Johnson v. Zerbst

Johnson v. Zerbst

Infobox SCOTUS case
Litigants = Johnson v. Zerbst
ArgueDate = April 4
ArgueYear = 1938
DecideDate = May 23
DecideYear = 1938
FullName = Johnson v. Zerbst, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Ga.
USVol = 304
USPage = 458
Citation =
Prior =
Subsequent =
Holding = Since the Sixth Amendment constitutionally entitles one charged with crime to the assistance of counsel, compliance with this constitutional mandate is an essential jurisdictional prerequisite to a federal court's authority to deprive an accused of his life or liberty.
SCOTUS = 1938
Majority = Black
JoinMajority = Hughes, Brandeis, Stone, Roberts
Concurrence = Reed
Dissent = McReynolds
Dissent2 = Butler
NotParticipating = Cardozo
LawsApplied =

"Johnson v. Zerbst", 304 U.S. 458 (1938), was a United States Supreme Court case, in which the petitioner, Johnson, had been convicted in federal court of feloniously possessing, uttering, and passing counterfeit money in a trial where he had not been represented by an attorney but instead by himself. Johnson filed for habeas corpus relief, claiming that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel had been violated, but he was denied by both a federal district court and the court of appeals.

upreme Court involvement

The United States Supreme Court agreed to hear the case and overturned the decisions of the lower courts. In a six to two decision, the Court held that the federal court had infringed upon Johnson’s life and liberty by not giving him counsel to defend him during trial. In the majority opinion written by Justice Hugo Black, the Court held that,

This set the precedent that a person has the right to be represented by an attorney unless they waive their right to counsel knowing full well the potential consequences. This precedent, however, at the time only made this right applicable to federal defendants and did not extend quite yet to defendants in trials under state jurisdiction, something that changed with the "Gideon v. Wainwright" decision.

ee also

*List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 304

External links

*


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Betts v. Brady — Infobox SCOTUS case Litigants=Betts v. Brady ArgueDateA=April 13 ArgueDateB=14 ArgueYear=1942 DecideDate=June 1 DecideYear=1942 FullName=Vanover v. Black Citation=62 S. Ct. 1252; 86 L. Ed. 1595; 1942 U.S. LEXIS 489 USVol=316 USPage=455 Prior=None …   Wikipedia

  • Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution — The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution sets forth rights related to criminal prosecutions in federal courts. The Supreme Court has ruled that the principal rights guaranteed by this amendment are so fundamental and important that… …   Wikipedia

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 304 — This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 304 of the United States Reports :* Morgan v. United States , ussc|304|1|1938 (per curiam) * United States v. Bekins , ussc|304|27|1938 * Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United… …   Wikipedia

  • Miranda warning — The Miranda warning (also referred to as Miranda rights) is a warning that is required to be given by police in the United States to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) before they are interrogated to inform them …   Wikipedia

  • Plea — For the pygmy backswimmer genus, see Plea (insect). In legal terms, a plea is simply an answer to a claim made by someone in a civil or criminal case under common law using the adversary system. Colloquially, a plea has come to mean the assertion …   Wikipedia

  • Dietrich v The Queen — Court High Court of Australia Full case name Dietrich v The Queen Date decided 13 N …   Wikipedia

  • Massiah v. United States — Supreme Court of the United States Argued March 3, 1964 Decided May 18, 1964 …   Wikipedia

  • Sutherland Asbill & Brennan — Infobox Law Firm firm name = Sutherland LLP firm headquarters = flagicon|USA Atlanta, Georgia num offices = 6 num attorneys = 500 practice areas = Investment Funds, Energy, Tax, Outsourcing revenue = key people = Mark D. Wasserman (Managing… …   Wikipedia

  • 6. Amendment — Der 6. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten, das Sixth Amendment, gehört zur Bill of Rights und garantiert bei der Strafverfolgung durch US Bundesgerichte bestimmte Rechte. Er stellt sicher, dass die Angeklagten das Recht auf… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • 6. Zusatz zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika — Der 6. Zusatzartikel zur Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten, das Sixth Amendment, gehört zur Bill of Rights und garantiert bei der Strafverfolgung durch US Bundesgerichte bestimmte Rechte. Er stellt sicher, dass die Angeklagten das Recht auf… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”