Methane clathrate

"Burning ice". Methane, released by heating, burns; water drips.
Inset: clathrate structure (University of Göttingen, GZG. Abt. Kristallographie).
Source: United States Geological Survey.

Methane clathrate, also called methane hydrate, hydromethane, methane ice, "fire ice", natural gas hydrate or just gas hydrate, is a solid clathrate compound (more specifically, a clathrate hydrate) in which a large amount of methane is trapped within a crystal structure of water, forming a solid similar to ice.^[1] Originally thought to occur only in the outer regions of the Solar System where temperatures are low and water ice is common, significant deposits of methane clathrate have been found under sediments on the ocean floors of Earth.^[2] The worldwide amounts of methane bound in gas hydrates is conservatively estimated to total twice the amount of carbon to be found in all known fossil fuels on Earth.^[3]

Methane clathrates are common constituents of the shallow marine geosphere, and they occur both in deep sedimentary structures, and as outcrops on the ocean floor. Methane hydrates are believed to form by migration of gas from depth along geological faults, followed by precipitation, or crystallization, on contact of the rising gas stream with cold sea water. Methane clathrates are also present in deep Antarctic ice cores, and record a history of atmospheric methane concentrations, dating to 800,000 years ago.^[4] The ice-core methane clathrate record is a primary source of data for global warming research, along with oxygen and carbon dioxide.

Structure and composition

The average methane clathrate hydrate composition is 1 mole of methane for every 5.75 moles of water, though this is dependent on how many methane molecules "fit" into the various cage structures of the water lattice. The observed density is around 0.9 g/cm³.^[5] One litre of methane clathrate solid would therefore contain, on average, 168 litres of methane gas (at STP).^{[nb 1]}

Methane forms a structure I hydrate with two dodecahedral (12 vertices, thus 12 water molecules) and six tetradecahedral (14 water molecules) water cages per unit cell. This compares with a hydration number of 20 for methane in aqueous solution.^[6] A methane clathrate MAS NMR spectrum recorded at 275 K and 3.1 MPa shows a peak for each cage type and a separate peak for gas phase methane.^{[citation needed]} Recently, a clay-methane hydrate intercalate was synthesized in which a methane hydrate complex was introduced at the interlayer of a sodium-rich montmorillonite clay. The upper temperature stability of this phase is similar to that of structure I hydrate.^[7]

Methane hydrate phase diagram. The horizontal axis shows temperature from -15 to 33 Celsius, the vertical axis shows pressure from 0 to 120,000 kilopascals (0 to 1,184 atmospheres). For example, at 4 Celsius hydrate forms above a pressure of about 50 atmospheres.

Natural deposits

Worldwide distribution of confirmed or inferred offshore gas hydrate-bearing sediments, 1996.
Source: USGS

Gas hydrate-bearing sediment, from the subduction zone off Oregon

Specific structure of a gas hydrate piece, from the subduction zone off Oregon

Methane clathrates are restricted to the shallow lithosphere (i.e. < 2,000 m depth). Furthermore, necessary conditions are found only either in polar continental sedimentary rocks where surface temperatures are less than 0 °C; or in oceanic sediment at water depths greater than 300 m where the bottom water temperature is around 2 °C. In addition, deep fresh water lakes may host gas hydrates as well, since methane hydrates, in particular, cannot be formed in salt water (e.g. the fresh water Lake Baikal, Siberia^[8]). Continental deposits have been located in Siberia and Alaska in sandstone and siltstone beds at less than 800 m depth. Oceanic deposits seem to be widespread in the continental shelf (see Fig.) and can occur within the sediments at depth or close to the sediment-water interface. They may cap even larger deposits of gaseous methane.^[9]

Oceanic

There are two distinct types of oceanic deposit. The most common is dominated (> 99%) by methane contained in a structure I clathrate and generally found at depth in the sediment. Here, the methane is isotopically light (δ¹³C < -60‰) which indicates that it is derived from the microbial reduction of CO₂. The clathrates in these deep deposits are thought to have formed in situ from the microbially produced methane, as the δ¹³C values of clathrate and surrounding dissolved methane are similar.^[9] However, it is also thought that fresh water used in the pressurization of oil and gas wells in permafrost and along the continental shelves world wide, combine with natural methane to form clatherate at depth and pressure, since methane hydrates cannot form, initially, in salt water. Local variations may be very common, as the act of forming hydrate, which extracts pure water from saline formation waters, can often lead to local, and potentially-significant increases in formation water salinity.^[10] Hydrates normally exclude the salt in the pore fluid from which it forms, and thus they have high electric resistivity just as ice and sediments containing hydrates have a higher resistivity compared to sediments without gas hydrates (Judge [67])^{[citation needed]}.

These deposits are located within a mid-depth zone around 300–500 m thick in the sediments (the gas hydrate stability zone, or GHSZ) where they coexist with methane dissolved in the fresh, not salt, pore-waters. Above this zone methane is only present in its dissolved form at concentrations that decrease towards the sediment surface. Below it, methane is gaseous. At Blake Ridge on the Atlantic continental rise, the GHSZ started at 190 m depth and continued to 450 m, where it reached equilibrium with the gaseous phase. Measurements indicated that methane occupied 0-9% by volume in the GHSZ, and ~12% in the gaseous zone.^[11]

In the less common second type found near the sediment surface some samples have a higher proportion of longer-chain hydrocarbons (< 99% methane) contained in a structure II clathrate. Carbon from this type of clathrate is isotopically heavier (δ¹³C is -29 to -57 ‰) and is thought to have migrated upwards from deep sediments, where methane was formed by thermal decomposition of organic matter. Examples of this type of deposit have been found in the Gulf of Mexico and the Caspian Sea.^[9]

Some deposits have characteristics intermediate between the microbially and thermally sourced types and are considered to be formed from a mixture of the two.

The methane in gas hydrates is dominantly generated by microbial consortia degrading organic matter in low oxygen environments, with the methane itself produced by methanogenic archaea. Organic matter in the uppermost few centimetres of sediments is first attacked by aerobic bacteria, generating CO₂, which escapes from the sediments into the water column. Below this region of aerobic activity, anaerobic processes take over, including, successively with depth, the microbial reduction of nitrite/nitrate, metal oxides, and then sulfates are reduced to sulfides. Finally, once sulfate is used up, methanogenesis becomes a dominant pathway for organic carbon remineralization.

If the sedimentation rate is low (about 1 cm/kyr), the organic carbon content is low (about 1% ), and oxygen is abundant, aerobic bacteria can use up all the organic matter in the sediments faster than oxygen is depleted, so lower-energy electron acceptors are not used. But where sedimentation rates and the organic carbon content are high, which is typically the case on continental shelves and beneath western boundary current upwelling zones, the pore water in the sediments becomes anoxic at depths of only a few centimeters or less. In such organic-rich marine sediments, sulfate then becomes the most important terminal electron acceptor due to its high concentration in seawater, although it too is depleted by a depth of centimeters to meters. Below this, methane is produced. This production of methane is a rather complicated process, requiring a highly reducing environment (Eh -350 to -450 mV) and a pH between 6 and 8, as well as a complex syntrophic consortia of different varieties of archaea and bacteria, although it is only archaea that actually emit methane.

In some regions (e.g., Gulf of Mexico) methane in clathrates may be at least partially derived from thermal degradation of organic matter, dominantly in petroleum.^{[12][citation needed]} The methane in clathrates typically has a biogenic isotopic signature and highly variable δ¹³C (-40 to -100‰), with an approximate average of about -65‰ .^{[13][citation needed][14][citation needed][15]} Below the zone of solid clathrates, large volumes of methane may occur as bubbles of free gas in the sediments.^[11][16][17]

The presence of clathrates at a given site can often be determined by observation of a "bottom simulating reflector" (BSR), which is a seismic reflection at the sediment to clathrate stability zone interface caused by the unequal densities of normal sediments and those laced with clathrates.

Reservoir size

The size of the oceanic methane clathrate reservoir is poorly known, and estimates of its size decreased by roughly an order of magnitude per decade since it was first recognized that clathrates could exist in the oceans during the 1960s and '70s.^[18] The highest estimates (e.g. 3×10¹⁸ m³)^[19] were based on the assumption that fully dense clathrates could litter the entire floor of the deep ocean. Improvements in our understanding of clathrate chemistry and sedimentology have revealed that hydrates only form in a narrow range of depths (continental shelves), only at some locations in the range of depths where they could occur (10-30% of the GHSZ), and typically are found at low concentrations (0.9-1.5% by volume) at sites where they do occur. Recent estimates constrained by direct sampling suggest the global inventory occupies between one and five million cubic kilometres (0.24 to 1.2 million cubic miles).^[18] This estimate, corresponding to 500-2500 gigatonnes carbon (Gt C), is smaller than the 5000 Gt C estimated for all other fossil fuel reserves but substantially larger than the ~230 Gt C estimated for other natural gas sources.^[18][20] The permafrost reservoir has been estimated at about 400 Gt C in the Arctic,^{[21][citation needed]} but no estimates have been made of possible Antarctic reservoirs. These are large amounts, for comparison the total carbon in the atmosphere is around 700 gigatons.^[22]

These modern estimates are notably smaller than the 10,000 to 11,000 Gt C (2×10¹⁶ m³) proposed^[23] by previous workers as a motivation considering clathrates as a fossil fuel resource (MacDonald 1990, Kvenvolden 1998). Lower abundances of clathrates do not rule out their economic potential, but a lower total volume and apparently low concentration at most sites^[18] does suggest that only a limited percentage of clathrates deposits may provide an economically viable resource.

Continental

Methane clathrates in continental rocks are trapped in beds of sandstone or siltstone at depths of less than 800 m. Sampling indicates they are formed from a mix of thermally and microbially derived gas from which the heavier hydrocarbons were later selectively removed. These occur in a Alaska, Siberia as well as Northern Canada.

In 2008, Canadian and Japanese researchers extracted a constant stream of natural gas from a test project at the Mallik gas hydrate field in the Mackenzie River delta. This was the second such drilling at Mallik: the first took place in 2002 and used heat to release methane. In the 2008 experiment, researchers were able to extract gas by lowering the pressure, without heating, requiring significantly less energy.^[24] The Mallik gas hydrate field was first discovered by Imperial Oil in 1971-1972.^[25]

Commercial use

The sedimentary methane hydrate reservoir probably contains 2–10 times the currently known reserves of conventional natural gas. This represents a potentially important future source of hydrocarbon fuel. However, in the majority of sites deposits are likely to be too dispersed for economic extraction.^[18] Other problems facing commercial exploitation are detection of viable reserves; and development of the technology for extracting methane gas from the hydrate deposits. To date, there has only been one field commercially produced where some of the gas is thought to have been from methane clathrates, Messoyakha Gas Field, supplying the nearby Russian city of Norilsk.

A research and development project in Japan is aiming for commercial-scale extraction by 2016.^[26] In August 2006, China announced plans to spend 800 million yuan (US$100 million) over the next 10 years to study natural gas hydrates.^[27] A potentially economic reserve in the Gulf of Mexico may contain ~10¹⁰ m³ of gas.^[18] Bjørn Kvamme and Arne Graue at the Institute for Physics and technology at the University of Bergen have developed a method for injecting CO₂ into hydrates and reversing the process; thereby extracting CH₄ by direct exchange.^[28]

Hydrates in natural gas processing

Routine operations

Methane clathrates (hydrates) are also commonly formed during natural gas production operations, when liquid water is condensed in the presence of methane at high pressure. It is known that larger hydrocarbon molecules such as ethane and propane can also form hydrates, although as the molecule length increases (butanes, pentanes), they cannot fit into the water cage structure and tend to destabilise the formation of hydrates.

Once formed, hydrates can block pipeline and processing equipment. They are generally then removed by reducing the pressure, heating them, or dissolving them by chemical means (methanol is commonly used). Care must be taken to ensure that the removal of the hydrates is carefully controlled, because of the potential for the hydrate to undergo a phase transition from the solid hydrate to release water and gaseous methane at a high rate as the pressure is reduced. The rapid release of methane gas in a closed system can result in a rapid increases in pressure.^[5]

It is generally preferable to prevent hydrates from forming or blocking equipment. This is commonly achieved by removing water, or by the addition of ethylene glycol (MEG) or methanol, which act to depress the temperature at which hydrates will form (i.e. common antifreeze). In recent years, development of other forms of hydrate inhibitors have been developed, such as Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitors (which dramatically slow the rate of hydrate formation) and anti-agglomerates, which do not prevent hydrates forming, but do prevent them sticking together to block equipment.

Effect of hydrate phase transition during deep water drilling

When drilling in oil- and gas-bearing formations submerged in deep water, the reservoir gas may flow into the well bore and form gas hydrates owing to the low temperatures and high pressures found during deep water drilling. The gas hydrates may then flow upward with drilling mud or other discharged fluids. As they rise, the pressure in the annulus decreases and the hydrates dissociate into gas and water. The rapid gas expansion ejects fluid from the well, reducing the pressure further, which leads to more hydrate dissociation and further fluid ejection. The resulting violent expulsion of fluid from the annulus is one potential cause or contributor to what is referred to as a "kick".^[29] (Kicks, which can cause blowouts, typically do not involve hydrates: see Blowout: formation kick).

Measures which reduce the risk of hydrate formation include:

• High flow-rates, which limit the time for hydrate formation in a volume of fluid, thereby reducing the kick potential.^[29]
• Careful measuring of line flow to detect incipient hydrate plugging.^[29]
• Additional care in measuring when gas production rates are low and the possibility of hydrate formation is higher than at relatively high gas flow rates.^[29]
• Monitoring of well casing after it is "shut in" (isolated) may indicate hydrate formation. Following "shut in", the pressure rises as gas diffuses through the reservoir to the bore hole; the rate of pressure rise will exhibit a reduced rate of increase when hydrates are forming.^[29]
• Additions of energy (e.g., the energy released by setting cement used in well completion) can raise the temperature and convert hydrates to gas, producing a "kick".

Blowout recovery

Concept diagram of oil containment domes, acting as upsidedown funnels to pipe oil to surface ships. The sunken oil rig is nearby.

At sufficient depths, methane complexes directly with water to form methane hydrates, as was observed during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010. BP engineers developed and deployed a subsea oil recovery system over oil spilling from a deepwater oil well 5,000 feet (1,500 m) below sea level to capture escaping oil. This involved placing a 125-tonne (280,000 lb) dome over the largest of the well leaks and piping it to a storage vessel on the surface.^[30] This option had the potential to collect as much as 85% of the leaking oil but is previously untested at such depths.^[30] BP deployed the system on May 7–8, when it failed due to buildup of methane clathrate inside the dome; with its low density of approximately 0.9g/cm³ the methane hydrates accumulated in the dome, adding buoyancy and obstructing flow.^[31]

Methane clathrates and climate change

Main article: Clathrate gun hypothesis

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas. Despite its short atmospheric half life of 7 years, methane has a global warming potential of 62 over 20 years and 21 over 100 years (IPCC, 1996; Berner and Berner, 1996; vanLoon and Duffy, 2000). The sudden release of large amounts of natural gas from methane clathrate deposits has been hypothesized as a cause of past and possibly future climate changes. Events possibly linked in this way are the Permian-Triassic extinction event and the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum.

Climate scientists such as James E. Hansen hypothesize that methane clathrates in the permafrost regions will be released as a result of global warming, unleashing powerful feedback forces which may cause runaway climate change that cannot be controlled.

Recent research carried out in 2008 in the Siberian Arctic has shown millions of tonnes of methane being released^{[32][33][34][35][36]} with concentrations in some regions reaching up to 100 times above normal.^[37]

Natural gas hydrates (NGH) vs. liquified natural gas (LNG) in transportation

Since methane clathrates are stable at a higher temperature than liquefied natural gas (LNG) (−20 vs −162 °C), there is some interest in converting natural gas into clathrates rather than liquifying it when transporting it by seagoing vessels. A significant advantage would be that the production of natural gas hydrate (NGH) from natural gas at the terminal would require a smaller refrigeration plant and less energy than LNG would. Offsetting this, for 100 tonnes of methane transported, 750 tonnes of methane hydrate would have to be transported; since this would require a ship of 7.5 times greater displacement, or require more ships, it is unlikely to prove economic.

See also

• Clathrate compound
• Clathrate gun hypothesis
• Clathrate hydrate
• Future energy development
• Long-term effects of global warming

Notes

1. ^ The average methane clathrate hydrate composition is 1 mole of methane for every 5.75 moles of water. The observed density is around 0.9 g/cm³.^[5] For one mole of methane, which has a molar mass of about 16.04 g (see Methane), we have 5.75 moles of water, with a molar mass of about 18.02 g (see Properties of water), so together for each mole of methane the clathrate complex has a mass of 16.04 g + 5.75 × 18.02 g = 119.65 g. The fractional contribution of methane to the mass is then equal to 16.04 g / 119.65 g = 0.134. The density is around 0.9 g/cm³, so one litre of methane clathrate has a mass of around 0.9 kg, and the mass of the methane contained therein is then about 0.134 × 0.9 kg = 0.1206 kg. At a density as a gas of 0.717 kg/m³ (at 0 °C; see the info box at Methane), that means a volume of 0.1206 / 0.717 m³ = 0.168 m³ = 168 L.

References

1. ^ US Geological Survey, Gas hydrate: What is it?, accessed 27 February 2010.
2. ^ Roald Hoffmann (2006). "Old Gas, New Gas". American Scientist 94 (1): 16–18. 
3. ^ Gas (Methane) Hydrates -- A New Frontier , USGS fact sheet
4. ^ Lüthi, D; Le Floch, M; Bereiter, B; Blunier, T; Barnola, JM; Siegenthaler, U; Raynaud, D; Jouzel, J et al. (2008). "High resolution carbon dioxide concentration record 650,000–800,000 years before present". Nature 453 (7193): 379–382. Bibcode 2008Natur.453..379L. doi:10.1038/nature06949. PMID 18480821. 
5. ^ ^{a b c} Max, Michael D. (2003). Natural Gas Hydrate in Oceanic and Permafrost Environments. Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 0-7923-6606-9. http://books.google.com/?id=fd8QFKwcSskC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q. 
6. ^ Dec, SF; Bowler, KE; Stadterman, LL; Koh, CA; Sloan Ed, Jr; Kristin E. Bowler, Laura L. Stadterman, Carolyn A. Koh, and E. Dendy Sloan, Jr. (2006). "Direct Measure of the Hydration Number of Aqueous Methane". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2): 414–415. doi:10.1021/ja055283f. PMID 16402820.  Note: the number 20 is called a magic number equal to the number found for the amount of water molecules surrounding a hydronium ion.
7. ^ Guggenheim, S; Koster van Groos AF (2003). "New gas-hydrate phase: Synthesis and stability of clay-methane hydrate intercalate". Geology 31 (7): 653–656. Bibcode 2003Geo....31..653G. doi:10.1130/0091-7613(2003)031<0653:NGPSAS>2.0.CO;2. 
8. ^ Vanneste, M. et al.; De Batist, M; Golmshtok, A; Kremlev, A; Versteeg, W (2001). "Multi-frequency seismic study of gas hydrate-bearing sediments in Lake Baikal, Siberia". Marine Geology 172: 1–21. doi:10.1016/S0025-3227(00)00117-1. 
9. ^ ^{a b c} Kvenvolden, K. (1995). "A review of the geochemistry of methane in natural gas hydrate". Organic Geochemistry 23 (11–12): 997–1008. doi:10.1016/0146-6380(96)00002-2. 
10. ^ DOE
11. ^ ^{a b} Dickens, GR; Paull CK, Wallace P (1997). "Direct measurement of in situ methane quantities in a large gas-hydrate reservoir". Nature 385 (6615): 426–428. Bibcode 1997Natur.385..426D. doi:10.1038/385426a0. 
12. ^ Kvenvolden, 1998(incomplete ref)
13. ^ Kvenvolden, 1993(incomplete ref)
14. ^ Dickens 1995 (incomplete ref)
15. ^ Matsumoto, R. (1995). "Causes of the δ¹³C anomalies of carbonates and a new paradigm 'Gas Hydrate Hypothesis'". Jour. Geol. Soc. Japan 101: 902–924. 
16. ^ Matsumoto, R.; Watanabe, Y., Satoh, M., Okada, H., Hiroki, Y., Kawasaki, M., and ODP Leg 164 Shipboard Scientific Party (1996). "Distribution and occurrence of marine gas hydrates - preliminary results of ODP Leg 164: Blake Ridge Drilling". J. Geol. Soc. Japan 102: 932–944. 
17. ^ Clathrates - little known components of the global carbon cycle
18. ^ ^{a b c d e f} Milkov, AV (2004). "Global estimates of hydrate-bound gas in marine sediments: how much is really out there?". Earth-Sci Rev 66 (3–4): 183–197. Bibcode 2004ESRv...66..183M. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2003.11.002. 
19. ^ Trofimuk, A. A.; N. V. Cherskiy and V. P. Tsarev (1973). "[Accumulation of natural gases in zones of hydrate—formation in the hydrosphere]" (in Russian). Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 212: 931–934. 
20. ^ USGS World Energy Assessment Team, 2000. US Geological Survey world petroleum assessment 2000––description and results. USGS Digital Data Series DDS-60.
21. ^ MacDonald, 1990 (Incomplete ref)
22. ^ Geotimes — November 2004 — Methane Hydrate and Abrupt Climate Change
23. ^ Buffett, Bruce; David Archer (15 November 2004). "Global inventory of methane clathrate: sensitivity to changes in the deep ocean". Earth and Planetary Science Letters 227 (3–4): 185. Bibcode 2004E&PSL.227..185B. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2004.09.005. http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~archer/reprints/buffett.2004.clathrates.pdf. "Preferred ... global estimate of 3¹⁸ g ... Estimates of the global inventory of methane clathrate may exceed 10¹⁹ g of carbon" 
24. ^ Thomas, Brodie (2008-04-31). "Researchers extract methane gas from under permafrost". Northern News Services. http://www.nnsl.com/northern-news-services/stories/papers/mar31_08ma.html. Retrieved 2008-06-16. 
25. ^ "Geological Survey of Canada, Mallik 2002". Natural Resources Canada. 2007-12-20. http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/gashydrates/mallik2002/index_e.php. Retrieved 2008-06-16. 
26. ^ Background and organization
27. ^ Agreements to boost bilateral ties
28. ^ Norske forskere bak energirevolusjon, VB nett, in Norwegian
29. ^ ^{a b c d e} Wang, Zhiyuan; Sun Baojiang (2009). "Annular multiphase flow behavior during deep water drilling and the effect of hydrate phase transition". Petroleum Science 6: 57–63. doi:10.1007/s12182-009-0010-3. 
30. ^ ^{a b} Winning, David (2010-05-03). "US Oil Spill Response Team: Plan To Deploy Dome In 6–8 Days". Wall Street Journal (Dow Jones & Company). http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100503-700843.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines. Retrieved 2010-05-05. ^{[dead link]}
31. ^ "Giant dome fails to fix Deepwater Horizon oil disaster". Nature.com. May 10, 2010. http://blogs.nature.com/news/thegreatbeyond/2010/05/_giant_dome_fails_to_fix_deepw.html. Retrieved 10 May 2010 
32. ^ Compare: Methane bubbling through seafloor creates undersea hills, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 5 February 2007
33. ^ Translation of a blog entry by Örjan Gustafsson, expedition research leader, 2 September 2008
34. ^ Shakhova, N.; Semiletov, I.; Salyuk, A.; Kosmach, D.; Bel'cheva, N. (2007). "Methane release on the Arctic East Siberian shelf". Geophysical Research Abstracts 9: 01071. http://www.cosis.net/abstracts/EGU2007/01071/EGU2007-J-01071.pdf?PHPSESSID=e. 
35. ^ N. Shakhova, I. Semiletov, A. Salyuk, D. Kosmach (2008), Anomalies of methane in the atmosphere over the East Siberian shelf: Is there any sign of methane leakage from shallow shelf hydrates?, EGU General Assembly 2008, Geophysical Research Abstracts, 10, EGU2008-A-01526
36. ^ Volker Mrasek, A Storehouse of Greenhouse Gases Is Opening in Siberia, Spiegel International Online, 17 April 2008
37. ^ Connor, Steve (September 23, 2008). "Exclusive: The methane time bomb". The Independent. http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/exclusive-the-methane-time-bomb-938932.html. Retrieved 2008-10-03. 

External links

• Center for Hydrate Research
• USGS Geological Research Activities with U.S. Minerals Management Service - Methane Gas Hydrates
• Methane Hydrates - discusses U.S. government funding of methane hydrates research
• Sustainable energy- Carbon Neutral Methane Energy Production from Hydrate Deposits
• Natural gas studies in Canada
• Are there deposits of methane under the sea? Will global warming release the methane to the atmosphere?
• Methane seeps from Arctic sea bed
• All About Hydrates - Necessary Conditions for Methane Hydrate Formation U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY