Natural transformation


Natural transformation

In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a natural transformation provides a way of transforming one functor into another while respecting the internal structure (i.e. the composition of morphisms) of the categories involved. Hence, a natural transformation can be considered to be a "morphism of functors". Indeed this intuition can be formalized to define so-called functor categories. Natural transformations are, after categories and functors, one of the most basic notions of category theory and consequently appear in the majority of its applications.

Contents

Definition

If F and G are functors between the categories C and D, then a natural transformation η from F to G associates to every object X in C with that in D using a morphism ηX. ηX : F(X) → G(X) called the component of η at X, such that for every morphism f : XY in C we have:

\eta_Y \circ F(f) = G(f) \circ \eta_X

This equation can conveniently be expressed by the commutative diagram

Natural transformation.svg

If both F and G are contravariant, the horizontal arrows in this diagram are reversed. If η is a natural transformation from F to G, we also write η : FG or η : FG. This is also expressed by saying the family of morphisms ηX : F(X) → G(X) is natural in X.

If, for every object X in C, the morphism ηX is an isomorphism in D, then η is said to be a natural isomorphism (or sometimes natural equivalence or isomorphism of functors). Two functors F and G are called naturally isomorphic or simply isomorphic if there exists a natural isomorphism from F to G.

An infranatural transformation η from F to G is simply a family of morphisms ηX: F(X) → G(X). Thus a natural transformation is an infranatural transformation for which ηYF(f) = G(f) ∘ ηX for every morphism f : XY. The naturalizer of η, nat(η), is the largest subcategory of C containing all the objects of C on which η restricts to a natural transformation.

Examples

A worked example

Statements such as

"Every group is naturally isomorphic to its opposite group"

abound in modern mathematics. We will now give the precise meaning of this statement as well as its proof. Consider the category Grp of all groups with group homomorphisms as morphisms. If (G,*) is a group, we define its opposite group (Gop,*op) as follows: Gop is the same set as G, and the operation *op is defined by a *op b = b * a. All multiplications in Gop are thus "turned around". Forming the opposite group becomes a (covariant!) functor from Grp to Grp if we define fop = f for any group homomorphism f: GH. Note that fop is indeed a group homomorphism from Gop to Hop:

fop(a *op b) = f(b * a) = f(b) * f(a) = fop(a) *op fop(b).

The content of the above statement is:

"The identity functor IdGrp : GrpGrp is naturally isomorphic to the opposite functor op : GrpGrp."

To prove this, we need to provide isomorphisms ηG : GGop for every group G, such that the above diagram commutes. Set ηG(a) = a−1. The formulas (ab)−1 = b−1 a−1 and (a−1)−1 = a show that ηG is a group homomorphism which is its own inverse. To prove the naturality, we start with a group homomorphism f : GH and show ηHf = fop ∘ ηG, i.e. (f(a))−1 = fop(a−1) for all a in G. This is true since fop = f and every group homomorphism has the property (f(a))−1 = f(a−1).

Further examples

If K is a field, then for every vector space V over K we have a "natural" injective linear map VV** from the vector space into its double dual. These maps are "natural" in the following sense: the double dual operation is a functor, and the maps are the components of a natural transformation from the identity functor to the double dual functor.

Every finite dimensional vector space is also isomorphic to its dual space. But this isomorphism relies on an arbitrary choice of basis, and is not natural, though there is an infranatural transformation. More generally, any vector spaces with the same dimensionality are isomorphic, but not (necessarily) naturally so. (Note however that if the space has a nondegenerate bilinear form, then there is a natural isomorphism between the space and its dual. Here the space is viewed as an object in the category of vector spaces and transposes of maps.)

Consider the category Ab of abelian groups and group homomorphisms. For all abelian groups X, Y and Z we have a group isomorphism

Hom(X Y, Z) → Hom(X, Hom(Y, Z)).

These isomorphisms are "natural" in the sense that they define a natural transformation between the two involved functors Ab × Abop × AbopAb.

Natural transformations arise frequently in conjunction with adjoint functors. Indeed, adjoint functors are defined by a certain natural isomorphism. Additionally, every pair of adjoint functors comes equipped with two natural transformations (generally not isomorphisms) called the unit and counit.

Operations with natural transformations

If η : FG and ε : GH are natural transformations between functors F,G,H : CD, then we can compose them to get a natural transformation εη : FH. This is done componentwise: (εη)X = εXηX. This "vertical composition" of natural transformation is associative and has an identity, and allows one to consider the collection of all functors CD itself as a category (see below under Functor categories).

Natural transformations also have a "horizontal composition". If η : FG is a natural transformation between functors F,G : CD and ε : JK is a natural transformation between functors J,K : DE, then the composition of functors allows a composition of natural transformations ηε : JFKG. This operation is also associative with identity, and the identity coincides with that for vertical composition. The two operations are related by an identity which exchanges vertical composition with horizontal composition.

If η : FG is a natural transformation between functors F,G : CD, and H : DE is another functor, then we can form the natural transformation Hη : HFHG by defining

(Hη)X = HηX.

If on the other hand K : BC is a functor, the natural transformation ηK : FKGK is defined by

 (\eta K)_X = \eta_{K(X)}.\,

Functor categories

If C is any category and I is a small category, we can form the functor category CI having as objects all functors from I to C and as morphisms the natural transformations between those functors. This forms a category since for any functor F there is an identity natural transformation 1F : FF (which assigns to every object X the identity morphism on F(X)) and the composition of two natural transformations (the "vertical composition" above) is again a natural transformation.

The isomorphisms in CI are precisely the natural isomorphisms. That is, a natural transformation η : FG is a natural isomorphism if and only if there exists a natural transformation ε : GF such that ηε = 1G and εη = 1F.

The functor category CI is especially useful if I arises from a directed graph. For instance, if I is the category of the directed graph • → •, then CI has as objects the morphisms of C, and a morphism between φ : UV and ψ : XY in CI is a pair of morphisms f : UX and g : VY in C such that the "square commutes", i.e. ψ f = g φ.

More generally, one can build the 2-category Cat whose

  • 0-cells (objects) are the small categories,
  • 1-cells (arrows) between two objects C and D are the functors from C to D,
  • 2-cells between two 1-cells (functors) F:C\to D and G:C\to D are the natural transformations from F to G.

The horizontal and vertical compositions are the compositions between natural transformations described previously. A functor category CI is then simply a hom-category in this category (smallness issues aside).

Yoneda lemma

If X is an object of a locally small category C, then the assignment Y ↦ HomC(X, Y) defines a covariant functor FX : CSet. This functor is called representable (more generally, a representable functor is any functor naturally isomorphic to this functor for an appropriate choice of X). The natural transformations from a representable functor to an arbitrary functor F : CSet are completely known and easy to describe; this is the content of the Yoneda lemma.

Historical notes

Saunders Mac Lane, one of the founders of category theory, is said to have remarked, "I didn't invent categories to study functors; I invented them to study natural transformations." Just as the study of groups is not complete without a study of homomorphisms, so the study of categories is not complete without the study of functors. The reason for Mac Lane's comment is that the study of functors is itself not complete without the study of natural transformations.

The context of Mac Lane's remark was the axiomatic theory of homology. Different ways of constructing homology could be shown to coincide: for example in the case of a simplicial complex the groups defined directly, and those of the singular theory, would be isomorphic. What cannot easily be expressed without the language of natural transformations is how homology groups are compatible with morphisms between objects, and how two equivalent homology theories not only have the same homology groups, but also the same morphisms between those groups.

See also

  • Extranatural transformation

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • natural transformation — noun Given categories C and D and functors F and G both going from C to D, then a transformation eta; from F to G consists of components eta;<sub>X</sub>:F(X) rarr; G(X), indexed by objects X of C, which are morphisms in D. The… …   Wiktionary

  • Monoidal natural transformation — Suppose that and are two monoidal categories and and are two lax monoidal functors between those categories. A monoidal natural transformation between those funct …   Wikipedia

  • Natural (disambiguation) — Natural is an adjective that refers to Nature. Natural may refer too: In science and mathematics: Natural transformation, category theory in mathematics Natural foods Natural history, a broad area of the natural sciences concerned with living… …   Wikipedia

  • Natural mapping — may refer to: Natural transformation in category theory, a branch of abstract mathematics Natural mapping (interface design) This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title. If an …   Wikipedia

  • Transformation naturelle — En théorie des catégories, une transformation naturelle permet de transformer un foncteur en un autre tout en respectant la structure interne (i.e. la composition des morphismes) des catégories considérées. On peut ainsi la voir comme un… …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Transformation of culture — Transformation of culture, or cultural change, to the dynamic process whereby the living cultures of the world are changing and adapting to external or internal forces. This process is occurring within Western culture as well as non Western and… …   Wikipedia

  • Natural England — Agency overview Formed 1 October 2006 Jurisdiction England Headquarters Sheffield, England Employees …   Wikipedia

  • Natural organic matter — (NOM) is broken down organic matter that comes from plants and animals in the environment. [ Natural Organic Matter, GreenFacts, 22 Apr, 2007 …   Wikipedia

  • Transformation (genetics) — An unrelated process called malignant transformation occurs in the progression of cancer. In molecular biology transformation is the genetic alteration of a cell resulting from the direct uptake, incorporation and expression of exogenous genetic… …   Wikipedia

  • Natural competence — In microbiology, genetics, cell biology and molecular biology, competence is the ability of a cell to take up extracellular ( naked ) DNA from its environment. Competence may be differentiated between natural competence, a genetically specified… …   Wikipedia


Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.