- Cruelty to animals
Cruelty to animals, also called animal abuse or animal neglect, is the infliction of suffering or harm upon non-human animals, for purposes other than self-defense. More narrowly, it can be harm for specific gain, such as killing animals for food or for their fur, although opinions differ with respect to the method of slaughter. Diverging viewpoints are held by jurisdictions throughout the world.
Broadly speaking, there are two approaches to the issue. The animal welfare position holds that there is nothing inherently wrong with using animals for human purposes, such as food, clothing, entertainment, and research, but that it should be done in a humane way that minimizes unnecessary pain and suffering. Animal rights theorists criticize this position, arguing that the words "unnecessary" and "humane" are subject to widely differing interpretations, and that the only way to ensure protection for animals is to end their status as property, and to ensure that they are never used as commodities. Laws concerning animal cruelty are designed to prevent needless cruelty to animals, rather than killing for other aims such as food, or they concern species not eaten as food in the country involved, such as those regarded as pets.
- 1 In law
- 2 In theory and practice
- 3 Notes
- 4 Further reading
- 5 External links
Many jurisdictions around the world have enacted statutes which forbid cruelty to some animals but these vary by country and in some cases by the use or practice.
In Australia, many states have enacted legislation outlawing cruelty to animals, however, it is argued that welfare laws do not adequately extend to production animals. Whilst police maintain an overall jurisdiction in prosecution of criminal matters, in many states officers of the RSPCA and other animal welfare charities are accorded authority to investigate and prosecute animal cruelty offenses.
In Japan, the 1973 Welfare and Management of Animals Act (amended in 1999 and 2005) stipulates that "no person shall kill, injure, or inflict cruelty to animals without due course", and in particular, criminalises cruelty to all mammals, birds, and reptiles possessed by persons; as well as cattle, horses, goats, sheep, pigs, dogs, cats, pigeons, domestic rabbits, chickens, and domestic ducks regardless of whether they are in captivity.
- Killing or injuring without due reason: up to one year's imprisonment with labour or a fine of up to one million yen
- Cruelty such as causing debilitation by discontinuing feeding or watering without due reason: a fine of up to five hundred thousand yen
- Abandonment: a fine of up to five hundred thousand yen
Separate national and local ordinances exist with regards to ensuring health and safety of animals handled by pet shops and other businesses.
Animal experiments are regulated by the 2000 Law for the Humane Treatment and Management of Animals, which was amended in 2006. This law requires those using animals to follow the principles outlined in the 3Rs and use as few animals as possible, and cause minimal distress and suffering. Regulation is at a local level based on national guidelines, but there are no governmental inspections of institutions and no reporting requirement for the numbers of animals used.
As of 2006 there were no laws in China governing acts of cruelty to animals. In certain jurisdictions such as Fuzhou, dog control officers may kill any unaccompanied dogs on sight. However, the People's Republic of China is currently in the process of making changes to its stray-dog population laws in the capital city, Beijing. Mr. Zheng Gang who is the director of the Internal and Judicial Committee which comes under the Beijing Municipal People's Congress (BMPC), supports the new draft of the Beijing Municipal Regulation on Dogs from the local government. This new law is due to replace the current Beijing Municipal Regulation on Dog Ownership, introduced in 1889. The current regulation talks of "strictly" limiting dog ownership and controlling the number of dogs in the city. The new draft focuses instead on "strict management and combining restrictions with management." There are no government supported charitable organizations like the RSPCA, which monitors the cases on animal cruelty, so that all kinds of animal abuses, such as to fish, tigers, and bears, are to be reported for law enforcement and animal welfare.
In September 2009, legislation was drafted to address deliberate cruelty to animals in China. If passed, the legislation would offer some protection to pets, captive wildlife and animals used in laboratories, as well as regulating how farm animals are raised, transported and slaughtered.
As of 2010, Hong Kong has supplemented or replaced the laws against cruelty with a positive approach using laws that specify how animals should be treated. The government department primarily responsible for animal welfare in Hong Kong is the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD).
Laws enforced by the AFCD include these:
- the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Ordinance (also enforced by the police)
- the Public Health (Animals and Birds) Ordinance (including regulations for licences imposed on livestock keepers and animal traders and a Code of Standards for Licensed Animal Traders)
- the Dogs and Cats Ordinance
- the Pounds Ordinance
- the Rabies Ordinance
- the Wild Animals Protection Ordinance
In addition, the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department (FEHD) does the following:
- enforces the Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance, which includes regulations for slaughterhouses and wet markets
- publishes a Code of Practice for the Welfare of Food Animals (which describes their transport)
- publishes Operational Guidelines for the Welfare of Food Animals at Slaughterhouses
The Department of Health does the following:
- enforces the Animals (Control of Experiments) Ordinance.
- publishes a Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Experimental Purposes
As of 2006, Hong Kong has a law titled "Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Ordinance", with a maximum 3 year imprisonment and fines of HKD$200,000.
The Taiwanese Animal Protection Act was passed in 1998, imposing fines up to NT$250,000 for cruelty. Criminal penalties for animal cruelty were enacted in 2007, including a maximum of 1 year imprisonment.
Egyptian law states that anyone who inhumanely beats or intentionally kills any domesticated animal may be jailed or fined. The Egyptian Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals was established by the British over a hundred years ago, and is currently administered by the Egyptians. The SPCA was instrumental in promoting a 1997 ban on bullfighting in Egypt.
Veterinarian Lana Dunn and several Saudi nationals report that there are no laws to protect animals from cruelty since the term is not well-defined within the Saudi legal system. They point to a lack of a governing body to supervise conditions for animals, particularly in pet stores and in the exotic animal trade with East Africa.
Germany, Switzerland, Sweden, and Austria have all banned battery cages for egg-laying hens. The entire European Union is phasing out battery cages by 2012. It is also illegal in many parts of Europe to declaw a cat.
In Germany, killing animals or causing significant pain (or prolonged or repeated pain) to them is punishable by imprisonment of up to three years or a financial penalty. If the animal is of foreign origin, the act may also be punishable as criminal damage.
Acts of cruelty against animals can be punished with imprisonment, for a minimum of three months up to a maximum of three years, and with a fine ranging from a minimum of 3.000,00 Euro to a maximum of 160.000,00 Euro, as for the law n°189/2004. The law was passed mainly to crush the phenomenon of dog fighting, which in Italy is a clandestine blood sport fully controlled by organized crime.
On August 18, 1911, the House of Commons introduced the Protection of Animals Act 1911 (c.27) following lobbying by the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA). The maximum punishment was 6 months of "hard labour" with a fine of 25 pounds.
In the London Police Act 1839, "fighting or baiting Lions, Bears, Badgers, Cocks, Dogs, or other Animals" was prohibited in London, with a penalty of up to one month imprisonment, with possible hard labour, or up to five pounds. The law laid numerous restrictions on how, when, and where animals could be driven, wagons unloaded, etc.. It also prohibited owners from letting mad dogs run loose and gave police the right to destroy any dog suspected of being rabid or any dog bitten by a suspected rabid dog. The same law prohibited the use of dogs for drawing carts. Up until then, dogs were used for delivering milk, bread, fish, meat, fruit, vegetables, animal food (the cat's-meat man), and other items for sale and for collecting refuse (the rag-and-bone man). As Nigel Rothfels notes, the prohibition against dogs pulling carts in or near London caused most of the dogs to be killed by their owners as they went from being contributors to the family income to unaffordable expenses. Cart dogs were replaced by people with handcarts. About 150,000 dogs were killed or abandoned. Erica Fudge quotes Hilda Kean:At the heart of nineteenth-century animal welfare campaigns is the middle-class desire not to be able to see cruelty.—Hilda Kean, Animal Rights, 1998
The Protection of Animals Act 1911 extended the ban on draft dogs to the rest of the kingdom. As many as 600,000 dogs were killed or abandoned.
The Act of 1911 has now been replaced by Animal Welfare Act of 2006.
The Swiss animal protection laws are among the strictest in the world, comprehensively regulating the treatment of animals including the size of rabbit cages, and the amount of exercise that must be provided to dogs.
In Mexico, there are little to no animal cruelty laws, however, it has been suggested that animal cruelty laws are slowly being implemented. The country's current policy usually condemns physical harm to animals as property damage to the owners of the abused animal. The Law of Animal Protection of the Federal District is wide-ranging, based on banning 'unnecessary suffering'. Similar laws now exist in most states. However, this is disregarded by much of the public and authorities.
The primary federal law relating to animal care and conditions in the US is the Animal Welfare Act of 1966, amended in 1970, 1976, 1985, 1990, 2002 and 2007. It is the only Federal law in the United States that regulates the treatment of animals in research, exhibition, transport, and by dealers. Other laws, policies, and guidelines may include additional species coverage or specifications for animal care and use, but all refer to the Animal Welfare Act as the minimum acceptable standard.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund releases an annual report ranking the animal protection laws of every state based on their relative strength and general comprehensiveness. In 2010's report, the top five states for their strong anti-cruelty laws were Illinois, Maine, Michigan, Oregon, and California. The five states with the weakest animal cruelty laws were Kentucky, North Dakota, Idaho, Mississippi, and Iowa.
In 2004, a Florida legislator proposed a ban on "cruelty to bovines," stating: "A person who, for the purpose of practice, entertainment, or sport, intentionally fells, trips, or otherwise causes a cow to fall or lose its balance by means of roping, lassoing, dragging, or otherwise touching the tail of the cow commits a misdemeanor of the first degree." The proposal did not become law.
In the United States, ear cropping, tail docking, the Geier Hitch, rodeo sports, and other acts are legal and sometimes condoned. Penalties for cruelty can be minimal, if pursued. Currently, 46 of the 50 states have enacted felony penalties for certain forms of animal abuse. However, in most jurisdictions, animal cruelty is most commonly charged as a misdemeanor offense. In one recent California case, a felony conviction for animal cruelty could theoretically net a 25 year to life sentence due to their three-strikes law, which increases sentences based on prior felony convictions.
In 2003, West Hollywood, California passed an ordinance banning declawing of house cats. In 2007, Norfolk, Virginia passed legislation only allowing the procedure for medical reasons. However, most jurisdictions allow the procedure.
State welfare laws
Several states have enacted or considered laws in support of humane farming.
- On November 5, 2002, Florida voters passed Amendment 10 by a margin of 55% for, amending the Florida Constitution to ban the confinement of pregnant pigs in gestation crates.
- On January 14, 2004, the bill AB-732 died in the California Assembly's Agriculture Committee. The bill would have banned gestation and veal crates, eventually being amended to include only veal crates. On May 9, 2007, the bill AB-594 was withdrawn from the California State Assembly. The bill had been effectively killed in the Assembly Agriculture Committee, by replacing the contents of the bill with language concerning tobacco cessation coverage under Medi-Cal. AB-594 was very similar to the current language of Proposition 2.
- On November 7, 2006, Arizona voters passed Proposition 204 with 62% support. The measure prohibits the confinement of calves in veal crates and breeding sows in gestation crates.
- On June 28, 2007, Oregon Governor Ted Kulongoski signed a measure into law prohibiting the confinement of pigs in gestation crates (SB 694, 74th Leg. Assembly, Regular Session).
- In January 2008, Nebraska State Senate bill LB 1148, to ban the use of gestation crates for pig farmers, was withdrawn within 5 days amidst controversy.
- On May 14, 2008, Colorado Governor Bill Ritter signed into law a bill, SB 201, that phases out gestation crates and veal crates.
The Animal Legal Defense Fund releases an annual report ranking the animal protection laws of every province and territory based on their relative strength and general comprehensiveness. In 2011 the top four, for their strong anti-cruelty laws, were Ontario, Manitoba, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia. The worst four were Alberta, Northwest Territories, Quebec, and Nunavut.
In theory and practice
There are many reasons why individuals abuse animals. Animal cruelty covers a wide range of actions (or lack of action). Learning about animal abuse has revealed patterns of behavior employed by abusers.
Animal cruelty is often broken down into two main categories: active and passive, also referred to as commission and omission, respectively.
Passive cruelty is typified by cases of neglect, in which the cruelty is a lack of action rather than the action itself. Examples of neglect are starvation, dehydration, parasite infestations, allowing a collar to grow into an animal’s skin, inadequate shelter in extreme weather conditions, and failure to seek veterinary care when necessary.
In many cases of neglect in which an investigator believes that the cruelty occurred out of ignorance, the investigator may attempt to educate the pet owner, then revisit the situation. In more severe cases, exigent circumstances may require that the animal be removed for veterinary care.
Active cruelty implies malicious intent, as when a person has deliberately and intentionally caused harm to an animal, and is sometimes referred to as NAI (Non-Accidental Injury). Acts of intentional animal cruelty may be indicators of serious psychological problems. There is an intrinsic link between battered pets and battered women and children. The likelihood that women's shelter personnel will encounter women and children who have been threatened by batterers using animal abuse as a weapon is high. This is because more families in America have pets than have children. Secondly, the majority of pet owners are themselves parents with children. Thirdly, 64.1% of households with children under age 6, and 74.8% of households with children over age 6, also have pets. Lastly, as many as 71% of pet-owning women seeking shelter at safe houses have reported that their partner had threatened and/or actually hurt or killed one or more of their pets; 32% of these women reported that one or more of their children had also hurt or killed pets. Battered women report that they are prevented from leaving their abusers because they fear what will happen to the animals in their absence. Animal abuse sometimes is used as a form of intimidation in domestic disputes.
One of the known warning signs of certain psychopathologies, including antisocial personality disorder, also known as psychopathic personality disorder, is a history of torturing pets and small animals, a behavior known as zoosadism. According to the New York Times, "[t]he FBI has found that a history of cruelty to animals is one of the traits that regularly appears in its computer records of serial rapists and murderers, and the standard diagnostic and treatment manual for psychiatric and emotional disorders lists cruelty to animals a diagnostic criterion for conduct disorders. "A survey of psychiatric patients who had repeatedly tortured dogs and cats found all of them had high levels of aggression toward people as well, including one patient who had murdered a young boy." Robert K. Ressler, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation's behavioral sciences unit, studied serial killers and noted,"Murderers like this (Jeffrey Dahmer) very often start out by killing and torturing animals as kids."
Cruelty to animals is one of the three components of the Macdonald triad, indicators of violent antisocial behavior in children and adolescents. According to the studies used to form this model, cruelty to animals is a common (but not universal) behavior in children and adolescents who grow up to become serial killers and other violent criminals.
It has also been found that children who are cruel to animals have often witnessed or been victims of abuse themselves. In two separate studies cited by the Humane Society of the United States roughly one-third of families suffering from domestic abuse indicated that at least one child had hurt or killed a pet.
TV & film making
Animal cruelty has long been an issue with the art form of filmmaking, with even some big-budget Hollywood films receiving criticism for allegedly harmful—and sometimes lethal—treatment of animals during production. One of the most infamous examples of animal cruelty in film was Michael Cimino's legendary flop Heaven's Gate, in which numerous animals were brutalized and even killed during production. Cimino allegedly killed chickens and bled horses from the neck to gather samples of their blood to smear on actors for Heaven's Gate, and also allegedly had a horse blown up with dynamite while shooting a battle sequence, the shot of which made it into the film. After the release of the film Reds, the star and director of the picture, Warren Beatty apologized for his Spanish film crew's use of tripwires on horses while filming a battle scene, when Beatty wasn't present. Tripwires were used against horses when Rambo III and The Thirteenth Warrior were being filmed. An ox was sliced nearly in half during production of Apocalypse Now, while a donkey was bled to death for dramatic effect for the film Manderlay, in a scene later cut from the film.
Cruelty in film exists in movies outside the United States. There is a case of cruelty to animals in the South Korean film The Isle, according to its director Kim Ki-Duk. In the film, a real frog is skinned alive while fish are mutilated. Several animals were killed for the camera in the controversial Italian film Cannibal Holocaust. The images in the film include the slow and graphic beheading and ripping apart of a turtle, a monkey being beheaded and its brains being consumed by natives and a spider being chopped apart. In fact, Cannibal Holocaust was only one film in a collective of similarly themed movies (cannibal films) that featured unstaged animal cruelty. Their influences were rooted in the films of Mondo filmmakers, which sometimes contained similar content. In several countries, such as the UK, Cannibal Holocaust was only allowed for release with most of the animal cruelty edited out.
More recently, the video sharing site YouTube has been criticized for hosting thousands of videos of real life animal cruelty, especially the feeding of one animal to another for the purposes of entertainment and spectacle. Although some of these videos have been flagged as inappropriate by users, YouTube has generally declined to remove them, unlike videos which include copyright infringement.
The Screen Actors Guild (SAG) has contracted with the American Humane Association (AHA) for monitoring of animal use during filming or while on the set. Compliance with this arrangement is voluntary and only applies to films made in the United States. Films monitored by the American Humane Association may bear one of their end-credit messages. Many productions, including those made in the US, do not advise AHA or SAG of animal use in films, so there is no oversight.
Simulations of animal cruelty exist on television, too. On the September 23, 1999 edition of WWE Smackdown!, a plot line had professional wrestler Big Boss Man trick fellow wrestler Al Snow into appearing to eat his pet chihuahua Pepper.
The use of animals in the circus has been controversial since animal welfare groups have documented instances of animal cruelty during the training of performing animals. The Humane Society of the United States has documented multiple cases of abuse and neglect, and cite several reasons for opposing the use of animals in circuses, including confining enclosures, lack of regular veterinary care, abusive training methods and lack of oversight by regulating bodies. Animal trainers have argued that some criticism is not based in fact, including beliefs that animals are 'hurt' by being shouted at, that caging is cruel and common, and the harm caused by the use of whips, chains or training implements.
In 2009, Bolivia passed legislation banning the use of any animals, wild or domestic, in circuses. The law states that circuses "constitute an act of cruelty." Circus operators had one year from the bill's passage on July 1, 2009 to comply.
In 2010, Lebanese animal rights groups became enraged when it was learned that wild performing animals belonging to the Monte Carlo Circus were transported from Egypt to Lebanon without being provided with food and water.
Following the campaign, new regulations were enacted that prohibit the use of animals in circuses in Israel. Finland and Singapore have restricted the use of animals in entertainment. The UK and Scottish Parliaments have committed to ban certain wild animals in travelling circuses and approximately 200 local authorities in the UK have banned all animal acts on council land. Animal acts are still very popular throughout much of Europe, the Americas and Asia. In the United States animal welfare standards are overseen by the United States Department of Agriculture under provisions of the Animal Welfare Act. Efforts to ban circus animals in cities like Denver, Colorado have been rejected by voters. Some circuses now present animal-free acts.
Animal snuff films, known as crush films can be found on the Internet. These films depict instances of animal cruelty, and/or pornographic acts with animals, usually involving the death of an animal, including insects, mice, rats, guinea pigs, hamsters, monkeys, birds, cats, and dogs. In 1999, the U.S. government banned the depiction of animal cruelty, however the law was overturned by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals which ruled that the category "depiction of animal cruelty" contained in the law was not an exception to First Amendment protections. In an 8–1 decision handed down in April 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with the lower court's ruling, but on the grounds that the law was unconstitutionally broad. The case itself did not involve crush films, but rather, a video that in part depicted dogfighting.
Military animals are creatures that have been employed by humankind for use in warfare. They are a specific application of working animals. Examples include horses, dogs and dolphins. Only recently has the involvement of animals in war been questioned, and practices such as using animals for fighting, as living bombs (as in the use of exploding donkeys) or for military testing purposes (such as during the Bikini atomic experiments) may now be criticised for being cruel. Princess Anne, the Princess Royal, the patron of the British Animals in War Memorial, stated that animals adapt to what humans want them to do, but that they will not do things that they don't want to, despite training. Animal participation in human conflict was commemorated in the United Kingdom in 2004 with the erection of the Animals in War Memorial in Hyde Park, London.
In 2008 a video of a US Marine throwing a puppy over a cliff during the Iraq conflict was popularised as an internet phenomenon and attracted widespread criticism of the soldier's actions for being an act of cruelty.
- ^ Graeme McEwen. The fox is in charge of the chickens Animals Australia. Retrieved July 4, 2008.
- ^ <5461726F2D93AE95A882CC88A48CEC8B7982D18AC7979D82C98AD682B782E9>
- ^ Christopher S. Stevenson, Lisa A. Marshall and Douglas W. Morgan Japanese guidelines and regulations for scientific and ethical animal experimentation. Progress in Inflammation Research 2nd Edition 2006 p187. DOI 10.1007/978-3-7643-7520-1_10
- ^ Select Committee on Animals In Scientific Procedures Report July 2002, Accessed 23rd August 2007
- ^ Richard Spencer. Just who is the glamorous kitten killer of Hangzhou? April 3, 2006.
- ^ "Beijing loosens leash on pet dogs". Chinadaily.com.cn. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc/2003-07/18/content_246068.htm. Retrieved 2008-11-06.
- ^ SBS Australia. "The Biggest Chinese Restaurant in the World". http://www.sbs.com.au/blogarticle/108747/The-Biggest-Chinese-Resturant-in-the-World/blog/Documentaries-SBS. Retrieved 4 November 2008.
- ^ Journal of Ecotourism. "The Shark Watching Industry and its Potential Contribution to Shark Conservation". http://www.multilingual-matters.net/jet/004/jet0040108.htm. Retrieved 8 November 2008.
- ^ Sohu Forum. "人類的飲食與野生動物的滅絕有著本質和必然的聯繫". http://q.sohu.com/forum/15/topic/3835337. Retrieved 8 November 2008.
- ^ 中國青年報. "國家禁令擋不住虎骨酒熱銷". http://zqb.cyol.com/content/2006-08/25/content_1490521.htm. Retrieved 4 November 2008.
- ^ Jadecampus. "Conservationists Call on China to Support Law Over Tiger Farms". http://www.jadecampus.com/1024/news/EarthTimes30mar07.htm. Retrieved 4 November 2008.
- ^ 中國青年報. "拿什麼拯救你可憐的黑熊:能不能不用熊膽?". http://news.sina.com.cn/s/2003-11-21/15072183821.shtml. Retrieved 4 November 2008.
- ^ "China unveils first ever animal cruelty legislation". The Daily Telegraph (London). September 18, 2009. http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/peterwedderburn/100010449/china-unveils-first-ever-animal-cruelty-legislation/. Retrieved 2009-09-18.
- ^ Review of Animal Welfare Legislation in Hong Kong by Amanda S. Whitfort and Fiona M. Woodhouse, June 2010. This document reviews animal welfare laws and compares them to those of Taiwan, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, the European Union, and the United States.
- ^ Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department, "Penalty for Cruelty to Animals," Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Chapter 169, Section 3) 15 December 2006
- ^ Koahsiung Municipal Institute for Animal Health, "Laws and Regulations," Animal Protection Act last amended 11 July 2007.
- ^ Legislature Related to Animals in Egyptian Law[dead link]
- ^ Humanity, through animal care
- ^ (Not-So-) BIZARRE DOG LAW California Man Faces Life in Prison for Killing Dog; and Tennessee Judge Slam-Dunks Puppy Mill Owners July 14, 2002 Dogs in the News
- ^ The Domestic Cat: the biology of its behaviour Cambridge. Second Edition. Page 185
- ^ Animal lovers lament lack of law against cruelty
- ^ "EU bans battery hen cages". BBC News. 1999-01-28. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/264607.stm. Retrieved 2008-09-21.
- ^ Declawing Cats: Manicure or Mutilation?[dead link]
- ^ § 17 Tierschutzgesetz (TierSchG)
- ^ § 303 Strafgesetzbuch (StGB)
- ^ (Italian) The Italian Parliament - Law 189/2004 - Art. 544/ter/quater/quinquies
- ^ Animal Welfare Act 2006 Sec 32(1)
- ^ The Times, Monday, Jan 01, 1912; pg. 3; Issue 39783; col F "The Animals' New Magna Charter"
- ^ "London Police Act 1839, Great Britain Parliament. Section XXXI, XXXIV, XXXV, XLII".
- ^ /http://books.google.ca/books?id=PPBoQB860A4C&pg=PA167&lpg=PA167&dq=dog+carts+milk+bread+fish&source=bl&ots=lSWzpxib70&sig=DvruWQXkjt6nJwcgAcdW5dfRd4s&hl=en&ei=03I8TaawMYL58Aadz8HgCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBUQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=dog%20carts%20milk%20bread%20fish&f=false Dog power]
- ^ Dog carts and the extinction of memory
- ^ a b Representing Animals, Indiana University Press, pp. 12, ISBN 025334154X . Chapter: 'A Left-handed Blow: Writing the History of Animals' by Erica Fudge
- ^ Handcarts and other carts
- ^ Animal Rights by Hilda Kean, 1998, University of Chicago Press.
- ^ Protection of Animals Act 1911
- ^ Scales of Justice: In Zurich, Even Fish Have a Lawyer, Deborah Ball. The Wall Street Journal. March 6, 2010
- ^ The lawyer who defends animals, Leo Hickman. The Guardian. March 5, 2010
- ^ "Legislative History of the Animal Welfare Act". http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/pubs/AWA2007/intro.shtml. Retrieved 7 April 2010.
- ^ "The Animal Welfare Act". http://www.peta.org/mc/factsheet_display.asp?ID=80. Retrieved 7 April 2010.
- ^ "2010 State Animal Protection Laws Rankings". www.aldf.org. http://www.aldf.org/article.php?id=1548. Retrieved 2011-05-17.
- ^ Book Review: Brute Force: Animal Police and the Challenge of Cruelty
- ^ a b Emery, David. "Florida to Consider Ban on Cow Tipping". About.com. http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/a/058976.htm. Retrieved 2007-06-07.
- ^ "ALDF: U.S. Jurisdictions With and Without Felony Animal Cruelty Provisions". Aldf.org. http://www.aldf.org/article.php?id=261. Retrieved 2009-04-29.
- ^ "Accused Dog Killer Could Get 25 Years to Life in Prison". Kron4.com. http://www.kron4.com/Global/story.asp?S=7237905. Retrieved 2008-11-06. [dead link]
- ^ Judge allows California cities to ban cat declawing
- ^ Norfolk Bans De-Clawing Of Cats[dead link]
- ^ "PorkNet Newsletter". MetaFarms.com, Inc. 2002-11-07. http://www.porknet.com/archive/110702.html#96977. Retrieved 2008-07-03.
- ^ "Criminal Justice and Judiciary". California State Senate. 2004. http://www.senate.ca.gov/sfa/2004/_04_DL04.HTM. [dead link]
- ^ "AB-732 Analysis". California State Assembly. 2008-01-14. http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/03-04/bill/asm/ab_0701-0750/ab_732_cfa_20040114_122451_asm_comm.html.
- ^ "2007 Mid Year Summary". California Assembly Committee on Agriculture. 2007. http://www.asm.ca.gov/acs/committee/c53/publications/2007%20Mid%20Year%20Summary.doc.
- ^ "AB-594 Analysis". California State Assembly. 2008-05-09. http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_0551-0600/ab_594_cfa_20070508_133457_asm_comm.html.
- ^ Andrea Johnson, "Polls Indicate Strong Support for Pen Gestation for Hogs[dead link]," The Prairie Star 2007.
- ^ "Back door activists gain momentum". Learfield Communications, Inc.. 2007-07-05. http://www.brownfieldnetwork.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=96AD5AA7-BEEA-38F9-4397078DB6063307. Retrieved 2008-07-03. [dead link]
- ^ "Farm Animal Welfare Bill Killed in Legislature". Omaha World Daily. 2008-02-17.
- ^ "Farm Sanctuary Applauds Colorado for Passing Legislation Phasing out Veal and Gestation Crates". Reuters. 2008-05-14. http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS239162+14-May-2008+BW20080514. Retrieved 2008-07-03.
- ^ "Farm Animal Welfare Measure Becomes Law". Federation of Animal Science Societies (FASS). 2008-05-14. http://www.fass.org/page.asp?pageID=312. Retrieved 2008-07-03.
- ^ "2011 Canadian Animal Protection Laws Rankings". www.aldf.org. http://www.aldf.org/article.php?id=1714. Retrieved 2011-05-17.
- ^ "Pet-Abuse.Com – Animal Cruelty". Pet-abuse.com. http://www.pet-abuse.com/pages/animal_cruelty.php. Retrieved 2008-11-06.
- ^ "Pet-Abuse.Com – Animal Cruelty". Pet-abuse.com. http://www.pet-abuse.com/pages/animal_cruelty.php. Retrieved 2010-03-17.
- ^ "Domestic Violence & the Animal Abuse Link". Animaltherapy.net. http://www.animaltherapy.net/DomesticViolence.html. Retrieved 2008-11-06.
- ^ a b Felthous, Alan R. (1998). Aggression against Cats, Dogs, and People. In Cruelty to Animals and Interpersonal Violence: Readings in Research and Applications.. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press. pp. 159–167.
- ^ Goleman, Daniel (1991-08-07). "Clues to a Dark Nurturing Ground for One Serial Killer". New York Times. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CEEDF113EF934A3575BC0A967958260&scp=309&sq=Daniel+Goleman&st=nyt. Retrieved 2010-04-30.
- ^ A. Duncan et al Significance of Family Risk Factors in Development of Childhood Animal Cruelty in Adolescent Boys with Conduct Problems Journal of Family Violence 20.4 (2005): 235–239
- ^ "Animal Cruelty and Family Violence: Making the Connection". Humane Society of the United States. http://www.hsus.org/hsus_field/first_strike_the_connection_between_animal_cruelty_and_human_violence/animal_cruelty_and_family_violence_making_the_connection/. Retrieved 2008-10-26. [dead link]
- ^ Andy McKeague, An Interview with Kim Ki-Duk and Suh Jung on The Isle at monstersandcritics.com, May 11, 2005. Retrieved March 11, 2006.
- ^ "Pointless Cannibal Holocaust Sequel in the Works". Fangoria. http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/4101. Retrieved 2007-01-13.
- ^ Times online, timesonline.co.uk August 19, 2007. Retrieved August 25, 2007.
- ^ Practical Fishkeeping, practicalfishkeeping.co.uk[dead link] May 17, 2007. Retrieved August 25, 2007.
- ^ Entertainment Industry FAQ[dead link]
- ^ Earning Our Disclaimer[dead link]
- ^ Pepper Tribute
- ^ http://www.lordsofpain.net/news/2002_/articles/1038994515.php
- ^ "Circus Incidents: Attacks, Abuse and Property Damage" (PDF). Humane Society of the United States. 2004-06-01. http://www.hsus.org/web-files/PDF/2004_HSUS_Circus_Incidents.pdf. Retrieved 2008-05-23. [dead link]
- ^ "Circuses". Humane Society of the United States. http://www.hsus.org/wildlife/issues_facing_wildlife/circuses/index.html. Retrieved 2008-05-23. [dead link]
- ^ Patton, K (2007-04-01). "Frequently Asked Questions: Do circus trainers/handlers abuse animals?". lionden.com. http://www.lionden.com/faqs.htm#+Do%20circus%20trainers/handlers%20abuse%20animals. Retrieved 2008-05-23.
- ^ Guardian – Bolivia bans all circus animals
- ^ All Headline News – Maltreated Circus Lions, Tigers and Bears Take the Heat of Lebanese Politics
- ^ "Animal-Free Circuses: Factsheet" (PDF). PETA. 2005-08-09. http://www.circuses.com/pdfs/AnimalFreeCircuses.pdf. Retrieved 2008-05-28.
- ^ 3rd Circuit Strikes Down Law Criminalizing Sale of Animal Cruelty Depictions
- ^ Sherman, Mark (April 10, 2010). "Court voids law aimed at animal cruelty videos". Associated Press. http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hrs_8csElBknniLX6saFhRg8IZuQD9F6S3LO0. Retrieved April 10, 2010. [dead link]
- ^ "Animals in War – The unseen casualties". Animal Aid. 2003-06-01. http://www.animalaid.org.uk/h/n/NEWS/news_other/ALL/913//. Retrieved 2009-09-05.
- ^ "The Military's War on Animals". PETA. http://www.peta.org/feat/military/. Retrieved 2009-09-05.
- ^ Price, Eluned (2004-11-01). "They served and suffered for us". London: The Daily Telegraph. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/3626468/They-served-and-suffered-for-us.html. Retrieved 2009-09-05.
- ^ "Animal war heroes statue unveiled". The Daily Telegraph. 2004-11-24. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4037873.stm. Retrieved 2009-09-05.
- ^ Naughton, Philippe (4 March 2008). "Puppy-toss video makes Marine figure of hate". London: The Times. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article3481977.ece. Retrieved 4 September 2009.
- Arluke, Arnold. Brute Force: Animal Police and the Challenge of Cruelty, Purdue University Press (August 15, 2004), hardcover, 175 pages, ISBN 1-55753-350-4. An ethnographic study of humane law enforcement officers.
- Lea, Suzanne Goodney (2007). Delinquency and Animal Cruelty: Myths and Realities about Social Pathology, hardcover, 168 pages, ISBN 978-1-59332-197-0. Lea challenges the argument made by animal rights activists that animal cruelty enacted during childhood is a precursor to human-directed violence.
- Munro H. (The battered pet (1999) In F. Ascione & P. Arkow (Eds.) Child Abuse, Domestic Violence, and Animal Abuse. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 199–208.
- Illustration of 3-dog milk cart in Flanders, 1906
- Goldfish used in art, to highlight morality, court finds no basis of cruelty (2003) From BBC News
- Pet-Abuse.Com – Database of Criminal Animal Cruelty Cases
Anti-social behaviour · Bullying · Child abuse (neglect, sexual) · Domestic abuse · Elder abuse · Harassment · Humiliation · Incivility · Institutional abuse · Intimidation · Neglect · Personal abuse · Professional abuse · Psychological abuse · Physical abuse · Sexual abuse · Spiritual abuse · Stalking · Structural abuse · Verbal abuse · more...
Complex post-traumatic stress disorder · Dehumanization · Denial · Destabilisation · Exaggeration · Grooming (adult, child) · Lying · Manipulation · Minimisation · Personality disorders · Psychological projection · Psychological trauma · Psychopathy · Rationalization · Victim blaming · Victim playing · Victimisation
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Cruelty to Animals — • Includes sections on pagan, Old and New Testament, scholastic, and Catholic perspectives Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. Cruelty To Animals Cruelty to Animals … Catholic encyclopedia
cruelty to animals — A crime that is defined differently in different states and municipalities, but usually involves the willful infliction of pain, suffering, or death on an animal, or the intentional or malicious neglect of an animal. Category: Criminal Law… … Law dictionary
cruelty to animals — abuse of animals, maltreatment of animals … English contemporary dictionary
cruelty to animals — Every act, omission, or neglect whereby unjustifiable pain or suffering, and, under some statutes, death, is caused an animal. 4 Am J2d Am § 28. See fox hunt; pigeon shooting; societies for the prevention of cruelty; spaying … Ballentine's law dictionary
Cruelty to Animals Act 1849 — The Cruelty to Animals Act 1849 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom (12 13 Vict. c. 92) with the long title An Act for the more effectual Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. The Act repealed two previous Acts, the Cruel Treatment of… … Wikipedia
Cruelty to Animals Act 1876 — Animal testing Main articles Animal testing Alternatives to animal testing Testing on … Wikipedia
Cruelty to Animals Act 1835 — The Cruelty to Animals Act 1835 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom (citation 5 6 Will. 4, c. 59), which was intended to protect animals from mistreatment. The British legal action to protect animals began with the passing of the… … Wikipedia
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — This article is about the original RSPCA in England and Wales. Similarly named societies in other countries are listed (with links) at the SPCA disambiguation page.The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) is a charity in … Wikipedia
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) is any of a number of animal welfare organizations whose operations include protecting and providing shelter to animals in danger. The SPCAs are non profit organizations that campaign… … Wikipedia
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Hong Kong) — Infobox Company company name = Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Hong Kong) (香港愛護動物協會) company company type = Charity company slogan = Respect for Life, Begins with Concern for Animals foundation = 1903, Hong Kong location = Hong… … Wikipedia