- On-time performance
In transportation (such as municipal public transportation), schedule adherence or on-time performance refers to the level of success of the service (such as a bus or train) remaining on the published schedule.
There are many factors that can have an impact on on-time performance. Depending on the situation, the service may face regular delays or a service that usually performs on time may be occasionally behind schedule. Some of these factors include:
- Bus transport: The volume of automobile traffic on the bus's route can impact the bus's ability to keep on the schedule. While a route that is free of obstruction can remain on schedule or even move ahead of schedule, heavy traffic can slow down the bus behind its schedule. This can be due to regular conditions at the time of day, or an occasional or one-time event, such as a sports game or festival that draws a large crowd.
- Rail transport: The volume of traffic on the route can cause even more delays for rail vehicles, because of tight scheduling at sidings and other meet points. On passenger railroads, freight traffic is especially problematic because of the length and slow acceleration of the freight trains.
- Accident: A collision that obstructs traffic flow can also tie up vehicles on the route until the accident is cleared and therefore cause them to be behind schedule.
- Detour: A road closure that forces the bus to temporarily deviate from its regular route may cause it take more time than planned to reach its destination.
- Weather: Inclement weather may cause a bus that usually remains on schedule to be behind as a result of precautions that must be taken by the vehicle's operator and other vehicles on the road. Trains might have to operate slower as a result of slippery rail during the autumn season, and high wind can affect signal systems.
- Increased ridership: When a special event takes place, the service may experience higher ridership levels than usual, leading to more time the bus or train may have to spend allowing passengers to board and depart.
- Breakdown: A disabled bus or train, besides being unable to complete its own route, may slow down others that follow on the schedule. As riders scramble to board a subsequent bus or train on the schedule, the higher ridership levels on that run may slow it down. Additionally, on a rail line, a disabled train may block other trains from passing, or may require track-sharing with opposing trains, thereby slowing service in both directions.
- Unrealistic scheduling: Many public transportation agencies are tax-subsidized, and therefore are often cash-strapped while attempting to maximize service provided to customers. In such cases, schedules that are written do not provide enough time for operators to travel along the route in the time allotted, and layovers are too short to allow enough recovery time, thereby seriously delaying the service on a regular basis.
- Clumping: On some bus lines with more frequent service, while one bus falls behind schedule while it is busy picking up and dropping off a large volume of passengers, one or more subsequent buses on the published schedule that pass these already cleared stops may have a nearly empty run, and may actually jump ahead of its scheduled time to the point that two or more buses are within close sight of one another, or in some cases, one bus is able to pass another. This phenomenon is sometimes known as clumping or bunching . When this occurs, the even spacing of buses on the schedule may be severely disrupted, leading to extremely long waits for those attempting to catch a bus with a more frequent schedule, and multiple buses arriving at once.
Improving schedule adherence
Transit agencies often take the following measures in attempts to improve schedule adherence on their routes:
- Modify schedules by adding running time, known as schedule padding. This is the most common solution, but agencies often add running time by cutting layover time, which adversely affects the ability to recover from unplanned incidents. If layover time is to remain the same, it may require an increased expenditure in the system's budget or a slight reduction in the number of trips.
- Cutting other under-performing services. The savings generated from eliminating or reducing other services may be used to improve service on other, higher-performing routes.
- Modifying routes to a route where buses can be less obstructed, when this does not interfere with the ability of riders to reach their buses.
- Splitting a long route into two or more shorter ones, as shorter routes are more likely to remain on schedule.
- Some cities have introduced bus rapid transit services or limited stop lines on long, overcrowded routes. This involves the use of part of the route's budget to operate another line on the same route that stops only at key points. While the overall frequency of the original route is reduced, riders traveling over a longer distance have the option of obtaining a quicker trip on the limited-stop line.
- Some agencies and transport companies have installed GPS devices on their buses and trains to monitor the locations of the vehicles. By linking this real-time information with stop locations and predicted travel-times, the estimated time of arrival of the next service is then displayed at some stops.
- Customer interfaces: Some agencies and companies have made the GPS tracking data described above available to public transport users online, by a toll free number, or through the mobile web.
- Accept the principle that A late journey always gets later. It is better for the majority that one journey is significantly delayed or canceled rather than delay many after because of knock-on effects such as clumping. This is more important for transportation such as railoads where vehicles are carefully scheduled to use limited infrastructure such as tracks.
The following chart shows some examples of real-world on-time performance. The figures are always (unless stated otherwise) per vehicle, not per customer. This means that if 95 % of vehicles have less than 5 minutes of delay, one cannot conclude that 95 % of passengers experience less than 5 minutes of delay. Delays are usually greater during rush hour, therefore the delays per passenger are usually higher than per vehicle.
Operator Mode of transport Period < 1' < 2' < 3' < 5' < 10' < 15' < 20' < 30' Comments Source SBB All passenger rail 2010 84.3 % 90.7 % 95.6 %  DB Intercity rail September - October 2007 46 % 62 % 72 % 84 % 92 % 96 % Figures disputed by DB AG, no official figures available  Local rail 56 % 76 % 86 % 94 % 98 % 99 % Amtrak California Zephyr 2010 47.7 % > 550 miles, therefore on time is < 30' delay  Capitol Corridor 93.5 % < 250 miles, therefore on time is < 10' delay JR Central All passenger rail 2010 Average delay 30 seconds (no distribution given)  Lufthansa Short/medium distance flights November 2008 - March 2009 84.7 % Arrivals  Long distance flights 78.2 %
- ^ UOR_1.2
- ^ "SBB Infrastruktur - Pünktlichkeit Reiseverkehr". Swiss Federal Railways. http://mct.sbb.ch/mct/infra-dienstleistungen/infra-kundeninfos/infra-kennzahlen_reiseverkehr.htm. Averages over the numbers from the chart.
- ^ "Deutsche Bahn - Wie pünktlich fahren die Züge wirklich?". Stiftung Warentest. http://www.test.de/themen/auto-verkehr/test/Deutsche-Bahn-Wie-puenktlich-fahren-die-Zuege-wirklich-1617492-2617492/. Figures from charts.
- ^ "Amtrak - Routes - Historical On-Time Performance". Amtrak. http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/ContentServer/Page/1237608335166/1237405732511.
- ^ "Data Book 2010". Central Japan Railway Company. http://english.jr-central.co.jp/company/company/others/data-book/index.html.
- ^ "Consumer Report - Winter 2008/9". Association of European Airlines. http://files.aea.be/News/PR/Pr09-016.pdf.
- ASCE Research Library AATT 2006 Applications of Advanced Technology in Transportation 9th International Conference Kelvin C. P. Wang, Brian L. Smith, Donald R. Uzarski, S. C. Wong - Editors, August 13–16, 2006, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization TRANSIT PERFORMANCE MEASURES
- Case Study Category: Public Transit - Service and Operations
Public transport Bus Rail Vehicles for hire Carpooling Other transport Ship LocationsBus bulb • Bus garage • Bus lane • Bus stand • Bus station • Bus stop • Bus terminus • Bus turnout • Hub • Interchange station • Kassel kerb • Layover • Metro station • Park and ride • Queue jump • Taxicab stand • Train station • Tram stop • Transit mall • Airport • Harbor • Port • Hangar • Dry dock Revenue/fares Scheduling Other
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Performance appraisal — Performance appraisal, also known as employee appraisal, is a method by which the job performance of an employee is evaluated (generally in terms of quality, quantity, cost and time). Performance appraisal is a part of career… … Wikipedia
Performance art — This article is about Performance art. For other uses, see Performance (disambiguation) Performance art is art in which the actions of an individual or a group at a particular place and in a particular time constitute the work. It can happen… … Wikipedia
Performance measurement — with a process is the complement to process execution. Based on measured performance, the feedback control loop may be closed. The metrics to assess performance is set according to a determined econometric model. The expected best result is… … Wikipedia
Performance poetry — is poetry that is specifically composed for or during performance before an audience. During the 1980s, the term came into popular usage to describe poetry written or composed for performance rather than print distribution. Performance poetry is… … Wikipedia
time is of the essence — When a clause in a contract (normally related to a time deadline) is made of the essence , it means that the innocent party can claim immediately if the relevant provision is broken without having to give any notice or allow a period for… … Law dictionary
Time-Limited Error Recovery — (TLER) is a name used by Western Digital for a hard drive feature that allows improved error handling in a RAID environment. In some cases, there is a conflict whether error handling should be undertaken by the hard drive or by the RAID… … Wikipedia
Time management — is commonly defined as the various means by which people effectively use their time and other closely related resources in order to make the most out of it. [The Concise Dictionary of Business Management, by David A. Statt, Taylor Francis Group… … Wikipedia
Performance management — is closely connected to Performance measurement. They are sometimes mistaken for each other. In careful usage, Performance Management is the larger domain and includes Performance Measurement as a component.Performance measurement is the process… … Wikipedia
Performance improvement — is the concept of measuring the output of a particular process or procedure, then modifying the process or procedure in order to increase the output, increase efficiency, or increase the effectiveness of the process or procedure. The concept of… … Wikipedia
Performance tuning — is the improvement of system performance. This is typically a computer application, but the same methods can be applied to economic markets, bureaucracies or other complex systems. The motivation for such activity is called a performance problem … Wikipedia