- S. A. Dange
Shripat Amrit Dange (
Marathiश्रीपाद अमृत डांगे)( 10 October 1899- 22 May 1991) was a founding member of the Communist Party of India( CPI) and a stalwart of Indian trade union movement. During Raj, Dange was arrested by the British authorities for communistand trade union activities and was jailed for an overall period of 13 years. After India's Independence, a series of events like Sino-Soviet split, Sino-Indian war, and the revelation that while in jail, Dange had written letters to the British Government, offering to cooperate with Britain against Germanyin the World War II, led to a split in the Communist Party of India, in 1964. The breakaway Communist Party of India (Marxist)(CPI(M)) emerged stronger both in terms of membership and their performance in the Indian Elections. Dange who remained the Chairman of the CPI till 1978, was removed in that year because the majority of party workers were against Dange's political line of supporting Indian National Congress, and Indira Gandhi, the then Congress Prime Minister. He was expelled from the CPI in 1981. He joined the All India Communist Party(AICP), and later, United Communist Party of India. Towards the end, Dange got increasingly marginalized in the Indian Communist movement. He was also a well known writer and was the founder of "Socialist" the first socialist weekly in India. Dange played an important role in the formation of Maharashtrastate.
Dange was born in a family of
Deshastha Brahmins -- a sub- casteof brahmins in Nasik, Maharashtra. He was expelled from college for organizing a movement against compulsory teaching of the Bible[http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761580046/Dange_Shripat_Amrit.html "Shripat Amrit Dange"] Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2007] . Early in his Dange was exposed to conditions of workers when he undertook voluntary work in the textile mill areas of Bombay(current spelling: Mumbai). Dange was drawn into active politics by the fervor of nationalist movement against the British rule in India. Bal Gangadhar Tilak, a veteran Indian National Congress leader from Maharashtra, the earliest proponent of swaraj(complete independence) greatly inspired young Dange. Later when Mahatma Gandhilaunched the Non-Cooperation Movementin 1920, Dange gave up his studies and joined the Independence movement [ [http://parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/lsdeb/ls10/ses1/0411079105.htm Obituary reference in the Indian Parliament] ] .
Following the Russian Revolution of 1917, Dange became interested in
Marxism. Dange grew increasingly skeptical about Gandhism; especially of Gandhi's promotion of cottage industries, as the sole solution for India's economic ills, while overlooking possibilities of modern industrial economy. "He also disliked what he believed was an excessive emphasis on religious and moral considerations and reliance on the goodwill of individuals to effect change. He came to believe that only a revolution involving the solidarity of the workers, peasants, and army could bring down foreign rule and with it, capitalism." [ [http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761580046/Dange_Shripat_Amrit.html "Shripat Amrit Dange"] Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2007]
"Gandhi Vs. Lenin"
In 1921, Dange published a pamphlet titled "Gandhi Vs.
Lenin", a comparative study of the approaches of both the leaders; but, Lenin coming out as better of the two. This work proved to be a turning point in Dange's life. Prominent Marxist leader M.N. Royread the work and went on to meet its young author, when he came to Bombay. Nearer home, a progressive Bombay flour mill owner, Ranchoddas Bhavan Lotvala, read "Gandhi vs. Lenin" and was impressed by its contents. 'Lotvala subsidized Dange's study of Marxism for several years, and together they built up a library of Marxist Literature and published translations of classics [ [http://books.google.com/books?id=3Um04zTdisEC&pg=PA41&lpg=PA41&dq=bhavan+lotvala&source=web&ots=qd4iDEGXba&sig=1XQyAYo2LjhI9DDwXadjschhOBc#PPA41,M1 Riepe, Dale. "Marxism in India"] in Parsons, Howard Lee and Sommerville, John (ed.) "Marxism, Revolution and Peace". Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1977. p. 41.] .
In 1922, with Lotvala's help, Dange launched the English weekly, "Socialist", the first Indian Marxist journal. Later
Mohit Sen, Dange's contemporary and a well-known communist intellectual, wrote that Dange's articles in "The Socialist" impressed Lenin himself. [Sen, Mohit. "The Dange Centenary" in Banerjee, Gopal (ed.) "S.A. Dange - A Fruitful Life". Kolkata: Progressive Publishers, 2002. p. 43.] "
Impact of Bolshevist Revolution
The second decade of the 20th century proved to be formative years for young Dange. The period also witnessed worldwide economic crises. There were long strikes in the industrialized world, especially in Britain. In India, the working class movement gained steady momentum during this period. It was during one of the long textile mill strikes that Dange got himself acquainted with the conditions of laborers.
The period also coincided with influence of Bolshevist ideas, following the Russian Revolution of 1917, manifesting in political events in countries outside Russia. This process was quickened by the establishment of the
Third Internationalor the Communist International, or in popular parlance -- its abbreviated form -- Comintern, an international communist organization founded in Moscowin March 1919. As a resolution adopted in the first congress of the Comintern its stated objective was to fight
by all available means, including armed force, for the overthrow of the international bourgeoisie and for the creation of an international Soviet republic as a transition stage to the complete abolition of the State. [ [http://www.mi5.gov.uk/output/Page238.html "MI5 History."] "The Communist Threat." in chapter "The Inter-War Period" ]
Meeting with M.N. Roy
M.N. Roy, an ex-member of the
Anushilan Samiti, perhaps the most important secret revolutionary organization operating in East Bengalin the opening years of the 20th century, went to Moscow in by the end of April 1920 [Roy, Samaren M.N. Roy: A Political Biography" Orient Longman1997. p.54. "] . The new Russian government under Lenin evinced interest in him and encouraged him to form an Indian Communist Party. Roy went on to found the émigré Communist Party of India on 17 October1920 ["Documents of History of the Communist Party of India" (ed.) G. Adhikari with the assistance of Dilip Bose. New Delhi: People's Publishing House. 1982. p. 229.] .in Tashkent. On his return to India, M.N. Roy who had read "Gandhi Vs. Lenin" met Dange in 1922. Dange at that time was closely associating with Lotvala to spread Marxian ideas. It was during this period that Dange grew in prominence as a Marxist; a sure way those days to invite antagonism from the British Government.
Dange and founding of the Communist Party of India
The Government of India, under the
British Crown, saw the founding of Comintern as a disruptive force that would cause internal disorder. It viewed the nascent leftismin India with great suspicion. During the 1920s, the Government foisted a series of 'conspiracy cases [Criminal cases in which the accused are charged with actions that would alienate the sovereignty of British India, from the British King.] against persons whom they suspected to have communist leanings.
Dange in the eyes of the British authorities
During this period M.N. Roy, the spokesperson of the Comintern, was seen as the most dangerous of Indian communists. During that time all the letters written by Roy from Moscow to Dange were intercepted and delivered. [http://books.google.com/books?id=7EkGKKvJ0lsC&pg=PA176&lpg=PA176&dq=kanpur+cospiracy+case&source=web&ots=haTs019SoM&sig=GeZnOOvM95gfaPbULxb6pG4MAnE#PPA176,M1 "Ganachari, Arvind". 'Evolution of Law of 'Sedition' in the Context of the Indian Freedom Struggle 1837-1922"] in Dossal, Mariam and Maloni, Ruby (ed.) "State Intervention and Popular Response: Western India in the Nineteenth Century" Mumbai: Popular Prakashan. 1999. p. 175.]
The British government initially did not think Dange was dangerous.
In 1923, they came to the conclusion that they did not have enough to prove anti-government activity as "Dange is a pure doctrinaire and nothing here seen of him indicate any real power of organization." The Government of India soon canged its mind and the file notes that 'The evidence collected clearly shows that Dange has been an important figure in the conspiracy as constant reference to his name would be unavoidable in any event in the prosecution to be instituted against other members of the conspiracy at [Allahabad] .The conspiracy referred to here is the Kanpur Conspiracy Case that would catapult Dange to a leader with national prominence.
Kanpur Bolshevik Conspiracy Case
March 17 1924, M.N. Roy, S.A. Dange, Muzaffar Ahmed, Nalini Gupta, Shaukat Usmani, Singaravelu Chettiar, Ghulam Hussain and others were charged, in what was called the Cawnpore(now spelt Kanpur) Bolshevik Conspiracy case. The specific charge was that they as communists were seeking "to deprive the King Emperor of his sovereignty of British India, by complete separation of India from imperialistic Britain by a violent revolution."
The case attracted interest of the people towards Comintern plan to bring about violent revolution in India. Communist trials had taken place in India, in frontier towns like
Peshawarwhere Russian trained muhajircommunists were put on trial. "But no case had attracted public gaze like the Kanpur case. Pages of newspapers daily splashed sensational communist plans and people for the first time learned such a large scale about communism and its doctrines and the aims of the Communist International in India." Ralhan, O.P. (ed.) "Encyclopedia of Political Parties" New Delhi: Anmol Publications p.336]
Singaravelu Chettiar was released on account of illness. M.N. Roy was out of the country and therefore could not be arrested. Ghulam Hussain confessed that he had received money from the Russians in
Kabuland was pardoned. Muzaffar Ahmed, Nalini Gupta, Shaukat Usmani and Dange were sentenced for various terms of imprisonment. This case was responsible for actively introducing communism to the Indian masses. Dange was released from prison in 1925.
Formation of the Communist Party of India
The industrial town of Kanpur, in December 1925, witnessed a conference of different communist groups, under the chairmanship of Singaravelu Chettiar. Dange, Muzaffar Ahmed, Nalini Gupta, Shaukat Usmani were among the key organizers of the meeting. The meeting adopted a resolution for the formation of the Communist Party of India with its headquarters in Bombay. [The two major Indian communist parties, namely, Communist Party Of India (CPI) and the Communist Party of India (Marxist)(CPI(M)) maintain different views on exactly when the Communist Party of India was founded. The date maintained as the foundation day by the CPI is 26 December 1925. But according to the Communist Party of India (Marxist), the party was founded in Tashkent, USSR on October 17, 1920.] , The British Government's extreme hostility towards communists, made them to decide not to openly function as a communist party; instead, they chose a more open and non-federated platform, under the name the Workers and Peasants Parties.
Initial years of labor movement in India
In 1920 the
All India Trade Union Congress(AITUC) was formed at Bombay by N.M. Joshi and others. Joshi was a philanthropist who was sympathetic to the workers'cause. At that time AITUC did not have a cohesive ideology, but it was sympathetic to the Indian National Congress [ [http://books.google.com/books?id=7EkGKKvJ0lsC&pg=PA176&lpg=PA176&dq=kanpur+cospiracy+case&source=web&ots=haTs019SoM&sig=GeZnOOvM95gfaPbULxb6pG4MAnE#PPA176,M1 Ganachari, Arvind. 'Evolution of Law of 'Sedition' in the Context of the Indian Freedom Struggle 1837-1922"] in Dossal, Mariam and Maloni, Ruby (ed.) "State Intervention and Popular Response: Western India in the Nineteenth Century" Mumbai: Popular Prakashan. 1999. p. 176.] . When Dange wrote about the founding session of AITUC at Bombay, he brought out the organization's Congress roots:
The AITUC was guided principally by the Congress leaders. The masses at this period were being led by Lokmanya Tilak and his group, in which Lala Lajpat Rai from Punjab, Bepinchandra Pal from Bengal and others had a big place. Mahatma Gandhi had refused to sponsor the idea of founding the AITUC and so he did not attend. [http://www.indialabourarchives.org/usr/local/gsdl/cgi-bin/library?e=d-000-00---0aituc-aituc%2Chemant%2Cindrani%2Cwet%2Coral%2Cbms%2Ctexah-01-0-0-0prompt-14-Document-stx--0-1l--1-en-50---20-about-dange--001-001-1-0isoZz-8859Zz-1-0&d=HASH2a94913f7f6a874cd44dd7.8&cl=search&gp=1 "S.A. Dange" in his introduction to "AITUC 50 Years Documents"] , Volume 1. published by AITUC Publications. p.xxiii.]Communists were also largely excluded when, again in Bombay, in 1923, jobbers and mill clerks came together and started Girni Kamgar Mahamandal (Great Association of Mill-Workers). They participated in the long textile strike in 1924 [http://books.google.com/books?id=DLSXynwxKKsC&pg=PR3&dq=girni+kamgar+mahamandal&sig=qMRCl0bSWRWlgRJAb4bFbhLwVr0 "Chandavarker, Rajanarayan". "Imperial Power and popular politics: Class, resistance and state in India"] New York: Cambridge University Press. 1998. p.131 ] .
Girni Kamgar Union
The early trade union movement in India were not directly inspired by the communists. Dange played an important role in bringing the labor activists amongst Bombay textile workers under the communist umbrella. Girni Kamgar Mahamandal was split and the communists formed their own union, the Girni Kamgar Union during the general strike of 1928.
The linkages which were forged in this strike placed the communists firmly in control of the Girni Kamgar Mahamandal and enabled them to dominate trade union movement. They were now forced to confront problems forced by the structure of industrial relations. The initiative taken by the communist leadership in reflecting working class-militancy enabled them to establish their presence at the level of industry as a whole. To consolidate this position it was imperative that the Girni Kamgar Union as it is now called to penetrate the level of the individual mill...On October 30, 1928 the Girni Kamgar Union had a membership of 324; by the end of that they boasted 54000 members.Two long and bitter strikes in 1928 and 1929 involving the members of Girni Kamgar Union followed. Dange was he general secretary of the Girni Kamgar Union. For their role in the strikes he was arrested along with Muzaffar Ahmed and Shaukat Usmani.
Dange edited the Marathi journal, "Kranti", the official organ of the Girni Kamgar Union from the time of its inception.
Believing that the world capitalism was in crisis, during 1920s the Comintern deployed its workers to various countries. Indian communists had forged a close relationship with
Communist Party of Great Britain. In 1926 and 1927 members of the British Communist Party, notably Philip Sprattand Ben Bradley, came to India. [ [http://mercury.soas.ac.uk/users/tt2/teach/impnat/India/swaraj.htm Tomlinson, Professor B.R. (Tom). "India Text"] Notes left on the net by Tomlinson, Professor B.R. (Tom). Department of History, School for Oriental and African Studies. SOAS. University of LondonLondon ] mandated by Comintern to work among the industrial laborers of Bombay and Calcutta(present spelling: Kolkatta. Workers' and Peasants' Parties were started in those cities and in the United Provinces.
The communists were addressing ground level problems and as a result "N.M. Joshi, in spite of money and no persecution from the government lost the leadership (of AITUC) to the communists [ [http://books.google.com/books?id=DLSXynwxKKsC&pg=PR3&dq=girni+kamgar+mahamandal&sig=qMRCl0bSWRWlgRJAb4bFbhLwVr0 Chandavarker, Rajanarayan. "Imperial Power and popular politics: Class, resistance and state in India"] New York: Cambridge University Press. 1998. p.183 ] ." The communists took over the leadership of the AITUC in December 1929, when their rivals, led by N.M.Joshi, walked out of the session, and founded a rival organization. Like rest of the world, it was a period of great unrest in India too.
In India throughout 1928 and 1929 there was a strong wave of strikes, on the railroads, in ironworks and in the textile industry. 31 million working days lost in 1928, through industrial disputes. Trade union numbers and organization grew rapidly during this period." [http://www.wcml.org.uk/internat/meerut1.htm "Working Class Movement Library" "Meerut Conspiracy Trial"] ]Muzaffar Ahmed, Usmani and Dange joined these later campaigns on their release from jail.
Meerut Conspiracy Case
thumb|600px|right|">Portrait of 25 of Meerut Prisoners taken outside the jail. Backrow:(left to right) K.N. Sehgal, S.S. Josh, H.L. Hutchinson, Shaukat Usmani, B.F. Bradly, A. Prasad, P. Spratt, and G. Adhikari.Middle Row: K.R. Mitra, Gopan Chakravarthy, Kishore Lal Ghosh, K.L. Kadam, D.R. Thengdi, Goura Shanker, S. Banerjee, K.N. Joglekar, P.C. Joshi, and Muzaffar Ahmed.Front Row: M.G. Desai, G. Goswami, R.S. Nimkar, S.S. Mirajkar, S.A. Dange, G.V. Ghate and Gopal Basak.
The British Government was clearly worried about the growing influence of the Communist International. Its ultimate objective, so the government perceived, was to achieve "complete paralysis and overthrow of existing Governments in every country (including India) by means of a general strike and armed uprising.".The government's immediate response was to foist yet another conspiracy case -- the
In more than one way the Meerut Conspiracy case trial helped the Communist Party of India to fconsolidate its position among workers. Dange along with 32 persons were arrested on or about
March 201929 and were put on trial under Section 121A of the Indian Penal Code, which declares,
Whoever within or without British India conspires to commit any of the offenses punishable by Section 121 or to deprive the King of the sovereignty of British India or any part thereof, or conspires to overawe, by means of criminal force or the show of criminal force, the Government of India or any local Government, shall be punished with trnsportation for life [During the British rule, a severe form of punishment was banishing convicts to a penal settlement in
Andaman Islands.] , or any shorter term, or with imprisonment of either description which may extend to ten years.
The main charges were that in 1921 Dange, Shaukat Usmani and Muzaffar Ahmad entered into a conspiracy to establish a branch of Comintern in India and they were helped by various persons, including the accused Philip Spratt and Benjamin Francis Bradley, sent to India by the Communist International. The aim of the accused persons, according to the charges raised against them was
to deprive the King Emperor of the sovereignty of British India, and for such purpose to use the methods and carry out the programme and plan of campaign outlined and ordained by the Communist International.
The Sessions Court in Meerut awarded stringent sentences to the accused in January 1933. Out of the accused 27 persons were convicted with various durations of 'transportation'. While Muzaffar Ahmed was transported for life, Dange, Spratt, Ghate, Joglekar and Nimbkar were each awarded transportation for a period of 12 years. On appeal, in July 1933, the sentences of Ahmed, Dange and Usmani were reduced three years. Reductions were also made in the sentences of other convicts. [ [http://www.wcml.org.uk/internat/meerut1.htm "Working Class Movement Library" "Meerut Conspiracy Trial"] ] .
Impact of Meerut Conspiracy Case
Though all the accused were not communists, the charges framed against them betrayed the British government's fear for growth of communist ideas in India. In the trial the accused were all labeled as Bolsheviks. During the trial of four and a half years, the defendants turned the courtroom into a public platform to espouse their cause. As a result, the trial saw strengthening of the communist movement in the country.
Harkishan Singh Surjeet, a former General Secretary of the Communist Party of India (Marxist)wrote about the aftermath of the Meerut Conspiracy case thus:
a Party with a centralized apparatus, came into being only after the release of the Meerut prisoners, in 1933. The Meerut Conspiracy Case, though launched to suppress the communist movement, provided the opportunity for Communists to propagate their ideas. It came out with its own manifesto and was affiliated to the Communist International in 1934. [ [http://www.cpim.org/marxist/1995_marxist_cpi_75_hks.htm Surjeet, Harkishan Singh "75th Anniversary of the Formation of the Communist Party of India"] , an article in "The Marxist", New Delhi, Volume: 2, No. 1 Issue: January- March 1984]
The CPI and the independence movement
During the period, prior to India's Independence, the Communist Party of India's responses to freedom struggle were dictated by the Comintern's views. After its admission to the Third International, the Communist Party of India was seen to be guided by the policies imposed by
Stalinon the international communist movement. Stalin's policies were, in turn, dictated by Russia's geopolitical interests. As a result the positions taken by the CPI ran many times counter to popular nationalist sentiments, leading to erosion of the Party's popular base.
Up to 1934, the CPI viewed India's freedom struggle as a movement of the reactionary
bourgeoisiepoliticians. The British government had banned communist activities from 1934 to 1938. When the Comintern adopted the Georgi Dimitrovthesis of popular frontagainst fascism, CPI declared support for the Congress in 1938. The communist leaders like Dinkar Mehta, Sajjad Zaheer, E.M.S. Namboodiripad, and Soli Batliwala became members of the national executive of the Congress Socialist Party.
The Raj re-banned the CPI in 1939, for its initial anti-War stance. The line was changed when, following the the Nazi-Soviet pact (1939-40). The Communist Party of India did not take an active stance against
Hitlerand his policies. But when Hitler attacked Poland, the Communist Party of India had called the World War II, an 'Imperialist War'. But when the Fuehrerattacked the Soviet Union, the same Communist Party of India decided to call the war, a People's War.
USSRhad sided with the Great Britainin the war, the Communist Party of India was legalized for the first time. Saying that the freedom struggle would impede the war against fascism, the CPI stayed away from the freedom struggle. The Indian National Congress was able to politically corner the communists, as the popular sentiments were overwhelmingly supporting Gandhi's Quit India Movement.
Dange in 'P.C. Joshi era'
After the sudden arrest of then Somnath Lahiri, Secretary of CPI, during end-1935, Puran Chand Joshi became the first general secretary of Communist Party of India, for a period from 1935 to 1947 -- or as it was called the 'P.C. Joshi era.'
In1943 Dange for the first was elected to the Central Committee of the CPI [B.T. Ranadive. "S.A. Dange (1959)" in Banerjee, Gopal (ed.) "S.A. Dange - A Fruitful Life". Kolkata: Progressive Publishers, 2002. p. 26.] . In October 1944 he attended the XVII Congress of the Communist Party of Great Britain in London as a fraternal representative from the the Communist Party of India.Between 1929 and 1935 Dange remained in jail for role in Meerut conspiracy case. After being released from jail in 1935, Dange went on a speaking tour in
Andhra Pradeshon the invitation of the Andhra leadership of the Congress Socialist Party. His tour resulted in that many prominent Congress Socialist Party leaders from Andhra Pradesh joining the Communist Party. [B.T. Ranadive. "S.A. Dange (1959)" in Banerjee, Gopal (ed.) "S.A. Dange - A Fruitful Life". Kolkata: Progressive Publishers, 2002. p. 23. ] After he came out of the jail, up to 1939, he was working for the Party and was trying increase its hold over the trade union movement.
Around this time Dange's legislative career also took off. He was elected to the Bombay Legislative Assembly as Communist candidate in 1946.
Dange's rise in trade union movement
In 1939 Dange was convicted to four months of rigorous imprisonment for organizing a strike of textile workers. He was arrested on
11 March 1940for leading a general strike of textile workers in Bombay and interned in the DeoliDetention Camp. At Deoli several other communist leaders were also jailed along with him. In prison he started a political study circle amongst the prisoners. He was released in 1943 [B.T. Ranadive. "S.A. Dange (1959)" in Banerjee, Gopal (ed.) "S.A. Dange - A Fruitful Life". Kolkata: Progressive Publishers, 2002. p. 25.] .
Even before the takeover of the AITUC by the communists, in 1927, Dange was elected Assistant Secretary of AITUC. [B.T. Ranadive. "S.A. Dange (1959)" in Banerjee, Gopal (ed.) "S.A. Dange - A Fruitful Life". Kolkata: Progressive Publishers, 2002. p. 19.] " During the year 1943- 1944 Dange was elected for the first time as the chairman of the All India Trade Unions Congress.
In 1944-1945 he was a delegate to the World Trade Union Conference in London. In 1945-1947 he became the vice chairman of the All India Trade Union Congress. Also in October 1945 he became a member of the Executive Committee and chairman of the General Council of the
World Federation of Trade Unions. In February 1947, Dange again became the chairman of All India Trade Union Congress and continued to be at the helm of that organization either as general secretary or chairman.
CPI on the eve of independence
Around the British decided to transfer the power to the Indians, the CPI found itself not in a very happy situation. For once their disassociation with the Quit India movement made them unpopular with the people. Secondly huge support that the Congress garnered ran contrary the CPI's portrayal of it as a mere bourgeoisie party.
Internationally also CPI found itself lost. At the start of World War II, the Comintern supported a policy of non-intervention, arguing that the war was an imperialist war between various national ruling classes. But when the Soviet Union itself was invaded on
22 June 1941, the Comintern changed its position to one of active support for the Allies. Stalin disbanded Comintern in 1943. It is surmised that the dissolution came about as Stalin wished to calm his World War II Allies (particularly Franklin Delano Rooseveltand Winston Churchill) not to suspect that the Soviet Union was pursuing a policy of trying to foment revolution in other countries. [Robert Service, "Stalin. A biography". (Macmillan - London, 2004), pp 444-445]
The CPI was in a state of confusion and the Party clearly neede advice. In July 1947, P.C.Joshi, the then General Secretary, secured Dange's entry to
Dange in Moscow
On the day India got freedom, 15 August 1947 Dange was in
Moscowtalking to the Soviet leaders. Andrei Zhdanovand Mikhail Suslov, leading Soviet theorists of the period, participated in the 1947 talks with Dange.
The following free and frank exchange between Dange and Zhdanov on the day after the India's Independence day, that is, on
16 August 1947, brings out the chaotic situation in which the Communist Party of India found itself at that historical juncture:
Further com. Zhdanov asks com. Dange to explain why the Congress managed to strengthen its authority.
Comrade Dange opines that during the war the Congress, taking into account the anti-English sentiments of the wide masses, opposed the English and by this action acquired a semblance of a national organization fighting for the national sovereignty.
The Communist Party during the war supported the allies, including the English and by this action weakened its influence as a lot of people could not correctly understand the position of the Party. A considerable part of the supporters of the Communist Party during the war shifted to the Congress. [http://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/rdv7n1/Dange.htm "Transcript" of the Discussion held on 16.VIII.1947 from 6 pm to 8 between Comrade A.A. Zhdanov with Com. Shripat Amrit Dange] , Member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party Of India.]
The Soviet leaders closely questioned Dange about the Congress. For years questions regarding what attitude should be taken toward the Congress would be debated inside the left parties in India. The following portion shows Dange's attitude towards the Congress and
Muslim League, at that time.
Com. Zhdanov: What is Nehru – a capitalist or a landowner?
Com. Dange: A bourgeois.
Com. Zhdanov: And Jinnah?
Com. Dange: Also a bourgeois. He is an eminent advocate, has acquired a lot of money and has invested it in enterprises. Nehru also belongs to a family of eminent advocates and has invested his substantial savings in the Indian company of Tata....
The 1950s: internal strifes within the CPI
Around the time of independence the CPI was sending confusing signals -- from left to centrist to right. General Secretary Joshi was advocating unity with the Indian National Congress under the leadership of Jawaharlal Nehru. By the end of 1947, P.C. Joshi found himself in the minority. His line was challenged by the radicals who claimed that "ye azaadi jhoota hai [ This freedom is bogus.] " B.T. Ranadive, a prominent radical leader, was inspired by the great strides that the Chinese communists had made, and wanted a similar model for India.
The Communist Party of India’s second congress at
Calcutta(new spelling Kolkata) on 28 February 1948, the Zhdanovline of insurrection was adopted on the premise that 'free' India was only a “semi-colony of British imperialism”. Joshi, who stood collaboration with Congress was sidelined, and Ranadive became the General Secretary. Open call for taking up arms, known as 'Calcutta thesis' and was closely identified with its main proponent and the new General Secretary, Ranadive. As a result insurgencies took place in Tripura, Telanganaand Travancore.
A rebellion in the Telangana region in the northern part of what was to become Andhra Pradesh, a peasant struggle against the feudal regime of the Nizam was already happening when Calcutta thesis was adopted. To use the Telangana rebellion to herald in the Indian revolution was one the main pillar of Ranadive strategy. During the peak of Telangana rebellion, 3,000 villages and some 41,000 square kilometers of territory were involved in the revolt. The ruler of Hyderabad state,
nizamhad not yet acceded his territory to India, but the violence of the communist-led rebellion, the central government sent in the army in September 1948. By November 1949, Hyderabad had been forced to accede to the Indian union, and, by October 1951, the violent phase of the Telangana movement had been suppressed.
Dange had been a member of the CPI Central Committee since the founding of the Party. But during 1950-1951 he was not included in the Central Committee.
At the start of 1950s, the CPI was bitterly divided over the manner in which political power in India should be captured. The militants advocated the 'Chinese path', or capture of power through violent means and the other group that included Dange was for the 'Indian path'(a moderate strategy to capture power within the constraints of
The proponents of the `Chinese path' led by Comrade C. Rajeswara Rao and those of the `Indian path' led by Comrade Ajoy Ghosh had set up their own centers and the CPI was on the verge of a split."Sen, Mohit". "A Traveller and the Road – The Journey of an Indian Communist". New Delhi: Rupa Co., 2003. p. 81]
30 May 1950, the extremists with hundreds of their followers split from the Party and came out in the open [ [http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F10B15FB3B5F177A93C3AA178ED85F448585F9 "Rival Red Party Is Set Up in India, Forswearing the Tactic of Violence" 31 May 1950 "New York Times"] . New York.] . When the war of attrition between both continued unabated, the Soviet Communists intervened. The warring leaders were invited to Russia for a discussion with the Communist Party of the Soviet Union( CPSU) in 1951.
Events that followed were described Mohit Sen thus:
Four leaders, two from each center, were brought to Moscow. They travelled in cognito as manual workers in a Soviet ship from Calcutta. They were
Ajoy Ghoshand S.A. Dange from the 'Indian Path', and C. Rajeswara Rao and M. Basava Punnaiah, from the Chinese path.
S.A. Dange and C. Rajeswara Rao have both told me about the meeting with the leaders of the CPSU. The first meeting was attended from the Soviet side by Comrades Suslov,
Malenkovand Molotov. It was on the third day that it was announced that Comrade Stalin would attend. So he did for subsequent days...
Stalin's view also was that India was not an independent country but ruled indirectly by British colonialists. He also agreed that the Communists could eventually advance only by heading an armed revolution. But this would not be of the Chinese type. He strongly advised that the armed struggle being conducted in Telengana should be ended.
In 1951, Dange was elected to both the Central Committee and the Politburo. In 1952 Dange lost elections to the Indian Parliament from Bombay.
Visit to India of Bulganin and Khrushchev
Jawaharlal Nehru, the then Indian Prime Minister visited USSR and received a tremendous welcome. This was followed by the maiden visit to India of the Soviet leaders, Nikolai Bulganinand Nikita Khrushchevin 1955. Jawaharlal Nehru, frankly put forward to the visiting Soviet leaders that the Communist Party of India was claiming to receive direction from the CPSU. To this Khrushchev's response was a reiteration of the official Soviet Party line, that with the abolition of the Comintern, there was no organisation for leading the Communist Parties in other countries. Khrushchev and Bulganin's visit paved way for forging of a strong relationship between the Government of India (and later Congress Party) and the USSR, independent of CPI.
The party was again on the verge of split at its fourth congress held at
Palakkadin 1956. Against the ultra-left line of Ranadive, Dange and P.C. Joshi were for reviving the 'popular front' and working with the ruling Indian National Congress. These differences within the Communist Party of India, up to Palakkad congress was an internal matter of the Party; the international communist movement at that time was united. Ranadive who was earlier shunned for his extremismmade a comeback to the Party leadership at the Palakkad congress.
Formation of Maharashtra
After India's independence in 1947, the princely states were integrated into the Indian Union, and the
Deccan Statesincluding Kolhapur were integrated into Bombay State, which was created from the former Bombay Presidencyin 1950. The Government of India had appointed the States Re-organization Committee for setting up states on the basis of language. This committee recommended a bi-lingual state called Bombay for Maharashtra-Gujarat, with Bombay as its capital. The state came into being on November 1, 1956, but stirred up political unrest in both the states. In Maharashtra, under the leadership of Keshavrao Jedhe, an all-party meeting was held in Puneand a joint Maharashtra council (Samyukta Maharashtra Samiti) was founded. In the second general elections the Samiti defeated the stalwarts of Congress by securing 101 seats out of 133, including 12 from Mumbai.
Dange was elected to the Second Lok Sabha in 1957 from Bombay City (Central) Constituency of the State of Bombay.
Dange along with S.M. Joshi, N.G. Gore and P.K. Atre fought relentlessly for Samyukta Maharashtra, a struggle that cost a lot of lives. Finally on
May 1, 1960, pre-dominantly Marathi-speaking state of Maharashtra was born.
ino-Indian border Dispute
Dange was the leader of the Communist group in the House of People or
Lok Sabha, when the Sino-Indian border dispute broke out -- an event that would sharpen the differences within the CPI. The Calcutta Congress at the end of September 1959 brought into open the differences within the Party. As Manchester Guardianreported:
Half the party wants to express its support for the Congressstand that there will be no gift (to China) of the and that India stands broadly by the McMahon line. The otherhalf wants to go back to guerrilla tactics and give up theparliamentary experiment.The nationalist parliamentary wing of the CP, led by AjoyGhosh, believes that the time for violence has not come andthat Moscow counsels patience. ...The other half of the ICP (sic), fed up with the parliamentaryexperiment, argues that Kerala proved that the ruling class willnever allow a people's Government to capture powerdemocratically.This is the first time that the ICP has been so sdivided, and that the division has become so public. [The Manchester Guardian.September 30 1959.]
International Socialists vs. Nationalists
Sino-Indian border dispute brought into open bitter internal war within the CPI between those who described themselves as international socialists and others who advocated that national sentiments should not be completely ignored. Mr. Dange, leader of the Party in Parliament,
M.N. Govindan Nair, secretary of the Kerala unit, and Dr. Muzaffar Ahmed of Uttar Pradesh were the proponents of the nationalist cause.
The conflict came in the open when
P.C. Joshi, who controlled the Party's weekly "New Age", suppressed Mr. Dange's statement in Parliament that he sharply stood by the McMahon line, and also a resolution passed by Maharashtra State Committee supporting Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru on the border dispute. Joshi was earlier sidelined for his pro-Congress advocacy, but later rehabilitated by making him the editor of the Party journal.
Initial Advantage with Dange
An important leader publicly to join the nationalist Dange faction was
A.K. Gopalan, the deputy leader of the Communist group in Lok Sabha. He was quoted by a newspaper that he(Gopalan) was shocked by the ' Ladakhincident' [Heavy Indian causalities occurred a peak of the Karakorum on the Aksai-chin plateau. The area was said to be a part of Ladakh by the Indian Government, but the Chinese claimed it to be a part of Sinkiang. In 1959 the Indian patrols suffered heavy losses in the hands of Chinese army in this region and is referred to as Ladakh incident.] , lamenting the loss of Indian lives, and stating that the country would support Nehru in his efforts to avoid any repetition of it. [ The Baltimore Sun. October6 1959.]
In the initial stages, Dange's nationalist line was the dominant one. To quote Manchester Guardian, "Hence not only the Party's extremists of the Joshi wing, but also the middle-of-the-road Moscow faction were at that time visibly losing ground. This favorable development was probably accelerated by the attitude of studied neutrality adopted in Moscow, wherethe Soviet press printed both the Chinese and Indian accounts of the Ladakh skirmish, without appearing to take sides. [ManchesterGuardian. October 30 1959.] His general nationalist communist position had the backing of the Kerala, Maharashtra,
Andhra Pradesh, Rajasthan, Biharand Uttar Pradeshunits of the Party.
Dange losing ground
But soon after opposition against Dange erupted in the Party when Dange came up with his own definition of communist internationalism, different from standard Marxian understanding of the term. In his view internationalism is valid only for 'domestic' issues such as Hungary and Tibet, which were the 'domestic' affairs of the USSR and China. But he regards relations between India and China as non-domestic, so that Indian communists may side with theIndian Government in this specific cases. Even the comrades who sided with Dange on the Sino-Indian border issue, were not ready to compromise on basic tenets of communism. Dange was severely criticized and he had own up his fault in the Party forum, through a process called 'self-criticism'. [ Manchester Guardian. 29 October 1959.]
There was also a consolidation among the communist internationalists at this stage. The
Swisspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitungidentified B. T. Ranadive, a former generalsecretary(1948-50), as supporting P.C. Joshi in his pro-Chinese attitude. According to these two militants, Nehruought to be condemned by the Party as a "reactionary", and thepolicy of Congress should be resolutely opposed. At this stage, the secretariat's eight members were divided as follows:
*Dange, Gopalan, Ahmad - nationalist communists
*Joshi, Ranadive - extremists, pro-China
*Bhubesh Gupta - former extremist, present views uncertain.
*Ajoy Ghosh and one other not identified by the newspaper - centralists, attempting to restore unity. [ Neue Zürcher Zeitung. October 27 1959.]
"See main article
In the meanwhile fighting began on the Himalayan border on 10 October 1962 between the Chinese People's Liberation Army and Army of India. The war ended when the Chinese unilaterally declared a ceasefire on 20 November 1962, which went into effect at midnight.
"See main article
Another issue that fueled the split in the Communist Party of India was parting of the ways between the USSR and China. Though the conflict had a long history, it came out in open in 1959, Khrushchev sought to appease the West during a period of the
Cold Warknown as 'The Thaw', by holding a summit meeting with U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower. Two other reasons were USSR's unwillingness to support Chinese nuclear program and their neutrality in the initial days of Sino-Indian border conflict. These events greatly offended Mao Zedongand the other Chinese Communist leaders.
Left vs. Right
In 1962, the Mao criticized Khrushchev for backing down in the
Cuban missile crisis. By that time the Soviets were openly supporting India in its border dispute with China. These events were followed by formal statements of each side's ideological positions: the Chinese came out with their document in June 1963. [ [http://www.etext.org/Politics/MIM/classics/mao/polemics/index.html "The Chinese Communist Party's Proposal Concerning the General Line of the International Communist Movement"] .] The Soviets too came out with their own document. [ [http://www.etext.org/Politics/MIM/classics/mao/polemics/sevenlet.html "Open Letter of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union"] .] Thereafter the two parties stopped communicating.
These events had their direct fall-out in the Communist Party of India. Former nationalist vs. international socialist debate had now turned into a conflict between the Right (the Russian line) and the Left (the Chinese line). Dange, who was supporting the Nehru Government, was the main leader of the Right. After the death of Secretary-General Ajoy Ghosh in January 1962, a truce was established. Dange, who at that time was the head of the All-India Trade Union Congress, became the first chairman of the CPI and the centrist leader, Namboodiripad, became the Secretary-General.
plit in the CPI
At that time, the Government of India had arrested 400 prominent communist leaders of the Left wing for their alleged pro-China views. Dange, seized this opportunity, a move that would further erode his base, to reassert the right-wing control over the pro-left strongholds of West Bengal and the Punjab.In February 1963 -- with 48 of its 110 members absent, indetention or in hiding -- the National Council voted to"administer the work of the
West BengalParty" through a Provincial Organizing Committee acting on behalf of theCentral Secretariat.
Through such partisan measures Dange alienated the centrist leader,E.M.S. Namboodiripad, who resigned from the post of Secretary-General, leaving Dange to take over the post.By earlier 1963 the Left hadestablished an underground organization for what amountedto a breakaway West Bengal Communist Party Unit. According to prominent leftist fortnightly "Link", New Delhi, the new outfit enjoyed the support of 14,000 of the 17,000 Communist Party members inthe state [ "Link", July 7 1963. New Delhi] . Similar moves were made in many other states by the left-wing. Release of their leaders from jails by the state governments also helped the leftists to consolidate their position among cadres.
In September 1963, A.K. Gopalan (formerly with Dange in 1959) was able to organizean impressive anti-official party rally in Calcutta. Dange still had a majority of two-to-oneon the council, but the emerging alliance between the Leftistsand Namboodiripad's smaller Centrist faction forced him to be cautious. However, at that stage, with secessionist organizationsalready at work in several states, no caution or concessioncould halt the drift towards a split; though attempts were still not given up for unity. Suddenly in March 1964, a trigger was provided by what was called the 'Dange letters', that exploded on the face of the Party, precipitating a split.
"The Current", a Bombay magazine published these letters whichwere said to be written by Dange to the British Viceroyfrom prison in 1924, after his conviction in the Kanpur Conspiracy Case, and in which he had promised to cooperate with Britain against Germany in World War II [March 7, 1964,
The Current, Bombay.] . Dange, who was the chairman of the Party got the Secretariat to denounced the letters as a forgery. But slide towards split became unstoppable. His opponentsexploited this opening, and called for his removal from theleadership to facilitate investigation.
The birth of CPI(M)
The cascading events following the Dange Letters ultimately resulted in the split of the Party in October, 1964. The left challenge came into the open with a conference to prepare a party program, immediately after the Dange Letters. The showdown came on
April 11 1964when 30 Leftists and two Centrist leaders. Namboodiripad and Jyoti Basu, walked out of a National Council meeting. and proceeded to appeal to all Indian Communists to repudiate the Dange leadership. National Council suspended the thirty-two leaders.
The left leaders who were ousted, in turn, announced a separated national convention. After the
Tenaliconvention the CPI left-wing organized party district and state conferences. Also it was decided in the Tenali convention to hold a party congress of the left-wing in Calcutta. The Calcutta Congress was held during October 31 - November 7, 1964. Simultaneously, the official Party under Dange convened a Party Congress of the Communist Party of India in Bombay. The split was complete. The left group which assembled in Calcutta decided to adopt the name 'Communist Party of India (Marxist)'.This party also adopted its own political programme. P. Sundarayyawas elected general secretary of CPI(M).
General Elections 1967
After the split, the first event that tested out the relative strengths of both groups was the Kerala Assembly Elections held in 1965. The Communist Party of India contested in 79 seats but only win 3 seats, polling about 0.5 million votes with 8.30% vote share. The Communist Party of India (Marxist) contested 73 seats, won 40, with about 1.3 million votes, constituting of 19.87% vote share. [ [http://www.eci.gov.in/StatisticalReports/SE_1965/StatisticalReport%201965%20Kerala.pdf "Statistical Report of General Elections, 1965 to the Legislative Assembly of Kerala"] The Election Commission of India, New Delhi.]
In 1967, General Elections to the Parliament, Dange won from the Bombay Central South Constituency. The results had again shown a weakening CPI. They contested in 109 seats, won only 23, with about 7.5 million votes ( that is 5.11% of total votes polled. The CPI(M) contested in 59, won 19, with 6.2 million votes(4.28%). [ [http://www.eci.gov.in/StatisticalReports/LS_1967/Vol_I_LS_67.pdf"Statistical Report of General Elections, 1967 to the Fourth Lok Sabha"] The Election Commission of India, New Delhi.]
In the state legislative elections held simultaneously, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) emerged as a major party in Kerala and West Bengal. In Kerala a United Front government led by E.M.S. Namboodiripad was formed. The Communist Party of India was a minor coalition partner. In West Bengal, Communist Party of India (Marxist) emerged as the main force, but the chief ministership of the coalition government was given to
Ajoy Mukherjeeof the Bangla Congress, a provincial break-away group of the Indian National Congress. For the Communist Party of India, The Kerala experiment of coexisting with Communist Party of India(Marxist) did not work for long.
plit in the Trade Union
Even after the Party split, Communist Party of India (Marxist) and Communist Party cadres remained unified in the
All India Trade Union Congress. After the short-lived coexistence between both the Parties broke down in Kerala and also in West Bengal similar rupture happened, the trade union wing also split. In December 1969, eight Communist Party of India (Marxist) members walked out of an All India Trade Union Congress executive committee meeting. Later, the Marxist break-away members would organize an All India Trade Union Conference in Calcutta, on 28-31 May 1970. The Calcutta conference was the founding conference of the Centre of Indian Trade Unions, new Communist Party of India (Marxist) trade union. [ Bose, Shanti Shekar. "A Brief Note on the Contents of Documents of the Communist Movement in India". National Book Agency: Kolkata. 2005. p. 56-59]
Collaborating with Congress
The issue whether to support Congress or not bedevilled the undivided Communist Party right from the year of independence, 1947, when the then general secretary
P.C. Joshistrongly spoke in favor of it. Joshi was marginalized for this, yet the question persisted and was one of the reasons for the CPI split. It was increasingly becoming clear that anti-Congress faction, the Communist Party of India (Marxist) was stronger of the two groups.
In the late 1960s, however, the mood within the Communist Party of India turned strongly anti-Congress. In the Bombay party congress in 1968, the CPI took the decision of forging an anti-Congress front. This had resulted in collaborating with the Communist Party of India (Marxist) for a short while. Soon differences between both Parties again came out in the open. From 1970 onwards Communist Party of India started once again working with the Congress. Dange was one of the principal architects of this union.
One of the events that facilitated cooperating with Congress was the
Bangladesh Liberation War. In 1971 Bangladesh(formerly East Pakistan) declared its independence from Pakistan. The Pakistani military tried to quell the uprising; but Indian military intervention thwarted such moves. There was confusion within the ranks of the Indian communists -- while the pro-Soviet CPI had no problem in supporting the war, and the Indian prime minister, Indira Gandhi, the CPI(M) found itself in quandary participated in the resistance struggle, the pro-China communist groups were in a quandary, because China had sided with Pakistan in the war.
CPI-led government in Kerala
During the period 1970-1977, CPI was a strong ally of the Congress party and nothing typified better than the alliance both the parties forged in Kerala. Both the parties formed a coalition government together in that state, with the CPI-leader
C. Achutha Menonas the Chief Minister. In Kerala legislative elections held in 1970, the Communist Party of India won only 16 seats, out of a total of 133, where as the coalition leader Indian National Congress had won 30 seats [ [http://www.eci.gov.in/StatisticalReports/SE_1970/StatiRep_KL_70.pdf "Statistical Report of General Elections, 1970 to the Legislative Assembly of Kerala".] The Election Commission of India, New Delhi.] . Still, Congress accepted Achuta Menon's leadership till the next election that would be held seven years later.
The CPI and the Emergency
"See main article
Indian Emergency (1975–1977)"
A state of emergency declared by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, in June 1975, by invoking Article 352 of the
Constitution of India, and it lasted for 21 months. Emergency provisions suspended all the Constitutional rights and gave power to rule by decree. It enabled the Prime Minister to suspend elections and civil liberties.
Indira Gandhi took this extreme step due to a host of reasons. The venerated Gandhian leader
Jaya Prakash Narayan's agitation in Biharfor change in provincial government, was getting increasingly against the Central Government. More immediate reason for clamping of emergency was that in a judgment dated June 12 1975, Justice Jagmohanlal Sinhaof the Allahabad High Courtheld that Mrs. Gandhi was guilty on the charge of misuse of government machinery for her election campaign. The case was filed by Raj Narain, who had been recently defeated in the parliamentary election by Indira Gandhi. The court declared her election null and void and unseated her from her seat in Lok Sabha. The court also banned her from contesting any election for an additional six years.
CPI support to Indira Gandhi
CPI saw emergency as an opportunity and welcomed it 'as necessary to combat fascist movement led by Jaiprakash Narayan and the parties of right reaction. CPI leaders believed they could turn emergency into a communist revolution. Almost a decade of close cooperation with Indira Gandhi and the Congress seemed to be on the verge of bringing about a massive revolutionary breakthrough for the CPI. [page 224, "Coalition Strategies and Tactics of Indian Communism" by Stanley A. Kochanek appearing in "Coalition Strategies of Marxist Parties", edited by Trond Gilber Published 1989 Duke University Press]
Backlash: General elections, 1977
In 1977, Indira Gandhi went for general elections and CPI was still supporting her. The Congress lost the elections and emergency was lifted. The CPI suffered its worst ever losses in general elections. CPI(M) was able to hold on to its base in West Bengal, but, electoral support for the CPI took a nosedive, as the following table would show:
Comparative Performance of the Communist Parties in General Elections of 1971 and 1977. [ [http://www.eci.gov.in/StatisticalReports/LS_1971/Vol_I_LS71.pdf "Statistical Report on General Election 1971 to the Fifth Lok Sabha."] The Election Commission of India, New Delhi] [ [http://www.eci.gov.in/StatisticalReports/LS_1977/Vol_I_LS_77.pdf"Statistical Report on General Election 1977 to the Sixth Lok Sabha."] The Election Commission of India, New Delhi.]
Towards left unity
To both the communist parties, election results raised serious questions regarding their relevance in the Indian political system. Newly strewn up
Bharatiya Lok Dal[Bharatiya Lok Dal was formed at the end of 1974 through the fusion of seven parties opposed to Indira Gandhi. The leader of the BLD was Charan Singh. In 1977, the Bharatiya Lok Dal combined with the Jan Sangh and anti- Indira Gandhi breakaway Indian National Congress (Organization) to form the Janata Party. The newly formed Janata Party contested the 1977 elections, and got majority to form the first non-Congress Government in India. But the Janata Party contested the election on the Bharatiya Lok Dal symbol. Therefore, on record of the Election Commission of India, the government was formed by the Bharatiya Lok Dal, and not, Janata Party.] - a medley of groups ranging from Congress rebels to Hindu party Jan Sangh- under the patronage of Jaiprakash Narayan, was able to garner 41.32% of the votes polled. Congress though lost heavily in terms of seats, still had 34.52% of popular votes. To the left parties the fact that these two parties accounted for more than three-fourth of the electorate and 449 out a total of 542 seats did suggest a possibility of a two (bourgeoisie) party political system. The result was a lot of soul searching for both the parties. Eventually both the parties would regroup and would form an alliance.
Dange's isolation in CPI
As one of the few parties that supported emergency, the CPI was under attack from all other quarters. In spite of strong pro-Indira arguments presented by Dange, CPI in its eleventh party congress at
Bhatinda, repudiated the support to emergency and opted for a new policy of left democratic unity. In Bhatinda congress two separate groupings emerged, one led by Dange and another led by C. Rajeswara Rao. The Rajeswara Rao's faction was victorious and the Bhatinda congress confirmed the shift towards creating alliances with leftist forces against Congress. Dange's pro-Congress line was severely tested within his own party. Similarly in their tenth party congress held at Jullunderaround the same time, CPI(M) also decided pursue a path of left unity.
Even after Bhatinda congress, Dange was able to retain some of his influence though the majority was moving towards unity with CPI(M). The main reason for this was CPI sharing power with the Congress in Kerala.
Initially, both parties differed on the concept of what left and democratic unity would mean. This came out in open in when leaders of both parties met for the first time after 1964 split in New Delhi on
April 13, 1978. In spite of repudiation of emergency, the CPI was not ready to change its overall assessment of Congress. Congress according to CPI contained left and democratic elements. This stand also justified continued cooperation between Congress and CPI in Kerala [page 226, "Coalition Strategies and Tactics of Indian Communism" by Stanley A. Kochanek appearing in "Coalition Strategies of Marxist Parties", edited by Trond Gilber Published 1989 Duke University Press] .
All India Communist Party
By 1980, the writing on the wall was clear. Poll alliance between CPI and CPI(M) was forged. CPI had parted ways with Congess in Kerala. The Dange group within the party was reduced to an insignificant minority. In 1980 a section of CPI cadre who wanted to retain the close relationship with the Congress, broke away from the Party and formed
All India Communist Party. Roza Deshpandhe, the daughter of Dange and her husband Bani Deshpande, played an important role in organising the founding of the new party.Andersen, Walter K.. "India in 1981: Stronger Political Authority and Social Tension", published in Asian Survey, Vol. 22, No. 2, A Survey of Asia in 1981: Part II (Feb., 1982), pp. 119-135] . It is said that Dange himself was initially largely sceptical of a split in the CPI.Sen, Mohit. A Traveller and the Road – The Journey of an Indian Communist. New Delhi: Rupa Co., 2003. p. 388]
The founders of All India Communist Party retained close communications with Dange. In May, 1981 the National Council of CPI expelled Dange. When the first conference of AICP was held in
Meerut[Das Gupta, Jagadish, in Banerjee, Gopal (ed.), S.A. Dange – A Fruitful Life. Kolkata: Progressive Publishers, 2002. p. 101] , commencing on March 13. [ [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B06E2DF1239F937A25750C0A967948260 New York Times] March 14 1981] Dange turned up there uninvited and took charge of the new party. He was elected general secretary of the party. [Banerjee, Gopal (ed.), S.A. Dange – A Fruitful Life. Kolkata: Progressive Publishers, 2002. p.153]
Marginalization within the communist movement
Although having Dange as its leader AICP was not able to attract any major nationwide following for two main reasons. Firstly, the Soviet Union did not give any political support to the new party. The founders of AICP were upholding the pro-Soviet CPI policy of cooperating with the National Congress, but the Soviets were not interested in a split within CPI. Secondly, the Congress showed limited interest towards the idea of having a national alliance with the new party.
AICP versus Congress
In the end, the two parties would be poised against each other in several local elections. Not only that, the Congress successfully outmaneuvered the new party in taking over a pro-Soviet goodwill organization. As an alternative to the CPI-controlled Indian-Soviet Cultural Society (ISCUS), members of AICP and the Congress had set up the Friends of the Soviet Union. Eventually the control over this organization was completely taken over by the Congress. [Bhattacharya, Mrimoy in Banerjee, Gopal (ed.), S.A. Dange – A Fruitful Life. Kolkata: Progressive Publishers, 2002. p. 141] .
Merger with United Communist Party of India
In 1987 AICP merged with the Indian Communist Party and formed the
United Communist Party of India. Veteran communist leader Mohit Senwas the general secretaryof the party until his death in 2003.
The party failed to register any presence in the country. For example in the 2007 assembly election in Uttar Pradesh UCPI launched three candidate, Devi Dayal Yadav in Karki (572 votes, 0.49% of the votes in the constituency), Anand Kumar in Baberu (899 votes, 0.82%) and Vimal Krishan Srivastav in Banda (456 voes, 0.39%). [ [http://www.eci.gov.in/StatisticalReports/SE_2007/StatReport_AS_2007_UTTAR_PRADESH.pdf "Statistical Report on General Election 2007 to the Legislative Assembly of Uttar Pradesh."] The Election Commission of India. New Delhi.] Similarly in 2006
Tamil Naduelections UCPI could garner only 921 votes in the state. [ [http://www.eci.gov.in/StatisticalReports/SE_2006/StatReport_TN_2006.pdf "Statistical Report on General Election 2006 to the Legislative Assembly of Tamil Nadu"] The Election Commission of India. New Delhi. ]
Death and legacy
Dange died at a Bombay hospital on
May 22, 1991. He was given a state funeral by the Maharashtrastate government. [Banerjee, Gopal. "S.A. Dange - A Fruitful Life". Kolkata: Progressive Publishers, 2002. p. 13.] He was survived by his wife Ushatai and daughter, Roza Deshpande.
Dange's birth centenary
Seven years later, in 1998, it was decided to celebrate his birth centenary celebrations, starting from October 10 that year in a gathering of trade unionists in Mumbay. A committee was set up to undertake a project for instituting a memorial to Dange. The concept of the memorial approved in the meeting was that it would house a modern education center, a large library and facilities for research on various issues concerning the working class movement. There will also be a trade union school with hostel and canteen facilities. [ [http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19980707/18850574.html The Indian Express] July 7, 1998.] . This project did not take off.
No sponsors for centenary function in Mumbai
Another attempt by various communist organizations was to hold a national communist conference in Mumbai on the occasion of Dange's birth centenary celebrations. But this had failed due to the paucity of funds. The communist organizations could not raise sufficient funds nor could find a generous sponsorer to host the meet in Dange's own city. Therefore, the venue of the conference was shifted to Kerala. [ [http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19981124/32851854.html The Indian Express] November 24, 1998.]
Honor by the Indian Parliament
December 10, 2004, The Indian Parliament honoured Dange when Dr. Manmohan Singh, Prime Minister of India unveiled his statue along with other left leaders such as Acharya Narendra Devaand A.K. Gopalanin Parliament House. The 9-feet high bronze statue of Dange, sculpted by Vithoba Panchal, has been donated by the labor organization, Shramik Pratishthan, Mumbai [ [http://www.speakerloksabha.gov.in/pressrelease/PressreleaseDetails.asp?PressId=119&button=Edit Press release from the office of the Speaker, Lok Sabha] ] .
Controversies continued to dog Dange even after death. In what were supposedly based on
KGBdocuments, notes smuggled out by former KGBspy Vasili Mitrokhinat the time of his defection to Britain, Christopher Andrewpublished, in 2005, a book [A sequel to the earlier book "Mitrokhin Archive" published in 1999] "Mitrokhin Archive II", that contained details of alleged transactions between the CPI and the KGB during 1975-76, and it claimed that the money exchanged was between 0.4 to 0.8 million rupees a month. The supposed KGB papers claim that deceased CPI leaders Dange and C. Rajeshwara Rao regularly received bribes and favors from the Russians in mid-1970s and Dange even issued receipts for the money he received. Almost cinema-like, this money changed hands from car windows in desolate areas near New Delhi, the book claimed.
Mitrokhin Archives are not KGB papers per se, but were notes taken by Vasili Mitrokhin over 30 years. CPI questioned the authenticity of these papers. "This is utter nonsense. We have said this before and we say it again that these documents haven't been verified and no one knows if these are real KGB papers," said CPI leader Manju Kumar Majumder, when the book was out. [ [http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/sep/22cpi.htm CPI's Dange, Rajeshwar named in KGB files] news iem appearing on rediff.com website on 22 September, 2005.] Academicians like
J. Arch Getty[ [http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/ahr/106.2/br_170.html Book Review by Getty, American Historical Review.] ] [http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/sep/26raman.htm] and counter-intelligence specialists [Former Indian counter-intelligence specialist Bahukutumbi Raman pointed out that Mitrokhin did not bring either the original documents or photocopies. Instead, he brought handwritten/typed notes of the contents of the documents. ] had questioned the veracity of these papers.
Diaries of I.A. Benediktov, Russian
ambassadorto India during the 1960s named Indian communist leaders seeking aid from the Soviet Union. Dange's name figured in the first excerpt is from a 17 January 1962 entry from the journal Benediktov describing a conversation with Bhupesh Gupta, the then Secretary of the National Council of CPI.
Gupta reported that after the death of Ghosh at the present time in the party there is an acute insufficiency of means for the preelection campaign. He expressed the fear that with the death of Ghosh the source for receiving means for the communist party from the CPSU might be closed. These questions were handled by Ghosh alone, Gupta underscored. He never consulted with him /Gupta/, and even less with [Elamulam M.S.] Nambudiripad and G. Nair/ with the latter two only about using the assistance/. All these matters were held in strictest secrecy from other leaders of the party and members of the National Council. This explains the fact that not a single report on this question has appeared in the press. Gupta said that he cannot singlehandedly take on responsibility in questions of assistance, therefore he considers it necessary to consult with Nambudiripad, whom he characterized as a person of crystalline honesty and whom Ghosh trusted. Gupta confidentially reported that A. Ghosh had not consulted on this problem with Akhmed or with [Shripad Amrit] Dange, who once proposed that he entrust to him alone all matters connected with the receipt of aid from abroad. [ [http://www.wilsoncenter.org/index.cfm?topic_id=1409&fuseaction=va2.document&identifier=5034C002-96B6-175C-9B523CB39440A49F&sort=Subject&item=India Russian Foreign Ministry Documents on the Soviet-Indian Relations and Sino-Indian Border Conflict. Cold War International History Project.] Virtual Archive Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars website]
In as much as Mitrokhin archive was based entirely on notes based on alleged primary sources, the Benediktov diaries also brought in Dange through a mere hearsay. But both these documents were used by the critics of communism to attack the communist parties and Dange.
Dange the author
Dange's arrival in the political arena was through the pamphlet "Gandhi vs. Lenin" that got him two impoertant contacts of his youth, those of M.N. Roy and the rich Bombay flour mill owner Lotwala. The latter helped him to start the first ever socialist magazine in India, "The Socialist". Mohit Sen said that Dange's articles in "The Socialist" impressed
Leninhimself. [Sen, Mohit. "The Dange Centenary" in Banerjee, Gopal (ed.) "S.A. Dange - A Fruitful Life". Kolkata: Progressive Publishers, 2002. p. 43. ]
From Primitive Communism to Slavery
Dange was a keen follower of literature. He had published a book called "Literature and People" that advocated
socialist realism, as opposed to elitism.
Dange's major work, "From Primitive Communism to Slavery" was published in 1949. The book attempted to analyze stages of growth of society in ancient India. The author had painfully researched ancient scriptures and other sources to make it a definitive tome.
Engels’ book "The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State" was the kind of road map he used. He analyzed the ancient epics to arrive at the reasons for origin of private property in India. The first draft of the book was written in Yerawada Jail in the period of October 1942 to January 1943.
Dange's magnum opus was severely criticized by the famous
polymathand historian D.D. Kosambiwho said that in order to defend Engels he had to deny Dange. He went on to say that Dange’s work was unquestionably a caricature of Engel’s work. [D.D. Kosambi. "Marxism and Ancient Indian Culture". Review of S. A. Dange's "India from Primitive Communism to Slavery", Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, xxix (Poona, 1949), 271-77.] Kosambi was especially severe when he said, ‘Marxism is not a substitute for thinking, but a tool of analysis which must be used, with a certain minimum of skill and understanding, upon the proper material. [D.D. Kosambi. "Marxism and Ancient Indian Culture". Review of S. A. Dange's "India from Primitive Communism to Slavery", Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, xxix (Poona, 1949). p.277.] .
The book was released in 2002 under the the title "Vedic India" by his daughter Roza and her husband, Bani Deshpande. Dange was again criticized for "his ideas on ancient India and his discovery of the ideals of communism in the primitive ages (and hence a glorification of the ancient culture) left him exposed to charges of having read Marxism in the most unscientific fashion" [ [http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/br/2002/02/12/stories/2002021200090600.htm Ananth, V. Krishna. "Commentary on events, personalities".] "The Hindu" Feb 12, 2002 Review of Problems of Indian Renaissance: S. A. Dange, Edited by Bani Deshpande and Roza Deshpande; Vichar Bharati Prakashan, Mumbai-400014.]
Communist Party of India
Communist Party of India (Marxist)
* [http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761580046/Dange_Shripat_Amrit.html Shripat Amrit Dange] Dange's short biography in
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Dange-Saint-Romain — Dangé Saint Romain Pour les articles homonymes, voir Saint Romain. Dangé Saint Romain … Wikipédia en Français
Dangé — Saint Romain Pour les articles homonymes, voir Saint Romain. Dangé Saint Romain … Wikipédia en Français
Dangé-St-Romain — Dangé Saint Romain Pour les articles homonymes, voir Saint Romain. Dangé Saint Romain … Wikipédia en Français
Dangé-Saint-Romain — City coat of arms … Wikipedia
Dangé-Saint-Romain — Saltar a navegación, búsqueda Dangé Saint Romain País … Wikipedia Español
Dange Shuni — LGA and town … Wikipedia
Dange — Dange … Deutsch Wikipedia
‘Dangė’ — statusas T sritis augalininkystė apibrėžtis Braškių veislė, sukurta Lietuvos sodininkystės ir daržininkystės institute. Veislė nuolat dera, uogos stambios. Į tinkamiausių Lietuvoje auginti augalų veislių sąrašą įrašyta 2001 m. atitikmenys: angl.… … Žemės ūkio augalų selekcijos ir sėklininkystės terminų žodynas
Dange — Dange, Fluß im preußischen Regierungsbezirk Königsberg; kommt aus Rußland, wird in Memel schiffbar u. fällt in das Kurische Haff … Pierer's Universal-Lexikon
Dange — (spr. dannje), Fluß im preuß. Regbez. Königsberg, entspringt in Kurland, tritt bei Krottingen in Preußen ein und mündet nach 52 km langem Lauf (23 km schiffbar) bei Memel in das Tief von Memel … Meyers Großes Konversations-Lexikon
Dange — Dange, Fluß im preuß. Reg. Bez. Königsberg, fällt bei Memel in das kurische Haff … Herders Conversations-Lexikon