Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.


Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.

SCOTUSCase
Litigants=Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.
ArgueDate=November 29
ArgueYear=2005
DecideDate=March 1
DecideYear=2006
FullName=Illinois Tool Works Incorporated, et al. v. Independent Ink, Incorporated
USVol=547
USPage=28
Citation=126 S. Ct. 1281; 164 L. Ed. 2d 26; 2006 U.S. LEXIS 2024; 74 U.S.L.W. 4154; 77 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1801
Docket=04-1329
Prior=Summary judgment granted to defendant, sub nom. "Indep. Ink v. Trident, Inc.", 210 F. Supp. 2d 1155 (C.D. Cal. 2002); affirmed in part, reversed in part, sub nom. "Indep. Ink, Inc. v. Ill. Tool Works, Inc." 396 F.3d 1342 (Fed. Cir. 2005); cert. granted, 125 S. Ct. 2937 (2005)
Subsequent=On remand at Indep. Ink, Inc. v. Ill. Tool Works, Inc., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 10770 (Fed. Cir., Apr. 13, 2006)
Holding=A product involved in a tying arrangement is not presumed to have market power for purposes of establishing an antitrust violation by the mere fact that it is patented. Federal Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded.
SCOTUS=2006
Majority=Stevens
JoinMajority=Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer
NotParticipating=Alito
LawsApplied=15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 (§§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)

"Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.", 547 U.S. 28 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the application of U.S. antitrust law to "tying" arrangements of patented products. The Court ruled unanimously [The decision was unanimous as to the eight justices participating; Judge Samuel Alito joined the Court after it heard argument in this case, and so did not participate.] that there is not a presumption of market power under the Sherman Antitrust Act when the sale of a patented product is conditioned on the sale of a second product in a tying arrangement. A plaintiff alleging an antitrust violation must instead establish the defendant's market power in the patented product through evidence.

Background of the case

Independent Ink was a distributor of printer ink and related products. Trident manufactured ink-related products used in printers used to print bar codes on cardboard. Trident's license, when licensing its printing apparatus to those printers' manufacturers, required them to use Trident ink. However, it did not require end users of the bar-code printers to refill the printers with Trident ink cartridges. Trident did not, though, warranty its printer for use with others' ink cartridges.

In the course of a patent-infringement suit, Independent Ink alleged that Trident's license constituted a tying arrangement in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. (Illinois Tool Works then bought Trident, so was added as a defendant.) Its lawsuit was thrown out of Federal district court on summary judgment, June 3, 2002.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed summary judgment for the most part, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari. In the present case, the Court vacated the Court of Appeals decision for the reasons outlined above, and the summary judgment was effective reinstated.

ee also

* List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 547

Notes

References

* [http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/05pdf/04-1329.pdf Full text of the Supreme Court's decision]


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • List of patent case law — This list contains an alphabetical listing of historically significant or leading case law in the area of patent law. A * Aerotel v Telco and Macrossan s Application (UK, 2006) * Ariad v. Lilly (US, 2006) * Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers… …   Wikipedia

  • List of United States patent law cases — This is a list of patent law cases in the United States from 1878 to 2007.Early cases*City of Elizabeth v. American Nicholson Pavement Co. 1878. Prior use does not include experimental use. *Egbert v. Lippmann 1881. Held that public use of an… …   Wikipedia

  • List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 547 — This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 547 of the United States Reports :* Texaco Inc. v. Dagher , ussc|547|1|2006 * Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc. , ussc|547|9|2006 * Illinois Tool Works Inc.… …   Wikipedia

  • Liste des arrêts de la Cour suprême des États-Unis, volume 547 — Ceci est une liste des arrêts de la Cour suprême des États Unis du volume 547 de l’United States Reports: Sommaire 1 Liste 2 Voir aussi 3 Source 4 Liens externes …   Wikipédia en Français

  • Exhaustion doctrine — This article is about the first sale doctrine as applied to patents. For the analogous first sale doctrine applicable to copyright, see First sale doctrine. Under the exhaustion doctrine, doctrine of exhaustion, or first sale doctrine, the first… …   Wikipedia

  • Tying (commerce) — Competition law Basic concepts History of competition law Monopoly Coercive monopoly Natural monopoly …   Wikipedia

  • Business and Industry Review — ▪ 1999 Introduction Overview        Annual Average Rates of Growth of Manufacturing Output, 1980 97, Table Pattern of Output, 1994 97, Table Index Numbers of Production, Employment, and Productivity in Manufacturing Industries, Table (For Annual… …   Universalium

  • United States — a republic in the N Western Hemisphere comprising 48 conterminous states, the District of Columbia, and Alaska in North America, and Hawaii in the N Pacific. 267,954,767; conterminous United States, 3,022,387 sq. mi. (7,827,982 sq. km); with… …   Universalium

  • performing arts — arts or skills that require public performance, as acting, singing, or dancing. [1945 50] * * * ▪ 2009 Introduction Music Classical.       The last vestiges of the Cold War seemed to thaw for a moment on Feb. 26, 2008, when the unfamiliar strains …   Universalium

  • Ronald Reagan — Reagan redirects here. For other uses, see Reagan (disambiguation). Ronald Reagan 40th President of the United States In office …   Wikipedia