Reproductive justice

Reproductive justice

Reproductive justice is a concept linking reproductive health with social justice. The term emerged from the work of reproductive health organizations for women of color in the United States in the 1990s.


Proponents of the concept of reproductive justice aim to recognize that women's reproductive health is connected to and affected by conditions in their lives that are shaped by their socioeconomic status, race, sexuality, and nationality. [Silliman et al 2004, p.4.] Proponents argue that women cannot have full control over their reproductive lives, unless issues such as socioeconomic disadvantage, racial discrimination, inequalities in wealth and power, and differential access to resources and services are addressed. [Ross 2006, p.2.] The grassroots organization Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice defines reproductive justice as follows: "We believe reproductive justice is the complete physical, mental, spiritual, political, economic, and social well-being of women and girls, and will be achieved when women and girls have the economic, social and political power and resources to make healthy decisions about our bodies, sexuality and reproduction for ourselves, our families, and our communities in all areas of our lives." [Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice 2005, p.1.]

Advocates for reproductive justice have identified three main frameworks for advocating for women's sexual and reproductive needs: reproductive health, reproductive rights, and reproductive justice. [Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice 2005, p.1.] The reproductive health framework emphasizes access to health services, addressing inequalities in health by providing services to historically under-served communities [Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice 2005, p.2.] The reproductive rights framework emphasizes the protection of an individual woman's legal right to reproductive health services, focusing on increasing access to contraception and keeping abortion legal. [Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice 2005, p.2.] The reproductive justice framework utilizes an intersectional analysis of women's experiences and focuses on changing the structural inequalities that affect women's reproductive health and their ability to control their reproductive lives. [Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice 2005, p.2.]

For reproductive justice activists, the primary difference between the reproductive rights and health frameworks and the reproductive justice framework is that the rights and health frameworks focus on protecting individual rights and choices, while the reproductive justice framework focuses on broader socioeconomic conditions and bringing about structural change. [Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice 2005, p.3.] The emphasis on individual choice in the health and rights frameworks is considered problematic because it obscures the social context in which reproductive choices are made, ignoring the fact that many women do not have access to services or resources, [Smith 2005, p.127-128] such as quality health care services or health insurance. This lack of access limits the options available to these women. Therefore, advocates of reproductive justice argue that certain enabling conditions are necessary for women to make reproductive decisions free of constraint or coercion. Correa and Petchesky, p.92] These conditions include such factors as access to reliable transportation, health services, education, childcare, and access to positions of power; adequate housing and income; elimination of health hazardous environments; [Petchesky 1984, p.396.] and freedom from violence and discrimination. [Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice 2005, p.5.]

Reproductive justice activists have also criticized the choice paradigm because the focus on abortion rights in the pro-choice movement does not take into account the experiences of many women of color in the US.Fact|date=July 2008 The struggle for women of color has often been a fight for the right "to" have children, as manydubious Native American, Black and Puerto Rican women have been targeted for forced sterilization. [Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice 2005, p.4.] Thus, reproductive justice activists believe that it is equally important to fight for the right to have a child, the right not to have a child, the right to parent the children that one already has, and the right to control one's birthing options.Ross, "What is Reproductive Justice?," p.4.]

Origin and history of the term

Roots of the reproductive justice framework can be traced to the 1970s, when women of color organizations such as the National Council of Negro Women criticized the term "choice" in the mainstream reproductive rights movement. [Ross 2006, p.5.] The 1980s and 1990s saw the creation of many new reproductive health organizations for women of color, such as the National Black Women's Health Project. [Silliman et al 2004, p.1.] The term "reproductive justice" was coined in 1994 by the Black Women's Caucus at a national pro-choice conference sponsored by the Illinois Pro-Choice Alliance in Chicago. [Ross 2006, p.1.] The conference took place two months after the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development. The caucus was formed as an attempt to move away from the "choice" framework and adapt the Cairo Programme of Action in the context of the United States. [Ross 2006, p.6.] Utilizing the human rights framework of the Cairo Programme of Action, the caucus created the term "reproductive justice," which was originally defined as "reproductive health integrated into social justice." [Ross 2006, p.6.]

In 1997, several members of the caucus became co-founders of the SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Health Collective, which utilized a human rights framework as the basis for its organizing. After organizing a national conference in 2003 that explored the issue of reproductive justice, SisterSong adopted the reproductive justice framework as its principal framework. [Ross 2006, p.7.] In 2004, SisterSong member group Asian and Pacific Islanders for Reproductive Health adopted reproductive justice as its central framework and renamed itself Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice, [Ross 2006, p.7.] Several other reproductive rights and women's organizations, such as Planned Parenthood [Ross 2006, p.11.] and the National Organization for Women, [Mendez 2006.] have since adopted usage of the term.

Issues related to reproductive justice

Because of the broad scope of the reproductive justice framework, reproductive justice activists are involved in organizing for a wide array of causes. These causes include movements for immigrant rights, labor rights, disability rights, LGBTQ rights, economic justice, and environmental justice. Other causes include organizing for comprehensive sex education, safe and affordable contraceptives, repeal of the Hyde Amendment, and ending violence against women, and human trafficking. [Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice 2005, p.7.] [Silliman et al 2004, p.40]



*Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice (2005). [ A New Vision for Advancing our Movement for Reproductive Health, Reproductive Rights and Reproductive Justice] . [ Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice] . Retrieved on April 15, 2008.
*Correa, Sonia and Rosalind Petchesky. “Reproductive and Sexual Rights: A Feminist Perspective.” "Feminist Theory Reader". Ed. Carole R. McCann and Seung-Kyung Kim. New York: Routledge, 2003. 88-102. ISBN 0-415-93153-3.
*Mendez, Zenaida (2006). [ Reproductive Justice is Every Woman's Right] . [ NOW] . Retrieved on April 15, 2008.
*Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. "Abortion and Women’s Choice: The State, Sexuality, and Reproductive Freedom". 2nd ed. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1984. ISBN 0582282152.
*Ross, Loretta (May 2006). [ Understanding Reproductive Justice] . [ SisterSong] . Retrieved on April 16, 2008.
*Ross, Loretta. "What is Reproductive Justice?" [ Reproductive Justice Briefing Book] . [ SisterSong] . Retrieved on April 16, 2008.
*Silliman, Jael, Marlene Gerber Fried, Loretta Ross, and Elena R. Gutierrez. "Undivided Rights: Women of Color Organize for Reproductive Justice". Cambridge: South End Press, 2004. ISBN 0-89608-729-8.
*SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Health Collective. [ Reproductive Justice Briefing Book] . [ SisterSong] . Retrieved on April 16, 2008.
*Smith, Andrea. “Beyond Pro-Choice Versus Pro-Life: Women of Color and Reproductive Justice.” "NWSA Journal" no 17 (Spring 2005): 119-140.

ee also

*Black feminism
*Health disparities
*Intersectionality theory
*Reproductive health
*Third-wave feminism

External links

* [ SisterSong]
* [ Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice]
* [ Choice USA]
* [ Expanding the Movement for Empowerment and Reproductive Justice]
* [ California Latinas for Reproductive Justice]
* [ SPARK! Reproductive Justice NOW]
* [ Black Women's Health Imperative]
* [ National Women's Health Network]
* [ African American Women Evolving]
* [ Colorado Organization for Latina Opportunity and Reproductive Rights]
* [ National Asian Women's Health Organization]
* [ National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health]
* [ INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence]

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Reproductive rights — are rights relating to reproduction and reproductive health.cite journal |last=Cook |first=Rebecca J. |coauthors=Mahmoud F. Fathalla |year=1996 |month=September |title=Advancing Reproductive Rights Beyond Cairo and Beijing |journal= International …   Wikipedia

  • Justice and Witness Ministries — (JWM) is one of five covenanted ministries of the United Church of Christ. JWM is responsible for national office ministries related to four areas: economic justice; human rights, justice for women and transformation; public life and social… …   Wikipedia

  • The Religious Institute on Sexual Morality, Justice, and Healing — is an American multi faith organization dedicated to advocating for sexual health, education, and justice in faith communities and society. It was co founded in 2001 by Reverend Debra W. Haffner, a Unitarian Universalist minister and sexologist,… …   Wikipedia

  • City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health — Supreme Court of the United States Argued 30 November …   Wikipedia

  • Webster v. Reproductive Health Services — SCOTUSCase Litigants=Webster v. Reproductive Health Services ArgueDate=April 26 ArgueYear=1989 DecideDate=July 3 DecideYear=1989 FullName=William L. Webster, Attorney General of Missouri, et al. v. Reproductive Health Services, et al. USVol=492… …   Wikipedia

  • Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice — The Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (RCRC) was founded in 1967 as the Clergy Consultation Service on Abortion and then later as the Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights (RCAR). The current name was chosen in 1993.RCRC is the… …   Wikipedia

  • Environmental justice — (EJ) is the confluence of social and environmental movements, which deals with the inequitable environmental burden born by groups such as racial minorities, women, or residents of developing nations. It is a holistic effort to analyze and… …   Wikipedia

  • Section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 — Violent pornography redirects here. For the System of a Down song, see Mezmerize (album). Sex and the law Social issues Age of consent · …   Wikipedia

  • Centre pour la justice au Tibet — Pour les articles homonymes, voir TJC. Centre pour la justice au Tibet Contexte général Fiche d’identité Fondateur …   Wikipédia en Français

  • No Longer Silent: Clergy for Justice — No Longer Silent logo No Longer Silent: Clergy for Justice is an organization of Phoenix, Arizona based Mainline Protestant and Roman Catholic clergy committed to raising awareness within the general public and within their own denominations to… …   Wikipedia