Affair. He claimed that he was holding it for a ransom of $30 million, in reference to the amount of money given to Iran to transfer to the contras. He was later arrested and confined to prison, making him, as satirized by Howard Zinn, "the only person to be imprisoned as a result of the Iran-Contra affair." [Zinn, Howard (2003), pp. 587-588]

See also

*United States-Iran relations
*Allegations of state terrorism by United States of America
*CIA drug trafficking
*Gary Webb
*Mistakes were made
*"Nicaragua v. United States"
*Nahum Manbar
*List of people pardoned by George H. W. Bush

Footnotes

References

*Asleson, Vern. "Nicaragua: Those Passed By". Galde Press ISBN 1-931942-16-1, 2004

*cite book|author=Cockburn, Alexander and Jeffrey St. Clair|title=Whiteout, the CIA, drugs and the press|publisher=Verso|date=1998|location=New York City|isbn=1859842585

*cite book|author=Reagan, Ronald|authorlink=Ronald Reagan|year=1990|location=New York|publisher=Simon & Schuster|title=An American Life

*cite web|title=Report of the Congressional Committees Investigating the Iran-Contra Affair (S. Rep. No. 216, H.R. Rep. No. 433, 100th Cong., 1st Sess.)|publisher=United States Government Printing Office, via Google Books|date=November 11, 1987|url=http://books.google.com/books?vid=ISBN0788126024&id=ew_K3auTwEgC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3&dq=committees&as_brr=1&sig=jrbRSeUgdNVpav3Eh1pijaCG-sY#PPR1,M1|accessdate=2007-04-03

*cite news|author=Shenon, Philip and Stephen Engelberg|title=Eight Important Days in November: Unraveling the Iran-Contra Affair|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DE6DC1F3EF936A35754C0A961948260|work=The New York Times|date=July 5, 1987|accessdate=2008-03-28

*cite web|title=Tower Commission Report (Excerpts)|publisher=The American Presidency Project|date=February 26, 1987|url=http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/PS157/assignment%20files%20public/TOWER%20EXCERPTS.htm|accessdate=2008-04-23|author=Tower, John; Edmund Muskie and Brent Scowcroft

*cite book|last=Webb|first=Gary|authorlink=Gary Webb|title=Dark Alliance: The CIA, the Contras, and the crack cocaine explosion|publisher=Seven Stories Press|date=1998|isbn=1888363681

*cite book|last=Zinn|first=Howard|title=A People's History of the United States|place=New York|publisher=Perennial|year=2003|isbn=0060528370

External links

* [http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB210/index.htm The Iran-Contra Affair 20 Years On] : Documents Spotlight Role of Reagan, Top Aides. By the National Security Archive
* [http://meria.idc.ac.il/journal/2007/issue2/jv11no2a5.html How the Reagan Administration Taught Iran the Wrong Lessons] – Middle East Review of International Affairs, June, 2007 article by Nathan Thrall
* "The Secret Government: The Constitution in Crisis" ( [http://www.archive.org/details/TheSecretGovernmentTheConstitutioninCrisis Audio] , [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3505348655137118430 Video] ) -- 1987 Bill Moyers special on the Iran-Contra Affair
* [http://www.bartleby.com/65/ir/Irancont.html Condensed article outlining Iran-Contra]
* [http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/walsh Final Report of the Independent Counsel for Iran/Contra Matters (Walsh Report)]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Iran–Contra affair — Iran–Contra Scandal Other names Iran–Contra Participants Ronald Reagan, Robert McFarlane, Caspar Weinberger, Hezbollah, Nicaraguan contras, Oliver North, Manucher Ghorbanifar, John Poindexter Date August 20, 1985 …   Wikipedia

  • Iran-Contra affair — the name given to a series of secret and illegal actions by US government officials under President Ronald Reagan. In 1985, officials in the National Security Council sold military weapons to Iran so it would help in freeing US prisoners in… …   Universalium

  • Iran-Contra affair — …   Useful english dictionary

  • (the) Iran-Contra affair — the Iran Contra affair [the Iran Contra affair] the name given to a series of secret and illegal actions by US government officials under President Ronald Reagan. In 1985, officials in the ↑National Security Council sold military weapons to Iran… …   Useful english dictionary

  • Iran-Contra — Affaire Iran Contra L’affaire Iran Contra (ou Irangate, nommée ainsi en souvenir du scandale du Watergate), est un scandale politique survenu aux États Unis dans les années 1980. L affaire est toujours voilée de secrets et il est difficile de… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Irán-Contra — El escándalo Irán Contra, también conocido como Irangate, es un acontecimiento político ocurrido entre 1985 y 1986, en el cual el gobierno de los Estados Unidos, bajo la administración del presidente Ronald Reagan, vendió armas al gobierno Iraní… …   Wikipedia Español

  • Affaire Iran-Contra — L’affaire Iran Contra (ou Irangate, nommée ainsi en souvenir du scandale du Watergate) est un scandale politique survenu aux États Unis dans les années 1980. L affaire est toujours voilée de secrets et il est difficile de découvrir les faits.… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Affaire de l'Iran-Contra — Affaire Iran Contra L’affaire Iran Contra (ou Irangate, nommée ainsi en souvenir du scandale du Watergate), est un scandale politique survenu aux États Unis dans les années 1980. L affaire est toujours voilée de secrets et il est difficile de… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Scandale Iran-Contra — Affaire Iran Contra L’affaire Iran Contra (ou Irangate, nommée ainsi en souvenir du scandale du Watergate), est un scandale politique survenu aux États Unis dans les années 1980. L affaire est toujours voilée de secrets et il est difficile de… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Contra — is a Latin preposition meaning against . It is very frequently abbreviated to con, which is a separate preposition. It may refer to: Contras, Nicaraguan counter revolutionaries opposed to the Sandinistas Iran–Contra affair, the Reagan… …   Wikipedia


Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.