The Game of the Century (chess)


The Game of the Century (chess)
Fischer's game score, in descriptive notation

The Game of the Century usually refers to a chess game played between Donald Byrne and 13-year-old Bobby Fischer in the Rosenwald Memorial Tournament in New York City on October 17, 1956. It was nicknamed "The Game of the Century" by Hans Kmoch in Chess Review. Kmoch wrote, "The following game, a stunning masterpiece of combination play performed by a boy of 13 against a formidable opponent, matches the finest on record in the history of chess prodigies."[1]

Contents

Background

Donald Byrne (1930–76) was one of the leading American chess masters at the time of this game. He had won the 1953 U.S. Open Championship, and would later represent the United States in the 1962, 1964, and 1968 Olympiads.[2] He became an International Master in 1962, and would likely have risen further if not for ill health.[3] Robert "Bobby" Fischer (1943–2008) was at this time a promising young master. Following this game, he had a meteoric rise, winning the 1957 U.S. Open on tiebreaks, winning the 1957–58 U.S. (Closed) Championship (and all seven later championships he played in), qualifying for the Candidates Tournament and becoming in 1958 the world's youngest grandmaster at age 15. He won the world championship in 1972, and is considered one of the greatest chessplayers in history.

In this game, Fischer (playing Black) demonstrates noteworthy innovation and improvisation. Byrne (playing White), after a standard opening, makes a seemingly minor mistake on move 11, losing tempo by moving the same piece twice. Fischer pounces with brilliant sacrificial play, culminating in an incredible queen sacrifice on move 17.[peacock term] Byrne captures the queen, but Fischer gets far too much material for it – a rook, two bishops, and a pawn. At the end, Fischer's pieces coordinate to force checkmate, while Byrne's queen sits, helpless, at the other end of the board.

Graham Burgess, John Nunn, and John Emms suggested three lessons to be learned from this game, which can be summarized as follows:

  1. In general, moving the same piece twice in the opening wastes time; other pieces should be developed first.
  2. Material sacrifices are likely to be effective against a king still in the middle and an open central file.
  3. Even at 13, Fischer was a player to be reckoned with.[4]

The game

1. Nf3

A noncommittal move by Byrne. From here, the game can develop into a number of different openings.

1... Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7

Fischer defends based on "hypermodern" principles, inviting Byrne to establish a classical pawn stronghold in the center, which Fischer intends to target and undermine with his fianchettoed bishop and other pieces.

4. d4 0-0

Fischer castles, bringing his king to safety. The Black move 4...d5 would have reached the Grünfeld Defence immediately. After Fischer's 4...0-0, Byrne could have played 5.e4, whereupon 5...d6 6.Be2 e5 reaches the main line of the King's Indian Defense.

5. Bf4 d5

The game has now transposed to the Grünfeld Defence (5.Bf4, D92), usually initiated by 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5.

6. Qb3

A form of the so-called Russian System (the usual move order is 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Qb3), putting pressure on Fischer's central d5 pawn.

6... dxc4

Fischer relinquishes his center, but draws Byrne's queen to a square where it is a little exposed and can be attacked.

7. Qxc4 c6

Also possible is 7...Na6 (the Prins Variation), preparing ...c5 to challenge White's center.

8. e4 Nbd7

In later games, Black played the more active 8...b5 followed by 9...Qa5.[5][6] An example is BisguierBenko, U.S. Championship 1963–64.[7] Fischer's choice is a little slow, although one would not guess that from the subsequent play.

9. Rd1 Nb6 10. Qc5

An awkward square for the queen, which leaves it exposed to a possible ...Na4 or ...Ne4, as Fischer brilliantly demonstrates. Since both of those squares are protected by Byrne's knight on c3, he understandably did not appreciate the danger. 10.Qb3 would have left the queen better placed, although it would have invited further harassment with 10...Be6.
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 a8 black rook b8 black king c8 black king d8 black queen e8 black king f8 black rook g8 black king h8 black king 8
7 a7 black pawn b7 black pawn c7 black king d7 black king e7 black pawn f7 black pawn g7 black bishop h7 black pawn 7
6 a6 black king b6 black knight c6 black pawn d6 black king e6 black king f6 black knight g6 black pawn h6 black king 6
5 a5 black king b5 black king c5 white queen d5 black king e5 black king f5 black king g5 white bishop h5 black king 5
4 a4 black king b4 black king c4 black king d4 white pawn e4 white pawn f4 black king g4 black bishop h4 black king 4
3 a3 black king b3 black king c3 white knight d3 black king e3 black king f3 white knight g3 black king h3 black king 3
2 a2 white pawn b2 white pawn c2 black king d2 black king e2 black king f2 white pawn g2 white pawn h2 white pawn 2
1 a1 black king b1 black king c1 black king d1 white rook e1 white king f1 white bishop g1 black king h1 white rook 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
Position after 11.Bg5

10... Bg4

Byrne's pawns control the center squares. However, Fischer is ahead in piece development and has castled, while Byrne's king is still in the center. These factors would not have been very significant had Byrne attended to his development on his next move.

11. Bg5?

Byrne errs, moving the bishop a second time instead of completing his development. Burgess, Nunn and Emms, as well as Wade and O'Connell, suggest 11.Be2, protecting the king and preparing kingside castling.[5][8] Flear–Morris, Dublin 1991, continued 11.Be2 Nfd7 12.Qa3 Bxf3 13.Bxf3 e5 14.dxe5 Qe8 15.Be2 Nxe5 16.0-0 and White was slightly better.[5] Byrne doubtless thought that Black's slight lead in development would be transitory, not anticipating the maelstrom that his young opponent now initiates.

11... Na4!!

"One of the most powerful moves of all time." (Jonathan Rowson).[9] Fischer offers an ingenious knight sacrifice. If Byrne played 12.Nxa4, Fischer would play Nxe4, leaving Byrne with some terrible choices:
  • 13.Qxe7 Qa5+ 14.b4 Qxa4 15.Qxe4 Rfe8 16.Be7 Bxf3 17.gxf3 Bf8 produces a deadly pin;
  • 13.Bxe7 Nxc5 14.Bxd8 Nxa4 15.Bg5 Bxf3 16.gxf3 Nxb2 gives Fischer an extra pawn and ruins Byrne's pawn structure;
  • 13.Qc1 Qa5+ 14.Nc3 Bxf3 15.gxf3 Nxg5 regains the sacrificed piece with a better position and extra pawn;
  • 13.Qb4 Nxg5 14.Nxg5 Bxd1 15.Kxd1 Bxd4 16.Qd2 Bxf2 with a winning material advantage (Fischer).

12. Qa3 Nxc3 13. bxc3 Nxe4!

Fischer again offers material in order to open the e-file and get at White's uncastled king.

14. Bxe7 Qb6 15. Bc4

Byrne wisely declines the offered material. If 15.Bxf8 Bxf8 16.Qb3, Fischer analyzes 16...Nxc3! 17.Qxb6 (17.Qxc3?? Bb4 wins the queen) axb6 18.Ra1 Re8+ 19.Kd2 Ne4+ 20.Kc2 Nxf2 21.Rg1 Bf5+, which he considers winning for Black. Also strong is 16...Re8 17.Qxb6 (17.Be2 Nxc3!) axb6 18.Be2 Nxc3 19.Rd2 Bb4 20.Kf1 Ne4 21.Rb2 Bc3 22.Rc2 Nd2+! 23.Kg1 (23.Nxd2 Bxe2+ 24.Kg1 Bd3! 25.Rc1 Bxd2 leaves Black with a winning material advantage) Rxe2 24.Rxc3 Nxf3+ 25.gxf3 Bh3 26.Rc1 Rxa2 leaving White absolutely paralyzed.
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 a8 black rook b8 black king c8 black king d8 black king e8 black rook f8 black king g8 black king h8 black king 8
7 a7 black pawn b7 black pawn c7 black king d7 black king e7 black king f7 black pawn g7 black bishop h7 black pawn 7
6 a6 black king b6 black queen c6 black pawn d6 black king e6 black king f6 black king g6 black pawn h6 black king 6
5 a5 black king b5 black king c5 white bishop d5 black king e5 black king f5 black king g5 black king h5 black king 5
4 a4 black king b4 black king c4 white bishop d4 white pawn e4 black king f4 black king g4 black bishop h4 black king 4
3 a3 white queen b3 black king c3 black knight d3 black king e3 black king f3 white knight g3 black king h3 black king 3
2 a2 white pawn b2 black king c2 black king d2 black king e2 black king f2 white pawn g2 white pawn h2 white pawn 2
1 a1 black king b1 black king c1 black king d1 white rook e1 black king f1 white king g1 black king h1 white rook 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
After 17.Kf1. Instead of protecting his queen, Fischer is about to launch a stunning counterattack with ...Be6.

15... Nxc3!

Now if 16.Qxc3, 16...Rfe8 pins the bishop to White's king, thus regaining the sacrificed piece with an extra pawn.

16. Bc5 Rfe8+ 17. Kf1

Byrne threatens Fischer's queen; Fischer brings his rook into play, misplacing Byrne's king. It appears that Fischer must solve his problems with his queen, whereupon White can play 18.Qxc3, with a winning material advantage.

17... Be6!!

This stunning resource is the move that made this game famous. Instead of saving his queen, Fischer offers to sacrifice it. Fischer pointed out that 17...Nb5? loses to 18.Bxf7+ Kxf7 19.Qb3+ Be6 20.Ng5+ Kg8 21.Nxe6 Nxd4 22.Nxd4+ Qxb3 23.Nxb3.[10]

18. Bxb6?

Byrne takes the offered queen, hoping to outplay his 13-year-old opponent in the ensuing complications. However, Fischer gets far too much for his queen, leaving Byrne with a hopeless game. The move 18.Bxe6 would have been even worse, leading to a smothered mate with 18...Qb5+ 19.Kg1 Ne2+ 20.Kf1 Ng3+ 21.Kg1 Qf1+! 22.Rxf1 Ne2#. White's 18.Qxc3 would have been met by 18...Qxc5! and if 19.dxc5, Bxc3. White's best chance may have been 18.Bd3 Nb5!, which Kmoch wrote would also result in "a win for Black in the long run".[11]
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 a8 black king b8 black king c8 black king d8 black king e8 black rook f8 black king g8 black king h8 black king 8
7 a7 black king b7 black pawn c7 black king d7 black king e7 black king f7 black pawn g7 black bishop h7 black pawn 7
6 a6 black king b6 white queen c6 black pawn d6 black king e6 black king f6 black king g6 black pawn h6 black king 6
5 a5 black king b5 black king c5 black king d5 black king e5 black king f5 black king g5 black king h5 black king 5
4 a4 black rook b4 black king c4 black bishop d4 black king e4 black king f4 black king g4 black king h4 black king 4
3 a3 black king b3 black king c3 black king d3 black king e3 black king f3 white knight g3 black king h3 black king 3
2 a2 white pawn b2 black king c2 black king d2 black king e2 black king f2 white pawn g2 white pawn h2 white pawn 2
1 a1 black king b1 black king c1 black king d1 black knight e1 black king f1 black king g1 white king h1 white rook 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
After 25...Nxd1. Fischer has gotten more than enough material for his sacrificed queen.
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8 a8 black king b8 white queen c8 black king d8 black king e8 black king f8 black king g8 black king h8 black king 8
7 a7 black king b7 black king c7 black king d7 black king e7 black king f7 black pawn g7 black king h7 black king 7
6 a6 black king b6 black king c6 black pawn d6 black king e6 black king f6 black king g6 black pawn h6 black king 6
5 a5 black king b5 black pawn c5 black bishop d5 black bishop e5 white knight f5 black king g5 black king h5 black pawn 5
4 a4 black king b4 black king c4 black king d4 black king e4 black knight f4 black king g4 black king h4 white pawn 4
3 a3 black king b3 black king c3 black king d3 black king e3 black king f3 black king g3 black king h3 black king 3
2 a2 black rook b2 black king c2 black king d2 black king e2 black king f2 black king g2 white pawn h2 black king 2
1 a1 black king b1 black king c1 black king d1 black king e1 black king f1 black king g1 white king h1 black king 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
After 35...Bc5+; mate is inevitable.

18... Bxc4+

Fischer now begins a 'windmill' series of discovered checks, picking up material.

19. Kg1 Ne2+ 20. Kf1 Nxd4+ 21. Kg1

21.Rd3? axb6 22.Qc3 Nxf3 23.Qxc4 Re1# (Fischer).

21... Ne2+ 22. Kf1 Nc3+ 23. Kg1 axb6

Fischer captures a piece, simultaneously attacking Byrne's queen.

24. Qb4 Ra4!

Fischer's pieces cooperate nicely: the bishop on g7 protects the knight on c3, which protects the rook on a4, which in turn protects the bishop on c4 and forces Byrne's queen away. Perhaps Byrne overlooked this move when analyzing 18.Bxb6, expecting instead 24...Nxd1? 25.Qxc4, which is much less clear. Otherwise, it is hard to explain why Byrne played 18.Bxb6, since Black now has a clearly winning position.

25. Qxb6

Unfortunately for Byrne, he has nothing better than this pawn-grab, since he has no queen move available to protect his threatened rook on d1.

25... Nxd1

Fischer has gained a rook, two bishops, and a pawn for his sacrificed queen, leaving him ahead the equivalent, roughly, of one minor piece – an easily winning advantage in master play. White's queen is far outmatched by Black's pieces, which dominate the board and will soon overrun White's position. Moreover, Byrne's remaining rook is stuck on h1 and it will take precious time (and the loss of the pawn on f2) to free it. Byrne could resign here, but plays on until checkmate.[12]

26. h3 Rxa2 27. Kh2 Nxf2 28. Re1 Rxe1 29. Qd8+ Bf8 30. Nxe1 Bd5 31. Nf3 Ne4 32. Qb8 b5

Note that every piece and pawn of Black's is defended, leaving White's queen with nothing to do.

33. h4 h5 34. Ne5 Kg7

Fischer breaks the pin, allowing the bishop to attack as well.

35. Kg1 Bc5+

Now Fischer "peels away" the white king from its last defender, and uses his pieces in concert to force checkmate.

36. Kf1 Ng3+ 37. Ke1 Bb4+

Kmoch notes that with 37...Re2+ Fischer could have mated a move sooner.[13]

38. Kd1 Bb3+ 39. Kc1 Ne2+ 40. Kb1 Nc3+ 41. Kc1 Rc2# 0–1

Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
8  black king  white queen  black king  black king  black king  black king  black king  black king 8
7  black king  black king  black king  black king  black king  black pawn  black king  black king 7
6  black king  black king  black pawn  black king  black king  black king  black pawn  black king 6
5  black king  black pawn  black king  black king  white knight  black king  black king  black pawn 5
4  black king  black bishop  black king  black king  black king  black king  black king  white pawn 4
3  black king  black bishop  black knight  black king  black king  black king  black king  black king 3
2  black king  black king  black rook  black king  black king  black king  white pawn  black king 2
1  black king  black king  white king  black king  black king  black king  black king  black king 1
Solid white.svg a b c d e f g h Solid white.svg
Final position

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Chess Review, December 1956, p. 374. Also available on DVD (p. 418 on Chess Review 1956 PDF file).
  2. ^ Graham Burgess, John Nunn, and John Emms, The Mammoth Book of The World's Greatest Chess Games, Carroll & Graf, 1998, p. 213. ISBN 0-7867-0587-6.
  3. ^ Golombek, p. 52
  4. ^ Burgess, Nunn, and Emms, p. 216.
  5. ^ a b c Burgess, Nunn, and Emms, p. 214.
  6. ^ Arthur Bisguier and Andrew Soltis, American Chess Masters from Morphy to Fischer, Macmillan, 1974, pp. 272, 275. ISBN 0-02-511050-0.
  7. ^ Bisguier–Benko, U.S. Championship 1963–64
  8. ^ Robert Wade and Kevin J. O'Connell, Bobby Fischer's Chess Games (2nd ed. 1973), p. 111. ISBN 0-385-08627-X.
  9. ^ Rowson, Jonathan (1999). Understanding the Grünfeld. Gambit Publications. p. 17. ISBN 1-901983-09-9. 
  10. ^ Bobby Fischer, Bobby Fischer's Games of Chess, Simon and Schuster, 1959, p. 65.
  11. ^ I.A. Horowitz and Jack Straley Battell, The Best in Chess, E.P. Dutton & Co., 1965, pp. 329-30.
  12. ^ One of Byrne's chess students related later why he played on: "First of all, you have to remember that in 1956 no one knew that Bobby Fischer was going to become Bobby Fischer! He was just a very promising 13-year-old kid who played a great game against me. When it got to the position where I was lost, I asked some of the other competitors if it might be a nice thing to let the kid mate me, as a kind of tribute to the fine game he played. They said, 'Sure, why not?' and so I did." Tim Krabbé, Open Chess Diary (scroll down to No. 241) (quoting Don Heisman).
  13. ^ I.A. Horowitz and Jack Straley Battell, The Best in Chess, E.P. Dutton & Co., 1965, p. 330.

References

External links


Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Game - получить на Академике действующий промокод Fairy Season или выгодно game купить со скидкой на распродаже в Fairy Season

  • The Game of the Century — is a name frequently given to outstanding matches of some sport or competition. Some of them include:*The Game of the Century (chess), a chess game between Donald Byrne and Bobby Fischer in 1956 *Game of the Century (college basketball), a… …   Wikipedia

  • Development of the World Chess Championship — Further information: World Chess Championship The concept of a world chess champion started to emerge in the first half of the 19th century, and the phrase world champion appeared in 1845. From this time onwards various players were acclaimed as… …   Wikipedia

  • Match of the Century — As well as its general use as a superlative, the term Match of the Century may specifically refer to: Hungary 6 England 3 (1953) First game to see England defeated since the codification of association soccer from outside the British Isles. The… …   Wikipedia

  • Chess in the arts and literature — The Chess Players by Honoré Daumier (1863) Chess became a source of inspiration in the arts in literature soon after the spread of the game to the Arab World and Europe in the Middle Ages. The earliest works of art centered around the game are… …   Wikipedia

  • CHESS — The Jewish contribution to chess on an appreciable scale dates from the middle of the 19th century. There is no basis for the claim that Jews invented chess, or that King Solomon played the game, as is related in the Midrash (Ginzberg, Legends 4 …   Encyclopedia of Judaism

  • Chess theory — The game of chess is commonly divided into three phases: the opening, middlegame, and endgame.[1] As to each of these phases, especially the opening and endgame, there is a large body of theory as how the game should be played. Those who write… …   Wikipedia

  • Chess notation — is the term for several systems that have developed to record either the moves made during a game of chess or the position of the pieces on a chess board. The earliest systems of notation used lengthy narratives to describe each move; these… …   Wikipedia

  • The Staunton-Morphy controversy — concerns the failure of negotiations in 1858 for a chess match between Howard Staunton and Paul Morphy and later interpretations of the actions of the two players. The details of the events are not universally agreed, and accounts and… …   Wikipedia

  • Chess piece relative value — …   Wikipedia

  • Chess (poem) — Chess Front page of the 1585 edition Author Jan Kochanowski Original Title Szachy Country Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth …   Wikipedia