Citizens' Debate Commission

Citizens' Debate Commission

The Citizens' Debate Commission (CDC) is a nonpartisan American organization, formed in 2004, that was established to sponsor future general election presidential debates.

The CDC consists of national civic leaders from a multitude of political orientations and has an advisory board composed of over fifty civic organizations that it claims broadly reflects the composition and concerns of the electorate.

The CDC states that it was formed because the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD) fails to adequately serve voters' interests and charges that the CPD, which was created by the Republican and Democratic parties, secretly awards control of the presidential debates to the Republican and Democratic candidates, thereby limiting voter choice and restricting subject matters of political discourse.

The CDC claims to aim to host presidential debates that serve American voters, not political parties, first. The CDC promises to set fair candidate selection criteria, feature innovative and engaging formats, and resist anti-democratic demands of participating candidates. The CDC also promises to operate with full transparency and reverse the decline in debate viewership (Under the tenure of the CPD, debate viewership has dropped by over 25 million viewers.)

Contents

Participant selection criteria

The Citizens' Debate Commission (CDC) employs criteria developed by the Appleseed Citizens' Task Force on Fair Debates, a project of the Appleseed Electoral Reform Project at American University's Washington College of Law.

The Appleseed Task Force criteria includes all candidates on enough state ballots to win an electoral college majority who either 1) register at five percent in national polls or 2) register a majority in national polls asking eligible voters which candidates they would like to see included in the presidential debates.

The Appleseed criteria attempts to ensure that popular third party challengers are allowed to participate without drowning out the voices of the two leading contenders for the presidency. In 1984 and 1988, only the major party candidates fulfilled the Appleseed criteria; in 1996 and 1992, only H. Ross Perot and the major party candidates managed to meet the Appleseed threshold; and in 2000, only Ralph Nader, Pat Buchanan and the major party candidates satisfied the criteria.

The CDC says the two prongs of the Appleseed criteria that trigger inclusion, five percent and majority support, are sensible because they are rooted in democratic principles and federal law. The five percent threshold matches the public financing threshold for minor parties, which is the only legislative standard for measuring the viability of non-major parties. Elected officials codified five percent in the Federal Election Campaign Act, and taxpayers finance candidates whose parties attract five percent of the popular vote.

Format

The Citizens' Debate Commission advocates the following format stipulations for future presidential debates:

  1. Follow-up questions must be permitted in every debate.
  2. At least one debate must include candidate-to-candidate questioning.
  3. At least two debates must include rebuttals and surrebuttals.
  4. Response times must not be overly restrictive.
  5. Candidates may only exercise a limited number of vetoes concerning the selection of moderators and panelists.

The Citizens' Debate Commission also proposes the following four basic formats for future presidential debates:

  1. Two single-moderator debates.
  2. Authentic town-hall debate.
  3. Youth debate.
  4. Panel debate.

Members

The following seventeen civic leaders serve on the CDC:

Advisory board

The following civic organizations serve on the Advisory Board of the Citizens' Debate Commission:

  • 20/20 Vision
  • Accuracy In Media
  • Alliance for Better Campaigns
  • The American Cause
  • Appleseed Electoral Reform Project
  • Ballot Access News
  • Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law
  • Center for Food Safety
  • Center for Reclaiming America
  • Center for Rural Strategies
  • Center for Voting and Democracy
  • Citizens for Participation in Political Action
  • Citizen Works
  • Common Cause
  • Commonwealth Coalition
  • Conservative Caucus
  • Declaration Foundation
  • Democracy Matters
  • Democracy South
  • Democracy Unplugged
  • Demos
  • Earth Island Institute
  • Ella Baker Center for Human Rights
  • Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting
  • Fannie Lou Hamer Project
  • Federation for American Immigration Reform
  • Free Congress Foundation
  • Free Press
  • Friends of the Earth
  • Fund for Constitutional Government
  • Global Exchange
  • GRACE Public Fund
  • Grassroots Unity
  • Greenpeace
  • Independent Progressive Politics Network
  • In fact
  • Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy
  • Judicial Watch
  • League of Rural Voters
  • MassVOTE
  • Midwest Democracy Center
  • National Coalition Against Legalized Gambling
  • National Coalition for the Homeless
  • National Priorities Project
  • National Voting Rights Institute
  • The National Youth & Student Peace Coalition
  • National Youth Advocacy Coalition
  • Native Forest Council
  • New Road Map Foundation
  • Ohio Citizen Action
  • Public Campaign
  • Rainforest Action Network
  • ReclaimDemocracy.org
  • RenewAmerica
  • Santa Monica Ranked Voting
  • Student Environmental Action Coalition
  • Texans for Public Justice
  • Tikkun
  • U.S. English
  • The Voting Rights Project of the Institute for Southern Studies

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Поможем написать реферат

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Debate — Discussion redirects here. For a related article, see Discourse. For discussion in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:Talk page. University Debating Competitions Asian Championship · Australasian Championship · Canadian Championship ·… …   Wikipedia

  • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission — Supreme Court of the United States Argued March 24, 2009 …   Wikipedia

  • Citizens for Tax Justice — Motto Working for a Fair and Sustainable Tax System Formation 1979 Type Public Policy Think Tank Headquarters …   Wikipedia

  • Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse — The Commission to Inquire into Child Abuse (CICA) is one of a range of measures introduced by the Irish Government to investigate the extent and effects of abuse on children from 1936 onwards. It is commonly known in Ireland as the Ryan… …   Wikipedia

  • Arab citizens of Israel — Infobox Ethnic group group = Arab citizens of Israel عرب إسرائيل (العرب الإسرائيليون) rlm;ערבים אזרחי ישראל Emile Habibi • Ahmed Tibi • Salah Tarif caption = population = 1,144,000 plus270,000 in East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights (2006) 19.7%… …   Wikipedia

  • Health care reform debate in the United States — See also: Health care reform in the United States, Health care in the United States, and Uninsured in the United States Health care in the United States Public health care Federal Employees Health Benefits Program Indian Health Service… …   Wikipedia

  • Reconciliation and Unity Commission — The Reconciliation and Unity Commission is a proposed government body to be set up if the Reconciliation, Tolerance, and Unity Bill, which was introduced into the Fijian Parliament on May 4 2005, is passed. The legislation proposes to empower the …   Wikipedia

  • European citizens' consultations — The European Citizens’ Consultations are the first pan European participatory project to involve citizens from all 27 Member States of the European Union into the debate about the Future of Europe. Between October 2006 and May 2007, more than… …   Wikipedia

  • Mandal Commission — The Mandal Commission was established in India in 1979 by the Janata Party government under Prime Minister Morarji Desai with a mandate to identify the socially or educationally backward. [1] It was headed by Indian parliamentarian Bindheshwari… …   Wikipedia

  • Social Security debate (United States) — This article concerns proposals to change the Social Security system in the United States. Social Security is a social insurance program officially called Old Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI), in reference to its three components …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”