- Victor Ninov
Victor Ninov ( _bg. Виктор Нинов) is a former researcher in the
nuclear chemistry group atLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL) who was alleged to have fabricated the evidence used to claim the creation ofununoctium andununhexium Fact|date=August 2008.Ninov was trained at the GSI in
Germany . His hiring by the LBNL from GSI had been considered a coup: he had been involved in the discovery of elements 110 (now nameddarmstadtium ), 111 (now namedroentgenium ) and 112 and was considered one of the leading experts at using the complex types of software needed to detect thedecay chain of unstabletransuranium element s.When the results proved to be unrepeatable by the
Berkeley group and other laboratories around the world, an internal investigation was convened. The result of the investigation was that Dr. Ninov's work had been "fraudulent" and an unusually high-profile scandal followedFact|date=August 2008. An internal committee at the lab concluded that Ninov was the only person in the large project to translate the raw computer results into human-readable results and had used this opportunity to inject false data [citejournal|first=Dalton|last=Rex|pages=728–729|title=Misconduct: The stars who fell to Earth|journal="Nature"|volume=420|doi=10.1038/420728a|year=2002] . Re-analysis of the raw data did not indicate the events which Ninov's analysis originally reportedFact|date=August 2008. Ninov was fired in 2001 after claiming that the unique design of his apparatus was responsible for the faulty evidence leading to the alleged new elements. Dr. Ninov continues to deny vigorously any wrong-doing and maintains his innocence of any intent to commit fraudFact|date=August 2008. He has also alleged that it was part of an international attempt to frame him and that he was scapegoated because his co-authors did not want to admit to their own errorsFact|date=August 2008.Ninov's work at GSI was also called into question by his colleagues because subsequent re-analysis of the GSI data found that it had been alteredFact|date=August 2008.
Reports on the Ninov affair were released around the same time that the final report on the Schön affair, another major incident of fraud in physics. As a result, the
American Physical Society adopted more stringent ethical guidelines, especially those regulating the conduct of coauthorsFact|date=August 2008.References
Bibliography
* "At Lawrence Berkeley, Physicists Say a Colleague Took Them for a Ride", George Johnson,
The New York Times , 15 Oct 2002. History of the Ninov affairee also
*
Problematic physics experiments External links
* [http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v83/i6/p1104_1 Observation of Superheavy Nuclei Produced in the Reaction of 86Kr with 208Pb] – Communication in "Physical Review Letters" stating observation of the element 118 published by Victor Ninov's research group
* [http://sanacacio.net/118_saga/story.html Sanacacio.net] Copy of NY Times article on the Ninov controversy
* [http://chronicle.com/weekly/v48/i49/49a01601.htm Atomic Lies] An essay about V. Ninov's career
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.