Moral clarity


Moral clarity

Moral clarity is a catchphrase associated with American political conservatives. Popularized by William J. Bennett's Why We Fight: Moral Clarity and the War on Terrorism, the phrase was first used in its current context during the 1980s, in reference to the politics of Ronald Reagan.[1]

The phrase moral clarity encodes a complex political argument that includes all of the following claims:

  • Traditional American values like democracy and freedom are universal human rights, worth promoting and defending through military intervention.
  • Attempts to understand or explain the actions of anti-Western terrorists as justifiable responses to actions of the United States or Israel are a sign of moral weakness at best, and sympathy for the terrorists at worst, and will hamper efforts to defeat them.
  • Though the actions of the United States and its allies may lead to civilian deaths or other forms of collateral damage, may require the use of means such as torture that would be condemned in other contexts, and may involve temporary alliances with undemocratic regimes, these actions are justified by the greater moral necessity of defeating terrorism and thus promoting American values and ensuring long-term U.S. security.
  • Opponents of action against terrorists are guilty of promoting moral relativism or moral equivalence, in which the allegedly similar means of both anti-terrorists and terrorists are used to blur the moral differences between good and evil.

Contents

Opposing views

For opponents of the notion of "moral clarity", dividing the world into good and evil does not lend itself to a workable foreign policy. For example, if Iraq was invaded for reasons of "moral clarity", it follows that other "rogue states" (like North Korea) would also be similarly attacked. This apparent contradiction is used to argue that proponents of "moral clarity" are guilty of hypocrisy or special pleading, and that the slogan moral clarity masks less exalted reasons for military intervention, particularly economic motives.

Opponents of the notion of "moral clarity" also note that organizations such as al Qaida and neo-Nazis also believe that their own point of view is one of "moral clarity", which justifies them to take whatever action they feel necessary against what they see as the "forces of evil". Thus, opponents of the notion of "moral clarity" assert that, but for the accident of their country and culture of birth, the proponents of "moral clarity" might well be on the opposite side, holding the same views. Proponents of this view argue that understanding the motivations and values of other cultures, rather than labeling them "evil", is a better first step in eliminating violence.

Critics also argue that "moral clarity" promotes a dangerous view expressed in the famous phrase "My country, right or wrong". The idea that the United States is always "good" is actually an argument of moral relativism, they say, since it makes no distinction between right and wrong actions. Furthermore, it is argued that "moral clarity" is used to discredit those want to hold the United States to a higher moral standard than "My country, right or wrong", a standard expressed by U.S. Brigadier General Carl Schurz: "Our country right or wrong. When right, to be kept right; when wrong, to be put right."

See also

  • American exceptionalism — the idea (not traditionally restricted to conservatives) that the United States has special values and a unique role in promoting and defending those values
  • Useful idiot — disparaging term for Americans who purportedly lack "moral clarity"

Further reading

  • William J Bennett (2002) Why We Fight: Moral Clarity and the War on Terrorism Regnery Publishing Inc. ISBN 0895261340
  • Susan Neiman (2008) Moral Clarity: A Guide for Grown-up Idealists Harcourt Inc. ISBN 015101197

References


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • The Center for Moral Clarity — is a non partisan Christian grassroots organization in the United States. Founded by Rod Parsley, according to its website, the center exists to affect moral change in our nation by encouraging passionate and persuasive Christian leadership,… …   Wikipedia

  • Socrates and the beginnings of moral philosophy — Hugh H.Benson INTRODUCTION Cicero in Tusculan Disputations famously tells us that Socrates first called philosophy down from the sky, set it in cities and even introduced it into homes, and compelled it to consider life and morals, good and evil …   History of philosophy

  • Rod Parsley — Saltar a navegación, búsqueda Rodney Lee Parsley (nació el 13 de enero de 1957), es un televangelista estadounidense, pastor superior de World Harvest Church, una mega iglesia pentecostal en Columbus (Ohio); es además fundador y presidente de The …   Wikipedia Español

  • Neoconservatism: Why We Need it —   Author(s) Douglas Murray Country …   Wikipedia

  • Rod Parsley — Infobox clergy name = Rod Parsley image size = caption = birthname = Rodney Lee Parsley birth date = Birth date|1957|01|13 birth place = Cleveland, Ohio, U.S. death date = death place = church = Pentecostal other names = education = writings =… …   Wikipedia

  • Susan Neiman — Infobox Philosopher region = Western Philosophy era = 20th / 21st century philosophy color = #B0C4DE image caption = name = Susan Neiman birth = 1955 school tradition = Enlightenment main interests = Morality·History of philosophy·Political… …   Wikipedia

  • 2008 Israel–Hezbollah prisoner swap — infobox generic | color = #cc9999 name = 2008 Israel Hezbollah prisoner swap sub0 = img1 = Eldad Udi leb.jpg width1 = 300px cap1 = lbl1 = Date: row1 = July 16 2008 lbl2 = Place: row2 = Israel Lebanon border lbl3 = Cause: row3 = 2006 Lebanon War… …   Wikipedia

  • George Weigel — (Baltimore, 1951 ) is an American Catholic author, and political and social activist. He currently serves as Distinguished Senior Fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Weigel was the Founding President of the James Madison Foundation. He …   Wikipedia

  • Project for the New American Century — Formation 1997 Extinction 2006 Type Public policy think tank …   Wikipedia

  • International Tribunal on Crimes against Women — The International Tribunal on Crimes against Women was a people s tribunal which took place on March 4 8, 1976 in Brussels. [Doughty, Frances. lesbians and International Women s Year: A Report on Three Conferences , in Our Right to Love: A… …   Wikipedia