Kruger and al. v. The Queen

Kruger and al. v. The Queen

- ! bgcolor="6699FF" | Case opinions
"Kruger and al. v. The Queen", [1978] 1 S.C.R. 104, was a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the relationship between the Indian Act and provincial game laws. The Indian Act is a federal law enacted under the British North America Act, 1867, which gives jurisdiction over Aboriginals to the federal government. The Court found that the Indian Act's statement that provincial laws may apply to Aboriginal peoples in Canada as long as they apply to other people protects laws even if these laws affect Aboriginals more than others.


Jacob Kruger and Robert Manuel were Penticton First Nations people (also known as "Indians") in British Columbia who killed deer outside hunting season. This was the land on which their tribe usually hunted, and it now belonged to the Crown. Since the hunting violated the provincial Wildlife Act, they were charged, but they appealed citing their Aboriginal rights under the Royal Proclamation, 1763.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal upheld the convictions, pointing to section 88 of the Indian Act. Section 88 stipulates that, "all laws of general application from time to time in force in any province are applicable to and in respect of Indians in the prov­ince, except to the extent that such laws are inconsistent with this Act or any order, rule, regulation or by-law made thereunder, and except to the extent that such laws make provision for any matter for which provision is made by or under this Act." The Court of Appeal found that this section allowed the Wildlife Act to apply to Aboriginals.


Justice Brian Dickson, writing for a unanimous Court, decided against Kruger and Manuel. Dickson first found that if hunting rights have been denied, it is not necessarily true that compensation must be provided in turn. No property was confiscated, as the Wildlife Act was geared toward a different purpose. Dickson also said that he would not reconsider the landmark Aboriginal case "Calder v. Attorney General of British Columbia" (1973) to determine how Aboriginal title is properly extinguished.

Turning to the general questions in the case, Dickson cited "The Queen v. George" to state that section 88 of the Indian Act protected provincial laws with provincial purposes. In pith and substance, the law must apply to all people and not just a specific people for it to be a "general application" under section 88. It did not even matter if the law, while applying to all, had a more significant impact on Aboriginals than other people; Dickson said that "There are few laws which have a uniform impact." [Page 110.] Dickson then noted that the Wildlife Act's purpose did not specifically address Aboriginals, and that it covered all people. As Dickson quoted another judge as saying, "no statute of the Provincial Legisla­true dealing with Indians or their lands as such would be valid and effective; but there is no reason why general legislation may not affect them." [Page 111.]

Dickson also found that there was no evidence regarding an Aboriginal-related motive to the legislation. Thus, the Wildlife Act's purpose, Dickson concluded, was to preserve a natural resource, namely the wildlife, and was not meant to limit Aboriginal rights. Regarding whether hunting is an Aboriginal right, Dickson noted that "However abundant the right of Indians to hunt and to fish, there can be no doubt that such right is subject to regulation and curtailment by the appropriate legislative authority." [Pages 111-112.] This case could be distinguished from an Aboriginal victory in "R. v. White and Bob" (1965). In the "Kruger" case, there was no treaty that would trump the provincial law under section 88.

Finally, Dickson stated that if section 88 can incorporate the Wildlife Act (as opposed to the Wildlife Act being effective in its own right), the Aboriginals would have the burden of proof that the Wildlife Act was inconsistent with the Indian Act.


As Professor Peter Hogg writes, Indianness (primary federal issues regarding Aboriginals), should include hunting on a reserve. This was demonstrated in "R. v. Jim" (1915) and "R. v. Isaac" (1976). Outside a reserve, hunting as Indianness is more debatable; as this was what happened in the "Kruger" case, it appeared such hunting is not Indianness, but in "Dick v. The Queen" (1985), the Supreme Court assumed such hunting is Indianness. [Hogg, Peter W. Constitutional Law of Canada. 2003 Student Ed. Scarborough, Ontario: Thomson Canada Limited, 2003, page 595.]

ee also

*List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Laskin Court)


External links

*Full text available at [ lexum] and [ canlii]

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • The Brothers Grimm (film) — Infobox Film name = The Brothers Grimm director = Terry Gilliam writer = Ehren Kruger starring = Matt Damon Heath Ledger Jonathan Pryce Lena Headey Peter Stormare Monica Bellucci producer = Jonathan Gordon Chris McGurk cinematography = Newton… …   Wikipedia

  • The Decemberists — Decemberists redirects here. For the 1825 Russian uprising, see Decembrist revolt. For the unfinished Tolstoy novel, see The Decembrists. The Decemberists The Decemberists, playing live at the 2006 Sasquatch! Music Festival …   Wikipedia

  • Kruger telegram — The Kruger telegram was a message sent by Germany s Kaiser Wilhelm II to Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, president of the Transvaal on 3 January 1896. The Kaiser congratulated the president on repelling the Jameson Raid, a sortie by 600… …   Wikipedia

  • Kruger House (Truckee, California) — The Kruger House (or C.B. White House) was built in 1874 at 10292 Donner Pass Road, Truckee, California by W.H. Kruger, then a partner in the Truckee Lumber Company. It is a Queen Anne Eastlake Victorian style building, originally a single family …   Wikipedia

  • Corbiere v. Canada (Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs) — Supreme Court of Canada Hearing: October 13, 1998 Judgment: May 20, 1999 …   Wikipedia

  • Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada — Departments of the Government of Canada Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Develompent Affaires autochtones et du développement du Nord canadien Minister John Duncan (Canad …   Wikipedia

  • Cultural depictions of Queen Victoria — Queen Victoria of the United Kingdom has been portrayed or referenced many times. Contents 1 Literature 2 Film 3 Television 4 Statues …   Wikipedia

  • Cultural depictions of Victoria of the United Kingdom — Victoria of the United Kingdom has been portrayed or referenced many times.LiteratureIn 1937 Lord Chamberlain the Earl of Cromer ruled that no British sovereign may be portrayed on the British stage until 100 years after his or her accession. For …   Wikipedia

  • Coins of the South African pound — The coins of the South African pound were part of the physical form of South Africa s historical currency, the South African pound. Prior to the Union of 1910, various authorities issued their own pounds, some as independent entities. After the… …   Wikipedia

  • Nazi propaganda and the United Kingdom — The position of Nazi propaganda towards the United Kingdom and its inhabitants changed over time. Prior to 1938, while Hitler tried to court Britain into an alliance, his propaganda praised the British as proficient Aryan imperialists. Later, as… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.