Dual Contracts


Dual Contracts

The Dual Contracts of 1913, also known as the Dual Subway System, were contracts for the construction and/or rehabilitation and operation of rapid transit lines in the City of New York. The majority of the lines of the present-day New York Subway were built or reconstructed under these contracts. The contracts were "dual," in that they were signed between the City and two separate private companies.

Contents

Background

1910 plan for IRT expansion

Contract 3 was signed between the City and the IRT, operator of the original subway line in New York City. Contract 4 was signed between the City and the Municipal Railway Company, a subsidiary of the BRT (later BMT), formed especially for the purpose of contracting with the city for construction of the lines. Contracts 1 and 2 were the original subway contracts between the City and the IRT for the first subway in New York. These contracts predated the Dual Contracts.

Under the terms of Contracts 3 and 4, the city would build new subway and elevated lines, and rehabilitate and expand certain existing elevated lines, and lease them to the private companies for operation. The cost would be borne more-or-less equally by the City and the companies. The City's contribution was in cash raised by bond offerings, while the companies' contributions were variously by supplying cash, facilities and equipment to run the lines.

The contract negotiations were long and sometimes acrimonious. For instance, when the IRT was reluctant (if not totally opposed) to the BRT's proposed access to Midtown Manhattan via the Broadway Line, the city and state negotiators immediately offered the BRT all of the lines under proposal - including such obvious IRT tie-ins such as the upper Lexington Avenue Line, and both lines in Queens. The IRT quickly gave in to the 'invasion' of Midtown Manhattan by the BRT.

The assignment of the proposed lines in Queens proved to be an imposition on both companies. Instead of one company enjoying a monopoly in that borough, both proposed lines — a short line to Astoria, and a longer line reaching initially to Corona, and eventually to Flushing — were assigned to both companies, to be operated in what was called "joint service." The lines would start from a huge station called Queensborough Plaza. The IRT would access the station from both the 1907 Steinway Tunnel and an extension of the Second Avenue Elevated from Manhattan over the Queensborough Bridge. The BRT would feed the Queens lines from a new tunnel from 60th Street in Manhattan. Technically the line was under IRT 'ownership', but the BRT/BMT was granted trackage rights in perpetuity, essentially making it theirs also.

The BRT had a big disadvantage, as both Queens lines were built to IRT specifications. This meant that IRT passengers would have a one-seat ride to Manhattan destinations, whereas BRT passengers had to make a change at Queensborough Plaza. This came to be important when service was extended for the 1939 World's Fair, as the IRT was able to offer direct express trains from Manhattan, and the BRT was not. This practice lasted well into the municipal ownership of the lines, and was not ended until 1949. Both companies would share in the revenues from this service. To facilitate this arrangement originally, extra long platforms were constructed along both Queens routes, so separate fare controls/boarding areas could be established. This quickly turned out to be operationally unworkable, so eventually a proportionate formula was worked out. The bonus legacy of this construction was that the IRT was able to operate 11-car trains on this line, and when the BMT took over the Astoria Line, minimal work had to done to accommodate 10-car BMT units.

Several provisions were imposed on the companies, which eventually led to their downfall and consolidation into City ownership in 1940:

  • The fare was limited to five cents, and this led to financial troubles for the two companies after post-World War I inflation.
  • The City had the right to "recapture" any of the lines it built, and run them as its own.
  • The City was to share in the profits.

IRT lines

The following lines were built under the Dual Contracts for the IRT:

The following lines were rebuilt with extra tracks:

BMT lines

1924 map of the BMT Dual Contracts lines

All Manhattan and Queens BMT lines were built under the Dual Contracts, as were all subway and some elevated lines in Brooklyn.

Lines and line segments built new

Grade-separated rights-of-way built to replace surface railroads

1911 plan, giving all the contracts to the BRT

Existing rights-of-way rehabilitated and expanded

  • Brighton Beach Line from Prospect Park to Church Avenue. Existing open cut widened and expanded from two to four tracks.
  • Jamaica Line from merge with line from Marcy Avenue to Broadway Junction. Elevated line expanded from two to three tracks.
  • Myrtle Avenue Line from Broadway–Myrtle to Myrtle–Wyckoff Avenues, including track connection to Jamaica Line. Elevated structure expanded from two to three tracks.
  • Fulton Street Line from Nostrand Avenue to east of split from Canarsie Line at Pitkin Avenue. Two track elevated expanded to three tracks and new flying junction complex with six tracks replaced two tracks between former Manhattan Junction in East New York and Pitkin Avenue. This portion gave the Canarsie Line two dedicated tracks.

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Dual-listed company — Dual listed companies should not be confused with cross listed companies, where the stock of one company is listed on more than one stock exchange. A dual listed company or DLC is a corporate structure in which two corporations function as a… …   Wikipedia

  • dual contract — see contract Merriam Webster’s Dictionary of Law. Merriam Webster. 1996. dual contract …   Law dictionary

  • dual sourcing — ➔ sourcing * * * dual sourcing UK US noun [U] PRODUCTION ► the act of buying supplies of the same product from two different companies: »Many companies regard dual sourcing as important, so would not agree to long term contracts with a single… …   Financial and business terms

  • Contratos Dual — Los Contratos Dual o conocidos en inglés como Dual Contracts de 1913, y también como Dual Subway System, fueron unos contratos para la construcción y/o rehabilitación  y operación de las líneas de tránsito rápido de la Ciudad de Nueva York.… …   Wikipedia Español

  • History of the New York City Subway — Charles Harvey demonstrating his elevated railroad design on Greenwich Street in 1867 Main article: New York City Subway The New York City Subway has a long history, beginning as many disjointed systems and eventually merging under City control.… …   Wikipedia

  • General Motors streetcar conspiracy — Pacific Electric Railway streetcars stacked at a junkyard on Terminal Island, March 1956 The General Motors streetcar conspiracy (also known as the National City Lines conspiracy) refers to allegations and convictions in relation to a program by… …   Wikipedia

  • Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit Corporation — The Brooklyn Manhattan Transit Corporation (BMT) was an urban transit holding company, based in Brooklyn, New York City, United States, and incorporated in 1923. It is now the BMT Division of the New York City Subway. Together with the IND, it is …   Wikipedia

  • BMT Canarsie Line — The Canarsie Line (sometimes referred to as the 14th Street ndash;Canarsie Line) is a rapid transit line of the BMT Division of the New York City Subway system, named after its terminus in the Canarsie neighborhood of Brooklyn. It is used by the… …   Wikipedia

  • Culver Line (New York City Subway) — Culver Line The F travels over the whole length as a local train. Several stations are also served by the G. Overview Type Rapid transit …   Wikipedia

  • IRT Flushing Line — The 7 and 7 Express trains serve the entire IRT Flushing Line at all times Overview Type Rapid transit …   Wikipedia