Roundaboutness, or "roundabout methods of production", is the term used to describe the process whereby capital goods are produced first and then, with the help of the capital goods, the desired consumer goods are produced.

The term was devised by the Austrian School economist Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, who maintained that it was consumer demand, and not necessarily the supply of savings, that would determine the capital investment in any industry.

The Austrian economist Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk argued against both the Ricardian labor theory of price and Marx's theory of exploitation. On the former, he contended that return on capital arises from the "roundabout" nature of production. A steel ladder, for example, will be produced and brought to market only if the demand supports the digging of iron ore, the smelting of steel, the machines that press that steel into ladder shape, the machines that make and help maintain those machines, etc. Advocates of the labour theory of value point out that every step in that process, however roundabout, involves labor. But Böhm-Bawerk said that what they missed was the process itself, the roundaboutness, which necessarily involves the passage of time.

Roundabout processes, Böhm-Bawerk maintained, lead to a price that pays for more than labor value. This makes it unnecessary to postulate exploitation in order to understand the return on capital, although how the length of the production process in and of itself produces value remains unclear, as if Böhm-Bawerk's idea were correct, the more inefficient a capitalist manufacturer, the longer their production process and the more profit they would accrue. When in fact the additional costs they incur through their inefficient production process would prevent them from selling their output at the market price. Rather than accruing higher profits therefore, they would accrue none at all.

The concept has similarities to the later Keynesian theory developed in the 1930s. A critique of roundaboutness was presented by Paul Samuelson during the Cambridge capital controversy.

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Roundaboutness — Round a*bout ness, n. The quality of being roundabout; circuitousness. [1913 Webster] …   The Collaborative International Dictionary of English

  • roundaboutness — index indirection (indirect action) Burton s Legal Thesaurus. William C. Burton. 2006 …   Law dictionary

  • roundaboutness — noun see roundabout I …   New Collegiate Dictionary

  • roundaboutness — round·about·ness …   English syllables

  • roundaboutness — noun see roundabout II * * * roundˈaboutness noun • • • Main Entry: ↑round …   Useful english dictionary

  • Многоступенчатость («окольное» производство) — ROUNDABOUTNESS Способ производства, который занимает много времени, однако является более эффективным. Рыбу, например, можно ловить руками простым, но малоэффективным способом. Если потратить какое то время на изготовление удочки, т.е. приложить… …   Словарь-справочник по экономике

  • Cambridge capital controversy — The Cambridge capital controversy was a 1960s debate in economics concerning the nature and role of capital goods (or means of production). The name arises because of the location of those most involved in the controversy: the debate was largely… …   Wikipedia

  • Austrian School — Part of a series on Libertarianism Austrian School …   Wikipedia

  • roundabout — I. adjective Date: 1608 circuitous, indirect < had to take a roundabout route > • roundaboutness noun II. noun Date: 1755 1. a circuitous route ; detour …   New Collegiate Dictionary

  • Friedrich Hayek — Infobox Philosopher region = Western Philosophy era = 20th century philosophy color = #B0C4DE name = Friedrich August von Hayek birth = birth date|1899|5|8 Vienna, Austria Hungary death = death date and age|1992|3|23|1899|5|8 Freiburg, Germany… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”

We are using cookies for the best presentation of our site. Continuing to use this site, you agree with this.