- Formal epistemology
Formal epistemology is a subdiscipline of
epistemologythat utilizes formal methodsfrom logic, probability theoryand computability theoryto elucidate traditional epistemic problems.
Some of the topics that come under the heading of formal epistemology include:
Ampliative inference(including inductive logic);
Game theoryand decision theory;
Algorithmic learning theory( computational epistemology);
* Formal theories of
* Foundations of
* Formal approaches to
paradoxesof belief and/or action.
Though formally oriented epistemologists have been laboring since the emergence of
formal logic(if not earlier), only recently have they been organized under a common disciplinary title. This gain in popularity may be attributed to the organization of yearly Formal Epistemology Workshops by [http://fitelson.org Branden Fitelson] and Sahotra Sarkar, starting in 2004, and the recent PHILOG-conferences starting in 2002 (The Network for Philosophical Logic and Its Applications) organized by Vincent F. Hendricks.
Contemporary Formal Epistemologists
* [http://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/faculty-arlocosta.php Horacio Arló-Costa] , Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University (Bayesian epistemology, epistemic logic, belief revision, conditionals, rational choice, normative and behavioral decision theory)
Luc Bovens(Bayesian epistemology, probability, etc)
* Darren Bradley (Sleeping Beauty, Doomsday, etc)
* [http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~schopra Samir Chopra] (belief revision, physics, etc)
* John Collins (knowledge, causation, vagueness, etc.)
* [http://www.personeel.unimaas.nl/f.dietrich Franz Dietrich] (collective decision-making, etc.)
* Ellery Eells (confirmation, probability)
Adam Elga(probabilistic reasoning, laws, etc)
* [http://fitelson.org Branden Fitelson] (confirmation, logic, etc)
Malcolm Forster(confirmation, simplicity, causation)
* Anthony Gillies (belief revision, formal semantics)
* [http://philrsss.anu.edu.au/people-defaults/alanh/index.php3 Alan Hájek] (foundations of probability, decision theory, etc.)
Joseph Halpern(reasoning about knowledge and uncertainty)
Sven Ove Hansson(risk, decision theory, belief revision, deontic logic)
Gilbert Harman(epistemology, statistical learning theory, mind and language)
* [http://stephanhartmann.org Stephan Hartmann] (Bayesian epistemology, probability, collective decision-making, etc.)
* [http://faculty-staff.ou.edu/H/James.A.Hawthorne-1 James Hawthorne] (confirmation theory, inductive logic, belief revision, nonmonotonic logic)
Vincent F. Hendricks(epistemic logic, formal epistemology)
* [http://www.uni-konstanz.de/philosophie/huber/ Franz Huber] (formal epistemology, philosophy of science, philosophical logic)
Richard Jeffrey(probabilistic reasoning)
* James Joyce (decision theory)
* [http://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/faculty-kelly.php Kevin T. Kelly] , Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University (computational epistemology, belief revision, etc)
* Marion Ledwig (Newcomb's problem)
* [http://www.bris.ac.uk/philosophy/department/staff/hl.html Hannes Leitgeb] (belief revision, probability, Bayesianism, etc.)
Isaac Levi(belief revision)
Patrick Maher(confirmation, inductive logic)
* David Miller (probability, induction, logic, Popper)
* [http://lucamoretti.org Luca Moretti] (confirmation, coherence, transmission of warrant, epistemic truth)
Daniel Osherson(inductive logic, reasoning, vagueness)
Gabriella Pigozzi(belief revision, decision theory)
* John Pollock (decision theory, reasoning, AI)
* [http://seis.bris.ac.uk/~pldpr/ Darrell Rowbottom] (foundations of probability, confirmation, philosophy of science, etc.)
* [http://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/faculty-seidenfeld.php Teddy Seidenfeld] Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University (statistical decision theory, probability theory, game theory)
* [http://www.uni-konstanz.de/philosophie/Spohn/spohn.shtml Wolfgang Spohn] (reasoning, probability, causation, philosophy of science, etc)
* Paul Thorn (direct inference, defeasible reasoning, induction, etc)
* Peter Vranas (confirmation, deontic logic, time travel, ethics, etc)
* [http://centria.fct.unl.pt/~greg/research.html Gregory Wheeler] (statistical reasoning, default logic, probabilistic logic)
* Roger White (confirmation, cosmology)
* [http://www.kent.ac.uk/secl/philosophy/jw/ Jon Williamson] (Bayesianism, probability, causation)
Timothy Williamson(knowledge, modality, logic, vagueness, etc)
* David Wolpert (No Free Lunch theorems, i.e., Hume done rigorously; physics and inference, i.e., monotheism theorems, Chomsky hierarchy of inference devices, etc.)
*Bovens, L. and Hartmann, S. (2003). Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
*Hendricks, V. F. (2001). The Convergence of Scientific Knowledge: A View from The Limit. Dordrect: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
*Hendricks, V. F. (2006). Mainstream and Formal Epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
*Hendricks, V. F. (ed.) (2006). Special issue on “8 Bridges Between Mainstream and Formal Epistemology”, Philosophical Studies.
*Hendricks, V. F. (ed.) (2006). Special issue on “Ways of Worlds I-II”, Studia Logica.
*Hendricks, V.F. and Pritchard, D. (eds.) (2006). New Waves in Epistemology. Aldershot: Ashgate.
*Hendricks, V. F. and Symons, J. (eds.) (2005). Formal Philosophy. New York:
Automatic Press / VIP. [http://www.formalphilosophy.com]
*Hendricks, V. F. and Symons, J. (eds.) (2006). Masses of Formal Philosophy. New York: Automatic Press / VIP. [http://www.formalphilosophy.com/Masses]
*Hendricks, V. F. and Hansen, P.G. (eds.) (2007). Game Theory: 5 Questions. New York: Automatic Press / VIP. [http://www.gametheorists.com]
*Hendricks, V.F. and Symons, J. (2006). Epistemic Logic. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford. CA: USA.
*Wolpert, D.H., (1996) The lack of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms, Neural Computation, pp. 1341-1390.
*Wolpert, D.H., (1996) The existence of a priori distinctions between learning algorithms, Neural Computation, pp. 1391-1420.
*Wolpert, D.H., (2001) Computational capabilities of physical systems. Physical Review E, 65(016128).
*Zhu, H.Y. and R. Rohwer, (1996) No free lunch for cross-validation, pp. 1421- 1426.
* [http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~fitelson/few/ Formal Epistemology Workshop]
* [http://webapp.utexas.edu/blogs/archives/sarkarlab/cat_formal_epistemology.html Formal Epistemology Archive]
* [http://www.phil.cmu.edu/~summerschool/ Carnegie Mellon Summer School in Logic and Formal Epistemology]
* [http://www.formalphilosophy.com/ Formal Philosophy]
* [http://www.formalepistemology.org/index.php/journal Formal Epistemology] , a free online journal.
Algorithmic learning theory
Computational learning theory
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Epistemology — (from Greek επιστήμη episteme , knowledge + λόγος , logos ) or theory of knowledge is a branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and scope (limitations) of knowledge. [Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Volume 3, 1967, Macmillan, Inc.] The term… … Wikipedia
epistemology — epistemological /i pis teuh meuh loj i keuhl/, adj. epistemologically, adv. epistemologist, n. /i pis teuh mol euh jee/, n. a branch of philosophy that investigates the origin, nature, methods, and limits of human knowledge. [1855 60; < Gk… … Universalium
epistemology — The philosophical theory of knowledge of how we know what we know. Epistemology is generally characterized by a division between two competing schools of thought: rationalism and empiricism . Both traditions of thought received their most… … Dictionary of sociology
epistemology — UK [ɪˈpɪsteˌmɒlədʒɪ] / US [ɪˈpɪsteˌmɑlədʒɪ] noun [uncountable] formal the study of knowledge … English dictionary
Computational epistemology — is a subdiscipline of formal epistemology that studies the intrinsic complexity of inductive problems for ideal and computationally bounded agents. In short, computational epistemology is to induction what recursion theory is to deduction.… … Wikipedia
Outline of epistemology — See also: Index of epistemology articles The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to epistemology: Epistemology or theory of knowledge – branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge. The… … Wikipedia
Constructivist epistemology — is an epistemological perspective in philosophy about the nature of scientific knowledge. Constructivists maintain that scientific knowledge is constructed by scientists and not discovered from the world. Constructivists claim that the… … Wikipedia
Naturalized epistemology — is a collection of philosophic views concerned with the theory of knowledge that emphasize the role of natural scientific methods. This shared emphasis on scientific methods of studying knowledge shifts focus to the empirical processes of… … Wikipedia
List of topics in epistemology — * A Defence of Common Sense * A priori and a posteriori (philosophy) * Adaptive representation * Aenesidemus * Aenesidemus (book) * Agrippa the Sceptic * Alison Wylie * Alvin Goldman * Analytic synthetic distinction * Androcentrism * Android… … Wikipedia
Android epistemology — is an approach to epistemology considering the space of possible machines and their capacities for knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, desires and for action in accord with their mental states. Thus, android epistemology incorporates artificial… … Wikipedia