- Waco Siege
Infobox Military Conflict
Mount Carmel Centerin flames during the assault on April 19, 1993.
result=Raid: Shootout resulting in the ATF retreat
Assault: Buildings burned to the ground resulting in a mass number of deaths. Walls damaged by the FBI and the Davidians' stored ammunition and explosives increased the casualties
Mount Carmel Center, Waco, Texas
February 28- April 19 1993
David Koresh(died during fire)
February 28):75 ATF agents,
3 helicopters manned by 10 Texas National Guard counterdrug personnel as distraction during the raid and filming [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Activities_of_Federal_Law_Enforcement_Agencies_Toward_the_Branch_Davidians/Section_5 Activities of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies Toward the Branch Davidians: V. Military involvement in the Government operations at WACO] ] House investigators determined that "someone" at BATF lied to the military about the Davidians being involved with drugs in order to get U.S. Army Special Forces and other military aid, in violation of the
Posse Comitatus Act. "Subcommittee on National Security, International Affairs, and Criminal Justice of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight and the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary at the Oversight Hearings on Federal Law Enforcement Conduct in Relation to the Branch Davidian Compound near Waco, Texas, and appended documents, Congressional Record, July, 1995"]
ballistic protection equipment, fire retardant clothing, regular flashlights, regular cameras (i.e. flash photography), shotguns and flash bangs [ [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Activities_of_Federal_Law_Enforcement_Agencies_Toward_the_Branch_Davidians/Section_5#d._Did_ATF_address_the_extreme_safety_and_health_concerns_a_methamphetamine_lab_presents_in_its_raid_on_the_Branch_Davidian_residence.3F House of Representatives report, Activities of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies Toward the Branch Davidians/Section 5] , section about equipment for raiding an methamphetamine lab being used or not by ATF agents the day of the raid]
hundreds of federal agents,
100 PVF7B5 Night Vision Goggles [http://www.usdoj.gov/05publications/waco/wacoappendix_b.html Report to the Deputy Attorney General on the Events at Waco, Texas] Appendix B. List of Military Personnel and Equipment]
2 UH-1 Helicopters
Hundreds of federal agents,
military vehicles (with their normal weapon systems removed): 9-10 M3 Bradleys, 4-5 M728 Combat Engineering Vehicles (CEV's) armed with
CS gas, 2 M1A1 Abramstanks, 1 M88 tank retriever
Britten-Norman Defendersurveillance aircraft ["FBI brings out secret electronics weapons as Waco siege drags on", by James Adams Washington. Sunday Times, March 21, 1993] ,
unknown number of Texas National Guard personnel, for maintenance of military vehicles and training on the use of the vehicles and their support vehicles (Humvees and flatbed trucks),
surveillance from Texas National Guard Counterdrug UC-26 surveillance aircraft and from Alabama National Guard,
2 members of the 22nd Regiment of the British Army's Special Air Service (SAS) as observers,
10 active duty Special Forces soldiers as "observers" (sic) and trainers, also present during assault,
Two senior Army officers as advicers
strength2=50+ men (trained on the use of weapons) [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Evaluation_of_the_Handling_of_the_Branch_Davidian_Stand-off_in_Waco%2C_Texas/FBI_Restraint Evaluation of the Handling of the Branch Davidian Stand-off in Waco, Texas/FBI Restraint] Edward S.G. Dennis, Jr.] ,
75+ women and children
243 total firearms, including two 50 caliber semi-automatic rifles, numerous assault rifles (semiautomatic
AK-47s and AR-15s), shotguns, revolvers and pistols
46 semiautomatic firearms modified to fire in full automatic mode (included on above list): 22 M-16 Type Rifles, 20 AK-47 Type Rifles, 2 Heckler and Koch SP-89, 2 M-11/NineUS Treasury Department
July 13, 1995Memorandum to the Press "Weapons Possessed by the Branch Davidians" http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/waco/treasury.html]
two AR-15 lower receivers also modified to fire in full automatic mode
4 Live M-21 Practice Hand Grenades
Material bought prior to raid: [http://www.usdoj.gov/05publications/waco/wacoappendix_f.html Report to the Deputy Attorney General on the Events at Waco, Texas] Appendix F Copy of indictment]
39 "full auto sears" devices used to convert semi-automatic weapons into automatic weapons,
parts for fully automatic
AK-47and M16 rifles,
30 round magazines and 100 round magazines for M-16 and AK-47 rifles,
pouches to carry large ammunition magazines,
substantial quantities of ammunition of various sizes (including .50 caliber armor piercing ammunition, 10,000 rounds of 9 mm ammunition and 10,000 rounds of .223 caliber ammunition),
grenade launcher parts,
K-bar fighting knives,
night vision equipment,
hundreds of practice
hand grenadeshulls and components (including 200+ Inert M31 Practice Rifle Grenades, 100+ Modified M-21 Practice Hand Grenade bodies, 219 Grenade Safety Pins, 243 Grenade Safety Levers found after the fire),
bullet proof vests
other similar equipment.
88 lower receivers for the
21 Sound suppressors or silencers (found after assault)
casualties1=raid: 4 deadciteweb|url=http://www.cesnur.org/testi/waco97.htm|title=Agents prepared for worst before Waco raid|publisher=Associated Press|date=2000-07-05|accessdate=2008-04-03] and 16 wounded
assault: noneFact|date=April 2008
casualties2=raid: 6 dead and 3+ woundedFact|date=April 2008
assault: 80 dead [http://www.cnn.com/US/9711/17/nichols.trial/ Prosecution tries to link Nichols, McVeigh through literature] "The government has argued that McVeigh and Nichols were incensed over how federal agents handled the 1993 clash with the Branch Davidian cult in Waco in which 80 cult members died."; retrieved
15 March 2008] (fire, falling roofs and suicide by gunshot)
casualties3=The Waco Siege [cite web | url = http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=2908955&page=1 | title = Remembering the Waco Siege | publisher =
ABC News| author = Justin Sturken and Mary Dore | date = 2007-02-28 | accessdate = 2008-06-23 ] (also known as the Waco Massacre [cite web | url = http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/waco/primary.html | title = Waco: the inside story, Readings | publisher = PBS | accessdate = 2008-06-23 ] ) took place on February 28 1993when the United StatesBureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF) attempted to execute a search warrant at the Branch Davidianranch at Mount Carmel, a property located nine miles (14 km) east-northeast of Waco, Texas. An exchange of gunfire resulted in the deaths of four agents and six Davidians. A subsequent 51-day siege by the Federal Bureau of Investigationended on April 19when fire destroyed the compound. Seventy-six people, including 21 children and two pregnant women, along with Davidian leader Vernon Wayne Howell, better known as David Koresh, died in the fire.
The Branch Davidian Seventh Day Adventist Church was formed in
Los Angeles, Californiaduring the 1930s, breaking away from the Seventh-day Adventist Church. As the group gained members, the leadership moved the church to a hilltop several miles west of Waco, which they named Mount Carmel, after a mountain in Israel mentioned in the Bible. A few years later, they moved again to a much larger site east of the city.
The new Mount Carmel Center consisted of a main church building (constructed primarily of thin plywood, taking advantage of a lack of building codes at the time), administrative and storage buildings, and homes for the leadership and important visitors.
The church announced at some point that the Second Coming of Jesus Christ was about to take place, and members were told to gather at the center to await this event. Many built houses, others stayed in tents, trucks or buses, and most sold their possessions. ["Psychotherapy Networker", March/April 2007, "Stairway to Heaven; Treating children in the crosshairs of trauma". Excerpt from the book "The Boy Who Was Raised as a Dog" by Bruce Perry and Maia Szalavitz.]
By 1992, most of the land belonging to the group had been sold, and most of the buildings had been removed, or were being salvaged for construction materials to convert much of the main chapel and a tall water tank into apartments for the resident members of the group. Many of the members of the group had been involved with the Davidians for a few generations, and many had large families.cite | author = | title = Ten years after Waco | publisher = People Weekly |date=2003-04-28]
In May 1992, Chief Deputy Daniel Weyenberg of the McLennan County Sheriff's Department called the ATF notifying that his office had been contacted by the local
United Parcel Serviceregarding a driver seeing a package that had broken open on delivery to the Branch Davidian residence, revealing that it contained firearms, inert grenade casings, and black powder. On June 9, 1992 a formal investigation was opened and a week later it was classified as sensitive, "thereby calling for a high degree of oversight" from both Houston and Headquarters (italics on the original). [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Activities_of_Federal_Law_Enforcement_Agencies_Toward_the_Branch_Davidians/Section_2 Activities of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies Toward the Branch Davidians: II. The ATF Investigation] ] citeweb|url=http://www.rickross.com/reference/waco/waco5.html|title=The Waco Dispute - Why the ATF Had to Act|author=Steve Higgins|publisher=The Washington Post|date=1995-07-02|accessdate=2008-04-03]
The documentary "Inside Waco" claims that the investigation started when in 1992 the ATF became concerned over reports of automatic gunfire coming from the Carmel compound.cite video | people = Neil Rawles | title = Inside Waco | medium = Television documentary| publisher = Channel 4/HBO| location = | date =
February 2, 2007 ]
The ATF began surveillance from a house across the road from the compound, but their cover was noticeably poor (the "college students" were in their 30s, not registered at the local schools, and they did not keep a schedule which would have fit any legitimate employment or classes). [http://www.time.com/time/daily/newsfiles/waco/101193.html Time.com, "Tripped Up By Lies: A report paints a devastating portrait of ATF's Waco planning -- or, rather, the lack of it",
October 11, 1993] Subsequent investigations, including sending in one agent undercover, revealed that there were over 150 weapons and 8,000 rounds of ammunition in the compound. Most of the weapons were legal semi-automatics; however, the ATF alleged there were also a number of firearms that had been illegally modified to fire full-automatic.
Davy Aguilera, the ATF agent that had prepared the affidavit, testified later on the trial that a neighbor heard machine-gun fire; but Aguilera failed to tell the magistrate that the same neighbor had previously reported the noise to the sheriff, who investigated the noise. The sheriff found Koresh had a lawful item called a hellfire device, which allows a semi-automatic firearm to fire at a rate approaching that of fully automatic firearms. The affidavit was approved by a U.S. magistrate and was used as a base for warrants. [citeweb|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_n26_v9/ai_14021102|title=TF's basis for the assault on Waco is shot full of holes - Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms fatal attack on the Branch Davidian complex in Waco, Texas - Column|author=Theodore H. Fiddleman, David B. Kopel|publisher=Insight on the News|date=1993-06-28|accessdate=2008-04-03]
Alleging that the Davidians had violated federal law, the ATF obtained search and
arrest warrants for Koresh and specific followers on weapons charges due to the many firearms they had accumulated, and they planned their raid for March 1, 1993, with the code name "Showtime".citeweb|url=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_23_17/ai_75706943/pg_1|title=Reno's halfway house|work=Insight on the News|date=2001-06-18|author=Eric Christensen] However, the raid was moved up a day in response to the Waco Tribune-Herald"Sinful Messiah" article (which the ATF had tried to prevent from being published).
The ATF attempted to execute a search warrant on a Sunday morning,
February 28 1993. Any advantage of surprise was lost as a reporter, who had been tipped off about the raid, asked for directions from a U.S. Postal Service mail carrier who was Koresh's brother-in-law. Koresh then confronted the ATF agent who had infiltrated the Branch Davidians and told him that they knew a raid was coming. Koresh and his male followers then began arming and taking up defensive positions, while the women and children were told to take cover in their rooms.
Despite being informed that the Davidians knew the raid was coming, the ATF commander ordered that the raid go ahead, even though their plan had depended on reaching the compound without the Davidians having been armed. While not standard procedure, ATF agents had their blood type written on their arms or neck after leaving the staging area and before the raid because it was recommended by the military to facilitate speedy blood transfusions in the case of injury. [Davidian Criminal Trial Transcripts, Richardson - Cross (Mr. Rentz), pags 2054-2055]
Agents approached the site in cattle trailers pulled by pickup trucks owned by individual ATF agents. It is not known who fired the first shots. It is reported that the first firing occurred at the double front entry doors. ATF agents stated that they heard shots coming from within the compound, while Branch Davidian survivors claimed that the first shots came from the ATF agents outside.
Within a minute of the raid starting, a Davidian, Wayne Martin, called
Emergency service, pleading for them to stop shooting. The resident asked for a ceasefire, and audiotapes record him saying "Here they come again!" and "That's them shooting, that's not us!"
The local sheriff then attempted to contact the ATF force, but initially could not get through because the ATF communications officer had turned his radio off. Eventually the sheriff got through and negotiated a ceasefire.This conflicts with Gazecki's documentary, where the sheriff of McLennan county at the time states that the ATF agents withdrew only once they were out of ammunition."cite video | people = William Gazecki | title = Waco - The Rules of Engagement | medium = Film documentary | publisher = New Yorker Video |year=2003 ]
After the ceasefire, the Davidians, who still had ample ammunition, allowed the dead and wounded to be removed and held their fire during the ATF retreat. ATF agents Steve Willis, Robert Williams, Todd McKeehan and Conway LeBleu were killed during the raid. Another 16 were wounded. The Davidians killed were Winston Blake, Peter Gent, Peter Hipsman, Perry Jones and Jaydean Wendel. Michael Schroeder was shot dead by ATF agents who alleged he fired a pistol at agents as he attempted to reenter the compound around 5 p.m. with Woodrow Kendrick and Norman Allison. His wife claims that he was merely returning from work and had not participated in the day's earlier altercation."
The local sheriff, in audiotapes broadcast after the incident, said he was not apprised of the raid.
Alan A. Stone's report states that the Davidians didn't ambush the ATF, that they "apparently did not maximize the kill of ATF agents" and that they were "willing to kill but not cold-blooded killers". It explains that they were rather "desperate religious fanatics expecting an apocalyptic ending, in which they were destined to die defending their sacred ground and destined to achieve salvation."citeweb|url=http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/waco/stonerpt.html|title=Report and Recommendations. Concerning the Handling of Incidents Such As the Branch Davidian Standoff in Waco Texas|date=1993-10-10|accessdate=2008-04-01] .
Chronology of events February 28
ATF agents established contact with Koresh and others inside the compound after they withdrew. The FBI took command soon after as a result of the deaths of federal agents. They placed
Jeff Jamar, head of the Bureau's San Antonio field office, in charge of the siege. The tactical team was headed by Richard Rogers, who had previously been criticized for his actions at the Ruby Ridge incident.
For the next 51 days, communication with those inside was by telephone by a group of 25 FBI negotiators. The final Justice Department report found that negotiators criticized the tactical commanders for undercutting negotiations. [From the Report of the Department of the Treasury on the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Investigation of Vernon Wayne Howell also known as David Koresh, September, 1993, Appendix D, 136-140.]
In the first few days the FBI believed they had made a breakthrough when they negotiated with Koresh an agreement that the Davidians would peacefully leave the compound in return for a message, recorded by Koresh, being broadcast on national radio. The broadcast was made, but Koresh then told negotiators that God had told him to remain in the building and "wait".
Despite this, soon afterwards negotiators managed to facilitate the release of 19 children, ranging in age from five months to 12 years old, without their parents. These children were released in groups of two. This was considered an allusion to
Noah's Arkby Koresh, while 98 people remained in the building. The children were then interviewed by the FBI and Texas Rangers, allegedly for hours at a time.
On day nine the Davidians released a video tape to show the FBI that there were no hostages, but in fact everyone seemingly was staying inside on their own free will. This video also included a message from Koresh. Videos also showed the 23 children still inside Ranch Apocalypse, and child care professionals on the outside prepared to take care of those children as well as the previous 21 released.
As the siege continued, Koresh negotiated more time, allegedly so he could write religious documents he said he needed to complete before he surrendered. His conversations, dense with biblical imagery, alienated the federal negotiators who treated the situation as a hostage crisis.
As the siege wore on, two factions developed within the FBI, one believing negotiation to be the answer, the other, force. Increasingly aggressive techniques were used to try to make the Davidians leave. Outside the compound nine disarmed
Bradley Fighting Vehiclesand five M-60 combat engineering vehicles (CEVs) obtained from the US Army began patrolling. The armored vehicles were used to destroy out buildings and crush cars belonging to Koresh. Music (heavily distorted) and disturbing sounds were played at high volume. Eventually all power and water was cut to the compound, forcing those inside to survive on rain water and stockpiled United States Army Meal, Ready-to-Eatrations.
Criticism was later leveled at the tactic of loud noises against Koresh by Schneider's attorney, Jack Zimmerman:
The point was this - they were trying to have sleep disturbance and they were trying to take someone that they viewed as unstable to start with, and they were trying to drive him crazy. And then they got mad 'cos he does something that they think is irrational! [Testimony to the Subcommitee on National Security "et al", loc cite. Congressional Record, July, 1995]
Despite the increasingly aggressive tactics, Koresh ordered a group of followers to leave. Eleven people left and were arrested as material witnesses, with one person charged with conspiracy to murder.
The children's willingness to stay with Koresh disturbed the negotiators who were unprepared to work around the Davidians' religious zeal. However, as the siege went on, the children were aware that an earlier group of children who had left with some women were immediately separated, and the women arrested.
During the siege a number of scholars who study
Apocalypticismin religious groups attempted to persuade the FBI that the siege tactics being used by government agents would only create the impression within the Davidians that they were part of a Biblical "end times" confrontation that had cosmic significance.cite web | title = U.S. ignores religion's fringes | work = "USA Today" |date=2001-10-04 | url=http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/2001-10-04-ncguest2.htm] This would likely increase the chances of a violent and deadly outcome. The religious scholars pointed out that while on the outside, the beliefs of the group may have appeared to be extreme, to the Davidians, their religious beliefs were deeply meaningful, and they were willing to die for them.
Koresh's discussions with the negotiating team became increasingly difficult. He proclaimed that he was the second coming of Christ and had been commanded by his father in heaven to remain in the compound.
The final assault
The FBI voiced concern that the Davidians might commit mass suicide, as had happened at
Jonestownwhere 900 people killed themselves at their leader's behest. The newly appointed U.S. Attorney General Janet Renoapproved recommendations by the FBI to mount an assault after being told that conditions were deteriorating and children were being abused inside the compound. Because the Davidians were heavily armed, the FBI's arms included .50 (12.7 mm) caliber guns and armored vehicles (CEVs). The assault took place on April 19th.
Combat Engineering tanks used booms to puncture holes in the walls of buildings of the compound so as to pump in
CS gas("tear gas") and try to flush out the Davidians without harming them. The stated plan called for increasing amounts of gas to be pumped in over two days to increase pressure. Officially, no armed assault was to be made, and loudspeakers were used to tell the Davidians that there would be no armed assault and to ask them not to fire on the vehicles. When several Davidians allegedly opened fire, the FBI's response was to increase the amount of gas being used.
After more than six hours no Davidians had left the building, sheltering instead in a cinder block room within the building or using gas masks. ["Tanks, chemicals couldn't break resolve of cultists," Associated Press, Washington Times, April 23, 1993.] The official FBI claim is that CEVs were used to punch large holes in the building to provide exits for those inside. Most Davidians dispute this claim because the "exits" were blocked by debris, structurally unstable, elevated and largely inaccessible due to smoke and large quanitities of tear gas. Several Davidians were blocked when a floor above collapsed, and nearly all Davidians said they feared being shot were they to leave. Fact|date=May 2008
The remaining Davidians burned to death as fire engulfed the building, with footage being broadcast worldwide by television. In all, 74 died.
Nothing remains of the buildings today, as the entire site was bulldozed by the ATF two weeks after the end of the siege. Only a small chapel, built years after the siege, stands on the site. Despite significant primary source video, much dispute remains as to the actual events of the siege.
Chronology of events April 19
Various gun-control groups, such as
Handgun Control Incorporatedand the Violence Policy Centerhave claimed that the Branch Davidans had used .50 caliber rifles and that therefore these types of firearms should be banned. [Brady Campaign "Selling High Powered Military Weapons in the Suburbs" http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/issues/?page=50cal#13] [VPC Criminal Use of the .50 Caliber Sniper Rifle http://www.vpc.org/snipercrime.htm] Nevertheless, the evidence of this is unclear; the US Treasury Department, in a memorandum to the press dated July 13, 1995titled "Weapons Possessed by the Branch Davidians", provided an inventory of all the firearms and firearm-related items that were recovered from the Branch Davidian's compound, which claims no .50 rifles or machine guns were recovered, only 4 .50 magazines, 3 .50 magazine springs and .50 belt links. Several years later, the General Accounting Officein response to a request from Henry Waxmanreleased a briefing paper titled, "Criminal Activity Associated with .50 Caliber Semiautomatic Rifles" which claims that the Branch Davidians did have access to and used .50 rifles. [Office of Special Investigations, U.S. General Accounting Office, Briefing Paper: Criminal Activity Associated with .50 Caliber Semiautomatic Rifles, Number, presented to GAO/OSI-99-15R of the U.S. House Committee on Government Reform, 15 July 1999Page 5 http://archive.gao.gov/f0502/162586.pdf] The GAO's claim is based on an unsourced BATFclaim that the Branch Davidians fired on the BATF with a .50 rifle. There has not been a reconciliation between the Treasury Department's account and the GAO's.
The events at Waco spurred both criminal prosecution and civil litigation. On August 3, 1993, a federal grand jury returned a superseding 10-count indictment against twelve of the surviving Davidians. The grand jury charged, among other things, that the Davidians had conspired to, and aided and abetted in, murder of federal officers, and had unlawfully possessed and used various firearms.
The Government dismissed the charges against one of the twelve Davidians, Kathryn Schroeder, pursuant to a plea bargain. After a jury trial lasting nearly two months, the jury acquitted four of the Davidians on all counts with which they were charged. Additionally, the jury acquitted all of the Davidians on the murder-related charges, but convicted five of them on the lesser-included offense of aiding and abetting the voluntary manslaughter of federal agents. [pag. 7403 of the trial trancripts] Eight Davidians were convicted on firearms charges.
The convicted Davidians were:
*Kevin A. Whitecliff—convicted of voluntary manslaughter and using a firearm during a crime.
*Jaime Castillo—convicted of voluntary manslaughter and using a firearm during a crime.
*Paul Gordon Fatta—convicted of conspiracy to possess machine guns and aiding Davidian leader David Koresh in possessing machine guns.
*Renos Lenny Avraam—convicted of voluntary manslaughter and using a firearm during a crime.
*Graeme Leonard Craddock—convicted of possessing a grenade and using or possessing a firearm during a crime.
*Brad Eugene Branch—convicted of voluntary manslaughter and using a firearm during a crime.
*Livingstone Fagan—convicted of voluntary manslaughter and using a firearm during a crime.
*Ruth Riddle—convicted of using or carrying a weapon during a crime.
*Kathryn Schroeder—sentenced to three years after pleading guilty to a reduced charge of forcibly resisting arrest.
Six of the eight Davidians appealed both their sentences and their convictions. They raised a host of issues, challenging the constitutionality of the prohibition on possession of machine guns, the jury instructions, the district court’s conduct of the trial, the sufficiency of the evidence, and the sentences imposed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated the defendants’ sentences for use of machine guns, determining that the district court had made no finding that they had “actively employed” the weapons. The Court of Appeals left the verdict undisturbed in all other respects.Fact|date=November 2007
On remand, the district court found that the defendants had actively employed machine guns, and re-sentenced five of them to substantial prison terms. The defendants again appealed. The Fifth Circuit affirmed. The Davidians pressed this issue before the United States Supreme Court. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the term “machine gun” in the relevant statute created an element of the offense to be determined by a jury, rather than a sentencing factor to be determined by a judge, as had happened in the trial court. On September 19, 2000 Judge Walter Smith followed the Supreme Court's instructions and cut 25 years from the sentences of 5 convicted Davidians and 5 years from the sentence of another. [Staff reports, "Davidians have prison terms cut,"
Dallas Morning News, September 20, 2000.] All Davidians were released from prison as of July 2007. [ [http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,192341,00.html Six Branch Davidians Due for Release 13 Years After Waco Inferno] , FoxNews, April 19, 2006; personal letter to Carol Moorefrom Livingstone Fagan, June, 2007]
Several of the surviving Davidians, as well as more than a hundred family members of those who had died or were injured in the confrontation, brought civil suits against the
United States Government, numerous federal officials, the former governor of Texas, and members of the Texas National Guard. They sought monetary damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), civil rights statutes, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, and Texas state law. The bulk of these claims were dismissed because they were insufficient as a matter of law or because the plaintiffs could advance no material evidence in support of them. Only FTCA claims related to the initial raid on the compound, the actions of the FBI during the insertion of tear gas on April 19, 1993, and the final fire proceeded to trial.Fact|date=November 2007
The court, after a month-long trial, rejected the Davidians’ case. The court found that, on February 28, 1993, the Davidians initiated a gun battle when they fired at federal officers who were attempting to serve lawful warrants. ATF agents returned gunfire to the building, the court ruled, in order to protect themselves and other agents from death or serious bodily harm. The court found that the government's planning of the siege--i.e. the decisions to use tear gas against the Davidians; to insert the tear gas by means of military tanks; and to omit specific planning for the possibility that a fire would erupt—was a discretionary function for which the government could not be sued. The court also found that the use of tear gas was not negligent. Further, even if the United States Government were negligent by causing damage to the buildings before the fires broke out, thus either blocking escape routes or enabling the fires to speed faster, that negligence did not legally cause the plaintiffs' injuries because the Davidians started the fires. The court found that the FBI's decision not initially to allow fire trucks on the property was reasonable because of the risk of injury or death to firefighters who might encounter hostile gunfire from the Davidian building.Fact|date=November 2007
The Davidians appealed. Their only serious contention was that the trial court judge, Walter S. Smith, Jr., should have recused himself from hearing their claims on account of his relationships with defendants, defense counsel, and court staff; prior judicial determinations; and comments during trial. The Fifth Circuit concluded that these allegations did not reflect conduct that would cause a reasonable observer to question Judge Smith’s impartiality, and it affirmed the take-nothing judgment.Fact|date=November 2007
Who fired first?
Helicopters had been obtained from the
Texas National Guardon the pretext that there was a drug laboratory at Mount Carmel. There were, however, no drug related charges on the arrest warrant served on the morning of February 28 1993." [http://www.waco93.com "Waco: The Rules of Engagement"] Official site of documentary] [ [http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Activities_of_Federal_Law_Enforcement_Agencies_Toward_the_Branch_Davidians/Section_5#cite_note-167 House of Representatives report, Activities of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies Toward the Branch Davidians, Section 5] , note 168: "ATF did not mention a drug lab or possession of illegal drugs as suspected crimes in its search warrant"."] . While the official version of events has always stated that the helicopters were merely used as a diversion, and that the Davidians were not targeted by sharpshooters within them, in transcripts of the negotiations, one negotiator admitted that the occupants were armed and that they might have opened fire:
Koresh: "No! Let me tell you something. That may be what you want the media to believe, but there's other people that saw too! Now, tell me Jim, again - you're honestly going to say those helicopters didn't fire on any of us?"
Jim Cavanaugh: "What I'm saying is the helicopters didn't have "mounted" guns. Ok? I'm not disputing the fact that there might have been fire from the helicopters." [The conversation is replayed in full, and undisputed by the FBI, on the documentary "Waco: The Rules of Engagement"] ]
An "Austin Chronicle" article noted, "Long before the fire, the Davidians were discussing the evidence contained in the doors. During the siege, in a phone conversation with the FBI, Steve Schneider, one of Koresh's main confidantes, told FBI agents that "the evidence from the front door will clearly show how many bullets and what happened." cite news | url = http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/2000-08-18/pols_feature9.html | title = Prying Open the Case of the Missing Door | author = Robert Bryce | work =
The Austin Chronicle| date = 2000-08-18 | accessdate = 2008-07-28] Houston attorney Dick DeGuerin, who went inside Mount Carmel during the siege, testified at the trial that protruding metal on the inside of the right-hand entry door made it clear that the bullet holes were made by incoming rounds. DeGuerin also testified that only the right-hand entry door had bullet holes, while the left-hand entry door was intact. The government presented the left-hand entry door at the trial, claiming that the right-hand entry door had been lost. The left-hand door contained numerous bullet holes made by both outgoing and incoming rounds. Texas Trooper Sgt. David Keys testified that he witnessed two men loading what could have been the missing door into a U-Haul van shortly after the siege had ended, but he did not see the object itself. And Michael Caddell, the lead attorney for the Davidians' wrongful death lawsuit explained, "The fact that the left-hand door is in the condition it's in tells you that the right-hand door was not consumed by the fire. It was lost on purpose by somebody." Caddell offered no evidence to support this allegation, which has never been proved. However, fire investigatorsSpecify|date=April 2008 stated that it was "extremely unlikely" that the steel right door could have suffered damage in the fire much greater than did the steel left door, and both doors would have been found together.Fact|date=April 2008 The right door remains missing, and the entire site was under close supervision by law enforcement officials until the debris -- including both doors -- had been removed.Fact|date=April 2008
Critics suggest that during the final raid the
CS gaswas injected into the building by armored vehicles in an unsafe manner, which could have started a fire. While two of the three fires were started well inside the building, away from where the CS gas was pumped in, survivor David Thibodeauclaimed in a 1999 interview with Reason Magazine that damage to the building allowed the gas to spread, stating that "They started to break the walls, break the windows down, spread the CS gas out."
Attorney General Reno had specifically directed that no pyrotechnic devices be used in the assault. Between 1993 and 1999, FBI spokesmen denied (even under oath) the use of any sort of pyrotechnic devices during the assault; however, pyrotechnic Flite-Rite CS gas grenades had been found in the rubble immediately following the fire. In 1999, FBI spokesmen were forced to admit that they had used the grenades, however they claimed that these devices, which dispense CS gas through an internal burning process, had been used during an early morning attempt to penetrate a covered, water-filled construction pit 40 yards away, and were not fired into the building itself. According to FBI claims, the fires started approximately three hours after the grenades had been fired. When the FBI's documents were turned over to Congress for an investigation in 1994, the page listing the use of the pyrotechnic devices was missing. The failure for six years to disclose the use of pyrotechnics despite her specific directive led Reno to demand an investigation. A senior FBI official told "
Newsweek" that as many as 100 FBI agents had known about the use of pyrotechnics, but no one spoke up until 1999.
The Branch Davidians had given ominous warnings involving fire on several occasions. [cite web | url = http://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/not_guilty/koresh/7.html?sect=8 | title = David Koresh: Millenial Violence | author = Katherine Ramsland | publisher = trutv.com | accessdate = 2008-08-04] This may or may not be indicative of the Davidians' future actions, but was the basis for the conclusion of Congress that the fire was started by the Davidians, "absent any other potential source of ignition." This was prior to the FBI admission that pyrotechnics were used, but a yearlong investigation by the Office of the Special Counsel after that admission nonetheless reached the same conclusion, and no further congressional investigations followed.
May 12, less than a month after the incident, Texas state authorities bulldozed the site, rendering further gathering of forensic evidence impossible.
Escaping from the fire
On the bunker a large concentration of bodies, weapons and ammunition were found. The arson report assumes that many of the occupants were either denied escape from within or refused to leave until escape was not an option.citeweb|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Report_to_the_Deputy_Attorney_General_on_the_Events_at_Waco%2C_Texas/Appendix_D|title=Report to the Deputy Attorney General on the Events at Waco, Texas/Appendix D|author=a team of independent arson investigator assembled by the Texas Rangers|accessdate=2008-04-17] The arson report also mentions that the structural debris from the breaching operations on the west end of the building could have blocked a possible escape route through the tunnel system.
An independent investigation concluded that the compound residents had sufficient time to escape the fire, if they had so desired.citeweb|url=http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Report_to_the_Deputy_Attorney_General_on_the_Events_at_Waco%2C_Texas/The_Aftermath_of_the_April_19_Fire#3._The_Fire_Development_Analysis|title=Report to the Deputy Attorney General on the Events at Waco, Texas/The Aftermath of the April 19 Fire ("The Fire Development Analysis" section)|author=two experts from the University of Maryland's Department of Fire Protection Engineering|accessdate=2008-04-17]
Evaluation by FBI of mass suicide possibility
According to Alan A. Stone's report, during the siege the FBI used an incorrect psychiatric perspective to evaluate Davidians' responses, which caused them to over-rely on Koresh's statements that they wouldn't commit suicide. They treated the Davidians as if they were a band of criminals, a military force or, generically, as the aggressor. The Davidians were instead :"an unconventional group in an exalted, disturbed, and desperate state of mind (...) devoted to David Koresh as the Lamb of God (...) willing to die defending themselves in an apocalyptic ending and, in the alternative, to kill themselves and their children (...) neither psychiatrically depressed, suicidal people nor cold-blooded killers (...) ready to risk death as a test of their faith." and should have been evaluated as such. According to Stone, this caused the FBI to not make the pertinent questions to Koresh and to others on the compound about whether they were planning a mass suicide. A more pertinent question would have been:"What will you do if we tighten the noose around the compound in a show of overwhelming power, and using CS gas, force you to come out?".
Autopsies of the dead revealed that some women and children found beneath a fallen concrete wall of a storage room died of skull injuries. Photographs taken after the fire show that the
M728CEV that penetrated the building while injecting CS gas did not come close enough to cause the collapse, which was more likely the result of the fire; photographs show signs of spalling on the concrete, which suggests that it was damaged by the intense heat.
Autopsy photographs of other children locked in what appear to be spasmic death poses are consistent with
cyanidepoisoning, one of the results produced by burning CS gas. The DOJ report indicated that only one body had traces of benzene, one of the components of solvent-dispersed CS gas, but that the gas insertions had finished nearly one hour before the fire ended, and that it was enough time for solvents to dissipate from the bodies of the Davidians that had inhaled the tear gas. [citeweb|url=|title=C. Identification of Bodies/Medical Examiner Reports|work=Report to the Deputy Attorney General on the Events at Waco, Texas|date=1993-04-03|accessdate=2008-04-02|url=http://www.usdoj.gov/05publications/waco/wacothirteen.html]
Autopsy records indicate that at least 20 Davidians were shot, including six children under the age of 14, and three-year-old Dayland Gent was stabbed in the chest. The expert retained by the Office of Special Counsel concluded that many of the gunshot wounds "support self-destruction either by overt suicide, consensual execution (suicide by proxy), or less likely, forced execution." [cite web | url = http://www.apologeticsindex.org/pdf/finalreport.pdf | title = Final report to the Deputy Attorney General concerning the 1993 confrontation at the Mt. Carmel Complex, Waco, Texas | date = 2000-10-02 | accessdate = 2008-06-04 |format=PDF] Another explanation, offered by survivor Clyde Doyle (himself a burn victim) is that the gunshots were mercy killings. In a 1995 press conference in
Las Vegas, Nevada, Doyle stated that :"I can understand why someone would end the suffering of someone, especially a child, who had been gassed and was burning to death. That makes more sense than these claims of a 'suicide pact.' The people who are saying that have never been on fire." (Las Vegas Review-Journal)
Documentary films and related issues
The Waco siege has been the subject of a number of documentary
films. The first of these was a made for television film, "In the Line of Duty: Ambush at Waco", which was made before the final assault on the church and essentially promoted the government's view of the initial ambush. The scriptwriter, Phil Penningroth, has since disowned his screenplay.
The first film that was critical of the official reports was "Waco: The Big Lie", [ [http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5369116450757675658&q=waco+the+big+lie&hl=en Waco: The big lie] , documentary, Google Video] produced by Linda Thompson followed by "Waco II: The Big Lie Continues". The Linda Thompson videos were controversial and made a number of allegations, the most famous of which was footage of a tank with what appears to be light reflected from it; Thompson's narration claimed this was a flame-thrower attached to the tank. Thompson's subsequent activities, such as declaring an armed march on
Washington, D.C.and her denunciation of many other researchers into the Waco siege as part of a cover-up, limited her credibility in most circles.
Michael McNulty, of the Citizens' Organization for Public Safety, released footage showing the "flame" to have been a reflection on aluminized insulation that was torn from the wall and snagged on the
M728CEV, which is a vehicle that does not come equipped with a flamethrower. In fact, no flamethrowers were in service in the US military at the time or even today.
Thompson's "creative editing" was exposed by the film "Waco: An Apparent Deviation" (produced by Michael McNulty, as the result of a comprehensive investigation by people associated with COPS).
The next film was "Day 51: The True Story of Waco", which featured
Ron Cole, a self-proclaimed militiamember from Coloradowho was later prosecuted for weapons violations. [ [http://cyrusproductions.org/ http://cyrusproductions.org/] Dead link|date=August 2008] Dead link|date=August 2008 The Linda Thompson and Ron Cole films, along with extensive coverage given to the Waco siege on some talk radioshows, galvanized support for the Branch Davidians among some sections of the right including the Nascent Militia Movement, while critics on the left also denounced the government siege on civil libertiesgrounds.
New Alliance Partyproduced a report blaming the siege on the influence of the Cult Awareness Network. [Ross & Green, [http://web.archive.org/web/20070620125917/http://www.ex-iwp.org/docs/1993/ross_green_waco_report.htm WHAT IS THE CULT AWARENESS NETWORK AND WHAT ROLE DID IT PLAY IN WACO?] ] Timothy McVeighcited the Waco incident as a primary motivation for the Oklahoma City bombingLou Michel and Dan Herbeck, "" (New York: ReganBooks, 2001); ISBN 0-06-039407-2.] and was known to be a fan of both the Linda Thompson and Ron Cole videos.Fact|date=January 2008 In March 1993, McVeigh drove from Arizona to Waco in order to observe firsthand the federal standoff. Along with other protesters, he was photographed by the F.B.I. [Harvard reference | Surname=Vidal | Given=Gore | Authorlink=Gore Vidal | Title=The Meaning of Timothy McVeigh| Journal=Vanity Fair | Volume= | Issue=September | Year=2001 | Page= | URL=http://www.isebrand.com/Gore_Vidal_McVeigh_2001.htm ]
Perhaps because most of the critical views were seen as coming from the political fringes of the right and left, most mainstream media discounted any critical views presented by early documentary films.
This changed when professional film makers Dan Gifford and Amy Sommer produced their
Emmy Awardwinning documentary, "". This film presents a history of the Branch Davidian movement and, most important, a critical examination of the conduct of law enforcement, both leading up to the raid and through the aftermath of the fire. The film features footage of the Congressional hearings on Waco, and juxtaposition of official government spokespeople with footage and evidence often directly contradicting the government spokespeople. The documentary also shows infra-red footage demonstrating that the FBI likely used incendiary devices to start the fire which consumed the building and that the FBI did indeed fire on, and kill, Branch Davidians attempting to flee the fire.
Subsequent government-funded studies [ [http://web.archive.org/web/20000817175032/www.osc-waco.org/IntRpt.pdf a] , [http://web.archive.org/web/20010202065900/www.osc-waco.org/FinalReport/FinalReport.htm b] , [http://web.archive.org/web/20010608065616/www.dallasnews.com/waco/78737_report12.htm c] , [http://web.archive.org/web/20030417182508/http://www.icg.isy.liu.se/publications/SSAB2001Klasen.pdf d] , and [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=2001SPIE.4370..286F&db_key=PHY&data_type=HTML&format= e] ] contend that the infra-red evidence does not support the view that the FBI improperly used incendiary devices or fired on Branch Davidians. Infra-red experts continue to disagree, and film maker Amy Sommer stands by the original conclusions presented in the "Waco: The Rules of Engagement" documentary.
"Waco: The Rules of Engagement" was nominated for a 1997 Academy Award for best documentary and was followed by another film: "Waco: A New Revelation". [ [http://www.waco-anewrevelation.com/ Waco: a new revelation] , official site of the documentary]
"America Wake Up (Or Waco)" was another film released in 2000 by Alex Jones which documents the 1993 Waco incident with the Branch Davidians.
"Wako-Shaman" is a song by Spanish-pop singer
Miguel Bose, and it was included in his 1993 studio album Bajo el signo de Cain (Under the Sign of Cain). The song refers to David Koresh's claim that his was "the Chosen One", and the events that led to the Waco Siege.
"The Assault on Waco" was released on
September 16, 2006on the Discovery channel, and it details the entire attack on Waco.
Professor Kenneth Newport's book, "The Branch Davidians of Waco" (2006), claims that starting the fire themselves was consistent with the Branch Davidians' theology.
"Inside Waco" is an Anglo-American documentary that attempts to show what really happened inside by piecing together accounts from the parties involved. It was produced jointly by
Channel 4and HBO. It aired on More4 in the UK on 1 February 2007and then 10 February 2007.
The fourth section of
John Updike's 1996 novel, " In the Beauty of the Lilies", is a fictional account of the Branch Dividians and the events of the siege recounted through the eyes of a man who joined the cult two years previously.
In 1999, the television show "
South Park" released an episode titled " Two Guys Naked in a Hot Tub." In the episode, the ATF stakes out a house full of party-goers whom they suspected of being a cult on the verge of committing a mass-suicide in parody of the ATF's handling of the Branch Davidians at Waco, Texas.
Running With Scissors, Inc.game " Postal 2", released in 2003, features a level very similar to the Waco Siege, where religious fanatics are trapped in a church-like building, sieged by members of both the ATF and the FBI, and equipped with two tanks.
By 1999, as a result of certain aspects of the documentaries discussed above, as well as allegations made by advocates for Davidians during litigation, public opinion held that the federal government had engaged in serious misconduct at Waco. A Time magazine poll conducted on
August 26, 1999, for example, indicated that 61 percent of the public believed that federal law enforcement officials started the fire at the Branch Davidian complex. In September of that year, Attorney General Janet Renoappointed former United States Senator John C. Danforthas Special Counsel to investigate the matter. In particular, the Special Counsel was directed to investigate charges that government agents started or spread the fire at the Mt. Carmel complex, directed gunfire at the Branch Davidians, and unlawfully employed the armed forces of the United States.
A yearlong investigation ensued, during which the Office of the Special Counsel interviewed 1,001 witnesses, reviewed over 2.3 million pages of documents, and examined thousands of pounds of physical evidence. In his final report of
November 8, 2000, Special Counsel Danforth concluded that the allegations were meritless. The report found, however, that certain government employees had failed to disclose during litigation against the Davidians the use of pyrotechnic devices at the complex, and had obstructed the Special Counsel’s investigation. Disciplinary action was pursued against those individuals.
Allegations that the government started the fire were based largely on an FBI agent’s having fired three “pyrotechnic” tear gas rounds, which are delivered with a charge that burns. The Special Counsel concluded that, because the FBI fired the rounds nearly four hours before the fire started, at a concrete construction pit partially filled with water, convert|75|ft|m away and downwind from the main living quarters of the complex, the rounds did not start or contribute to the spread of the fire. The Special Counsel noted, by contrast, that recorded interceptions of Davidian conversations included such statements as “David said we have to get the fuel on” and “So we light it first when they come in with the tank right . . . right as they’re coming in.” Davidians who survived the fire acknowledged that other Davidians started the fire. FBI agents witnessed Davidians pouring fuel and igniting a fire, and noted these observations contemporaneously. Lab analysis found accelerants on the clothing of Davidians, and investigators found deliberately punctured fuel cans and a homemade torch at the site. Based on this evidence and testimony, the Special Counsel concluded that the fire was started by the Davidians.
Charges that government agents fired shots into the complex on
April 19, 1993, were based on Forward Looking Infrared(“FLIR”) video recorded by FBI Nightstalker aircraft. These tapes showed 57 flashes, with some occurring around government vehicles that were operating near the complex. The Office of Special Counsel conducted a field test of FLIR technology on March 19, 2000, to determine whether gunfire caused the flashes. The testing was conducted under a protocol agreed to and signed by attorneys and experts for the Davidians and their families, as well as for the government. Analysis of the shape, duration, and location of the flashes indicated that they resulted from a reflection off debris on or around the complex, rather than gunfire. Additionally, independent expert review of photography taken at the scene showed no people at or near the points from which the flashes emanated. Interviews of Davidians, government witnesses, filmmakers, writers, and advocates for the Davidians found that none had witnessed any government gunfire on April 19. Finally, none of the Davidians who died on that day displayed evidence of having been struck by a high velocity round, as would be expected had they been shot from outside of the complex by government sniper rifles or other assault weapons. In view of this evidence, the Special Counsel concluded that the claim that government gunfire occurred on April 19, 1993, amounted to “an unsupportable case based entirely upon flawed technological assumptions.”
The Special Counsel considered whether the use of active duty military at Waco violated the
Posse Comitatus Actor the Military Assistance to Law Enforcement Act. These statutes generally prohibit direct military participation in law enforcement functions, but do not preclude indirect support such as loaning equipment, training in the use of equipment, offering expert advice, and providing equipment maintenance. The Special Counsel noted that the military provided “extensive” loans of equipment to the ATF and FBI including, among other things, two tanks the offensive capability of which had been disabled. Additionally, the military provided more limited advice, training, and medical support. The Special Counsel concluded that these actions amounted to indirect military assistance within the bounds of applicable law. The Texas National Guard, in its state status, also provided substantial loans of military equipment, as well as performing reconnaissance flights over the Davidian complex. Because the Posse Comitatus Act does not apply to the National Guard in its state status, the Special Counsel determined that the National Guard lawfully provided its assistance.
Oklahoma City bombingwas a terrorist attack on April 19 1995aimed at the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, a U.S. government office complex in downtown Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The attack claimed 168 lives and left over 800 injured. Until the September 11, 2001 attacks, it was the deadliest act of terrorismon U.S. soil.Prior to 9-11, the deadliest act of terror against the United States was the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, which killed 189 Americans.] Within days after the bombing, Timothy McVeighand Terry Nicholswere both in custody for their roles in the bombing. Investigators determined that McVeigh and Nichols were sympathizers of an anti-government militia movement and that their motive was to avenge the government's handling of the Waco siege and Ruby Ridgeincidents.
The perpetrators of the
Columbine high school massacrewere inspired by the Waco Siege. [ [http://copycateffect.blogspot.com/2007/12/omaha-jokela-columbine.html The Copycat Effect: Omaha-Jokela-Columbine ] ] [http://denver.rockymountainnews.com/pdf/900columbinedocs.pdf]
* Anthony, D. and T. Robbins (1997). "Religious totalism, exemplary dualism and the Waco tragedy." In Robbins and Palmer 1997, 261–284.
* Christopher Whitcomb. "Cold Zero: Inside the FBI Hostage Rescue Team". ISBN 0-552-14788-5. (Also covers
* Docherty, Jayne Seminare. "Learning Lessons From Waco: When the Parties Bring Their Gods to the Negotiation Table" (Syracuse, New York: Syracuse University Press, 2001). ISBN 0-8156-2751-3
* Heymann, Philip B. (U.S. Department of Justice). "Lessons of Waco: Proposed Changes in Federal Law Enforcement" (Washington: USDOJ, 1993). ISBN 0-16-042977-3
* Kerstetter, Todd. "'That's Just the American Way': The Branch Davidian Tragedy and Western Religious History", "
Western Historical Quarterly", Vol. 35, No. 4, Winter 2004.
* Kopel, David B. and Paul H. Blackman. "No More Wacos: What’s Wrong With Federal Law Enforcement and How to Fix It" (Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books, 1997). ISBN 1-57392-125-4
* Lewis, James R. (ed.). "From the Ashes: Making Sense of Waco" (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994). ISBN 0-8476-7915-2 (cloth) ISBN 0-8476-7914-4 (paper)
* Linedecker, Clifford L. "Massacre at Waco, Texas: The Shocking Story of Cult Leader David Koresh and the Branch Davidians" (New York: St. Martin’s Paperbacks, 1993). ISBN 0-312-95226-0
* Lynch, Timothy. "No Confidence: An Unofficial Account of the Waco Incident" (Washington: Cato Institute, 2001).
* Moore, Carol. "The Davidian Massacre: Disturbing Questions Abut Waco Which Must Be Answered." (Virginia: Gun Owners Foundation, 1995). ISBN 1-880692-22-8
* Newport, Kenneth G. C. "The Branch Davidians of Waco: The History and Beliefs of an Apocalyptic Sect" "(Oxford University Press, 2006). ISBN 0199245746
* Reavis, Dick J. "The Ashes of Waco: An Investigation" (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1995). ISBN 0-684-81132-4
* Tabor, James D. and Eugene V. Gallagher. "Why Waco?: Cults and the Battle for Religious Freedom in America" (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995). ISBN 0-520-20186-8
* Thibodeau, David and Leon Whiteson. "A Place Called Waco: A Survivor's Story" (New York: PublicAffairs, 1999). ISBN 1-891620-42-8
* Wright, Stuart A. (ed.). "Armageddon in Waco: Critical Perspectives on the Branch Davidian Conflict" (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).
Legal and governmental
* United States v. Branch, W.D. Texas Criminal Case No. 6:93cr46, trial transcript 1/10/94 - 2/26/94; 91 F.3d 699 (5th Cir. 1996)
* United States v. Castillo, 179 F.3d 321 (1999); Castillo v. United States, 120 S.Ct. 2090 (2000); on remand, 220 F.3d 648 (5th Cir. 2000)
* Andrade v. United States, W.D. Texas Civil Action No. W-96-CA-139, trial transcript 6/19/2000 - 7/14/2000; 116 F.Supp.2d 778 (W.D. Tex. 2000)
* Andrade v. Chojnacki, 338 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2003)
* United States Department of Justice. "Recommendations of Experts for Improvements in Federal Law Enforcement After Waco" (Washington: USDOJ, 1993). ISBN 0-16-042974-9::* Ammerman, Nancy T. (1993). "Report to the Justice and Treasury Departments regarding law enforcement interaction with the Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas." Submitted
September 3, 1993. "Recommendations of Experts for Improvements in Federal Law Enforcement After Waco." Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of the Treasury. [http://hirr.hartsem.edu/bookshelf/ammerman_article1.html Online] ::* Stone, Alan A. (1993). "Report and Recommendations Concerning the Handling of Incidents Such As the Branch Davidian Standoff in Waco Texas." Submitted November 10, 1993. "Recommendations of Experts for Improvements in Federal Law Enforcement After Waco." Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/waco/stonerpt.html Online] .
* Final Report to the Deputy Attorney General concening the 1993 confrontation at the Mt. Carmel Complex, Waco, Texas, John C. Danforth, Special Council (
November 8, 2000)
* Committee on the Judiciary (in conjunction with the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives, 104th Congress, Second Session. "Materials Relating to the Investigation Into the Activities of Federal Law Enforcement Agencies Toward the Branch Davidians" (Washington: USGPO, 1997). ISBN 0-16-055211-7 [ftp://ftp.loc.gov/pub/thomas/cp104/hr749.txt Online] .
* Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Rangers Branch Davidian Evidence Reports::* Sept 1999 http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/director_staff/public_information/branch_davidian/index.htm::* Jan 2000 Part 1 http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/director_staff/public_information/Branch_Davidian_2/BD%20part1.pdf::* Jan 2000 Part 2 http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/director_staff/public_information/Branch_Davidian_2/BD%20part2.pdf::* Jan 2000 Part 3 http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/director_staff/public_information/Branch_Davidian_2/BD%20part3.pdf::* Jan 2000 Part 4 http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/director_staff/public_information/Branch_Davidian_2/BD%20part4.pdf
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Waco siege — The Mount Carmel Center in flames during the assault on April 19, 1993 Date … Wikipedia
Siege de Waco — Siège de Waco Siège de Waco Entrée de la résidence du Mont Carmel en 1997 Informations générales Date 28 février 1993 19 avril 1993 … Wikipédia en Français
Siège de waco — Entrée de la résidence du Mont Carmel en 1997 Informations générales Date 28 février 1993 19 avril 1993 … Wikipédia en Français
Waco, Texas — Waco redirects here. For the siege near Waco, Texas, see Waco siege. For the steamship, see City of Waco. For other uses, see Waco (disambiguation). City of Waco City … Wikipedia
Waco (disambiguation) — Waco may refer to multiple places in the United States of America:*Waco, Texas, the most prominent place of this name *Waco, Georgia *Waco, Kentucky *Waco, Missouri *Waco, Nebraska *Waco, North Carolina *Waco, OhioWaco may also refer to:* a… … Wikipedia
Siege of Lal Masjid — Part of the War in North West Pakistan; War on Terror An explosion at Lal Masjid set off by the … Wikipedia
Siège de Waco — 31°35′45″N 96°59′17″O / 31.59583, 96.98806 … Wikipédia en Français
Waco Tribune-Herald — Infobox Newspaper name = Waco Tribune Herald caption = A sample front page of the Waco Tribune Herald type = Daily newspaper format = Broadsheet foundation = 1892 (as the Waco Evening Telephone ) ceased publication = price = owners = Cox… … Wikipedia
Siege — A siege is a military blockade of a city or fortress with the intent of conquering by attrition and/or assault. The term derives from sedere , Latin for seat or sitting. [ [http://m w.com/dictionary/siege Merriam Webster: siege] ] A siege occurs… … Wikipedia
Waco — /ˈweɪkoʊ/ (say waykoh) noun a town in the US, in central Texas, on the Brazos River; raid of a nearby ranch of the Branch Davidian sect by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 1993 led to 76 deaths in what is known as the Waco siege or Waco… … Australian English dictionary