London 1851 chess tournament

London 1851 was the first international chess tournament. [Byrne, Robert. [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9907E1DD1338F937A25752C0A961958260 "Chess"] , "The New York Times", January 14 1997. Accessed July 21 2008. "Indeed, it was not until the International Tournament of 1851, held at the Crystal Palace of the London Exhibition, that tournament play entered the chess scene."] The tournament was conceived and organised by English player Howard Staunton, and marked the first time that the best chess players in Europe would meet in a single event. Adolf Anderssen of Germany won the sixteen-player tournament, earning him the status of the best player in Europe.

Background and objectives

In May 1851, London staged the Great Exhibition to showcase British industry and technology, and London's thriving chess community felt obliged to do something similar for chess. Howard Staunton proposed and then took the lead in organizing the first ever international tournament, to be held at the same time. cite journal | journal=British Chess Magazine | title=Howard Staunton: part I | date=November 1908 | author= Murray, H.J.R. | url=http://sbchess.sinfree.net/Staunton_BCM.html | accessdate=2008-06-19 and cite journal | journal=British Chess Magazine | title=Howard Staunton: part II | date=November 1908 | author=Murray, H.J.R. | url=http://sbchess.sinfree.net/Staunton_BCM.html | accessdate=2008-06-19 ] He thought the Great Exhibition presented a unique opportunity because the difficulties that obstructed international participation would be greatly reduced, for example it would be easier for contestants to obtain passports and leave from work. cite book | title=The Chess Tournament | author=Howard Staunton | Staunton, H. | publisher=Hardinge Simpole | isbn=1843820897 This can be viewed online at or downloaded as PDF from cite web | url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_SUCAAAAYAAJ&pg=PR24&dq=1851+london+tournament+book+staunton&lr=#PPR10,M1 | title=Google books: The Chess Tournament, by Howard Staunton | accessdate=2008-06-19 ]

In 1848 a letter had been published in which Bledow proposed that he and von der Lasa should organize in Trier (Germany) an international tournament whose winner should be recognized as the world champion (Bledow died in 1846; it is not known why publication was delayed). cite web | url=http://www.chesscafe.com/text/spinrad06.pdf | title=Early World Rankings | date=2006 | author=Spinrad, J.P. | publisher=chesscafe.com | accessdate=2008-06-19 ] News of this may also have motivated Staunton to organize the London International tournament. cite web | url=http://www.chesscafe.com/text/spinrad11.pdf | author=Spinrad, J.P. | title=Ludwig Erdmann Bledow | publisher=chesscafe.com | accessdate=2008-06-19 ]

Staunton and his colleagues had ambitious objectives for this tournament, including convening a "Chess Parliament" to: complete the standardization of the moves and other rules, as there were still very small national differences and a few self-contradictions; to standardize chess notation; to agree time limits, as many players were notorious for simply "out-sitting" opponents. Staunton also proposed the production of a compendium showing what was known about chess openings, preferably as a table. Since he thought there would not be time for a single "Chess Parliament" session to handle this as well, he suggested further congresses, some perhaps including knowledgeable enthusiasts of below top-class playing strength, and a review process for dealing with contentious issues and possible mistakes in earlier decisions. cite book | title=The Chess Tournament | author=Howard Staunton | Staunton, H. | publisher=Hardinge Simpole | isbn=1843820897 This can be viewed online at or downloaded as PDF from cite web | url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_SUCAAAAYAAJ&pg=PR24&dq=1851+london+tournament+book+staunton&lr=#PPR10,M1 | title=Google books: The Chess Tournament, by Howard Staunton | accessdate=2008-06-19 ]

Before the tournament started two commentators wrote that the winner should be regarded as "the World’s Chess Champion"; one was Captain Hugh Alexander Kennedy, one of the tournament's organizers and competitors, while the other was the "Liberty Weekly Tribune" in Missouri. However there is no indication that crowning a world champion was a formal objective of the tournament.

Preparation

The Committee of Management was under the leadership of the Duke of Marlborough, but Staunton was its Secretary and most of its members were from Staunton's chess club, St George's. Rivalries in British chess at that time led the powerful London Chess Club to boycott the competition, and George Walker used his column in "Bell's Life" to try to disrupt the tournament preparations.cite book
last=Eales | first=Richard
origyear=1985 | year=2002 | title=Chess, The History of a Game
publisher=Harding Simpole | isbn=0-95137-573-3 | pages=142–145] Despite these obstacles, Staunton raised £500 for the prize fund, a considerable sum in 1851,citation
editor-last=Golombek | editor-first=Harry | editor-link=Harry Golombek
year=1977 | title=Golombek's Encyclopedia of Chess
publisher=Crown Publishing
isbn=0-517-53146-1
contribution=
page=185] and worth about £359,000 in 2006's money. [Conversion based on average incomes, which are the most appropriate measure for several days' hard work. If we use average prices for the conversion, the result is about £40,000: cite web | url=http://www.measuringworth.com/ukcompare/result.php?use%5B%5D=CPI&use%5B%5D=DEFIND&use%5B%5D=WAGE&use%5B%5D=GDPCP&use%5B%5D=GDPC&year_early=1851&pound71=500&shilling71=0&pence71=0&amount=500&year_source=1851&year_result=2008 | title=Five Ways to Compute the Relative Value of a U.K. Pound Amount, 1830 - 2006: 2006 equivalent of £335 in 1851 | accessdate=2008-06-19 ] Subscriptions were obtained from chess clubs in England and overseas.From France, collections were made at the Café de la Régence, and from India, the Calcutta Chess Club contributed £100, and in addition its principal officers John Cochrane and T.C. Morton made two of the four largest personal contributions.cite book
title=The Chess Tournament
author=Staunton, H.
publisher=Hardinge Simpole
id=ISBN 1843820897
This can be viewed online at or downloaded as PDF from cite web
url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_SUCAAAAYAAJ&pg=PR24&dq=1851+london+tournament+book+staunton&lr=#PPR10,M1
title=Google books: The Chess Tournament, by Howard Staunton
accessdate=2008-06-19] The tournament was scheduled to coincide with The Great Exhibition in London, and began on 26 May 1851.

Players

The tournament was planned as knock-out contest involving sixteen of Europe's best players. Invitations had been extended to foreign masters Vincent Grimm, József Szén, and Johann Löwenthal from Hungary; Adolf Anderssen, Bernhard Horwitz, Carl Mayet, and von der Lasa from Germany; Pierre Charles Fournier de Saint-Amant and Lionel Kieseritzky from France, and Carl Jaenisch, Alexander Petrov and Ilya Shumov from Russia. The British players were to be Howard Staunton, Henry Thomas Buckle, Marmaduke Wyvill, Elijah Williams, Captain Hugh Alexander Kennedy, Samuel Newham, and Henry Bird.

Unfortunately many of the invitees were unable to play. Grimm was unable to attend as he was exiled in Aleppo after his participation the Hungarian Revolution of 1848. Löwenthal had also participated in the failed revolt but fled to America, where he established himself in business. Löwenthal left his affairs behind to travel to London to play. Saint-Amant was unavailable as he had been sent by the French government to California as a diplomat following its independence from Mexico during the California Gold Rush. Von der Lasa and Petrov were also unable to attend. Jaenisch and Shumov could not arrive in time to play. Jaenisch arrived in London late, and played a post-tournament match with Staunton that Staunton won +7−2=1. Buckle also did not make the tournament, and as he was generally considered second only to Staunton among British players, he was the strongest British player missing. The dispute with the London Chess Club prevented Daniel Harrwitz from playing, and also weakened the pool of substitutes available, as George Walker, George Perigal, and George Webb Medley could have made for a stronger field if not for the boycott.citation
last=Olson | first=Calvin
year=2006 | title=The Chess Kings Volume One
publisher=Trafford | isbn=141203907-X | pages=33–36] Anderssen was reluctant to accept his invitation, as he was deterred by the travel costs. However Staunton offered to pay Anderssen's travel expenses out of his own pocket if necessary, should Anderssen fail to win a tournament prize; Anderssen accepted this generous offer. cite web | url=http://batgirl.atspace.com/Anderssen.html | title=Morphy's opponents: Adolf Anderssen | accessdate=2008-06-19 ]

As part of the project the London International Tournament's committee also organized a "London Provincial Tournament" for British players who were not strong enough to be invited to play in the International Tournament. The committee "promoted" E.S. Kennedy, Edward Löwe, James R. Mucklow, and Alfred Brodie to play in the International Tournament rather than the Provincial Tournament, in order to obtain the number of players required for a knock-out tournament.

Tournament

The tournament was organised as single elimination matches, with the eight losers in the first round being dropped from the tournament. Each first-round match was a best-of-three games, draws not counting. Subsequent rounds were best-of-seven, and losers played consolation matches. The pairings were made by chance, i.e. there was no seeding system of the type commonly used in tennis tournaments. Kieseritsky, Bird, and Löwenthal all lost in the first round. Anderssen beat Staunton soundly, 4–1 in the third-round semi-final. In the fourth-round final Anderssen beat Wyvill to take first place. Wyvill had had a relatively easy draw in the tournament to finish second. Staunton suffered a bitter defeat to Williams in the last round consolation match to finish a disappointing fourth.

Aftermath

Despite the obvious flaws in the knockout format of the tournament, the outcome was just as Anderssen was the best player. As provided by the rules of the tournament, Staunton immediately challenged Anderssen to a twenty-one-game match for a £100 stake. Anderssen agreed to the match, but could not play right away as he had been away from Germany and his job as a school teacher for over two months. In addition Staunton was physically unfit for an immediate contest. The proposed match was never played.

As a result of winning this tournament Anderssen was popularly recognised as Europe's best player, although as far as is known he was never described as "world champion". The "idea" of a world chess champion had been current at least since 1840, [ cite journal | journal=Fraser's Magazine | title=The Café de la Régence | author="G.W." | volume=22 | date=July to December, 1840 | url=http://mark_weeks.tripod.com/chw01h01/chw-1h01.htm | accessdate=2008-06-06 (Jeremy Spinrad believes the author was George Walker)] and the earliest known use of the term "world champion" is in 1845, referring to Staunton and published in Staunton's "Chess Players' Chronicle". Wilhelm Steinitz was widely recognized as "world champion" in the 1870s, but the first formal contest for the world title was the 1886 match between Steinitz and Johannes Zukertort. cite web | url=http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/extra/champion.html | title=Early Uses of ‘World Chess Champion’ | author=Edward Winter | accessdate=2008-06-06 ]

Staunton wrote the tournament book, which he titled "The Chess Tournament" (1852). Although an excellent description of the event,citation
last1=Hooper | first1=David | author1-link=David Vincent Hooper
last2=Whyld | first2=Kenneth | author2-link=Kenneth Whyld
year=1992 | title=The Oxford Companion to Chess | edition=2
publisher=Oxford University Press
isbn=0-19-280049-3
page391=] it was marred by ill grace with which he received Anderssen's victory.citation
last=Murray | first=H.J.R. | author-link=Harold James Ruthven Murray
year=1913 | title=A History of Chess
publisher=Oxford University Press | pages=887–888 |isbn=0-19-827403-3] However Staunton's description of Anderssen as Germany's second best player after Anderssen won the 1851 International tournament may have been reasonable on the basis of what is now known about von der Lasa's skill, and Anderssen's playing strength had surged in the months preceding the tournament, as a result of training matches against strong players in Germany. cite web | url=http://www.chesscafe.com/text/baron.pdf | author=Diggle,G.H. | title=The Baron | | publisher=chesscafe.com | accessdate=2008-06-17 ]

Staunton blamed his poor showing on the strain of his duties in organising the tournament, and also thought that he suffered from a weak heart since an illness in 1844. He condemned the pursuit of chess as a profession, writing

Chess never was, and while society exists, never can be a profession. It may to a great extent strengthen the mind of the professional man, but it must never become the object of his life. It is because its true character has been lost sight of by the zealous or the mercenary, that victory at any cost has become a more important object than the advancement of the science.

At least in part, this was the complaint of an ungracious loser, as most of Staunton's income was derived from his skill at chess. By this time Staunton was also a successful scholar with a long-term contract to produce editions of Shakespeare's plays.

Staunton was also concerned with the lack of time limits on play. After some experimentation, time controls would become standard in all serious tournaments some years later. The weakness of the knockout format, a kind of hybrid between match and tournament play, was eliminated by adopting the round-robin format beginning with the London 1862 tournament.

The famous Immortal Game, Anderssen–Kieseritsky, London 1851, was played as an offhand game during a break in this tournament. It was not one of the games of their first-round match.

The London Chess Club, which had fallen out with Staunton and his colleagues, organized a tournament that was played a month later and had a multi-national set of players (many of whom had competed in the International tournament), and the result was the same - Anderssen won. cite web | url=http://xoomer.alice.it/cserica/scacchi/storiascacchi/tornei/pagine/itorneifino1880.htm | title=I tornei di scacchi fino al 1879 | accessdate=2008-06-19 ]

trength of the competition

As this was the first ever international tournament, it is difficult to assess the strengths of the players. As an approximate guide, here are Chessmetrics' rating of the contestants immediately before the contest started:

cores

From Staunton's book about the tournament:

Knock-out tournament

16TeamBracket-Compact-NoSeeds-Byes
RD1=First Round
RD2=Second Round
RD3=Semi-final
RD4=Final

RD1-team01=flagicon|GER Anderssen
RD1-score01=2½
RD1-team02=flagicon|FRA Kieseritsky
RD1-score02=½
RD1-team03=flagicon|HUN Szén
RD1-score03=2
RD1-team04=flagicon|UK Newham
RD1-score04=0
RD1-team05=flagicon|GER Horwitz
RD1-score05=2½
RD1-team06=flagicon|UK Bird
RD1-score06=1½
RD1-team07=flagicon|UK Staunton
RD1-score07=2
RD1-team08=flagicon|UK Brodie
RD1-score08=0
RD1-team09=flagicon|UK Williams
RD1-score09=2
RD1-team10=flagicon|HUN Löwenthal
RD1-score10=0
RD1-team11=flagicon|UK Mucklow
RD1-score11=2
RD1-team12=flagicon|UK E.S. Kennedy
RD1-score12=0
RD1-team13=flagicon|UK H.A. Kennedy
RD1-score13=2
RD1-team14=flagicon|GER Mayet
RD1-score14=0
RD1-team15=flagicon|UK Wyvill
RD1-score15=2
RD1-team16=flagicon|UK Löwe
RD1-score16=0
RD2-team01=flagicon|GER Anderssen
RD2-score01=4
RD2-team02=flagicon|HUN Szén
RD2-score02=2
RD2-team03=flagicon|UK Staunton
RD2-score03=4½
RD2-team04=flagicon|GER Horwitz
RD2-score04=2½
RD2-team05=flagicon|UK Williams
RD2-score05=4
RD2-team06=flagicon|UK Mucklow
RD2-score06=0
RD2-team07=flagicon|UK Wyvill
RD2-score07=4½
RD2-team08=flagicon|UK H.A. Kennedy
RD2-score08=3½
RD3-team01=flagicon|GER Anderssen
RD3-score01=4
RD3-team02=flagicon|UK Staunton
RD3-score02=1
RD3-team03=flagicon|UK Wyvill
RD3-score03=4
RD3-team04=flagicon|UK Williams
RD3-score04=3
RD4-team01=flagicon|GER Anderssen
RD4-score01=4½
RD4-team02=flagicon|UK Wyvill
RD4-score02=2½

Play offs for minor places

*Williams 4½ – Staunton 3½ (Match for 3rd and 4th place)
*Szén 4½ – Capt. Kennedy ½ (Match for 5th and 6th place)
*Horwitz won as Mucklow defaulted (Match for 7th and 8th place)

References

External links

* [http://www.mark-weeks.com/chess/v1lon-ix.htm 1851 London Tournament] crosstables and PGN game scores at mark-weeks.com
* [http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chesscollection?cid=1007495 WCC Index (London 1851)] game scores at chessgames.com
* [http://www.rookhouse.com/events/london1851.html London, England - 1851]