- Initial public offering
Initial public offering (IPO), also referred to simply as a "public offering", is when a company issues
common stockor shares to the public for the first time. They are often issued by smaller, younger companies seeking capital to expand, but can also be done by large privately-owned companies looking to become publicly traded.
In an IPO, the issuer may obtain the assistance of an
underwritingfirm, which helps it determine what type of security to issue (common or preferred), best offering price and time to bring it to market.
IPOs can be a risky
investment. For the individual investor, it is tough to predict what the stock or shares will do on its initial day of trading and in the near future since there is often little historical data with which to analyze the company. Also, most IPOs are of companies going through a transitory growth period, and they are therefore subject to additional uncertainty regarding their future value.
Reasons for listing
When a company lists its shares on a public exchange, it will almost invariably look to issue additional new shares in order to raise extra capital at the same time. The money paid by investors for the newly-issued shares goes directly to the company (in contrast to a later trade of shares on the exchange, where the money passes between investors). An IPO, therefore, allows a company to tap a wide pool of stock market investors to provide it with large volumes of capital for future growth. The company is never required to repay the capital, but instead the new shareholders have a right to future profits distributed by the company and the right to a capital distribution in case of a dissolution.
shareholders will see their shareholdings diluted as a proportion of the company's shares. However, they hope that the capital investment will make their shareholdings more valuable in absolute terms.
In addition, once a company is listed, it will be able to issue further shares via a
rights issue, thereby again providing itself with capital for expansion without incurring any debt. This regular ability to raise large amounts of capital from the general market, rather than having to seek and negotiate with individual investors, is a key incentive for many companies seeking to list.
IPOs generally involve one or more
investment banks as " underwriters." The company offering its shares, called the "issuer," enters a contract with a lead underwriter to sell its shares to the public. The underwriter then approaches investors with offers to sell these shares.
The sale (that is, the allocation and pricing) of shares in an IPO may take several forms. Common methods include:
Self Distribution of Stock
A large IPO is usually underwritten by a "
syndicate" of investment banks led by one or more major investment banks (lead underwriter). Upon selling the shares, the underwriters keep a commission based on a percentage of the value of the shares sold. Usually, the lead underwriters, i.e. the underwriters selling the largest proportions of the IPO, take the highest commissions—up to 8% in some cases. Multinational IPOs may have as many as three syndicates to deal with differing legal requirements in both the issuer's domestic market and other regions. For example, an issuer based in the E.U. may be represented by the main selling syndicate in its domestic market, Europe, in addition to separate syndicates or selling groups for US/Canada and for Asia. Usually, the lead underwriter in the main selling group is also the lead bank in the other selling groups.
Because of the wide array of legal requirements, IPOs typically involve one or more
law firms with major practices in securities law, such as the Magic Circle firms of Londonand the white shoe firms of New York City.
Usually, the offering will include the issuance of new shares, intended to raise new capital, as well the secondary sale of existing shares. However, certain regulatory restrictions and restrictions imposed by the lead underwriter are often placed on the sale of existing shares.
Public offerings are primarily sold to institutional investors, but some shares are also allocated to the underwriters' retail investors. A broker selling shares of a public offering to his clients is paid through a sales credit instead of a commission. The client pays no commission to purchase the shares of a public offering; the purchase price simply includes the built-in sales credit.
The issuer usually allows the underwriters an option to increase the size of the offering by up to 15% under certain circumstance known as the
greenshoeor overallotment option.
United States, during the dot-com bubbleof the late 1990s, many venture capitaldriven companies were started, and seeking to cash in on the bull market, quickly offered IPOs. Usually, stock price spiraled upwards as soon as a company went public. Investors sought to get in at the ground-level of the next potential Microsoftand Netscape.
Initial founders could often become overnight
millionaires, and due to generous stock options, employees could make a great deal of money as well. The majority of IPOs could be found on the Nasdaqstock exchange, which lists companies related to computer and information technology. However, in spite of the large amounts of financial resources made available to relatively young and untested firms (often in multiple rounds of financing), the vast majority of them rapidly entered cash crisis. Crisis was particularly likely in the case of firms where the founding team liquidated a substantial portion of their stake in the firm at or soon after the IPO (Mudambi and Treichel, 2005).
This phenomenon was not limited to the United States. In Japan, for example, a similar situation occurred. Some companies were operated in a similar way in that their only goal was to have an IPO. Some stock exchanges were set up for those companies, such as
Perhaps the clearest bubbles in the history of hot IPO markets were in 1929, when closed-end fund IPOs sold at enormous premiums to net asset value, and in 1989, when closed-end country fund IPOs sold at enormous premiums to net asset value. What makes these bubbles so clear is the ability to compare market prices for shares in the closed-end funds to the value of the shares in the funds' portfolios. When market prices are multiples of the underlying value, bubbles are occurring.
A venture capitalist named
Bill Hambrechthas attempted to devise a method that can reduce the inefficient process. He devised a way to issue shares through a Dutch auctionas an attempt to minimize the extreme underpricing that underwriters were nurturing. Underwriters, however, have not taken to this strategy very well. Though not the first company to use Dutch auction,
Historically, IPOs both globally and in the US have been underpriced. The effect of
initial underpricingan IPO is to generate additional interest in the stock when it first becomes publicly traded. This can lead to significant gains for investors who have been allocated shares of the IPO at the offering price. However, underpricing an IPO results in "money left on the table"—lost capital that could have been raised for the company had the stock been offered at a higher price.
The danger of overpricing is also an important consideration. If a stock is offered to the public at a higher price than the market will pay, the underwriters may have trouble meeting their commitments to sell shares. Even if they sell all of the issued shares, if the stock falls in value on the first day of trading, it may lose its marketability and hence even more of its value.
Investment banks, therefore, take many factors into consideration when pricing an IPO, and attempt to reach an offering price that is low enough to stimulate interest in the stock, but high enough to raise an adequate amount of capital for the company. The process of determining an optimal price usually involves the
underwriters("syndicate") arranging share purchase commitments from lead institutional investors.
A company that is planning an IPO appoints lead managers to help it decide on an appropriate price at which the shares should be issued. There are two ways in which the price of an IPO can be determined: either the company, with the help of its lead managers, fixes a price or the price is arrived at through the process of book building.
Note: Not all IPOs are eligible for delivery settlement through the DTC system, which would then either require the physical delivery of the stock certificates to the clearing agent bank's custodian, or a
delivery versus payment("DVP") arrangement with the selling group brokerage firm.This information is not sufficient.
There are two time windows commonly referred to as "quiet periods" during an IPO's history. The first and the one linked above is the period of time following the filing of the company's S-1 but before SEC staff declare the registration statement effective. During this time, issuers, company insiders, analysts, and other parties are legally restricted in their ability to discuss or promote the upcoming IPO.cite news| title = Quiet Period | date =
August 18, 2005| url = http://www.sec.gov/answers/quiet.htm | publisher = Securities and Exchange Commission| quote =The federal securities laws do not define the term "quiet period," which is also referred to as the "waiting period." However, historically, a quiet period extended from the time a company files a registration statement with the SEC until SEC staff declared the registration statement "effective." During that period, the federal securities laws limited what information a company and related parties can release to the public. |accessdate=2008-03-04 ]
The other "quiet period" refers to a period of 40 calendar days following an IPO's first day of public trading. During this time, insiders and any underwriters involved in the IPO, are restricted from issuing any earnings forecasts or research reports for the company. Regulatory changes enacted by the SEC as part of the
Global Settlement, enlarged the "quiet period" from 25 days to 40 days on July 9, 2002. When the quiet period is over, generally the lead underwriters will initiate research coverage on the firm. Additionally, the NASD and NYSE have approved a rule mandating a 10-day quiet period after a Secondary Offeringand a 15-day quiet period both before and after expiration of a "lock-up agreement" for a securities offering.
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China$21.6B in 2006 [cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |coauthors= |title=The Largest IPO in History |url=http://www.fool.com/investing/international/2006/10/27/the-largest-ipo-in-history.aspx |quote=You might not have even known that it was happening, but a record of sorts was set overnight. The Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Hong Kong: 1398) held its long-awaited initial public offering, which, amazingly enough, was the largest one ever, raising a whopping $19 billion. |publisher= Motley Fool|date= October 27, 2006|accessdate=2008-03-04 ]
NTT Mobile Communications$18.4B in 1998 [ cite news |title=Pricing the 'biggest IPO in history' |url=http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China_Business/HI29Cb01.html ]
Visa Inc.$17.9B in 2008
*AT&T Wireless $10.6B in 2000
Rosneft$10.4B in 2006
Alternative Public Offering
Direct public offering
Secondary market(also known as "aftermarket ")
Secondary Market Offering
Seasoned equity offering
Thomson Financial League Tables
SEC Form S-1(Registration of Securities for IPO)
Securities regulation in the United States
Greenshoe optionand Reverse greenshoe option
last = Gregoriou
first = Greg
year = 2006
title = Initial Public Offerings (IPOs)
url = http://books.elsevier.com/finance/?isbn=0750679751
publisher = Butterworth-Heineman, an imprint of Elsevier
id = ISBN 0-7506-7975-1
* [http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do?contentType=Article&contentId=1610123] Goergen, M., Khurshed, A. and Mudambi, R. 2007. The Long-run Performance of UK IPOs: Can it be Predicted? "Managerial Finance", 33(6): 401-419.
* [http://bear.cba.ufl.edu/ritter/publ_papers/Why%20has%20IPO%20Underpricing%20Changed%20Over%20Time.pdf] Loughran, T. and Ritter, J.R. 2004. Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time? "Financial Management", 33(3): 5-37.
* [http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/15/2/413] Loughran, T. and Ritter, J.R. 2002. Why Don't Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in IPOs? "Review of Financial Studies", 15(2): 413-443.
* [http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a713761351~db=all] Khurshed, A. and Mudambi, R. 2002. The Short Run Price Performance of Investment Trust IPOs on the UK Main Market. "Applied Financial Economics", 12(10): 697-706.
* [http://www.minterest.com/stocks/ipo/ipo-pricing.html] Minterest.com
* [http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1540-6261.00517] Bradley, D.J., Jordan, B.D. and Ritter, J.R. 2003. The Quiet Period Goes Out with a Bang. "Journal of Finance", 58(1): 1-36.
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=886408] M.Goergen, M., Khurshed, A. and Mudambi, R. 2006. The Strategy of Going Public: How UK Firms
Choose Their Listing Contracts. "Journal of Business Finance and Accounting", 33(1&2): 306-328.
* [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VDH-4D638W4-1&_user=10&_coverDate=07%2F31%2F2005&_rdoc=6&_fmt=summary&_orig=browse&_srch=doc-info(%23toc%235983%232005%23999799995%23582452%23FLA%23display%23Volume)&_cdi=5983&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_ct=6&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a851cd84c34a896fd87c75690e57057f] Mudambi, R. and Treichel, M.Z. 2005. Cash Crisis in Newly Public Internet-based Firms: An Empirical Analysis. "Journal of Business Venturing", 20(4): 543-571.
* [http://bear.cba.ufl.edu/ritter/publ_papers/The%20IPO%20Quiet%20Period%20Revisited.pdf The IPO Quiet Period Revisited]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.