- Philosophy of war
The philosophy of war examines
warbeyond the typical questions of weaponryand strategy, inquiring into such things as the meaning and etiologyof war, the relationship between war and human nature, and the ethicsof war. Certain aspects of the philosophy of war may overlap with the philosophy of history, political philosophyand the philosophy of law.
Works about the philosophy of war
by different means"; i.e. that war must not exist only for its own sake. It must serve some purpose for the state.
Leo Tolstoy's novel " War and Peace" contains frequent philosophical digressions on the philosophy of war (and broader metaphysical speculations derived from Christianityand from Tolstoy's observations of the Napoleonic Wars). It was influential on later thought about war. Tolstoy's Christian-centered philosophy of war (especially his essays " A Letter to a Hindu" and " The Kingdom of God is Within You") was a direct influence on Gandhi's Hinduism-centered non-violent resistancephilosophy. Sun Tzuwrote a book titled " The Art of War", however its focus is mostly on weaponry and strategy instead of philosophy. Sun Tzu's observations are often broadened into a philosophy applied in situations extending well beyond war itself (see the main Wikipedia article on "The Art of War" for a discussion of the application of Sun Tzu's philosophy to areas other than war). Parts of Niccolò Machiavelli's masterpiece " The Prince" (as well as "Discourses") and parts of his own work titled "The Art of War" discuss some philosophical points relating to war, though neither book could be said to be a work in the philosophy of war
Apocalypse Now(an adaptation of Heart of Darkness) also contains a considerable amount of commentary on the philosophy of warfare, brutality, and human nature. The commentary is largely manifested in the dialogues between Colonel Kurtz and Captain Willard, but there are also more subtle statements about war in the behavior and philosophy of Colonel Kilgore.
Traditions of thought
Since the philosophy of war is often treated as a subset of another branch of philosophy (for example, political philosophy or the philosophy of law) it would be difficult to define any clear-cut schools of thought in the same sense that, e.g.,
Existentialismor Objectivism can be described as distinct movements. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy refers to Carl von Clausewitz is "the only (so-called) philosopher of war", implying that he is the only (major) philosophical writer who develops a philosophical system focusing "exclusively" on war. However, discernible traditions of thought on war have developed over time, so that some writers have been able to distinguish broad categories (if somewhat loosely).
Anatol Rapoport's introduction to his edition of the J. J. Graham translationof Clausewitz's "On War" identifies three main teleological traditions in the philosophy of war: the cataclysmic, the eschatological, and the political. ("On War", Rapoport's introduction, 13). These are not the only possible teleological philosophies of war, but only three of the most common. As Rapoport says,
::"To put it
metaphorically, in political philosophy war is compared to a game of strategy (like chess); in eschatological philosophy, to a mission or the dénouement of a drama; in cataclysmic philosophy, to a fireor an epidemic."
::"These do not, of course, exhaust the views of war prevailing at different times and at different places. For example, war has at times been viewed as a pastime or an
adventure, as the only proper occupation for a nobleman, as an affair of honor(for example, the days of chivalry), as a ceremony(e.g. among the Aztecs), as an outlet of aggressive instincts or a manifestation of a "death wish", as nature's way of ensuring the survival of the fittest, as an absurdity(e.g. among Eskimos), as a tenacious custom, destined to die out like slavery, and as a crime." ("On War", Rapoport's introduction, 17)
*The Cataclysmic school of thought, which was espoused by
Leo Tolstoyin his epic novel " War and Peace", sees war as a bane on humanity – whether avoidable or inevitable – which serves little purpose outside of causing destruction and suffering, and which may cause drastic change to society, but not in any teleological sense. Tolstoy's view may be placed under the subcategory of globalcataclysmic philosophy of war. Another subcategory of the cataclysmic school of thought is the ethnocentriccataclysmic, in which this view is focused specifically on the plight of a specific ethnicityor nation, for example the view in Judaismof war as a punishmentfrom Godon the Israelitesin certain books of the Tenakh ( Old Testament). As the Tenakh (in certain books) sees war as an ineluctable act of God, so Tolstoy especially emphasizes war as something that befalls man and is in no way under the influence of man's " free will", but is instead the result of irresistible globalforces. ("On War", Rapoport's introduction 16)
*The Eschatological school of thought sees all wars (or all major wars) as leading to some goal, and asserts that some final conflict will someday resolve the path followed by all wars and result in a massive upheaval of society and a subsequent new society free from war (in varying theories the resulting society may be either a
utopiaor a dystopia). There are two subsets of this view: the Messianic and the Global theory. The Marxistconcept of a communistworld ruled by the proletariatafter a final worldwide revolutionis an example of the global theory, and the Christianconcept of an Armageddonwar which will usher in the second comingof Christand the final defeat of Satanis an example of a theory that could fall under Global or Messianic. ("On War", Rapoport's introduction, 15) The messianiceschatological philosophy is derived from the Jewish-Christian concept of a Messiah, and sees wars as culminating in unification of humanity under a single faithor a single ruler. Crusades, Jihads, the Naziconcept of a Master Raceand the 19th century American concept of Manifest Destinymay also fall under this heading. ("On War", Rapoport's introduction, 15) (See main articles for more information: Christian eschatology, Jewish eschatology)
*The Political school of thought, of which Clausewitz was a proponent, sees war as a tool of the
state. On page 13 Rapoport says,
::"Clausewitz views war as a rational instrument of national
policy. The three words "rational", "instrument" and "national" are the key concepts of his paradigm. In this view, the decision to wage war "ought" to be rational, in the sense that it ought to be based on estimated costs and gains of war. Next, war "ought" to be instrumental, in the sense that it ought to be waged in order to achieve some goal, never for its own sake; and also in the sense that strategy and tactics ought to be directed towards just one end, namely towards victory. Finally, war "ought" to be national, in the sense that its objective should be to advance the interests of a national state and that the entire effort of the nation ought to be mobilized in the service of the military objective."
:He later characterizes the philosophy behind the
Vietnam Warand other Cold Warconflicts as "Neo-Clausewitzian". Rapoport also includes Machiavelli as an early example of the political philosophy of war ("On War", Rapoport's introduction, 13). Decades after his essay, the War on Terrorismand the Iraq War begun by the United Statesunder President George W. Bushin 2001 and 2003 have often been justified under the doctrine of preemption, a political motivation stating that the United States must use war to prevent further attacks such as the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Another possible system for categorizing different schools of thought on war can be found in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (see external links, below), based on
ethics. The SEP describes three major divisions in the ethics of war: the Realist, the Pacifist, and the Just War Theory. In a nutshell:
* Realists will typically hold that systems of
moralsand ethics which guide "individuals" within societies cannot realistically be applied to societies as a whole to govern the way they, as societies, interact with other societies. Hence, a state's purposes in war is simply to preserve its national interest. This kind of thinking is similar to Machiavelli's philosophy, and Thucydidesand Hobbesmay also fall under this category.
* Pacifists, however, maintain that a moral evaluation of war is possible, and that war is always found to be immoral.
Gandhi, Martin Luther Kingand Tolstoywere all famous advocates of pacifistic nonviolent resistance methods instead of war.
Just War Theory, along with pacifism, holds that morals do apply to war. However, unlike pacifism, according to Just War Theory it "is" possible for a war to be morally justified. The concept of a morally justified war underlies much of the concept International Law, such as the Geneva Conventions. Aristotle, Cicero, Augustine, Aquinas, and Hugo Grotiusare among the philosophers who have espoused some form of a just war philosophy. One common Just War Theory evaluation of war is that war is only justified if 1.) waged in a state or nation's self-defense, or 2.) waged in order to end gross violations of human rights. Political philosopher John Rawls advocated these criteria as justification for war.
*Clausewitz, Carl von, "On War". Middlesex, England: Penguin Books, 1968. J. J. Graham translation, 1908. Anatol Rapoport, editor. Introduction and notes (c) Anatol Rapoport, 1968.
Chanakya, " Arthashastra" [http://www.mssu.edu/projectsouthasia/history/primarydocs/Arthashastra/index.htm] , especially Book X [http://www.mssu.edu/projectsouthasia/history/primarydocs/Arthashastra/BookX.htm "Relating to War"] . Discusses war along with philosophical/religious observations about sacrificederived from Vedic scripture.
*Heindel, Max, "The Rosicrucian Philosophy in Questions and Answers - Volume II" ( [http://www.rosicrucian.com/2qa/2qaeng09.htm#question163 The Philosophy of War] , "World War I reference", ed. 1918), ISBN 0-911274-90-1. Describing a philosophy of war from the point of view of
*Rawls, John, "
The Law of Peoples". A discussion of international lawin the context of political liberalismwhich argues against the Clausewitzian conception of war between wholly autonomous states, seeking to replace it with a conception of a "fair and just" international society of peoples adhering to principles of international law.
Just War theory
* [http://www.iep.utm.edu/w/war.htm Philosophy of war page at the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
* [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/war/ Philosophy of war page at the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]
* [http://www.knox.army.mil/asl/list_philo.htm A reading list for great works in the philosophy of war]
* [http://www.nonresistance.org/literature.htm Readings about Christian nonresistance philosophy of war]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
War studies — is the multi disciplinary study of war. It is distinct from military history in that it encompasses a variety of fields: *Philosophy of war **Ethics of war **Deterrence theory *Psychology of war **Post traumatic stress disorder **Psychological… … Wikipedia
war, just — See just war … Philosophy dictionary
Philosophy — For other uses, see Philosophy (disambiguation) … Wikipedia
War — This article is about war in general. For other uses, see War (disambiguation) and The War (disambiguation). Warfare Military history Eras … Wikipedia
philosophy — noun (plural phies) Etymology: Middle English philosophie, from Anglo French, from Latin philosophia, from Greek, from philosophos philosopher Date: 14th century 1. a. (1) all learning exclusive of technical precepts and practical arts (2) the… … New Collegiate Dictionary
war — war1 /wawr/, n., v., warred, warring, adj. n. 1. a conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations or between parties within a nation; warfare, as by land, sea, or air. 2. a state or period of armed hostility or active military… … Universalium
Philosophy of history — or historiosophy is an area of philosophy concerning the eventual significance, if any, of human history. Furthermore, it speculates as to a possible teleological end to its development that is, it asks if there is a design, purpose, directive… … Wikipedia
philosophy — Philosophy in the early years of the twentieth century was heavily influenced by two different traditions. On the one hand, there was the legacy of the Europeanizing movement known as Krausism, a kind of secular humanism with a religious tinge … Encyclopedia of contemporary Spanish culture
War — • In its juridical sense, a contention carried on by force of arms between sovereign states, or communities having in this regard the right of states Catholic Encyclopedia. Kevin Knight. 2006. War War … Catholic encyclopedia
War in the Age of Intelligent Machines — (1991) is a book by Manuel de Landa that traces the history of warfare and of technology. It is influenced in part by Michel Foucault s Discipline and Punish (1978), and also reinterprets the concepts of war machines and the machinic phylum,… … Wikipedia