Internet censorship in India


Internet censorship in India

Internet censorship in India is carried out by Central as well as state governments of India, despite Article 19 of the Indian Constitution which guarantees freedom of speech to all its citizens.

History and law

The Government of India established the [http://www.cert-in.org.in/ Computer Emergency Response Team] , or CERT-IN, as a means to monitor all incoming and outgoing Internet traffic from India. The primary purpose of CERT-IN is to handle Internet security and many institutions and agencies are allowed to call on it, including the home affairs ministry, courts, the intelligence services, the police and the head of the National Human Rights Commission. CERT-IN's stated main mission is to enhance the security of India's Communications and Information Infrastructure through proactive action and effective collaboration.

Currently, there is no established law as to which websites the government censors, or when. In the past, mainly pornographic and anti-establishment political websites have been blocked. Once in a while, western news sites have also been blocked, though these blocks were usually short-lived.Fact|date=February 2007

In 2001, the Bombay High Court appointed a Committee to oversee issues relating to cyber pornography and Cybercrime. [http://www.cyquator.com/html/vol1.pdf Report of the Committee Appointed by the Bombay High Court] . The Court invited the petitioners Jayesh Thakkar and Sunil Thacker as [http://www.mid-day.com/news/city/2001/october/16106.htm special invitees] to provide their inputs and recommendations on cyber laws. The Committee upon identifying key issues made recommendations such as licensing of Cyber cafe, introducing identity cards for Cyber cafe visitors, ensure that Cyber Cafe that have cubicles or partitions be required to ensure that minors are not allowed to use machines in cubicles or behind partitions, mandatory maintaining of IP logs by cyber cafe, and so on. The Committee made several other recommendations such as connectivity and authentication at Internet service provider level which provided that Internet service providers were responsible for time clock coordination and record keeping. The report addressed the issue of protecting minor children from accessing adult sites and made a recommendation that Internet Service Providers must provide parental control software with every Internet connection. The committee placed a special emphasis on lack of technical knowledge in the police and recommended special training of cyber cops. The report of the committee's recommendations were well received by the Courts and are being put in to practice by the Police and Cyber cafes jointly. The Cyber Crime Investigation Cell was set up pursuant to a recommendation made by the committee.

A draft broadcast bill is being introduced which if passed would enable muzzling of all forms of mainstream media under conditions such as "reports implicating friendly nations".Fact|date=February 2007

Instances of censorship

Censorship during the Kargil War

In the wake of the Kargil War in 1999, the website of Dawn Newspaper was blocked from access within India by Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited [ [http://www.newswatch.in/news-analyses/ethics-and-freedom/560.html India blocks Pakistani newspaper web site] ] [ [http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19990716/ige16018.html Grateful Dawn group writes to Express] ] , a government-owned telecommunications company which at the time had monopoly control of the international Internet gateways in India. Media site Rediff elicited that the ban was instigated by the Indian government, and then published detailed instructions as to how one could bypass the filter and view the site.

Yahoo Groups ban, Sep 2003

The first documented incident of Internet censorship in India was the Yahoo groups ban of 23rd September 2003.

Kynhun, a Yahoo group linked to the outlawed "Hynniewtrep National Liberation Council", a minor separatist group from the North-Eastern state of Meghalaya, which espoused the case of the Khasi tribe was banned.

The order to implement the ban was forwarded to Indian ISP's by the Department of Telecommunications. Difficulties in implementing the ban by the ISP's ultimately led to all Yahoo groups being banned for a period of about two weeks.

Internet censorship of July 2006

The second reported incident of Internet censorship is the Indian Government's censorship of 17 websites including some blogs starting July 1, 2006.

The actual order did not ask for blogspot.com, typepad.com or geocities.com to be blocked. However, the inability of Indian ISP's to block specified sub-domains, once again led to these sites being temporarily blocked..

Rediff drops bulletin boards on Glasgow attack

The leading Indian website rediff has dropped bulletin boards on all news items relating to the Glasgow attacks and other stories related with terrorism. This order is supposed to be a self censorship based on guidelines from the government. The Rediff message boards were a forum where hostile messages were posted after news surfaced of the terrorists being Indian Muslims.

Future Plans

* The government is also planning to set up a centralized mechanism at the eight landing stations for the country to block websites as and when it pleases [ [http://infotech.indiatimes.com/Tech_News/News/Screening_for_dangerous_blogs_sites/articleshow/712242.cms Screening for dangerous blogs, sites] ] .
* Indian law enforcement has entered an agreement with the popular social networking site Orkut to track down what it deems to be "defamatory content". [ [http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Orkuts_tell-all_pact_with_cops_/RssArticleShow/articleshow/1982584.cms Orkut In Pact With Indian Law Enforcement] Slashdot]
* There have been reports about Blackberry devices sought to being banned in India due to security concerns. [ [http://iltb.apargupta.com/?p=41 An Innocuous Berry] ] .
* On November 1, 2007, The Economic Times reported that the Government of India was considering a ban on "posting of private and personal videos on internet and mobiles" to tackle cyber crime and piracy. [cite web
url = http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/2506623.cms
title = Govt weighs ban on posting videos on net
author = Niranjan Bharati
date = November 1, 2007
accessdate = 2007-11-01
]

External links

* [http://www.mid-day.com/news/city/2001/october/16106.htm] Natural Porn Killers - Jayesh and Sunil Thacker (Mid Day - October 7, 2001)
* [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1171868083.cms] HC admits cyberporn complaint as PIL (Times of India, July 13, 2001)
* [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1124348984.cms] Cyberporn panel set up, HC wants minors protected, Sunil Thacker invited as a special invitee (Times of India, September 30, 2001)
* [http://www.indiacensored.com Indiacensored.com]
* [http://www.thehoot.org/story.asp?storyid=Web210214166221Hoot72410%20PM935&pn=1] Rude encounters with Internet censorship; The Hoot on the blocking of Yahoo! Groups in 2003.
* [http://www.indosec.org/Sep23 IndoSec, India's Yahoo Groups ban of 2003] , documenting the Yahoo Groups ban of September 2003
* [http://www.ifex.org/en/content/view/full/75805/ Ban on Websites Draws Concern] - IFEX
* [http://www.shivamvij.com/2006/09/internet-censorship-in-india-an-rti-application.html] An application to India's Department of Telecom regarding details of Internet censorship, filed by a blogger-journalist in September 2006 under the provision of India's Right to Information Act, 2005.
* [http://www.rediff.com/news/2006/jul/17blog.htm] Are ISPs blocking blogs? Rediff, 17 July
* [http://in.rediff.com/news/2006/jul/19blogs.htm] Blog blockade will be lifted in 48 hours (Rediff)
* [http://www.indianweb2.com/2007/10/skype-google-yahoo-facing-scrutiny-in-india/ Google, Yahoo, Skype Facing Scrutiny in India] over Illegal Net Telephony (2007)

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Internet censorship — is control or suppression of the publishing or accessing of information on the Internet. The legal issues are similar to offline censorship.One difference is that national borders are more permeable online: residents of a country that bans… …   Wikipedia

  • Censorship in India — mainly targets religious issues. It is justified by the government as necessary to maintain communal harmony, peace and tranquillity, given the history of communal tension in India.The Constitution of India guarantees freedom of speech but places …   Wikipedia

  • Internet censorship in Thailand — was classified as substantial in the social area, as selective in the political and Internet tools areas, and no evidence of filtering was found in the conflict/security area by the OpenNet Initiative in May 2007.[1] Thailand is on Reporters… …   Wikipedia

  • Internet censorship in the People's Republic of China — Part of a series on Censorship By media …   Wikipedia

  • Internet censorship in Australia — Part of a series on Censorship By media …   Wikipedia

  • Internet police — is a generic term for police and secret police departments and other organizations in charge of policing Internet in a number of countries.[1] The major purposes of Internet police, depending on the state, are fighting cybercrime, as well as… …   Wikipedia

  • Censorship by country — Censorship varies in its extent in different countries.Censorship by countryAlgeriaSince its independence in 1962 Algerian journalists have been the main target of censorship.AustraliaAustralia is a federation, and responsibility for censorship… …   Wikipedia

  • Censorship in the People's Republic of China — This article is about censorship in the People s Republic of China. For censorship in the Republic of China (Taiwan), see Censorship in the Republic of China. Part of a series on Censorship …   Wikipedia

  • Censorship in South Korea — See also: Censorship history in South Korea Part of a series on Censorship …   Wikipedia

  • Censorship — Part of a series on Censorship By media …   Wikipedia


We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.