- United States Senate elections, 2006
election_name = United States Senate elections, 2006
country = United States
type = legislative
ongoing = no
previous_election = United States Senate elections, 2004
previous_year = 2004
next_election = United States Senate elections, 2008
next_year = 2008
seats_for_election = 33 seats in the
United States Senate
November 7, 2006
party1 = Democratic Party (United States)
last_election1 = 44 seats
seats1 = 49 "(2 independents caucus with the Democrats)"
seat_change1 = +5
popular_vote1 = 33,929,202
percentage1 = 53.9%
swing1 = +3.1%
party2 = Republican Party (United States)
last_election2 = 55 seats
seats2 = 49
seat_change2 = -6
popular_vote2 = 26,674,169
percentage2 = 42.4%
swing2 = –2.9%
map_size = 320px
map_caption = legend|#800|Republican holdlegend|#008|Democratic holdlegend|#00f|Democratic pickuplegend|#ff9|Independent holdlegend|#ff0|Independent pickup
title = Majority Leader
before_party = Republican Party (United States)
after_party = Democratic Party (United States)
Elections for the United States Senate were held on
November 7 2006, with 33 of the 100 seats in the United States Senatebeing contested. Senators are elected for six-year terms, with one third of the Senate seats up for a vote every two years. The term of office for those elected in 2006 runs from January 3 2007until January 3 2013. Senators who were elected in 2000 (known as Class 1) were seeking reelection or retiring in 2006.
The Senate election was part of the Democratic sweep of the 2006 elections, in which no Congressional or gubernatorial seat held by a Democrat was won by a Republican. Democratic candidates defeated six Republican incumbents:
Rick Santorum(Penn.), Mike DeWine( Ohio), Lincoln Chafee(R.I.), Jim Talent(Mo.), Conrad Burns(Mont.), and George Allen (Va.). Incumbent Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman(Conn.) lost an August Democratic primary challenge but won re-election as an independent. Democrats kept their two open seats in Minnesotaand Maryland, and Republicans held onto their lone open seat in Tennessee. In Vermont, Bernie Sanders, an independent, was elected to the seat left open by independent Senator Jim Jeffords.
In the 2006 election, two new female Senators (
Claire McCaskilland Amy Klobuchar) were elected to seats previously held by men. This brought the total number of female senators to an all-time high of 16.
The party balance for the Senate now stands at 51-49 in favor of the Democrats (including independent Bernie Sanders and
Independent DemocratJoe Lieberman, who caucus with the Democrats). The Democrats needed 51 seats to control the Senate because the Vice President of the United States, Republican Dick Cheney, would have broken a 50-50 tie in favor of the Republicans.
Close races, open seats, and party switches
"Close races" are those in which a candidate won by less than 10 points."
Jim Talentof Missouri, who was narrowly elected in a 2002 special election for the remaining four years of one term, faced a strong Democratic challenge for his seat. Missouri did not hold an election for governor in 2006, making this the only major statewide race in a traditional battleground state. Talent faced state Auditor Claire McCaskill, a former Jackson County Prosecutor and the 2004 Democratic gubernatorial nominee.
McCaskill carried some political baggage from her 2004 loss; however, Talent was elected to the Senate after a near-successful gubernatorial bid, the same position McCaskill was in for the 2006 election. McCaskill went out of her way to appeal to rural voters, who had largely favored her opponent in the gubernatorial race. She also benefited from talking up her support of
embryonic stem cellresearch, which a slight majority of Missourians supported but which Talent opposed. A related constitutional amendment was also on the ballot and narrowly passed.
The race was among the most competitive in the nation. McCaskill and Talent exchanged small leads in various polls throughout the campaign. In the end, McCaskill defeated Talent 50%-47%.
Conrad Burnsof Montanafaced a strong challenge from current Governor Brian Schweitzerin 2000, being re-elected by a mere 3% in a state that went for Bush twice by margins of over 20%. This, combined with the increasing strength of the state Democratic party and accusations of ethical issues related to the Jack Abramoffinfluence-peddling scandal, made this a highly competitive race. Burns faced Democratic primary winner and state Senate President Jon Tester, an organic farmerfrom Big Sandy.
Burns has long had a history of verbal missteps, and 2006 was no exception. On
July 27, he was forced to apologize after he verbally attacked out-of-state firefighters who were preparing to leave Montana after helping contain a summer forest fire and directly questioned their competence and skill; Burns was strongly criticized. [Courtney Lowery. [http://www.newwest.net/index.php/city/article/10273/C8/L8 Conrad Burns Issues Apology for Altercation with Firefighters] . NewWest Missoula. July 28 2006.]
For much of the campaign, Tester led by substantial margins. Burns narrowed the gap by attacking Tester as a liberal extremist. November 2nd, Mason-Dixon polled Tester and Burns tied at 47% with 5% undecided. [Charles S. Johnson,
Billings Gazette, [http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2006/11/04/news/state/33-poll.txt "Poll: Burns, Tester in dead heat"] , November 4, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.] On November 4th, Rasmussen Reports had Tester leading 50% to 48%. [ Rasmussen Reports, [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/State%20Polls/November%202006/montanaSenate1104.htm "Burns (R) Trailing Tester (D) By Two"] , November 5, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.]
Shortly before noon Mountain time November 8th, Tester was declared the victor by a slim margin, 198,032 votes to 194,904. [Mary Clare Jalonick, Breitbart.com, [http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/11/08/D8L91FRO1.html "Playing Outsider, Tester Wins Mont. Seat"] ,
November 5, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.] The race was the closest Senate election of 2006 in terms of absolute vote difference; the closest race by percentage difference was the Virginia senate election.
Mike DeWineof Ohiohad uninspiring approval ratings and the current Coingatescandal involving the Ohio Republican Partyand the widespread unpopularity of Governor Bob Taftwere thought to be hurting his re-election chances months before the election. He faced primary challenges from several more conservative Republicans, such as William G. Pierce, who were unhappy with his relatively centrist stances including his role as one of the Gang of 14who intervened to stop a showdown over judicial nominations. Lawyerand Iraq War veteran Paul Hackett, who narrowly lost to Jean Schmidtin the 2nd congressional district on August 2 2005, said in October 2005 he would seek the Democratic nomination to challenge DeWine. Rep. Sherrod Brownannounced his candidacy in October 2005. Hackett withdrew from the race on February 14 2006. Both DeWine and Brown won their primaries easily. An October 12th Rasmussen Reports poll had Brown leading DeWine 46% to 41%. [ Rasmussen Reports, [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/State%20Polls/October%202006/OhioSenateOct12.htm "Ohio Senate: Brown Holds On to 5-Point Edge"] , October 16, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.] An October 30th Reuters/Zogby poll had Brown leading DeWine 49% to 42%. [John Whitesides, Reuters, [http://elections.us.reuters.com/top/news/usnN01194336.html "Results in key Senate races — Reuters poll"] , 2 November 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.] A Rasmussen poll released November 4th showed Brown pulling away from Dewine with a 53% to 41% lead. [ Rasmussen Reports, [http://rasmussenreports.com/2006/State%20Polls/November%202006/OhioSenate.htm "Ohio Senate: Brown Runs Away with Lead"] Retrieved November 13, 2006.]
Brown comfortably won the election, garnering 56% of the vote to DeWine's 44%. [Ohio Secretary of State, [http://www.sos.state.oh.us/SOS/ElectionsVoter/results2006.aspx?Section=1846 "Unofficial Results:
November 7, 2006"] , Retrieved November 13, 2006.]
Rick Santorumof Pennsylvania, then the third-highest ranking member of the Republican caucus, was the Democrats' top target in 2006. He was a very conservative member of the Senate in a state that last voted for a Republican presidential nominee in 1988.
In his last election in the year 2000, Santorum received 7,706 more votes than
Al Gore, the Democratic candidate for President, who won Pennsylvania by 4.5 percent. [ [http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/results/PA/frameset.exclude.html Voter Results In Pennsylvania] . CNN. November 17 2000. Last access date August 29 2006] That year, Santorum ran against U.S. Rep. Ron Klink, a pro-lifeDemocrat who wasn't supported by party contributors and was heavily outspent. Democrats thus saw Santorum's seat as extremely vulnerable and made it a priority for a pick-up in 2006. Popular pro-life State Treasurer Bob Casey, Jr.was the Democratic nominee and was fully supported by the party establishment.
Santorum did not benefit from his recent controversial book, "
It Takes a Family", in which he criticized public schools and questioned whether or not both parents in a family should work, alleging that women who work are making a selfish decision and only do so because they find it "empowering". These stances were seized on by the Casey campaign as proof that Santorum was too conservative for Pennsylvania voters. Santorum also suffered from controversy concerning both his residency and a charter school his children were enrolled in.
Every public poll taken during the campaign showed Casey ahead. Most polling done after Labor Day showed Casey with a double-digit lead. On election night, Casey defeated Santorum 59%-41%. Polls conducted in the final closing days of the campaign showed Casey leading 52%-39% and 48%-40%, meaning that the Democrat had performed much better than what the polls showed. This was the largest margin of defeat for an incumbent Senator since
George McGovern's loss to James Abdnorin 1980.
Lincoln Chafeeof Rhode Island, a liberal Republican, faced a primary challenge from conservative Cranston Mayor Steve Laffey. Former state Attorney General Sheldon Whitehouse, who narrowly lost the gubernatorial nomination in 2002, faced token opposition in the Democratic primary.
The Republican primary was contentious. Laffey ran as a conservative, but he came under fire from other conservatives for supporting tax increases as Mayor and increasing spending. It was widely believed that the more liberal Chafee would have an easier time winning in the general election due to his appeal to independents.Fact|date=January 2007 Laffey received support from the conservative
Club for Growth. Although he was the most liberal Republican in the Senate and was repeatedly accused of being a RINO by members of his own party, the NRSC spent a large amount of money backing Chafee, and, in an unprecedented move, announced that they would abandon the race if Laffey won. Chafee prevailed in the September 12primary 54%-46%, and Laffey endorsed him for re-election. Chafee, however, may have been damaged by the contentious primary that potentially alienated Republican voters.
Chafee faced a complicated situation due to his political beliefs. He was unpopular with conservative Republicans whose votes he would need in order to win the primary, yet represented a heavily Democratic constituency that overwhelmingly disapproved of
George W. Bushand the Republican-controlled Congress. As a liberal Democrat running in a liberal, Democratic stronghold, Whitehouse did not face these problems. The Whitehouse campaign sought to characterize the election as a referendum on Bush and the Republican Congress; critics argued that Whitehouse was simply casting himself as a proxy vote for a Democratic majority in the Senate.
Polls showed a close race, with Whitehouse holding a narrow lead going into the election. In the end, however, voters seemed to place more emphasis on party control than their personal affection for Chafee. Whitehouse prevailed over Chafee on election night winning by a vote of 53%-47%.
Early in the 2006 campaign, freshman incumbent Republican George Allen of
Virginiaheld a double-digit lead in nearly all polls, and had positioned himself as a potential presidential candidate in 2008. That status was seriously jeopardized by a series of controversial events occurring during Allen's re-election campaign, culminating in his loss to his Democratic opponent, former Secretary of the Navy and decorated combat veteran Jim Webb. Retired Air Force officer Gail Parker ran as the Independent Green party candidate.
Among the most bitter Senate contests of the year, Allen's approval rating had dropped in statewide polls due in part to a series of embarrassing incidents during the campaign. In mid-August at a campaign stop in southwest Virginia, Allen called
S.R. Sidarth, a Webb volunteer of Indian descent, "macaca" and welcomed him to America, although he was born in Virginia. [ [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/15/AR2006081501210.html Allen on Damage Control After Remarks to Webb Aide.] Washington Post, August 16, 2006.] Controversy surrounding Allen continued into September following his reaction to questions about his Jewish heritage. [ [http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/us/politics/20allen.html?ex=1161057600&en=0d0422a024fb9ddc&ei=5070 New Twist In Senate Race in Virginia] The New York Times, September 20, 2006.] Additional reports surfaced in late September that Allen uttered the N-wordon a frequent basis while a student at the University of Virginia, according to former college football teammates. [ [http://salon.com/news/feature/2006/09/24/allen_football/ Teammates: Allen used "N-word" in college] Salon.com, September 24, 2006.] Allen fired back by pointing out remarks that Webb made during the 1980s that were demeaning to female veterans. He struck again when he released excerpts of graphic sexual scenes from some of the books Webb had penned, portraying the writing as misogynistic and pornography. Webb responded that these were based on events that he personally witnessed while in the military and while working as a journalist.
As controversy and allegations on both sides increased, the gap between the candidates tightened significantly. On
October 30, Reuters/Zogby had Webb leading Allen 45% to 44%. [John Whitesides, Reuters, [http://elections.us.reuters.com/top/news/usnN01194336.html "Results in key Senate races — Reuters poll"] , 2 November 2006. Retrieved 14 November 2006.] A November 2Rasmussen Reports poll had Allen and Webb tied at 49%. [Rasmussen Reports, [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/State%20Polls/November%202006/virginiaSenate.htm "Webb and Allen Dead Even"] , 5 November 2006. Retrieved 14 November 2006.] A November 3Mason-Dixon poll had Webb leading 46% to 45% with 7% undecided. [Jeff E. Schapiro, The Richmond Times-Dispatch, [http://www.timesdispatch.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RTD/MGArticle/RTD_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1149191518008 "New Times-Dispatch poll: Allen, Webb in dead heat"] , 4 November 2006. Retrieved 14 November 2006.]
As polls closed on
November 7, 2006, the margin of votes between Webb and Allen was approximately 7,000 votes, or less than 0.5% of all votes cast, a margin eligible to trigger a recount per Virginia election law. [Commonwealth of Virginia State Board of Elections, [http://www.sbe.virginia.gov/cms/documents/Virginia_Recounts_-_The_Basics.doc "Virginia Recounts – The Basics"] , November 2006. Retrieved 14 November 2006.] On the evening of November 8, 2006, NBCand the Associated Pressdeclared Webb the winner.cite news |url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15620405/?GT1=8717 |title=Democrats win control of Senate |publisher=MSNBC |date=2006-11-09 |accessdate=2006-11-09] Following recanvassing, the Virginia Board of Elections declared Webb the winner by 9,162 votes, a margin of 0.38%. [Commonwealth of Virginia, [http://sbe.virginiainteractive.org/index.htm"Unofficial Results"] , 7 November 2006. Retrieved 14 November 2006.]
On the afternoon of
November 9, 2006, Allen gave a speech conceding the election to Webb, stating "The people of Virginia have spoken and I respect their decision. The Bible teaches us there is a time and place for everything, and today I called and congratulated Jim Webb." cite news |url=http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/09/va.senate/index.html |title=Allen concedes, giving Senate control to Dems |publisher=CNN |date=2006-11-09 |accessdate=2006-11-09]
Joe Liebermanof Connecticutwas originally thought to be a shoo-in, but his reelection prospects were complicated by political cross-currents. Lieberman drew fire from the more anti-war elements within the Democratic party for his continual support for the foreign policy of President George W. Bushand for statements in which he has criticized other Democrats for "undermining the President" during a time of war. Greenwich telecom-networking businessman Ned Lamontdeclared his candidacy for the Democratic nomination in March, and while the Democratic state convention in May overwhelmingly endorsed Lieberman, Lamont's 33.4% support was more than twice the 15% needed to force a primary.
Lamont defeated Lieberman for the Democratic nomination in the
August 8primary 52%-48%. Lieberman decided to remain in the race as a "petitioning candidate," [ [http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-senate0809.artaug09,0,3365524.story?coll=hc-headlines-home Topic Galleries - Courant.com ] ] having announced on July 3 2006that he would begin collecting the necessary signatures to run as an independent in case he lost the primary. [Susan Haigh. [http://apnews.myway.com/article/20060704/D8IKRQQG2.html Lieberman Weighs Campaign As Independent] . My Way News. July 3 2006. Last accessdate August 29 2006] He also filed to create a new independent party, " Connecticut for Lieberman."
Challenging Lamont and Lieberman in the general election was Republican
Alan Schlesinger, former mayor of Derby and a former state representative. Schlesinger had a history of winning crossover Democratic voters, but he had never run in a large constituency. Schlesinger was embarrassed when it was revealed that he was thrown out of a casino for counting cards under an assumed name. [ [http://hotlineblog.nationaljournal.com/archives/2006/07/update_from_ct.html Update From CT: Schlesinger Chased From Race?] . The Hotline. July 12 2006. Last accessdate August 29 2006.]
Lieberman went on to win the election with 50% of the vote to Lamont's 40%. Schlesinger trailed far behind with only 10%, in part due to Lieberman receiving support from only 33% of Democrats but a commanding 70% of Republicans. While Lieberman won as the CFL nominee, he decided to serve as an
Independent Democratin the current Congress and continue to caucus with Senate Democrats.
Paul Sarbanesannounced on March 11 2005that he would retire rather than run for re-election in 2006. Sarbanes' seat had been considered safe, considering Maryland's Democratic voting tendencies and the overall pro-Democratic undercurrents of the 2006 elections. Representative Ben Cardinbested former Representative and NAACPPresident Kweisi Mfumeand others in the Democratic primary. Lieutenant Governor Michael S. Steele, a Republican, announced his candidacy on October 25 2005, and won the Republican nomination over token opposition. Democrats had a natural advantage in Maryland, with its large number of African-American voters and government workers, but Steele's personal popularity and potential appeal with fellow blacks kept the race somewhat competitive. On November 7, Cardin was victorious over Steele by a vote of 54%-44%. [Joshua Partlow, Washington Post, [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/07/AR2006110701263.html "Cardin, O'Malley Win in Md. Races"] , November 8, 2006. Retrieved November 14, 2006.]
Republican Representative Mark Kennedy secured major GOP endorsements in early 2005 and defeated nominal opposition in the primary. Kennedy benefited from high-profile Republicans coming to do fundraisers for him, including Vice President
Dick Cheneyin July 2005 and President George W. Bushin December 2005. An October 30th Mason-Dixon poll had Klobuchar leading Kennedy 50% to 40%. [Rachel E. Stassen-Berger, [http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/15905901.htm "Klobuchar still in command"] , the Pioneer Press, November 2, 2006. Accessed November 13, 2006.] On November 7, 2006Amy Klobuchar won the race with 58% of the vote to Mark Kennedy's 38%. [Rachel E. Stassen-Berger, [http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/legislature/15957568.htm "Klobuchar off to a divided Senate"] , the Pioneer Press, November 8, 2006. Accessed November 13, 2006.]
Jon Corzine, elected to the Senate in 2000, was elected Governor of New Jerseyin 2005. Corzine appointed Rep. Bob Menendezto serve the last year of the Senate term, and Menendez was sworn in to fill Corzine's vacancy on January 18 2006. [ [http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?id=27120&cat=Headlines&more=%2Fnews%2Fmore-news.asp Menéndez Appointed to Senate] . Hispanic Business. December 7 2005. Last accessdate August 29 2006] Republican State Senator Thomas Kean, Jr.(the son of former Governor and 9/11 CommissionChairman Thomas Kean) announced on March 25 2005that he would run for the U.S. Senate. Both nominees have problems within their own parties; Menendez has alienated many fellow Democrats with his aggressiveness and abrasiveness, while Kean is unpopular with party conservatives who consider him to be too liberal.
Menendez had an approval rating of 38%, which was thought to be a sign of vulnerability for the incumbent, especially since his disapproval was at 50%. [ [http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollTrack.aspx?g=1c342c05-72cd-4af6-b99e-4245a2f84d66 Survey USA] ,
October 16, 2006. Accessed November 13, 2006.] Although incumbents approval ratings below 50% are generally considered vulnerable, this standard perhaps did not apply to Menendez as he had just been appointed at the start of 2006 and was not well known statewide, a far different situation from most incumbents. President George W. Bushwas highly unpopular in the state, but Governor Corzine's early performance in office met with widespread disapproval, contributing to the large number of undecided voters. The campaign became increasingly aggressive, with Menendez calling Kean a Bush lackey while Kean repeatedly attacked Menendez as corrupt.
An October 16th Zogby poll had Kean leading Menendez 47% to 45%. [Zogby International, [http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1184 Toss-up! GOP, Dems Battle For Senate Control Down Stretch] ,
October 19, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.] An October 23rd LA Times/Bloomberg poll had Menendez leading Kean 45% to 41%. [Ronald Brownstein, [http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-poll25oct25,0,4475051,full.story?coll=la-home-headlines "Democrats' Senate hopes lie with rural voters, poll finds"] LA Times, October 25, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.] A Rasmussen Reports poll from October 25th had Kean leading Menendez 43% to 41%. [Rasmussen Reports, [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/2006/State%20Polls/October%202006/newJerseySenate1025.htm "New Jersey Senate: Kean (R) and Menendez (D) Tied"] , October 28, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.] A November 2nd poll by Zogby/Reuters showed a 49% to 37% Menendez lead. [John Whitesides, ABC News, [http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2623208 "Results in key Senate races: Reuters poll"] , November 2, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.] Another November 2nd poll by Rutgers showed Menendez up 46% to 42% [Rutgers-Eagleton Poll, [http://eagletonpoll.rutgers.edu/polls/release_11_02_06.pdf "MENENDEZ HOLDS FOUR PERCENT EDGE IN SENATE RACE"] , November 2, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.] and a third by Public Mind showed a 48% to 38% Menendez edge. [ Fairleigh Dickinson University, [http://publicmind.fdu.edu/negative/tab.html Public Mind Poll] , November 2, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.] A November 3rd poll by [Rasmussen] showed a 48% to 43% Menendez lead. [ Rasmussen Reports, [http://rasmussenreports.com/2006/State%20Polls/November%202006/NewJerseySenate.htm "New Jersey Senate: Menendez Now Up by 5"] , November 3, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.] A Monmouth University November 3rd had Menendez leading Kean 45% to 42% with 10% undecided. [Erik Larsen, Courier-News, [http://www.c-n.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061105/NEWS/611050310 "Kean trailing by only 3 points"] , November 6, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.]
On election night Menendez defeated Kean Jr. by a vote of 53% to 45%. [Donna de la Cruz,
USA Today, [http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/vote2006/NJ/nj.htm?csp=34 "Menendez beats Kean in heated New Jersey Senate race"] , November 8, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2006.]
Jim Jeffordsof Vermontleft the Republican Party to become an independent soon after being reelected as a Republican in the 2000 election. On April 20, 2005, he declared he would not seek another term. The national Democratic Party put independent and democratic socialist Representative Bernie Sanderson their party's ballot in order to keep other Democrats from having a possible "spoiler" effect on the general election results. Sanders won both the Democratic line and an independent line on the ballot. Richard Tarrantwas the Republican nominee, after winning the primary election on September 12. Sanders, a popular political figure in Vermont, won with 65% of the vote.
=Arizona= Wealthy real estate developer
Jim Pedersondeclared his intention to challenge Senator Jon Kylof Arizonaon September 14 2005. Pederson served as Arizona Democratic Party Chairman from 2001 to 2005 while spending millions of his own money to help Democrats modernize and to elect Janet Napolitanoas governor. Kyl got an unexpected boost when "TIME" listed him as one of the Ten Best Senators. While polling in October showed Pederson catching up, Kyl was re-elected 53%-44%.
Bill Fristof Tennessee, the current Majority Leader, had previously promised to leave the Senate when his second term ended in January 2007, and was widely considered to have presidential aspirations for 2008 (however, he announced in late November, 2006, that he would not pursue a Presidential run).
Although Tennessee's electoral votes went to George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004, a majority of the state offices are held by Democrats. Tennessee also has more registered Democratic voters than Republican voters and was at the time one of two states in the south to send more Democrats to the U.S. House of Representatives than Republicans, the other being Arkansas.
The Democratic nominee was Representative
Harold Ford, Jr.and the Republican nominee was Bob Corker, both of whom won primaries on August 3. Corker, former mayor of Chattanooga and 1994 Senate candidate, was well funded and advertised heavily in the western portion of the state during his primary campaign, where he was relatively unknown before this race. Ford was the representative from Tennessee's 9th congressional districtin the United States House of Representatives. Like Corker, Ford showed exceptional fundraising prowess, and the race was an expensive one for both parties.
The candidates exchanged leads in the polls, and there were a number of negative charges. Ford attacked Corker's business dealings. Corker portrayed Ford as a hyper-political Washington insider with nothing in common with Tennessee residents. The campaign made headlines when the Republican National Committee ran an ad that, among other things, ridiculed Ford for attending a party thrown by the Playboy corporation. It featured a fictional blond Playboy Bunny squealing, "I met Harold at the Playboy Party!" and then winking and saying, "Harold, call me." Democrats called the ad an attempt to play on racial prejudice, and Corker distanced himself from the ad.
Corker won the election 51%-48%.
enate contests in 2006
:Winning candidates in bold.
blue|Blue = Democratic pickup yellow|Yellow = Independent pickupgrey|Gray = Retiring Senator
United States House elections, 2006
United States gubernatorial elections, 2006
United States Senate elections, 2004
United States Senate elections, 2008
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
United States Senate elections, 2006/Non-partisan election analyses — Non partisan election analyses Below is a table summarizing various non partisan election analyses. Although the nomenclature varies slightly, the categories can be understood as follows: Safe the race is not expected to become competitive.… … Wikipedia
United States gubernatorial elections, 2006 — The U.S. 2006 gubernatorial elections were held on November 7, 2006 in 36 states, with 22 of the seats held by Republicans and 14 by Democrats.The elections coincided with the mid term elections of the United States Senate and the United States… … Wikipedia
United States general elections, 2006 — The 2006 United States midterm elections were held on Tuesday, November 7 2006. All United States House of Representatives seats and one third of the United States Senate seats were contested in this election, as well as 36 state governorships,… … Wikipedia
United States Senate elections, 2004 — Infobox Election election name = United States Senate elections, 2004 country = United States type = legislative ongoing = no previous election = United States Senate elections, 2002 previous year = 2002 next election = United States Senate… … Wikipedia
United States Senate elections, 2008 — Infobox Election election name = United States Senate elections, 2008 country = United States type = legislative ongoing = yes previous election = United States Senate elections, 2006 previous year = 2006 next election = United States Senate… … Wikipedia
United States Senate elections in Wyoming, 2008 — The Wyoming United States Senate elections for 2008 will be held on November 4, 2008. The simultaneous elections resulting from the death of Senator Craig L. Thomas in 2007, will mark a rarity in United States Senate elections, in which both… … Wikipedia
United States Senate elections, 1964 — Infobox Election election name = United States Senate elections, 1964 country = United States type = legislative ongoing = no previous election = United States Senate elections, 1962 previous year = 1962 next election = United States Senate… … Wikipedia
United States Senate elections, 1946 — legend|#00f|Democratic pickupsThe United States Senate elections of 1946 were in the middle of Democratic President Harry Truman s first term. The vote was largely seen as a referendum on Truman, whose approval rating had sunk to 32%… … Wikipedia
United States Senate elections in North Dakota — North Dakota United States Senate elections determine who serves as a United States Senator, representing North Dakota, for six year terms. The elections are staggered so that neither of North Dakota s two senate seats will be up for election… … Wikipedia
United States Senate elections, 2010 — Elections to the United States Senate will be held on November 2, 2010, with 34 of the 100 seats in the Senate being contested. Since Senators are elected for six year terms, those elected will serve from January 3, 2011 until January 3, 2017.… … Wikipedia