Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.

Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 28, 1955
Decided March 28, 1955
Full case name Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Glenshaw Glass Company
Citations 348 U.S. 426 (more)
75 S. Ct. 473; 99 L. Ed. 483; 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1508; 55-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P9308; 47 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 162; 1955-1 C.B. 207
Prior history Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Holding
The Court held that Congress, in enacting the income taxation statutes, intended to tax all gain except that which was specifically exempted.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Warren, joined by Black, Reed, Franfurter, Burton, Clark, Minton
Dissent Douglas
Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426 (1955),[1] was an important income tax case before the United States Supreme Court. The Court held as follows:

  • Congress, in enacting income taxation statutes that comprehend "gains or profits and income derived from any source whatever," intended to tax all gain except that which was specifically exempted.
  • Income is not limited to "the gain derived from capital, from labor, or from both combined."
  • Although the Court used this characterization in Eisner v. Macomber, it "was not meant to provide a touchstone to all future gross income questions."
  • Instead, income is realized whenever there are "instances of [1] undeniable accessions to wealth, [2] clearly realized, and [3] over which the taxpayers have complete dominion."
  • Under this definition, punitive damages qualify as "income" -- even though they are not derived from capital or from labor.

Contents

Facts

Two factually distinct cases were consolidated because they presented the same issue.

  • In one case, the defendant Glenshaw Glass Company had won an award of punitive damages in an antitrust lawsuit. The defendant did not declare this award as income or pay taxes on it, claiming that it was not subject to taxation. The Internal Revenue Service brought suit to collect the tax.
  • In another case, William Goldman Theatres, Inc. neglected to report punitive damages as income. Again, the Internal Revenue Service sued to collect the tax.

Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Chief Justice Earl Warren, held that the award of treble damages was taxable income.

In the opinion, Warren pointed out that the language of section 22(a) (the predecessor of current section 61(a)) was employed by Congress in order utilize "the full measure of its taxing power," as provided for under the Sixteenth Amendment. Essentially, Congress, in enacting section 22(a), intended to tax all gains except those specifically exempted.

The Court then held that the amounts received by the taxpayers in this case were "instances of undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have complete dominion."

This three-part "test" for determining income is broader than the earlier test employed by the Court in Eisner v. Macomber, and is to this day the preferred test for identifying gross income.

See also

Further reading

  • Dodge, Joseph M. (2002). "The Story of Glenshaw Glass: Towards a Modern Concept of Gross Income". In Caron, Paul L. (ed.). Tax stories: An in-depth look at ten leading federal income tax cases. New York: Foundation Press. pp. 15–52. ISBN 1587784033. 
  • Donaldson, Samuel A. (2005). Federal Income Taxation of Individuals: Cases, Problems & Materials. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West. pp. 49–52. ISBN 0314144293. 

References

  1. ^ Text of Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426 (1955) is available from: Justia · Findlaw

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Игры ⚽ Нужно решить контрольную?

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Commissioner v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co. — Commissioner v. Indianapolis Power Light Company Supreme Court of the United States Argued October 31 …   Wikipedia

  • Commissioner v. Kowalski — Supreme Court of the United States Argued October 12, 1977 Decided November …   Wikipedia

  • Hornung v. Commissioner — [1] (First Issue)United States Tax Court, 196747 T.C. 428Issues#Whether the value of a 1962 Chevrolet Corvette won by Paul Hornung (taxpayer) for his performance in the 1961 National Football League championship game should be included in his… …   Wikipedia

  • Clark v. Commissioner — Clark v. Commissioner, 40 B.T.A. 333, 335 (B.T.A. 1939) was an important early United States income tax case. Contents 1 Background 1.1 Facts 1.2 Deficiency assessed 2 Op …   Wikipedia

  • Gross income — is commonly defined as the amount of a company s or a person s income before all deductions or any taxpayer’s income, except that which is specifically excluded by the Internal Revenue Code, before taking deductions or taxes into account. For a… …   Wikipedia

  • Taxation of illegal income in the United States — In the United States, the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) was enacted by the U.S. Congress in part for the purpose of taxing net income. [ Commissioner v. Tellier , 383 U.S. 687, 691, 86 S. Ct. 1118, 66 1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) paragr. 9319 (1966).] The …   Wikipedia

  • Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution — The Sixteenth Amendment (Amendment XVI) of the United States Constitution was ratified on February 3, 1913. This Amendment overruled Pollock v. Farmers Loan Trust Co. (1895), which greatly limited the Congress s authority to levy an income tax.… …   Wikipedia

  • Cancellation of Debt (COD) Income — Part of a series on Taxation Taxation in the United States …   Wikipedia

  • Murphy v. IRS — Marrita Murphy and Daniel J. Leveille, Appellants v. Internal Revenue Service and United States of America, Appellees (commonly known as Murphy v. IRS),[1] is a controversial tax case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the District… …   Wikipedia

  • Income tax in the United States — UStaxationThe federal government of the United States imposes a progressive tax on the taxable income of individuals, partnerships, companies, corporations, trusts, decedents estates, and certain bankruptcy estates. Some state and municipal… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”