Chlorella regularis
Scientific classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Plantae
Division: Chlorophyta
Class: Trebouxiophyceae
Order: Chlorellales
Family: Chlorellaceae
Genus: Chlorella

Chlorella minutissima
Chlorella pyrenoidosa
Chlorella variabilis
Chlorella vulgaris

Chlorella is a genus of single-celled green algae, belonging to the phylum Chlorophyta. It is spherical in shape, about 2 to 10 μm in diameter, and is without flagella. Chlorella contains the green photosynthetic pigments chlorophyll-a and -b in its chloroplast. Through photosynthesis it multiplies rapidly requiring only carbon dioxide, water, sunlight, and a small amount of minerals to reproduce.[1]

The name Chlorella is taken from the Greek word chloros which means "green" and the Latin diminutive suffix ella meaning "small". German biochemist and cell physiologist Otto Heinrich Warburg, awarded with the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his research on cell respiration in 1931, also studied photosynthesis in Chlorella. In 1961 Melvin Calvin of the University of California received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his research on the pathways of carbon dioxide assimilation in plants using Chlorella. In recent years, researchers have made less use of Chlorella as an experimental organism because it lacks a sexual cycle and, therefore, the research advantages of genetics are unavailable[citation needed].

Many people believed Chlorella could serve as a potential source of food and energy because its photosynthetic efficiency can, in theory, reach 8%,[2] comparable with other highly efficient crops such as sugar cane.


Chlorella as a food source

It is an attractive possible food source because it is high in protein and other essential nutrients; when dried, it is about 45% protein, 20% fat, 20% carbohydrate, 5% fibre, and 10% minerals and vitamins. However, because it is a single-celled alga, harvest posed practical difficulties for its large-scale use as a food source.[citation needed] Mass-production methods are now being used to cultivate it in large artificial circular ponds.

Chlorella is a complete protein source.[dubious ] It is also packed with calories, fat, and vitamins.[3] At its onset, Chlorella was suggested as a "dirt-cheap" protein supplement to the human diet. Chlorella advocates sometimes focus on other supposed health benefits of the algae, such as claims of weight control, cancer prevention, and immune system support.[3]

Under certain growing conditions, Chlorella yields oils high in polyunsaturated fatsChlorella minutissima has yielded EPA at 39.9% of total lipids.[4]

Several studies suggest that Chlorella supplementation has a positive effect on the reduction of dioxin levels in breast milk and it may also have beneficial effects on nursing infants by increasing the IgA levels in breast milk.[5]


Following global fears of an uncontrollable population boom, during the late 1940s and the early 1950s Chlorella was seen as a new and promising primary food source and as a possible solution to the then current world hunger crisis. Many people during this era thought that world hunger was a growing problem and saw Chlorella as a way to end this crisis by being able to provide large amounts of high quality food for a relatively low cost.[3]

Many institutions began to research the algae, including the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation, the NIH, UC Berkeley, the Atomic Energy Commission, and Stanford University. Following WWII, many Europeans were starving and many Malthusians attributed this not only to the war but to the inability of the world to produce enough food to support the currently-increasing population. According to a 1946 FAO report, the world would need to produce 25 to 35 percent more food in 1960 than in 1939 to keep up with the increasing population, while health improvements would require a 90 to 100 percent increase.[3] Because meat was costly and energy-intensive to produce, protein shortages were also an issue. Increasing cultivated area alone would go only so far in providing adequate nutrition to the population. The USDA calculated to feed the U.S. population by 1975, it would have to add 200 million acres (800,000 km²) of land, but only 45 million were available. One way to combat national food shortages was to increase the land available for farmers, yet the American frontier and farm land had long since been extinguished in trade for expansion and urban life. Hopes rested solely on new agricultural techniques and technologies. Because of these circumstances, an alternative solution was needed.

To cope with the upcoming post-war population boom in the United States and elsewhere, researchers decided to tap into the unexploited sea resources. Initial testing by the Stanford Research Institute showed Chlorella (when growing in warm, sunny, shallow conditions) could convert 20 percent of solar energy into a plant which when dried, contained 50 percent protein.[3] In addition, Chlorella contained fat and vitamins. The plant's photosynthetic efficiency allowed it to yield more protein per unit area than any other plant—one scientist predicted 10,000 tons of protein a year could be produced with just 20 workers staffing a one thousand-acre (4 km²) Chlorella farm.[3] The pilot research performed at Stanford and elsewhere led to immense press from journalists and newspapers, yet did not lead to large-scale algae production. Chlorella was a seemingly-viable option because of the technological advances in agriculture at the time and the widespread acclaim it got from experts and scientists who studied it. Algae researchers had even hoped to add a neutralized Chlorella powder to conventional food products, as a way to fortify them with vitamins and minerals.[3]

When the preliminary laboratory results were published the reaction of scientific literature backed the possibilities of the supposed superfood. Science News Letter praised the optimistic results in an article entitled "Algae to Feed the Starving." John Burlew, the reported editor of Carnegie Institute stated, "the algae culture may fill a very real need," which Science News Letter turned into "future populations of the world will be kept from starving by the production of improved or educated algae related to the green scum on ponds." The cover of the magazine also featured Arthur D. Little's Cambridge laboratory, which was a supposed future food factory. A few years later, the magazine published an article entitled "Tomorrow's Dinner", which stated, "There is no doubt in the mind of scientists that the farms of the future will actually be factories." Science Digest also reported, "common pond scum would soon become the world's most important agricultural crop." At least in the decades that followed, algae was not cultivated on nearly that scale, however.

Current status

Since the growing world food problem of the 1940s was solved by better crop efficiency and not from a "super food," Chlorella has not seen the kind of public and scientific interest that it had in the 1940s. Chlorella can still be found today from companies promoting its "super food" effects.[3]

Production difficulties

In the end, scientists discovered Chlorella would be much more difficult to produce than previously thought. The experimental research was carried out in laboratories, not in the field. In order to be practical, the entire batch of algae grown would have to be placed either in artificial light or in shade to produce at its maximum photosynthetic efficiency. Also, for the Chlorella to be as productive as the world would require, it would have to be grown in carbonated water, which would have added millions to the production cost. A sophisticated process, and additional cost, was required to harvest the crop, and for Chlorella to be a viable food source, its cellulose cell walls would have to be pulverized. The plant could reach its nutritional potential only in highly-modified artificial situations. Another problem was developing sufficiently tasty foods from Chlorella,[6]

Although the production of Chlorella looked promising and involved creative technology, it has not to date been cultivated on the scale that some had predicted. It has not been sold on the scale of Spirulina, soybean products or whole-grains. Costs have remained high and Chlorella has for the most part been sold as a health food, for cosmetics, or animal feed.[6] After a decade of experimentation, studies showed that following exposure to sunlight, Chlorella captured just 2.5 percent — not much better than conventional crops.[3] Chlorella, too, was found by scientists in the 1960s to be impossible for humans and other animals to digest in its natural state due to the tough cell walls encapsulating the nutrients, which presented further problems for its use in American food production.[3] Since then, multiple methods have been developed to crack/break down this cell wall to make the nutrients available for digestion.

Claims of health and healing effects

Like Aphanizomenon flos-aquae (blue green algae) clinical studies on Chlorella suggest effects including polychlorinated dibenzodioxins detoxification in humans[7] and other animals,[8] healing from radiation exposure in animals[9] and the ability to reduce high blood pressure, lower serum cholesterol levels, accelerate wound healing, and enhance immune functions in humans.[10]

Chlorella has been found to have anti-tumor properties when fed to mice.[11][12][13] Another study found enhanced vascular function in hypertensive rats given oral doses of chlorella.[14] However, the use of Chlorella for healing effects has received criticism.[6]


Chlorella can create green and opaque water problems in aquaria. Chlorella can grow due to high nitrate and phosphate levels or direct sunlight. Decreasing phosphate and nitrate by partial water change and moving the aquarium to shade can help alleviate the problem.

See also


  1. ^
  2. ^ I. Zelitch, Photosynthesis, Photorespiration and Plant Productivity, Academic Press, 1971, p.275.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Belasco, W. (July 1997). Algae Burgers for a Hungry World? The Rise and Fall of Chlorella Cuisine. 38. pp. 608–634. .
  4. ^ Yongmanitchai; Ward, OP (February 1991). "Growth of and omega-3 fatty acid production by Phaeodactylum tricornutum under different culture conditions". Appl Environ Microbiol. 57 (2): 419–425. PMC 182726. PMID 2014989. Retrieved 2007-10-23. 
  5. ^ Nakano, S., Takekoshi, H. Nakano, M. (March 2007). "Chlorella (Chlorella pyrenoidosa) supplementation decreases dioxin and increases immunoglobulin a concentrations in breast milk.". Journal of medicinal food 10 (1): 134–142. doi:10.1089/jmf.2006.023. PMID 17472477. 
  6. ^ a b c Becker, E (2007). "Micro-algae as a source of protein". Biotechnology Advances 25 (2): 207–210. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.11.002. PMID 17196357 
  7. ^ Nakano, S et al. “Maternal-fetal distribution and transfer of dioxins in pregnant women in Japan, and attempts to reduce maternal transfer with Chlorella (Chlorella pyrenoidosa) supplements...” Chemosphere 2005 Dec; 61(9): 1244–55.
  8. ^ Takekoshi, H et al. “Effect of Chlorella pyrenoidosa on fecal excretion and liver accumulation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin in mice”. Chemosphere 2005 Apr; 59(2): 297b–304.
  9. ^ Singh, SP et al. “Post-exposure radioprotection by Chlorella vulgaris (E-25) in mice”. Indian J Exp Biol. 1995 Aug; 33(8): 612–5.
  10. ^ Merchant RE and Andre, CA. “A review of recent clinical trials of the nutritional supplement Chlorella pyrenoidosa in the treatment of fibromyalgia, hypertension, and ulcerative colitis”. Altern Ther Health Med. 2001 May–Jun; 7(3): 79–91. Review. PubMed
  11. ^ Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol - Oral administration of Chlorella vulgaris augments concomitant antitumor immunityPubMed
  12. ^ Ethnopharmacol - Immunomodulation by a unicellular green algae (Chlorella pyrenoidosa) in tumor-bearing mice PubMed
  13. ^ Cancer Immunol Immunother - Antitumor effect induced by a hot water extract of Chlorella vulgaris (CE): resistance to Meth-A tumor growth mediated by CE-induced polymorphonuclear leukocytes PubMed
  14. ^ J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) - Effect of chlorella and its fractions on blood pressure, cerebral stroke lesions, and life-span in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats PubMed

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Chlorella — Systematik ohne Rang: Chloroplastida Abteilung: Chlorophyta Klasse: Trebouxiophyceae Ordnung: Chlorellales …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • Chlorella — Fichier:Chlorella.jpg usine de production de Chlorella …   Wikipédia en Français

  • chlorella — [klō rel′ə, klôr el′ə] n. [ModL < CHLOR(O) + L ella, fem. dim. suffix] any of a genus (Chlorella) of microscopic, unicellular, green algae with spherical cells: several species are rich sources of proteins, carbohydrates, and fats …   English World dictionary

  • Chlorella — Chlorella. См. хлорелла. (Источник: «Англо русский толковый словарь генетических терминов». Арефьев В.А., Лисовенко Л.А., Москва: Изд во ВНИРО, 1995 г.) …   Молекулярная биология и генетика. Толковый словарь.

  • Chlorella —   Chlorella …   Wikipedia Español

  • Chlorella — Chlor …   Wikipédia en Français

  • chlorella — chlorellaceous /klawr euh lay sheuhs, klohr /, adj. /kleuh rel euh/, n. any freshwater, unicellular green alga of the genus Chlorella. [1890; < NL; see CHLOR 1, ELLA] * * * Any green algae of the genus Chlorella, found in fresh or salt water and… …   Universalium

  • chlorella — Cualquiera de las algas verdes del género Chlorella, que viven en aguas dulces o saladas y en el suelo. Tienen un cloroplasto caliciforme. Las chlorellas se emplean a menudo para estudiar la fotosíntesis, en experimentos con cultivos masivos, y… …   Enciclopedia Universal

  • chlorella — noun Etymology: New Latin, genus name, from Greek chlōros Date: 1904 any of a genus (Chlorella) of unicellular green algae …   New Collegiate Dictionary

  • chlorella — noun Any single celled green alga, of the genus Chlorella, found especially in stagnant water; now produced commercially as a food supplement …   Wiktionary

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.