- Proto-World language
The term Proto-World language refers to the hypothetical,
most recent common ancestorof all the world's languages – an ancient proto-languagefrom which are derived all modern languages, all language families, and all dead languages known from the past 6,000 years of recorded history.
linguistic monogenesis, Proto-World is theorized to have been spoken roughly 50,000 to 100,000 years ago, the time speculated by archaeogeneticsfor the phylogeneticseparation of the ancestors of all humans alive today. However, there is no guarantee that Proto-World is not younger (or older) than this, thereby making phylogenetics irrelevant to the dating of the language.
In such a scenario, Proto-World would spread from a small population out to other human populations long after they separated. Note also that it would not necessarily be the first language spoken altogether, but only the latest common ancestor of all languages known today, and already may have looked back on a long evolution, and even may have existed alongside other languages of which no trace survived into historical times. For example, it is disputed whether "
Homo neanderthalensis" had the faculty of speech. If they did, their language in all probability would not have been derived from Proto-World as defined above. Furthermore, if they had a language, this would substantiate the claim for the existence of Proto-World, without making any prediction as to its form, because it would imply that the origin of languagepredates human phylogenetic separation.
Many question the underlying theory of
monogenesis, the assumption that all known languages do derive from a common ancestor, suggesting that language may have developed independently in different groups of early humans from proto-linguistic means of communication, thereby disputing the existence of Proto-World, or at least shifting focus to glottogonic issues. This debate is essentially about the definition of the term language, and about whether the system of communication employed by human beings at the time of Mitochondrial Evequalifies as a language in the narrow sense.
In 1917 the Russian linguist Nikolay Marr expounded a monogenetic theory of language that resolves all modern languages to four primordial exclamations.
Drawing on the works of
Vladislav Illich-Svitych, the American linguist Joseph Greenbergclaimed that long-distance relationships can be shown by applying a controversial approach he called " mass lexical comparison". The languages are compared by using a limited set of words (including function words and affixes) simply by means of counting cognates. He used this method to establish a classification of African languages. His work has generated considerable interest outside the linguistic community. It is still much debated. Sergei Starostin[http://starling.rinet.ru/cgi-bin/bdescr.cgi?root=config&morpho=0&basename=%5Cdata%5Ceura%5Cglobet] cautiously suggested a number of roots from the "Borean language" - the hypothetical ancestor of different language families of the northern hemisphere; possible etymological matches between what he considered the five major macrofamilies of the Old World, Eurasiatic, Afroasiatic, Sino-Caucasianand Austricwith potential parallels from Amerindand several African language families added, but noting that it is still much too early to talk of a reconstructed " Proto-Borean" language, let alone Proto-World. Merritt Ruhlenis one of the most vocal and controversial supporters of the Proto-World hypothesis.
comparative methodis a technique used by linguists to demonstrate genetic relationships between languages. Using this method linguists can attempt to reconstruct a proto-language from its various daughter languages. Cognatesare words that have a common origin. Examples include: English mouse, German Maus, Swedish mus, Russian myš', Polish mysz, Greek mys. Using the comparative method linguists conclude that the Proto-Indo-European languageword for mouse was mūs. Some linguists have identified what they claim are possible cognates that could be evidence of a proto-world language. Joseph Greenbergproposed using a core of 300 words that he felt constituted the core of any language. These include pronouns, body parts and family members. He believed that these core words change much more slowly than others and are a good indicator for a genetic relationship between languages. [ [http://ehl.santafe.edu/intro1.htm The evolution of human languages] ]
The following table shows some roots in various language families which show similarities. ["The Origin of Language: Tracing the Evolution of the Mother Tongue" by
Merritt Ruhlen, 1996, p. 103. The table represents less than half of a set compiled by Bengtson & Ruhlen in 1994.] The symbol V stands for a vowel.
Some of the Indo-European words that come from words in this table are qui (Latin), who, aqua (Latin), digit, bough (from the root bhāghu- meaning elbow or shoulder), fud (dialectal English for vulva).
Based on these correspondences, linguist
Merritt Ruhlen[See the essay 'Global Etymologies' by John D. Bengtson and Merritt Ruhlenn in "On the Origin of Languages: Studies in Linguistic Taxonomy" by Merritt Ruhlen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994. ] has developed a table of basic words in Proto World:
*"Ku" = Who?
*"Ma" = What?
*"Pal" = Two
*"Akwa" = Water
*"Kw" = Drink
*"Kway" = Wet
*"Tik" = Finger, Toe, One
*"KanV" = Arm
*"Bungn" = Knee, Bend
*"Sum" = Hair
*"PutV" = Vulva, Vagina
*"Cuna" = Nose, Smell
Critics say that from a purely statistical point of view, even among any two unrelated languages, there will most likely be a number of similar-sounding words with similar meanings (see also
In addition, situations are conceivable in which a completely new language may have arisen even at later times. There is no known instance of such an event for spoken languages, but the
Nicaraguan Sign Languageis an example of a non-articulate language which arose naturally among deaf children raised by hearing parents [http://www.columbia.edu/~as1038/pdf/Senghas1995a.pdf] . However some consider Nicaraguan Sign Language to be an invalid example of spontaneous language generation since pre-existing gestures used by the surrounding hearing-capable population may likely have been its basis. There is no known fully developed spoken language that has emerged spontaneously from a non-speaking population.
Origin of language
Sun Language Theory
* Hock, Hans Henrich & Joseph, Brian D. (1996). "Language History, Language Change, and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics". Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Chapter 17.
* [http://www.zompist.com/langorg.htm Proto-World and the Language Instinct]
* [http://www.zompist.com/proto Deriving Proto-World with tools you probably have at home] A critique of the "maliq'a" world etymology from a methodological point of view
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Proto-Germanic language — Proto Germanic Spoken in Northern Europe Extinct evolved into Proto Norse, Gothic, Frankish and Ingvaeonic by the 4th century Language family Indo European … Wikipedia
Proto-Celtic language — Proto Celtic Geographic distribution: Europe Linguistic classification: Indo European Proto Celtic Subdivisions: Celtic languages … Wikipedia
Proto-Human language — The Proto Human language (also Proto Sapiens, Proto World) is the hypothetical most recent common ancestor of all the world s languages. The concept of Proto Human presupposes monogenesis of all recorded spoken human languages. It does not… … Wikipedia
Proto-Kartvelian language — The Proto Kartvelian language, or Common Kartvelian, is the hypothetical common ancestor of the Kartvelian languages in the Caucasus, which was spoken by the ancestors of the modern Kartvelian peoples. The existence of such a language is widely… … Wikipedia
Proto-Uralic language — Proto Uralic is the hypothetical language ancestral to the Uralic language family, which includes Finno Ugric and Samoyedic. The language was originally spoken in a small area in about 4000 BCE, and expanded to give differentiated protolanguages … Wikipedia
Proto-Romanian language — Proto Romanian (also known as Common Romanian , româna comună or Ancient Romanian , străromâna) is a Romance language evolved from Vulgar Latin and considered to have been spoken by the ancestors of today s Romanians and related Balkan Latin… … Wikipedia
Proto-language — *A proto language is a language which was the common ancestor of related languages that form a language family. *In historical linguistics, a synonymous term proposed language [redirected here] is a language for which no direct evidence exists,… … Wikipedia
Proto-Slavic — is the proto language from which Slavic languages later emerged. It was spoken before the seventh century AD. As with most other proto languages, no attested writings have been found; the language has been reconstructed by applying the… … Wikipedia
Proto-Balto-Slavic language — Proto Balto Slavic Geographic distribution: northeastern Europe Linguistic classification: Indo European Proto Balto Slavic Subdivisions: Balto Slavic languages Proto Balto Slavic … Wikipedia
Proto-Germanic — Infobox Language name=Proto Germanic nativename= pronunciation= region=Northern Europe extinct=evolved into Proto Norse, Gothic, Frankish and Ingvaeonic by the 4th century familycolor=Indo European fam2=Germanic script=Elder Futhark iso2=gem 750… … Wikipedia