- History of capitalist theory
The theory of capitalism describes the essential features of
capitalismand how it functions.
The conception of what constitutes capitalism has changed significantly over time, as well as being dependent on the political perspective and analytical approach adopted by the observer in question.
Adam Smithfocused on the role of enlightened self-interest (the "invisible hand") and the role of specialisationin promoting the efficiency of capital accumulation. Some proponents of capitalism (like Milton Friedman) emphasize the role of free markets, which, they claim, promote freedom and democracy. For many (like Immanuel Wallerstein), capitalism hinges on the extension into a global dimension of an economic system in which goods and services are traded in markets and capital goods belong to non-state entities. For others (like Karl Marx), it is defined by the creation of a labor marketin which most people have to sell their labor powerin order to make a living. As Marx argued (see also Hilaire Belloc), capitalism also differs from other market economies that feature private ownership through the concentration of the means of production in the hands of a few.
The first theorist of what we commonly refer to as capitalism is usually considered to be
Adam Smith. His 1776 work, " An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations", theorized that within a given stable system of commerce and evaluation, individuals would respond to the incentive of earning more by specializing their production. These individuals would naturally, without specific state intervention, "direct ... that industry in such a manner as its produce may be of the greatest value." This would enable the whole economy to become more productive, and it would therefore be wealthier. Smith argued that protecting particular producers would lead to inefficient production, and that a national hoarding of specie (i.e. cash in the form of coinage) would only increase prices, in an argument similar to that advanced by David Hume. His systematic treatment of how the exchange of goods, or a market, would create incentives to act in the general interest, became the basis of what was then called political economyand later economics. It was also the basis for a theory of law and government which would gradually supersede the mercantilistregime that was then prevalent.
Smith asserts that when individuals make a trade they value what they are purchasing more than they value what they are giving in exchange for a commodity. If this were not the case, then they would not make the trade but retain ownership of the more valuable commodity. This notion underlies the concept of mutually-beneficial trade where it is held that both sides tend to benefit by an exchange.
Although he is often described as the "father of capitalism" (and the "father of
economics"), Adam Smith himself never used the term "capitalism". He described his own preferred economic system as "the system of natural liberty." However, Smith defined "capital" as stock, and "profit" as the just expectation of retaining the revenue from improvements made to that stock. Smith also viewed capital improvement as being the proper central aim of the economic and political system. [http://www.adamsmith.org/smith/won-b2-c1.htm]
A major difference between Adam Smith's view of economics and that of present day capitalist theory is that Adam Smith viewed value as a product of labor, and thus operated under the
Labor Theory of Value, which was used by basically all economists until the Labor Theory of Value became central to Marxism.
It is generally considered that the most thorough and enduring critique of the results of capitalism was the one formulated by
Karl Marx. According to Marx, the treatment of labor as a commodityled to people valuing things more in terms of their price rather than their usefulness (see commodity fetishism), and hence to an expansion of the system of commodities. Marx observed that some people bought commodities in order to use them, while others bought them in order to sell them on at a profit. Much of the history of late capitalism involves what David Harvey called the "system of flexible accumulation" in which more and more things become commodities, the value of which is determined through the process of exchange rather through their use. For example, not only pins are commodities; shares in the ownership of a factory that manufactures pins become commodities; then options on the stock issued in the company that operates the factory become commodities; then portions of the interest rate attached to bonds issued by the company become commodities, and so on. The prevalence of commodity speculation in modern capitalism significantly shapes its outcomes.
Marx defines "capital" as money and "capitalist production" as the use of money to denominate wealth in money terms; these labels refer to
John Stuart Mill's definition of value in a market economy as being the going price for a good or service.
Marx expounded on the
Labor Theory of Valueto show that according to the Labor Theory of Value (which was the theory of value that was used by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Adam Smith, David Ricardo, etc) capitalists (owners of the means of production) exploit workers by depriving them of value that workers themselves create. According to Marx, profit is the difference between the value that the worker has created and the wage that the worker receives from his employer.
Once Marx firmly established this principle, the Labor Theory of Value was criticized and abandoned by supporters of capitalism.
During the course of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, there was a gradual movement in Europe and in the states that Europeans had founded, for the reduction of trade barriers, in particular restrictions on production and labor, the use of non-standard weights and measures, restrictions on the formation of new businesses, and the curtailing of royal prerogatives that interfered with the conduct of commerce. Two parallel doctrines emerged to describe and justify this process. One was the legal doctrine that the rightful owner of land or exerciser of a property right was the one that could make the best economic use of it, and that this principle must be reflected in the property laws of each nation. The other was the political doctrine of "laissez-faire" economics, namely that all coercive government regulation of the market represents unjustified interference, and that economies would perform best with government only playing a defensive role in order to ensure the operation of free markets.
The next major revision of the theoretical basis of capitalism began in the late 19th century with the expansion of corporations and finance, the globalization of production and markets, and the increasing desire to tap the productive capacity of the capital sectors of economies in order to secure the markets and resources required to continue economic growth. The state came to be viewed by many, particularly by the wealthy, as a vehicle for improving business conditions, securing markets and gaining access to scarce materials, even when such objectives could only be achieved through military force. In the 1920s this philosophy found its most publicly prominent voice in President
Calvin Coolidge's assertion that "the business of America is business". Critics of this period label it " corporatism", while its adherents generally regard it as a logical extension of the " laissez-faire" principles of natural liberty.
Capitalism and imperialism
J. A. Hobson, a British liberal writing at the time of the fierce debate concerning imperialismduring the Second Boer War, observed the spectacle of the " Scramble for Africa" and emphasized changes in European social structures and attitudes as well as capital flow, though his emphasis on the latter seems to have been the most influential and provocative. His so-called accumulation theory, very influential in its day, suggested that capitalism suffered from under-consumption due to the rise of monopoly capitalism and the resultant concentration of wealth in fewer hands, which he argued gave rise to a misdistribution of purchasing power. His thesis called attention to Europe's huge, impoverished industrial working class, which was typically far too poor to consume the goods that were produced by an industrialized economy. His analysis of capital flight and the rise of mammoth cartels later influenced Vladimir Leninin his book "Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism" [http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/index.htm] , which has become a basis for the neo-Marxist analysis of imperialism.
Although Hobson's works are still read, it is now widely acknowledged that his analysis neglected the mediating impact of a free-floating
interest rateon the accumulation of unused capital. His causal economic link between capitalism and imperialism therefore ultimately failsFact|date=October 2008, although his discussions of capitalism's cultural impacts may still be valid.
Contemporary World-Systems theorist
Immanuel Wallersteinperhaps addresses better Hobson's counter-arguments without degrading Hobson's underlying inferences. Accordingly, Wallerstein's conception of imperialism as a part of a general and gradual extension of capital investment from the center of the industrial countries to an overseas periphery coincides with Hobson's. According to Wallerstein, Mercantilismbecame the major tool of semi-peripheral, newly industrialized countriessuch as Germany, France, Italy, and Belgium. Wallerstein thus perceives formal empire as performing a function that was analogous to that of the mercantilist drives of the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in England and France; consequently, the expansion of the Industrial Revolution contributed to the emergence of an era of aggressive national rivalry, leading to the late nineteenth-century scramble for Africa and the acquisition of formal empires.
* [http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Capitalism.html "Capitalism"] by
Robert Hessen- says "capitalism" is a misnomer for "economic individualism" and discusses the emergence of capitalism
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
History of capitalism — The history of capitalism dates back to early forms of merchant capitalism practiced in the Middle East and Western Europe during the Middle Ages, though many economic historians consider the Netherlands as the first thoroughly capitalist country … Wikipedia
History of the People's Republic of China (1949–1976) — History of the People s Republic of China 1949–1976, The Mao Era … Wikipedia
Theory of Deep Democracy — Theory of Deep DemocracyThe theory of deep democracy makes a distinction between merely formal and deeper forms of democracy. Formal democracy is an important part of deep democracy, but it is merely a beginning or a necessary condition. In order … Wikipedia
History of socialism — The history of socialism, sometimes termed modern socialism , [Encyclopedia Australia entry on socialism] finds its origins in the French Revolution of 1789 and the changes brought about by the Industrial Revolution, although it has precedents in … Wikipedia
History of economic thought — The history of economic thought deals with different thinkers and theories in the field of political economy and economics from the ancient world to the present day. British philosopher Adam Smith is cited by many as the father of modern… … Wikipedia
History of anarchism — Part of the Politics series on Anarchism … Wikipedia
History and Class Consciousness — Georg Lukács History and Class Consciousness (1920) = Class consciousness, as described by Georg Lukács s famous History and Class Consciousness (1920), is opposed to any psychological conception of consciousness, which forms the basis of… … Wikipedia
History of the Socialist Workers Party (Britain) — The History of the Socialist Workers Party begins with the formation of the Socialist Review Group in 1950, followed by the creation of the International Socialists in 1962 and continues through to the present day with the formation of the… … Wikipedia
History of the Soviet Union (1964–1982) — Soviet Union … Wikipedia
History of Western civilization — The history of Western civilization traces its roots back to Classical Antiquity and continues to the present era in Europe, North America, Australia, and New ZealandAntiquity (before AD 500)The opposition of an European West to an Asiatic East… … Wikipedia