Water privatization


Water privatization

Water privatization is a short-hand for private sector participation in the provision of water services and sanitation, although more rarely it refers to privatization of water resources themselves. Because water services are seen as such a key public service, proposals for private sector participation often evoke stronger opposition than for other sectors. Globally, more than 90% of water and sanitation systems are publicly owned and operated.

Types

There are two main types of private sector participation in water supply and sanitation, sometimes known as the "British Model" and the "French Model". The British model consists of privatising both the assets (water and sanitation network, treatment plants and so on) and the operation of the assets, whilst in the French model, the assets remain publicly owned. The British model is largely limited to England and Wales (the system is still public in Scotland and Northern Ireland), with only isolated examples elsewhere.

For the more common "French model" of keeping assets public and privatising service operations, there are three major types, in order of increasing risk transfer to the private operator:
* management contract, under which the private operator is responsible only for running the system, in exchange for a fee (usually performance-related). Investment is typically financed and carried out by the public sector, but implementation may be delegated.
* lease contract, under which assets are leased to the private operator, who recoups the cost from end users. Investment is typically financed and carried out by the public sector, but implementation may be delegated.
* concession, under which the private operator is responsible for running the entire system, including planning and financing investment. Concession contracts usually run for 20-30 years.

An additional structure, a BOT (Build-Operate-Transfer), exists for the carrying out of specific new investments, usually the construction of new water or wastewater treatment plants. The BOT contract involves the private partner constructing the plant and then running it for a number of years (during which payment is received for the treatment capacity provided) before handing it over to the public water company. The risk for the private company for these is often relatively low, especially when contracts relate to capacity provided (rather than services provided) and the water company takes the demand risk.

All these structures can be considered public-private partnerships. In some cases, the operating company is a joint venture between the public owner of the assets and the private company, which usually has at least day-to-day management control.

Reasons for privatization

Typically there are four reasons for attempting to involve the private sector in water supply and sanitation:
* mobilizing financing for investment
* need for technical expertise
* increasing efficiency
* improvement of service quality

In developing countries, during the 1990s there has sometimes been pressure from international financial institutions such as the World Bank and IMF to introduce private sector participation in water supply and sanitation, for example through the imposition of loan conditionalities.

A recent World Bank paper summarised evidence on efficiency: "For utilities, it seems that in general ownership often does not matter as much as sometimes argued. Most cross-country papers on utilities find no statistically significant difference in efficiency scores between public and private providers." Note: exact quote missing - link does not function [ [http://wdsbeta.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2005/03/06/000090341_20050306101429/Rendered/PDF/wps3514.pdf World Bank] ]

Currently, commercialisation or the corporatisation of water supply systems is more popular in developing world due to the failures of water privatisation in some developing economies and the lack of interest by multinational water companies in commercially unattractive water supply systems.

Impact of privatization

The impact of private sector participation can vary substantially from one case to the other. In the case of water privatization in England, tariffs increased by 46% in real terms during the first nine years and operating profits have more than doubled (+142%) in eight years. On the other hand, privatization increased investments (in the six years after privatization the companies invested 17 billion Pound Sterling, compared to 9.3 billion Pound in the six years before privatization) and brought about compliance with stringent drinking water standards and led to a higher quality of river water. [ [http://rru.worldbank.org/documents/publicpolicyjournal/115vdbrg.pdf Water privatization and regulation in England and Wales] , by Caroline van den Berg 1997 ] However, it has been also argued that privatisation has led to both a decline in quality and supply with much of the infrastructure being left to decay. [ [Colin Robinson: A 'crisis'in water? The wrong sort of privatisation,Economic Affairs, Volume 18 Issue 2, June 1998, Pages 25 - 29 http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119118726/PDFSTART] ] Full-scale privatization with the sale of assets following the English example has been adopted by very few other countries, one of them being Chile.

For details see Water privatization in England

Multinationals

Privatization is often associated with multinationals. According to "Masons Water Yearbook" 2004/5, 545m people (9% of the world population) were served by private providers. The number has declined since then after private concessions in Argentina and Bolivia have been cancelled. Of the three biggest multinationals active in the sector

*Suez serves 117.4 million people around the world;
*Veolia Environnement, 108.2 million;
*RWE, 69.5 million (before selling its major water subsidiary, Thames Water, to Kemble Water)

The next biggest players are Aguas de Barcelona (35.2 million); SAUR (33.5 million); and United Utilities (22.1 million). Exceptionally, none of these are U.S.-based. Of the big three, Suez and Veolia are French-based, and RWE is German, although its water subsidiary (Thames Water) was originally British.

However, increasingly, domestic water operators are entering the market in Middle Income Countries (e.g. Brazil, Colombia, Malaysia, and China).

In addition, public utilities are going overseas and entering contracts that do not require investments (e.g. management contracts). Examples of these include Rand Water (South Africa) and Vitens (The Netherlands) winning the management contract in Ghana. The lines between public and private are thus blurring.

Anti-water-privatization campaigns

Privatization proposals in key public service sectors such as water and electricity are in many cases strongly opposed by opposition political parties and some civil society groups. The opposition viewpoint is often centred around the worries that privatization will lead to monopolies forming and that profits would be valued over service. According to PSIRU, the research arm of Public Services International, this has been the case in England and Wales. [ [http://www.psiru.org/reports/2001-02-W-UK-over.doc PSIRU on UK water privatization (Microsoft Word format)] . ] Usually campaigns involve demonstrations and political means; sometimes they may become violent (eg Cochabamba Riots of 2000 in Bolivia). Opposition is often strongly supported by trade unions. Other recent examples include Ghana and Uruguay (2004). In the latter case a civil-society-initiated referendum banning water privatization was passed in October 2004. A law banning privatization of public water supply was also passed in the Netherlands in September 2004, with broad cross-party support.

References

Sources

* Scott Wallsten and Katrina Kosec. [http://www.aei-brookings.com/publications/abstract.php?pid=919 "Public or Private Drinking Water? The Effects of Ownership and Benchmark Competition on U.S. Water System Regulatory Compliance and Household Water Expenditures"] , Brookings Institution Working Paper 05-05. (March 2005)
* A. Estache, S. Perelman, L. Trujillo (2005), [http://wdsbeta.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2005/03/06/000090341_20050306101429/Rendered/PDF/wps3514.pdf "Infrastructure performance and reform in developing and transition economies: evidence from a survey of productivity measures"] , World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3514, February 2005.
* Clare Joy and Peter Hardstaff (2005), [http://www.wdm.org.uk/resources/briefings/aid/dadwlong.pdf "Dirty aid, dirty water: The UK Government’s push to privatise water and sanitation in poor countries"] , World Development Movement, February 2005
* Belén Balanyá, Brid Brennan, Olivier Hoedeman, Satoko Kishimoto and Philipp Terhorst (eds), "Reclaiming Public Water: Achievements, Struggles and Visions from Around the World", Transnational Institute and Corporate Europe Observatory, January 2005. ISBN 90-71007-10-3 [http://www.tni.org/books/publicwater.pdf]
* Greenhill, Romilly, and Wekiya, Irene (2004), "Turning off the taps: donor conditionality and water privatisation in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania", London, UK, ActionAid. [http://www.actionaid.org.uk/wps/content/documents/TurningofftheTAps.pdf]
* David Hall and Robin de la Motte, "Dogmatic Development: Privatisation and conditionalities in six countries", War on Want [http://www.waronwant.org/?lid=7540]
* Emanuele Lobina and David Hall, "Problems with private water concessions: a review of experience", PSIRU, University of Greenwich [http://www.psiru.org/reports/2003-06-W-over.doc]
* Colin Robinson: A 'crisis'in water? The wrong sort of privatisation, Economic Affairs, Volume 18 Issue 2, June 1998, Pages 25 - 29 [http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/119118726/PDFSTART]
* Steven Renzetti and Diane Dupont (2003), "Ownership and Performance of Water Utilities", "Greener Management International" 42, Summer 2003 [http://www.greenleaf-publishing.com/pdfs/gmi42ren.pdf]
* De Witte, Kristof (2006), 'Efficiëntieprikkels in de drinkwatersector', Economisch statistische berichten, 5 mei, [http://www.economie.nl]
*Hulya Dagdeviren (2008) "Waiting for Miracles: The Commercialization of Urban Water Services in Zambia.' Development and Change 39 (1) pp.101 121 [https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/dspace/handle/2299/1982]

Further reading

* Ronald Bailey (2005), "Water Is a Human Right: How privatization gets water to the poor," "Reason" Magazine, retrieved from http://www.reason.com/news/show/34992.html on 2007-07-13
* Ann-Christin Sjölander Holland (2005), "The Water Business: Corporations versus People", Zed Books, ISBN 1-84277-564-2
* Matthias Finger & Jeremy Allouche (2002), "Water Privatisation: Transnational corporations and the re-regulation of the global water industry", Spon Press, ISBN 978-0-415-23208-1

See also

*Water privatization in Argentina
*Water privatization in Bolivia
*Water privatization in Brazil
*Water privatization in Chile
*Water privatization in Colombia
*Water privatization in Cuba
*Water privatization in Ecuador
*Water privatization in England
*Water privatization in Honduras
*Water privatization in Indonesia
*Water privatization in the Philippines

External links

* [http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/water/waterprivatization Food & Water Watch's "Water for All" campaign]
* [http://www.worldbank.org/watsan World Bank Water Supply and Sanitation]
* [http://www.stopcorporateabuse.org/cms/page1131.cfm Corporate Accountability International's Water Campaign]
* John Vidal, The Guardian, May 25, 2005, [http://society.guardian.co.uk/aid/story/0,14178,1491729,00.html "Flagship water privatisation fails in Tanzania"]
* Policy note on [http://rru.worldbank.org/PapersLinks/Open.aspx?id=4906 regulating water services in Chile]
* [http://rru.worldbank.org/Discussions/Topics/Topic9.aspx World Bank] archived online discussion: "A Scorecard for Water Utilities in Developing Countries"
* [http://www.wewontpaycampaign.com/ We Won't Pay Campaign] THE main anti water privatisation in Northern Ireland.
* [http://www.democracyctr.org/bechtel/index.htm The Democracy Center's report on the Bolivian Water Revolt]
* Fredrik Segerfeldt, [http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=4462 "Private Water Saves Lives"]
*{http://www.waterproject.info]
* [http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/50994/ Fighting the Corporate Theft of Our Water] By Tara Lohan, AlterNet, April 25, 2007.

Mulitmedia

* [http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=3932366493526265979&q=water+dirty+aid&total=21&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0 Dirty aid, dirty water] video on the global water crisis and privatisation of water services
* [http://www.wdm.org.uk/resources/maps/waterprivate.htm Map of water privitisation] The Record of water privitisation in developing countries


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Water privatization in Brazil — has been initiated in 1996. In 2008 private companies provided 7 million Brazilians 4% of the urban population in 10 of the country’s 26 states with drinking water. The private sector holds 65 concession contracts in the states of São Paulo, Rio… …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in England — was undertaken in 1989 by the government of Margaret Thatcher which privatized the ten previously public regional water and sewerage companies in England and Wales through divestiture (sale of assets). At the same time the economic regulatory… …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in the Philippines — was initiated by the government of Fidel V. Ramos throught the privatization of the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) for Metro Manila. [cite journal last = Llanto first = Gilberto M. authorlink = coauthors = title =… …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in Ghana — has been discussed since the late 1990s as a reaction to poor service quality and low efficiency of the existing urban water utility Ghana Water and Sewerage Corporation (GWSC), renamed Ghana Water Company Ltd. (GWCL) in 1999. The World Bank… …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in Honduras — has been limited to the city of San Pedro Sula which has signed a 30 year concession contract with a private operator. Two other cities, Puerto Cortes and Choloma, have introduced an interesting management model that cannot be characterized as… …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in Indonesia — began in February 1998 with the award of two 25 year water concessions to serve the city of Jakarta. A subsidiary of The French firm Ondeo (now Suez), called Palyja, was awarded the concession for the western part of the city and a subsidiary of… …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in South Africa — has taken many different forms. Since 1994 some municipalities have involved the private sector in water and saniation service provision in various forms, such as short term management contracts, long term concessions and contracts for specific… …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in Cuba — began in 2000 when the socialist government of Cuba signed a 25 year concession contract with a private company to manage the water and sewer system in 12 of the 15 municipalities that make up the country s capital Havana. The company, called the …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in Ecuador — has been limited to a single concession agreement in one city, while the bulk of the water and sanitation sector in Ecuador remains in public hands.In Guayaquil, the service was transferred to the private company [http://www.interagua.com.ec/… …   Wikipedia

  • Water privatization in Chile — The privatization of water in Chile was undertaken from 1998 to 2005 under the democratically elected governments of Eduardo Frei and Ricardo Lagos. Chile is the only country in Latin America that privatized its entire urban water supply and… …   Wikipedia


Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.