- Philosophy in the Soviet Union
Philosophical research in the Soviet Union was officially confined to Marxist-Leninist thinking, which theoretically was the basis of objective and ultimate philosophical truth. During the 1920s and 1930s, other tendencies of Russian thought were repressed (many philosophers emigrated, others were expelled).
Stalinenacted a decreein 1931 identifying dialectical materialismwith Marxism Leninism, making it the official philosophy which would be enforced in all Communist statesand, through the Comintern, in most Communist parties. Following the traditional use in the Second International, opponents would be labeled as "revisionists". From the beginning of Bolshevikregime, the aim of official Soviet philosophy (which was taught as an obligatory subject for every course), was the theoretical justification of Communist ideas. For this reason, "Sovietologists", whom the most famous were Józef Maria Bocheńskiand Gustav Wetter, have often claimed Soviet philosophy was close to nothing but dogma. However, since the 1917 October Revolution, it was marked by both philosophical and political struggles, which call into question any monolithic reading. Evald Vasilevich Ilyenkov was one of the main philosophers of the 1960s, who revisited the 1920s debate between "mechanicists" and "dialecticians" in " [http://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/works/positive/index.htm Leninist Dialectics & Metaphysics of Positivism] " (1979). During the 1960s and 1970s Western philosophies including analytical philosophyand logical empiricismbegan to make a mark in Soviet thought.
Philosophical and political struggles in the Soviet Union
Dialectical materialism was first elaborated by
Leninin " [http://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1908/mec/index.htm Materialism and Empiriocriticism] " (1908) around three axes: the "materialist inversion" of Hegelian dialectics, the historicityof ethical principles ordered to class struggleand the convergence of "laws of evolution" in physics ( Helmholz), biology (Darwin) and in political economics (Marx). Lenin hence took position between a historicist Marxism (Labriola) and a determinist Marxism, close to what was later called " social Darwinism" (Kautsky). Lenin's most important philosophical rival was Alexander Bogdanov(1873-1928), who tried to synthesize Marxism with the philosophies of Ernst Mach, Wilhelm Ostwald, and Richard Avenarius(which were violently criticized in "Materialism and Empiriocriticism"). Bodganov wrote a treatise on " tectology" and was one of the founders of Proletkultafter the war.
Following the 1917
October Revolution, Soviet philosophy divided itself between "dialecticians" (Deborin) and "mechanists" (Bukharin, who would detail Stalin's thesis upheld in 1924 concerning " socialism in one country"), was not a "mechanist" per se, but was seen as an ally. The mechanists (A.K. Timartizev, Timianski, Axelrod, Stepanov...), came mostly from scientific backgrounds, claimed that Marxist philosophy found its basis in a causal explanation of Nature. They upheld a positivist interpretation of Marxism which asserted that Marxist philosophy had to follow the natural sciences. Stepanov thus wrote an article flatly titled "The Dialectical Understanding of Nature is the Mechanistic Understanding". To the contrary, "dialecticians", whose background was Hegelian, insisted that dialectics could not be reduced to simple mechanism. Basing themselves mainly on Engels' " Anti-Dühring" and " Dialectics of Nature", they maintained that the laws of dialectics could be found in nature. Taking support on the theory of relativityand quantum mechanics, they responded that the mechanists' conception of nature was too restricted and narrow. Deborin, who had been a student of Plekhanov, the "father of Russian Marxism", also disagreed with the mechanicists concerning the place of Spinoza. The latter maintained that he was an idealist metaphysician, while Deborin, following Plekhanov, saw Spinoza as a materialist and a dialectician. Mechanism was finally condemned as undermining dialectical materialism and for vulgar evolutionismat the 1929 meeting of the Second All-Union Conference of Marxist-Leninist Scientific Institutions. Two years later, Stalin settled by fiat the debate between the mechanist and the dialectician tendencies by issuing a decree which identified dialectical materialism as the philosophical basis of Marxism-Leninism. Henceforth, the possibilities for philosophical research independent of official dogmatics virtually vanished, while lysenkoismwas enforced in the scientific fields (in 1948, geneticswere declared a " bourgeois pseudoscience"). However, this debate between "mechanists" and "dialecticians" would retain importance long after the 1920s.
David Riazanovwas named director of the Marx-Engels Institute, which he had founded, in 1920. He then created the MEGA ("Marx-Engels-Gesamt-Ausgabe"), which was supposed to edit Marx and Engels' complete works. He also published authors authors, such as Diderot, Feuerbach or Hegel. Riazanov was however excluded from any political functions in 1921 for defending trade unions' autonomy.
During the Fifth
CominternCongress, Grigory Zinovievcondemned for "revisionism" the works of Georg Lukacs, "History and Class Consciousness" (1923) and of Karl Korsch, "Marxism and Philosophy". "History and Class Consciousness" was disavowed by its author, who made his self-criticismfor political reasons (he thought that, for a revolutionary, being part of the party was the priority). It became however a leading source of Western Marxism, starting with the Frankfurt School, and even influenced Heidegger's " Sein und Zeit" (1927). Lukacs then went to Moscowin the beginnings of the 1930s where he would continue his philosophical studies, and returned to Hungaryafter World War II. He then took part to Imre Nagy's government in 1956, and was closely watched afterwards. Lev Vygotsky's (1896-1934) studies in developmental psychology, which opposed themselves to Ivan Pavlov's works, would be expanded in the activity theorydeveloped by Alexei Nikolaevich Leont'ev, Pyotr Zinchenko(a member of Kharkov School of Psychology), and Alexander Luria, a neuropsychologistwho developed the first lie detector.
Russian formalism was an influential school of
literary criticismfrom the 1910s to the 1930s, who revolutionised literary criticism by establishing the specificity and autonomy of poetic languageand literature. It includes the work of a number of highly influential Russian and Soviet scholars ( Viktor Shklovsky, Yuri Tynianov, Boris Eichenbaum, Roman Jakobson, Grigory Vinokur) Russian formalism exerted a major influence on thinkers such as Mikhail Bakhtinand Juri Lotman, and on structuralismas a whole. The movement's members are widely considered the founders of modern literary criticism. Under Stalin it became a pejorative term for elitist art.
Russian formalism was a diverse movement, producing no unified doctrine, and no consensus amongst its proponents on a central aim to their endeavours. In fact, "Russian formalism" describes two distinct movements: the
OPOJAZ("Obscestvo izucenija POeticeskogo JAZyka" - Society for the Study of Poetic Language) in St. Petersburgand the Linguistic Circle in Moscow. Therefore, it is more precise to refer to the "Russian Formalists", rather than to use the more encompassing and abstract term of "Formalism".
After the 20th Congress of the CPSU
Nevertheless, the conditions for creative philosophical work began to emerge in the mid-1950s, after the
20th Congress of the CPSUin 1956, albeit only on the 'outskirts' of philosophy: the philosophy of the natural science( B. Kedrov, I. Frolov), theory of perception and gnoseology( P. Kopnin, V. Lektorsky, M. Mamardashvili, E. Ilyenkov), the history of philosophy ( V. Asmus, A. Losev, I. Narski), ethics ( O. Dobronitski), aesthetics( M. Kagan, L. Stolovitsh), logics( G. Shtshedrovitski, A. Zinovyev) and semioticsand system theories (Y. Lotman, who set up the Sign Systems Studiesjournal, the oldest semiotics periodical; V. Sadovsky). The works of the young Marx, such as the " Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844", which had been first published in 1932 but suppressed under Stalin because of its incomplete break with German Idealism, also started being discussed.
Vasily Nalimov(1910-1997) was interested mainly in the philosophy of probability and its biological, mathematical, and linguistic manifestations. He also studied the roles of gnosticismand mysticismin science. Nalimov is usually credited with proposing the concept of citation index.
2) The so-called "communist morality" was an important part of Soviet Union philosophy. It was a new kind of morality developed to inhibit traditional defenses against evil. According to Lenin and Stalin, morality should be subordinated to the ideology of proletarian revolution. Denying the validity of religion-based morality, they wrote: what is useful to us is moral, what is harmful to us is immoral. Morality is a weapon in class struggle. Party and Komsomol members were drilled to accept that position, and to act accordingly.
The justification was simple. The world is full of injustice and immorality. We want to replace it by a much better "scientifically designed" social structure--communism. That is why what we do is right, by definition. Here is a good illustration. An act of torture committed by our enemy should be exposed as unspeakable barbarism. We do this to gain sympathy and support of naive people believing in "bourgeois morality." But an act of torture committed by us to punish an enemy of revolution is not immoral. It is a historical necessity. Likewise, Auschwitz elimination was considered immoral while Siberia elimination was considered moral.
What distinguishes these two cases? It is not the methodology of killing, gas versus cold; it is the ideology which is being served. Comrade Dzerzhinsky, the first director of punitive Soviet organs, was referred to as a highly moral communist. This honor was a reward for extremely brutal handling of declared class enemies, as ordered by the party of Lenin and Stalin. Other bolsheviks, including those who were later eliminated by Stalin, were also extremely brutal; they were leaders of Red Terror, Civil War, War Communism and Collectivization campaigns. Immorality is probably older than civilizations but Hitler and Stalin elevated it to new heights.
Ludwik Kowalski (The above comment was extracted from my book: "Hell on Earth: Brutality and Violence Under The Stalinist Regime" Wasteland Press, Shelbyville, 2008, ISBN 978-1-60047-232-9)
Publications and Propaganda
The USSR published voluminous materials to disseminate its philosophical ideals and justifications. These took the form of academic or professional journals or notes in the pattern of peer-reviewed material. For example the book below challenges the idea of a medical
deontology,Fact|date=August 2007 or ethics based on moral rules, versus ethics based on utilitarianrules decided on the best outcome for the greatest number of people.Fact|date=August 2007
*Evald Vasilevich Ilyenkov, " [http://www.marxists.org/archive/ilyenkov/index.htm Works at Marxist Archives] "
*Eesti Entsüklopeedia, X kd "sub" Venemaa
* V.A. Bazhanov. Philosophy in Post-Soviet Russia (1992 - 1997): Background, Present State, and Prospects // Studies in East European Thought, 1999, vol. 15, N 4, p. 1 - 23.
Andrey Kolmogorov(a mathematician)
Suppressed research in the Soviet Union
* [http://www.cup.cam.ac.uk/us/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=0521385342&ss=exc Excerpts] from "Consciousness and Revolution in Soviet Philosophy, From the Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov" (1991), David Bakhurst
* [http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism-thaxis/2002-September/017763.html "Marxism-Thaxis" - Mechanists versus Dialecticians in early Soviet philosophy]
* [http://www.bl.uk/collections/wider/russwomen/russwomenrel.html Russian and Soviet Women's Studies - Religion and Philosophy]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.