- Occupied territories
Occupied territories is a
term of artin international law. In accordance with Article 42 of the Laws and Customs of War on Land (Fourth Hague Convention); October 18, 1907 [ [http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/hague04.htm#art42 'Hague IV, MILITARY AUTHORITY OVER THE TERRITORY OF THE HOSTILE STATE, Article 42'] ] , Territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army. The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised.
Kellogg-Briand Pactof 1928 made the threat or use of military force in contravention of international law [Not out of self defense, not out of Article 51, and not authorized by the Security Council.] , as well as territorial acquisitions resulting from it unlawful. Though that Pact was not universally subscribed to, and was in fact gravely breached by its signatories, subsequent treaty law, specifically the Charter of the United Nations, done at San Franciscoin 1945, and adhered to by nearly all nations, contains a similar prohibition.
This was soon followed by the judgment of the
International Military Tribunalat Nurembergin the matter of several of the political and military leaders of the former Nazi entity, regarding crimes against peace, as well as other charges under the law of warand the law of nations, including war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. The Tribunal declared that waging a war of aggressionand territorial aggrandizement was not only criminal, but that "to initiate a war of aggression...is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole." Those found guilty for planning the war of aggression in question were hanged or received long prison sentences. As the judgement of the IMT was recognized as fully declarative of the law of nations and the laws and customs of war, the prohibition against wars of aggression thus entered into the customary international law, making it binding on all civilized nations and peoples without exclusion, reservation, or exception.
It must be noted that the grossly criminal act of levying a war of aggression is distinguished from the war without legal standing, which refers to military action not done for purposes of conquest and gross territorial gain, and not legitimated by
self-defense, and not authorized by Article 51or the Security Council. This class of wars might include the settlement of long-running territorial disputes, suppression or punishment of atrocities or outrages against a belligerent nation, suppression of alleged threats to national security, defense of allies or allied peoples, peace-enforcement or peace-keeping, or prejudicial resolution of ideological differences. Wars without legal standing are unlawful; however, they are common, and not criminal like a war of aggression is. Wars without legal standing often result in the occupation of territory by the victorious nation in such a war.
At the end of a war, usually the victorious side is in possession of territories previously possessed by another state. These territories are known as occupied territories. Acquisition of occupied territories is incidental to a
war, where the military forces of the occupying power come into the possession of territories previously held by another state. Military occupationis usually temporary; and under the subsequent articles of the Hague convention (articles 43, 44, and etc.), the status quo must be maintained pending the signing of a peace treaty, the resolution of specific conditions outlined in a peace treaty, or the formation of a new civilian government.
Examples of occupied territories include Germany and Japan after
World War II; Cambodiaby Vietnamfrom 1979 until 1989; Iraq after the 2003 invasion by the United States and allied forces removed the government of Saddam Husseinfrom power, and the Israeli-occupied territories.
Occupied territories are lawfully occupied only by military personnel, and such civilians as are necessary to support the military occupation of that territory. The
Fourth Geneva Conventionforbids the transfer of civilians from or to occupied territories. This provision exists to prevent the occupier from creating fait accomplis, such as those that would sustain a permanent claim to the territory in question. In the Second World War, persons were transferred from occupied territories or to occupied territories with dire consequences; for example, under the military occupation of the Nazi regime, Polish citizens of Jewish descent, and to a lesser extent, ChristianPoles, were "transferred to the East" (see Holocaust) by the Nazi occupier, and their lands were taken by Germans who were settled in the newly-vacant areas by the Nazi state to settle the newly depopulated Poland, as a preparation for Nazi annexation (see Lebensraum).
If a state unilaterally declares a territory that has been under military occupation to be
annexed, bodies such as the United Nations Security Councilfrequently describe such territories as "occupied" when that annexation is in breach of international law or not accepted by the United Nations General Assembly, even if the territory is governed through the civil laws of the state that has integrated the occupied territory into their own territories. [ John Dugard(professor of international law at the University of Leiden) [http://www.iht.com/articles/2003/08/02/eddugard_ed3_.php An illegal annexation : Tear down Israel's wall] International Herald Tribune, 2 August 2003] [ John Dugard(The Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights for the occupied Palestinian territory) [http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=8409&Cr=middle&Cr1=east Israel uses excessive force and annexation in Palestinian territories – UN report] , UN News Centre. Accessed 11 July2008.] [Paul Lewis, [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE3DF1739F933A2575BC0A966958260 Confrontation in the Gulf; U.N. Council Declares Void Iraqi Annexation of Kuwait] , The New York Times, 10 August 1990] [R. W. Apple Jr. [http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9D0CE6D91430F935A35750C0A967958260 After the war: The Overview; Iraq Disavows annexation, pledging to repay Kuwait; Rebellion my be subsiding] , The New York Times, 6 March 1991]
History and definitions
Most nations in the world are in some way an occupier of a previous inhabitant's land. Fact|date=February 2007 Generally, any disputed territory can be seen as occupied by the party that lacks control over it at that moment. Thus, the
Germanic tribesdisplaced the Celtsof central Europe, and Egyptwas conquered and absorbed in the 7th century by Arabswho were not its original population. This is particularly true of the region between Egypt and Turkeywhere repeated population movements and military conquests have occurred during the past several thousand years.
West Bank(58% Israeli-administered, with the remainder under Israeli suzerainty), Gaza Strip(whose land and sea access is blockaded by Israel) and Israelproper, the correct use of this expression is often controversial and hotly disputed.
Additionally, "occupation" has two distinct meanings:
# The state of being lived in (as in: "
Isle of Manis occupied by the Manx", or this house is occupied by the Smith family);
# The state of military control following conquest by war but prior to annexation.Although (1) and (2) are obviously distinct, they are sometimes intermingled. Under (1), the territory in question is under normal civilian law; under (2) the territory is usually under military law within the terms of the
Laws of war, such as the Fourth Geneva Convention(according to the UN).
Occupied territories since 1907
For a list of occupied territories since the Hague Convention of 1907 [http://www.yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/lawofwar/hague04.htm Laws and Customs of War on Land (Hague IV); October 18, 1907] first clarified and supplemented the customary laws of belligerent military occupation see the
list of military occupationsand the list of territorial disputes.
West Bank and Gaza Strip after 1967
International Court of Justice Opinion
In July of 2004, The International Court of Justice delivered an Advisory Opinion on the [http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&k=5a&PHPSESSID=60e2f3e3d732bbe27c8f55888a311c8f&case=131&code=mwp&p3=4 'Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory'] . The Court observed that under customary international law as reflected in Article 42 of the Regulations Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land annexed to the Fourth Hague Convention of 18 October 1907, territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army, and the occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised.
The State of Israel raised a number of exceptions and objections, [ [http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1579.pdf 'Letter dated 29 January 2004 from the Deputy Director General and Legal Advisor of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, together with the Written Statement of the Government of Israel'] ] but the Court found them unpersuasive. The Court ruled that territories had been occupied by the Israeli armed forces in 1967, during the conflict between Israel and Jordan, and that subsequent events in those territories, had done nothing to alter the situation. 'All these territories (including East Jerusalem) remain occupied territories and Israel has continued to have the status of occupying Power.'
tate Of Israel Position
The Gaza Strip (until the 2005 disengagement), and the West Bank, are often referred to as "the occupied territories", however their status was, and for the West Bank continues to be, disputed.
After the Six-day War in 1967, Israeli troops occupied the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and the
Golan Heights. However, the status of these territories has been the subject of dispute. Paul S. Riebenfeld, an international lawyer, who represented Jewishinterests at the League of Nations, argued that the West Bank and the Gaza Strip do not belong to any other sovereign state, are part of former Mandate Palestine, and therefore fall legitimately within Israel's jurisdiction. They were "occupied territories" before 1967; and the "occupying powers" had been Egyptand Jordan. Specifically, Egypt's borders had been determined by the international community even before World War Iwithout the Gaza Strip. Jordan had been part of Mandate Palestine; but the British, under the Mandate provisions of the League of Nationshad granted the British, "inter alia", the power to divide Palestine.
First, the region in question was divided, for administrative purposes, into
Transjordan(east of the Jordan River) and Cisjordan(west of the Jordan River). Next, the British, under its Mandatory powers, granted Transjordan independence, in 1947; shortly thereafter, the country changed its name to " Jordan." But the "West Bank" was clearly not on the east side of the Jordan river; although this land was conquered in the 1948 war, only one country, Great Britain, recognized Jordan's subsequent annexationof the West Bank, but not of East Jerusalem.
tate of Jammu and Kashmir
Jammu and Kashmiris a disputed and occupied territory, claimed by New Delhias part of their country which both the Peoples Republic of China and Pakistan dispute India's claims.
Western Saharais considered an occupied territory by the Polisario, the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republicgovernment in exile in Algeria, the United Nations, [UN General Assembly Resolution 34/37 - November 21, 1979 and UN General Assembly Resolution 35/19 - November 11, 1980] and some other groups. International bodies see Moroccoas the "de facto" administrative power pending a solution to the conflict. The referendum that the UN wants to hold has been effectively blocked, and many of the incidents reported to have occurred in the territory [ [http://web.amnesty.org/report2006/mar-summary-eng Western Sahara] "Impunity for past crimes remained a serious concern, particularly since some alleged perpetrators continued to be members, or even high-ranking officials, of the security forces.". Verified 4 Oct 2007.] are consistent with an unaccountable military occupation.
Most of the territory claimed by the SADR in Western Sahara is currently under the unrecognized but effective sovereignty of Morocco. They do not recognize the SADR, though dozens of countries do. [ [http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Africa/intifada_W_Sahara.html Third World Traveller] Intifada in Western Sahara, Morocco seals off the occupied territory, New Internationalist magazine, August 2005. Verified 4 Oct 2007.]
Douglas J. Feith, William V. O'Brien, Eugene V. Rostow, Paul S. Riebenfeld, Malvina Halberstam, & Jerome Hornblass, "Israel's Legitimacy in Law and History, Proceedings of the Conference on International Law and the Arab-Israeli Conflict". Sponsored by "The Lois D. Brandeis Society of Zionist Lawyers", October 21, 1990, New York. ed. Edward M. Siegel, Esq., assoc. ed. Olga Barrekette, (New York: Center for Near East Policy Research, 1993) ISBN 0-9640145-0-5
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Occupied territories — In the Six Day War (1967), Israel occupied various Arab and Arab held territories, including the Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights. Although commonly referred to as the Occupied Territories,… … Historical Dictionary of Israel
Occupied Territories — areas that were conquered by Israel during the Six Day War (1967) … English contemporary dictionary
Occupied Territories (album) — Occupied Territories Remix album by Muslimgauze Released 19 … Wikipedia
Occupied Territories (Muslimgauze album) — Infobox Album Name = Occupied Territories Type = remix Artist = Muslimgauze Released = 1996 July 23 Recorded = Genre = Length = Label = Staalplaat STCD110 Producer = Reviews = Last album … Wikipedia
Israeli-occupied territories — The Israeli occupied territories are the territories which have been designated as occupied territory by the United Nations and other international organizations, governments and others to refer to the territory seized by Israel during the Six… … Wikipedia
Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories, Accommodation and Refugees (Georgia) — Ministry of Internally Displaced Persons from the Occupied Territories, Accommodation and Refugees საქართველოს ოკუპირებული ტერიტორიებიდან იძულებით გადაადგილებულ პირთა, განსახლებისა და ლტოლვილთა სამინისტრო Coat of Arms of Georgia … Wikipedia
Allied Military Government Of Occupied Territories — Billet de 100 Francs émis par les américains, selon la forme de dollar US L Allied Military Government of Occupied Territories (AMGOT) est un gouvernement militaire d occupation constitué par des officiers américano britanniques charg … Wikipédia en Français
Allied military government of occupied territories — Billet de 100 Francs émis par les américains, selon la forme de dollar US L Allied Military Government of Occupied Territories (AMGOT) est un gouvernement militaire d occupation constitué par des officiers américano britanniques charg … Wikipédia en Français
List of Pro-Axis Leaders and Governments or Direct Control in Occupied Territories — This is a list of Native Pro Axis Leaders and Governments or Direct Control in Occupied Territories, including: # territories with some indigenous pro Axis leaders # collaborating local administrations # direct administration by occupying pro… … Wikipedia
Allied Military Government for Occupied Territories — The Allied Military Government for Occupied Territories (AMGOT) was the form of military rule administered by Allied forces during and after World War II within European territories they occupied.Notable AMGOTThis form of controlled government… … Wikipedia