Coronation cases

Main article: Frustration in English law

The Coronation cases were a group of appellate opinions in English law cases, all arising out of contracts that had been made for accommodation for viewing the celebrations surrounding the coronation of King Edward VII, originally scheduled for June 26, 1902. The King fell ill, and the Coronation was postponed until August.

In general, the contracts were voided on the ground of frustration of purpose. Certain contracts which did not mention that the purpose was to view the Coronation festivities were upheld, however.

List of cases

The cases included:

• Krell v Henry [1903] 2 K.B. 740 ^[1]
• Chandler v Webster [1904] 1 KB 493
• Herne Bay Steamboat Co v Hutton [1903] 2 K.B. 683 ^[2]
• Hobson v Pattenden & Co (1903) 19 TLR 186
• Clark v Lindsay (1903) 19 TLR 202
• Griffith v Brymer (1903) 19 TLR 434

In this matter, the parties entered into the contract after the decision had been made (but not publicized) to operate on the King. The contract was ruled to be void, not under the doctrine of frustration of purpose as in other Coronation cases, but on the grounds of mistake. The crucial difference is that, unlike the other coronation cases where a later event made the contract fundamentally different, in this case the parties entered into the contract under the mistaken assumption of fact that the coronation would take place.

Notes

1. ^ http://www.spr-consilio.com/art083.htm, URL accessed 3-May-2007.
2. ^ http://www.spr-consilio.com/art083.htm, URL accessed 3-May-2007.