Theory of everything (philosophy)


Theory of everything (philosophy)

In philosophy, a theory of everything or TOE is an ultimate, all-encompassing explanation of nature or reality.Rescher, Nicholas (2006a). "Holistic Explanation and the Idea of a Grand Unified Theory". "Collected Papers IX: Studies in Metaphilosophy".] Rescher, Nicholas (2006b). "The Price of an Ultimate Theory". "Collected Papers IX: Studies in Metaphilosophy".] Walker, Mark Alan (March 2002). [http://www.jetpress.org/volume10/prolegomena.html "Prolegomena to Any Future Philosophy"] . "Journal of Evolution and Technology" Vol. 10.] Adopting the term from physics, where the search for a theory of everything is ongoing, philosophers have discussed the viability of the concept and analyzed its properties and implications. Among the questions to be addressed by a philosophical theory of everything are: "Why is reality understandable?" "Why are the laws of nature as they are?" "Why is there anything at all?"

Properties and impasse of self-substantiation

In "The Price of an Ultimate Theory", originally published in 2000, Nicholas Rescher specifies what he sees as the principal properties of a TOE and describes an apparent impasse on the road to such a theory. First, he takes as a presupposition the principle of sufficient reason, which in his formulation states that every fact "t" has an explanation "t"':

Principle of sufficient reason: forall t , exists t' , (t' E t)

where E predicates explanation, so that "t'" E "t" denotes "t"' explains "t". Next, he asserts that the most direct and natural construction of a TOE "T*" would confer upon it two crucial features: comprehensiveness and finality. Comprehensiveness says that wherever there is a fact "t", "T*" affords its explanation:

Comprehensiveness: forall t , (T^* E t)

Finality says that as an "ultimate theory", "T*" has no deeper explanation:

Finality: forall t , ((t E T^*) o (t = T^*))

so that the only conceivable explanation of "T*" is "T*" itself. Rescher notes that it is obviously problematic to deploy a theory for its own explanation; at the heart of the traditional conception of explanatory adequacy, he says, is a principle of noncircularity stating that no fact can explain itself:

Noncircularity: exists t , (t E t)

The impasse is then that the two critical aspects of a TOE, comprehensiveness and finality, conflict with the fundamental principle of noncircularity. A comprehensive theory which explains everything must explain itself, and a final theory which has no deeper explanation must, by the principle of sufficient reason, have "some" explanation; consequently it too must be self-explanatory. Rescher concludes that any TOE theorist committed to comprehensiveness and finality is bound to regard noncircularity as "something that has to be jettisoned." But how, he asks, can a theory adequately substantiate itself?

Ways forward

Rescher's proposal in "The Price of an Ultimate Theory" is to dualize the concept of explanation so that a fact can be explained either "derivationally", by the premises which lead to it, or "systemically", by the consequences which follow from it. With derivational explanation, a fact "t" is explained when it is subsumed by some prior, more fundamental fact "t"'. With systemic explanation, "t" is explained when it is a "best fit" for its consequences, where fitness is measured by uniformity, simplicity, connectedness, and other criteria conducive to systemic integration. Rescher concludes that while a theory of everything cannot be explained derivationally (since no deeper explanation can subsume it), it can be explained systemically by its capacity to integrate its consequences.

In his 1996 book "The Conscious Mind", [citebook|title=The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory|author=Chalmers, David J.|year=1996|pages=p. 126–127] David Chalmers argues that a theory of everything must explain consciousness, that consciousness does not logically supervene on the physical, and that therefore a fundamental theory in physics would not be a theory of everything. A truly final theory, he argues, needs not just physical properties and laws, but phenomenal or protophenomenal properties and psychophysical laws explaining the relationship between physical processes and conscious experience. He concludes that " [o] nce we have a fundamental theory of consciousness to accompany a fundamental theory in physics, we may truly have a theory of everything." Developing such a theory will not be straightforward, he says, but "it ought to be possible in principle."

In "Prolegomena to Any Future Philosophy", a 2002 essay in the "Journal of Evolution and Technology", Mark Alan Walker discusses modern responses to the question of how to reconcile "the apparent finitude of humans" with what he calls "the traditional telos of philosophy—the attempt to unite thought and Being, to arrive at absolute knowledge, at a final theory of everything." He contrasts two ways of closing this "gap between the ambitions of philosophy, and the abilities of human philosophers": a "deflationary" approach in which philosophy is "scaled down into something more human" and the attempt to achieve a theory of everything is abandoned, and an "inflationary", transhumanist approach in which philosophers are "scaled up" by advanced technology into "super-intelligent beings" better able to pursue such a theory.

Criticism

In "Holistic Explanation and the Idea of a Grand Unified Theory", originally presented as a lecture in 1998, Rescher identifies two negative reactions to the idea of a unified, overarching theory: reductionism and rejectionism. Reductionism holds that large-scale philosophical issues can be meaningfully addressed only when divided into lesser components, while rejectionism holds that questions about such issues are illegitimate and unanswerable. Against reductionism, Rescher argues that explaining individual parts does not explain the coordinating structure of the whole, so that a collectivized approach is required. Against rejectionism, he argues that the question of the "reason why" behind existence is pressing, important, and not obviously meaningless.

ee also

*Theory of everything (physics)
*Meaning of life
*42

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Theory of everything (disambiguation) — Theory of everything (TOE) is an hypothetical physical theory that would explain all known physical phenomena.Theory of everything may refer to: * Theory of everything (book), a book by Ken Wilber dealing with his Integral theory * Theory of… …   Wikipedia

  • Theory of everything — A theory of everything (TOE) is a putative theory of theoretical physics that fully explains and links together all known physical phenomena. Initially, the term was used with an ironic connotation to refer to various overgeneralized theories.… …   Wikipedia

  • Theory of everything (book) — This article is about the book by Ken Wilber. See Theory of everything (disambiguation) for other uses. Theory of everything: An Integral Vision for Business, Politics, Science, and Spirituality ISBN 978 1570628559 (published by Shambhala, 189… …   Wikipedia

  • Everything — is the concept of all that exists.cite web title = everything url = http://www.merriam webster.com/dictionary/everything publisher = Merriam Webster Online Dictionary accessdate = 2008 06 17] Every entity, physical body, and abstract object is… …   Wikipedia

  • philosophy, Western — Introduction       history of Western philosophy from its development among the ancient Greeks to the present.       This article has three basic purposes: (1) to provide an overview of the history of philosophy in the West, (2) to relate… …   Universalium

  • Philosophy of mathematics — The philosophy of mathematics is the branch of philosophy that studies the philosophical assumptions, foundations, and implications of mathematics. The aim of the philosophy of mathematics is to provide an account of the nature and methodology of …   Wikipedia

  • Philosophy — • Detailed article on the history of the love of wisdom Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. Philosophy     Philosophy     † …   Catholic encyclopedia

  • Philosophy of language — is the reasoned inquiry into the nature, origins, and usage of language. As a topic, the philosophy of language for Analytic Philosophers is concerned with four central problems: the nature of meaning, language use, language cognition, and the… …   Wikipedia

  • Philosophy of religion — is a branch of philosophy that is concerned with the philosophical study of religion, including arguments over the nature and existence of God, religious language, miracles, prayer, the problem of evil, and the relationship between religion and… …   Wikipedia

  • Philosophy of Common Sense —     Philosophy of Common Sense     † Catholic Encyclopedia ► Philosophy of Common Sense     The term common sense designates     (1) a special faculty, the sensus communis of the Aristotelean and Scholastic philosophy;     (2) the sum of original …   Catholic encyclopedia


Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.