- Epistle of Barnabas
The "Epistle of Barnabas" is a Greek treatise with some features of an
epistlecontaining twenty-one chapters, preserved complete in the 4th century " Codex Sinaiticus" where it appears at the end of the New Testament. It is traditionally ascribed to Barnabaswho is mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles, though some ascribe it to another apostolic father of the same name, a "Barnabas of Alexandria," or simply attribute it to an unknown early Christian teacher. A form of the "Epistle" 850 lines long is noted in the Latin list of canonical works in the 6th century " Codex Claromontanus" [http://www.ntcanon.org/codex_Claromontanus.shtml] . It is not to be confused with the Gospel of Barnabas.
The most complete text is in the "Codex Sinaiticus" (=S; 4th century) and the "Codex Hierosolymitanus" (=H; 11th century), which are usually in agreement on variant readings. A truncated form of the text in which "
Polycarp's Epistle to the Philippians" 1.1-9.2 continues with Barnabas 5.7a and following, without any indication of the transition, survives in nine Greek manuscripts (=G; from 11th century onward) and often agrees with the old Latin translation (=L) against S and H.
#Until 1843 eight manuscripts, all derived from a common source (G), were known in Western European libraries: none of them contained chapters 1 to chapter 5.7a.
#The 4th century "
Codex Sinaiticus", in which the "Epistle" and the " Shepherd of Hermas" follow the canonical books of the New Testament, contains a more complete manuscript of the text, which is independent of the preceding group of texts.
#The 11th century "
Codex Hierosolymitanus" ("Jerusalem Codex" -- relocated from Constantinople), which includes the " Didache", is another witness to the full text. This Greek manuscript was discovered by Philotheos Bryenniosat Constantinoplein 1873, and Adolf Hilgenfeldused it for his edition in 1877.
#There is also an old Latin version of the first seventeen chapters (the "Two Ways" section in chapters 18 to 21 is not present) which dates, perhaps, to no later than the end of the 4th century and is preserved in a single 9th century manuscript (St Petersburg, Q.v.I.39). This is a fairly literal rendering in general (but sometimes significantly shorter than the Greek as well), often agreeing with the family G manuscripts. There are also brief citations from the "Epistle" in the writings of
Clement of Alexandria, and a few fragments of the "Two Ways" material in Syriac and elsewhere.
Toward the end of the second century
Clement of Alexandriacites the "Epistle." It is also appealed to by Origen of Alexandria. Eusebius, however, objected to it and ultimately the epistle disappeared from the appendix to the New Testament, or rather the appendix disappeared with the epistle. In the West the epistle never enjoyed canonical authority (though it stands beside the " Epistle of James" in the Latin manuscripts). In the East, the "Stichometry of Nicephorus", the list appended by the 9th century Patriarch of Jerusalem to his "Chronography," lists the "Epistle of Barnabas" in a secondary list, of books that are "antilegomena"— "disputed"— along with the "Revelation of John", the " Revelation of Peter" and the " Gospel of the Hebrews."
Origin of the "Epistle of Barnabas"
The first editor of the epistle,
Hugo Menardus( 1645) advocated the genuineness of its ascription to Barnabas, but the opinion to-day is that Barnabas was not the author. Many scholars today believe it was probably written in the years 70– 131, and addressed to Christian Gentiles. In 16.3-4, the Epistle reads: :"Furthermore he says again, 'Behold, those who tore down this temple will themselves build it.' It is happening. For because of their fighting it was torn down by the enemies. And now the very servants of the enemies will themselves rebuild it."
This passage clearly places Barnabas after the destruction of the temple in AD 70. But it also places Barnabas before the Bar Kochba Revolt of AD 132, after which there could have been no hope that the Romans would help to rebuild the temple. The document must come from the period between the two revolts. The place of origin remains an open question, although the Greek-speaking Eastern Mediterranean appears most probable (Treat).
Although the work is not gnostic in a heterodox sense, the author, who considers himself to be a teacher to the unidentified audience to which he writes (see e.g. 9.9), intends to impart to his readers the perfect
gnosis(special knowledge), that they may perceive that the Christians are the only true covenant people, and that the Jewish people had never been in a covenant with God. His polemics are, above all, directed against Judaizing Christians (see Ebionites, Nazarenes, Judaizing teachers).
In no other writing of that early time is the separation of the Gentile Christians from observant Jews so clearly insisted upon. The covenant promises, he maintains, belong only to the Christians (e.g. 4.6-8), and circumcision, and the entire Jewish sacrificial and ceremonial system are, according to him, due to misunderstanding. According to the author's conception, Jewish scriptures, rightly understood, contain no such injunctions (chapters 9-10). He is a thorough opponent to Jewish legalism, but by no means an antinomist. At some points the Epistle seems quite "Pauline", as with its concept of atonement.
It is likely that, due to the resurgence of Judaism in the early second century, and the tolerance of the
emperor Hadrian, Christians, such as the text's author, felt a need to polemically resist Jewish influences. In this case, the author seems to aim to demonstrate that Jewish understanding of the Mosaic legislation ( Torah) is completely incorrect and can now be considered superseded, since in the author's view the Jewish scriptures foreshadowed Jesus and Christianity when rightly understood.
The author quotes liberally from the
Old Testament, including the apocryphal books. He quotes from the New Testament gospels twice (4:14, 5:9), and is in general agreement with the New Testament presentation of salvation-history. He quotes material resembling 4 Esdras(12.1) and 1 Enoch(4.3; 16.5), which did not become part of the Biblical canonexcept in some traditions (e.g. 1 Enoch is considered scriptural in the Ethiopian church). The closing "Two Ways" section (chapters 18-21), which contains a series of moral injunctions, presents "another gnosis and teaching" (18.1) in relation to the body of the epistle, and its connection to the latter has given rise to much discussion.
* [http://www.ccel.org/l/lake/fathers/barnabas_a.htm Greek text of "Epistle of Barnabas"]
* [http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/ANF-01/anf01-40.htm#TopOfPage "Ante-Nicene Fathers", vol. i:] introduction and text
* [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02299a.htm "Catholic Encyclopedia" 1907:] "Epistle of Barnabas" from the official Roman Catholic point-of-view: "the chief importance of the epistle is in its relation to the history of the Canon of the Scriptures."
*Kraft, Robert A., Barnabas and the Didache: Volume 3 of The Apostolic Fathers: A New Translation and Commentary, edited by Robert Grant. New York: Thomas Nelson and Sons, 1965. [http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/rs/rak/publics/barn/barndidintro.htm]
*Treat, Jay Curry, in "The Anchor Bible Dictionary", v. 1, pp. 613-614.
*Prostmeier, Ferdinand R., Der Barnabasbrief. Übersetzt und erklärt. Series: Kommentar zu den Apostolischen Vätern (KAV, Vol. 8). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht: Göttingen 1999. ISBN 3-525-51683-5
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Epistle of Barnabas — Epistle of Barnabas † Catholic Encyclopedia ► Epistle of Barnabas Authorities for the Text and Editions There is a triple tradition of the Greek text of this document. Up to 1843 eight manuscripts of the Epistle of Barnabas were… … Catholic encyclopedia
Epistle to the Colossians — Epistle to the Colossians † Catholic Encyclopedia ► Epistle to the Colossians One of the four Captivity Epistles written by St. Paul during his first imprisonment in Rome the other three being Ephesians, Philemon and Philippians. That … Catholic encyclopedia
Barnabas — (first century) Saint and Apostle. Barnabas was not one of the original twelve. According to Acts, ‘Joseph, who was surnamed by the apostles Barnabas (which means “Son of Encouragement”), a Levite, a native of Cyprus, sold a field which… … Who’s Who in Christianity
Epistle to the Galatians — Epistle to the Galatians † Catholic Encyclopedia ► Epistle to the Galatians GALATIA In the course of centuries, gallic tribes, related to those that invaded Italy and sacked Rome, wandered east through Illyricum and Pannonia. At… … Catholic encyclopedia
Epistle to the Hebrews — Epistle to the Hebrews † Catholic Encyclopedia ► Epistle to the Hebrews This will be considered under eight headings: (I) Argument; (II) Doctrinal Contents; (III) Language and Style; (IV) Distinctive Characteristics; (V) Readers to… … Catholic encyclopedia
Epistle of Saint Jude — Epistle of St. Jude † Catholic Encyclopedia ► Epistle of St. Jude The present subject will be treated under the following heads: I. The Author and the Authenticity of the Epistle: (1) Jude in the Books of the New Testament;… … Catholic encyclopedia
Barnabas, The Epistle of — • Contains no clue to its author nor to those for whom it was intended Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006 … Catholic encyclopedia
Epistle to the Romans — The Epistle of St. Paul the Apostle to the Romans is one of the letters of the New Testament canon of the Christian Bible. Often referred to simply as Romans, it is one of the seven currently undisputed letters of Paul. It is even counted among… … Wikipedia
Barnabas, Feast of Saint — A Holy Day of the Church observed on June 11th. St. Barnabas was born at Cyprus, but was a Jew of the tribe of Levi. His original name was Joses, but after our Lord s Ascension he was called Barnabas, meaning the Son of Consolation. (Acts 4:36 … American Church Dictionary and Cyclopedia
BARNABAS, ST. — a member of the first Christian brotherhood, a companion of St. Paul s, and characterised in the Acts as a good man ; stoned to death at Cyprus, where he was born; an epistle extant bears his name, but is not believed to be his work; the… … The Nuttall Encyclopaedia