Appeal to consequences

Appeal to consequences

Appeal to consequences, also known as argumentum ad consequentiam (Latin: "argument to the consequences"), is an argument that concludes a premise (typically a belief) to be either true or false based on whether the premise leads to desirable or undesirable consequences. This is based on an appeal to emotion and is a form of logical fallacy, since the desirability of a consequence does not address the truth value of the premise. Moreover, in categorizing consequences as either desirable or undesirable, such arguments inherently contain subjective points of view.

In logic, appeal to consequences refers only to arguments which assert a premise's truth value ("true or false") based on the consequences; appeal to consequences does not refer to arguments that address a premise's desirability ("good or bad", or "right or wrong") instead of its truth value. Therefore, an argument based on appeal to consequences is valid in ethics, and in fact such arguments are the cornerstones of many moral theories, particularly related to consequentialism.

General form

An argument based on "appeal to consequences" generally has one of two forms [ [ - Appeal to Consequences] ] :

Positive form

:If P, then Q will occur.:Q is desirable.:Therefore, P is true.

It is closely related to wishful thinking in its construction.


* "Pi is probably a rational number: being rational would make it more elegant."
* "Real estate markets will continue to rise this year: home owners enjoy the capital gains."
* "Humans will travel faster than light: faster-than-light travel would be beneficial for space travel."

Negative form

:If P, then Q will occur.:Q is undesirable.:Therefore, P is false.

Appeal to force (argumentum ad baculum) is a special instance of this form.

This form somewhat resembles modus tollens but is both different and fallacious, since "Q is undesirable" is not equivalent to "Q is false".


* "The axiom of choice must be wrong because it implies the Banach-Tarski paradox, meaning that geometry contradicts common sense."
* "Wikipedia is seldom wrong: it would not be a reliable source if it contained many errors."
* "Atheism must be erroneous: it denies eternal happiness after death." (see Pascal's Wager)
* "Free will must exist: if it didn't, we would all be machines."
* "If the six men win, it will mean that the police are guilty of perjury, that they are guilty of violence and threats, that the confessions were invented and improperly admitted in evidence and the convictions were erroneous... This is such an appalling vista that every sensible person in the land would say that it cannot be right that these actions should go any further." Lord Denning in his judgment on the Birmingham Six
*Veljko Milkovic's 'Cart with Pendulum' must be fraudulent, because it contradicts the Laws of Action and Reaction.


ee also

*Appeal to fear
*Wishful thinking
*Argumentum ad hominem "circumstantial" form
*List of logical fallacies
*Pascal's Wager

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Appeal (disambiguation) — Appeal may refer to:* Appeal ndash; in law an appeal is a challenge of a judicial judgement to a higher authority, usually called an appellate court. * Appeal (motion) ndash; in parliamentary procedure an appeal is a challenge of the chair s… …   Wikipedia

  • Appeal to emotion — is a fallacy which uses the manipulation of the recipient s emotions, rather than valid logic, to win an argument. This kind of appeal to emotion is a type of red herring and encompasses several logical fallacies, including: * Appeal to… …   Wikipedia

  • Appeal to ridicule — Appeal to ridicule, also called the Horse Laugh [ [ to ridicule.html Nizkor Project Appeal to Ridicule] ] , is a logical fallacy which presents the opponent s argument in a way that appears… …   Wikipedia

  • Appeal to flattery — is a fallacy in which a person uses flattery, excessive compliments, in an attempt to win support for their side.Flattery is often used to hide the true intent of an idea or proposal. Praise offers a momentary personal distraction that can often… …   Wikipedia

  • Appeal to pity — An appeal to pity (also called argumentum ad misericordiam) is a fallacy in which someone tries to win support for their argument or idea by exploiting her or his opponent s feelings of pity or guilt. The appeal to pity is a specific kind of… …   Wikipedia

  • List of fallacies — For specific popular misconceptions, see List of common misconceptions. A fallacy is incorrect argumentation in logic and rhetoric resulting in a lack of validity, or more generally, a lack of soundness. Contents 1 Formal fallacies 1.1… …   Wikipedia

  • Argumentum ad populum — In logic, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for appeal to the people ) is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or most people believe it; it alleges: If many believe so, it is so. This type of argument is known …   Wikipedia

  • Utilitarianism — This article discusses utilitarian ethical theory. For a discussion of John Stuart Mill s book Utilitarianism, see Utilitarianism (book). For the architectural theory, see Utilitarianism (architecture) Part of a series on …   Wikipedia

  • Wishful thinking — For other uses, see Wishful thinking (disambiguation). Wishful thinking is the formation of beliefs and making decisions according to what might be pleasing to imagine instead of by appealing to evidence, rationality or reality. Studies have… …   Wikipedia

  • Creation–evolution controversy — A satirical cartoon from 1882, parodying Darwin s theory of evolution, in response to the publication of The Formation of Vegetable Mould Through the Action of Worms. The creation–evolution controversy (also termed the creation vs. evolution… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.