Louis le Brocquy

Infobox Artist
name = Louis le Brocquy

---

imagesize = 230px
caption = Photograph by Perry Ogden, 2000
birthdate = Birth date and age|1916|11|10|df=yes
location = Dublin, Ireland
deathdate =
deathplace =
nationality = Irish
field = Painting, Drawing, Sculpture, Printmaking, Ceramics, Tapestry, Illustration, Design
training = Self-taught
works = A Family, coll. The National Gallery of Ireland
The Tain illustrations
patrons =
awards = Premio Acquisto Internationale, Venice Biennale, 1956

http://www.lebrocquy.com

Louis le Brocquy (born 10 November 1916) is an Irish painter. Born in Dublin, Louis le Brocquy's work has received much international attention and many accolades in a career that spans seventy years of creative practice. In 1956, he represented Ireland at the Venice Biennale, winning the Premio Acquisito Internationale with "A Family" (coll. National Gallery of Ireland), subsequently included in the historic exhibition "Fifty Years of Modern Art" at Brussels, World Fair 1958. The same year he married the Irish painter Anne Madden and left London to work in the French Midi.

Le Brocquy is widely acclaimed for his evocative "Portrait ‘Heads" of literary figures and fellow artists, which include William Butler Yeats, James Joyce, and his friends Samuel Beckett, Francis Bacon and Seamus Heaney, in recent years le Brocquy's early "Tinker" subjects and Grey period "Family" paintings, have attracted headline attention on the international marketplace marking him as the fourth painter in Ireland and Britain to be evaluated within a very select group of artists, alongside Lucian Freud, David Hockney and Francis Bacon.

In Ireland, he is honoured as the first and only living painter to be included in the Permanent Irish Collection of the National Gallery of Ireland. To mark le Brocquy's 90th birthday some eleven one-person exhibitions were organised at home and abroad including the National Gallery of Ireland; the Tate; the Irish Museum of Modern Art; Dublin City Gallery The Hugh Lane; the Crawford Municipal Art Gallery, Cork; and the Hunt Museum, Limerick.

Early life

Eldest son of Albert le Brocquy (1888-1976), Honorary Secretary of the League of Nations Society, Ireland, and Sybil, née Staunton (1892-1973), co-founder of Amnesty International, Ireland; the latter was an acknowledged authority on the life and works of Jonathan Swift and prominent within the city's literary circles. Parents friendly with W.B. Yeats and family. Named after his grandfathers, his father and his maternal uncle Herbert, who had died at sixteen from a kick on the head playing rugby for Clongowes Wood College, Co. Kildare. According to the artist's biographer Anne Madden le Brocquy: ‘Herbert's memory was cherished in the family throughout Louis’ boyhood and marked the child's mind with a tragic image of his injured head.’ Attends Miss Sweeney's Mount Temple school (1924-26), where Elizabeth Yeats, co-founder with her sister Lily of the historic Cuala Press, teaches art. Earliest childhood drawings made there include the arms of Dublin City, a subject to which le Brocquy will return in old age in his illustrations for James Joyce's "Dubliners" (1986). Contemplating an early predisposition for painting le Brocquy says: ‘At birth I was the subject of an unusual genetic experiment; my right eye long-sighted, my left which could see clearly to within a foot or two. This meant of course that I could not see three-dimensionally, which in turn made it difficult to judge whether a distant figure was coming or going, or at which point of space in relationship to myself a ball might be bowled at cricket. Later on this greatly interested a London ophthalmologist named Dr. Trevor-Roper who, with his brother Hugh Trevor-Roper of Magdalen College, Oxford, studied art in relation to optical vision. Later, again, I realised that my own two-dimensional vision corresponded exactly with the painted surface before me. Here I was in my element.’ Educated at St. Gerard's School, Bray, Co. Wicklow (1926-34), the young boy undergoes a painful loss of religious faith. Gesa E. Thiessen observes: ‘In his youth le Brocquy was, as he himself states, very religious, in fact, he secretly believed he was to become a monk. However, in his last year at primary school he experienced the painful loss of faith due to the doctrinaire Roman Catholic teachings in his school on mariology, on the question of salvation of non-Roman Catholics and on the concept of transubstantiation which for him seemed entirely metaphysical and little related to actuality.’

Holidays spent in Glendalough and his grandfather's home in Co. Roscommon fire his imaginative life: ‘It was there that it dawned on me that life was not ordained, as we had been led to believe, but had mysteriously emerged and continued to emerge through some magic compulsion in which all nature secretly shared.’ Stuart Dodgson Collingwood, a nephew of Lewis Carroll, perceives his creative gifts and encourages him to become an artist. Le Brocquy, however, has no such plans at the time and shows little more than a casual interest in art: ‘I did try to make a number of landscape watercolours up to the age of thirteen. At which point I realised that these were nothing but imitative versions of works I was somehow led to emulate. I destroyed them. That put me off painting for a while.’ Studies chemistry at Kevin Street Technical School (1934), and, later, as an extra mural student attends Trinity College, Dublin (1934-36), while working at Greenmount Oil Refinery, the family business established in Harolds Cross by his paternal grandfather, Louis le Brocquy (1861-1950). Of his family background le Brocquy says: ‘My great-grandfather Ange van den Eynde, was said to have been involved as a boy in the Belgian War of Independence of 1830, capturing riderless Dutch horses for the rebels. Afterwards, on manoeuvres with a battery of field artillery, he was thrown from his horse under a gun-carriage, injuring his leg. Unable to ride thereafter, he maintained his love and exceptional judgement of that animal, which eventually led him via Chelsea, London, to his home at Newgrove, Raheny, Dublin, where he married a Kilkenny girl named Anne Walsh and passed a good-humoured and expansive life buying strings of Irish horses for the Belgian cavalry remount ... When I was a young man (with the derisory term West-British in mind) I occasionally referred to myself ironically as a "West-Belgian". No-one seemed to me less manifestly Irish than that small family whose name I bore.’

Early career

At the age of seventeen le Brocquy regains an amateur interest in art, prompted, in particular, by music. Produces his first sculpture "Evolution" (1934; plasticine, plaster cast), alongside the experimental paintings "Sunlight in a Wood" (a.k.a. Summer Haze, 1935), and "L’Après-Midi d’un Faune" (1937), all light-heartedly entered into the Royal Hibernian Academy exhibition of 1937-38. In May 1937, the "Dublin Evening Mail" reports: ‘One rarely hears of a young artist breaking through the portals of the Royal Hibernian Academy without having had a lesson in art ... Both his exhibits attracted attention on the opening day ... He is not, as I had expected, exceptionally keen on art, but is more interested in his chemistry work. The fact is surprising that these, the only two works of art which he has ever completed, were accepted and hung in the Academy, for he has not hitherto taken it devotedly.’

In the summer of 1938, however, le Brocquy envisaged for the first time becoming a painter, having previously regarded the matter as nothing more or less than a diversion. Unaccountably drawn to reproductions of old master paintings with which he had long been familiar, the young chemist immersed himself in the works of Titian (1485-1576), Velázquez (1599-1660), Goya (1746-1828) and Manet (1832-1883), later evoking his particular wonder at Rembrandt's "A Woman Bathing in a Stream" (1654; National Gallery, London), in which ‘the handling of white lead impasto could miraculously become the texture of her coarse white dress.’ In time the artist would record the following impression: ‘Perhaps of all painters, Rembrandt has given me the deepest insight. Just now, looking long at an overwhelming self-portrait, I had a disquieting experience. It was not that the hand which held the brushes in the painting became, so to speak, my hand. It was that I identified with the paint on the canvas so that my hand understood that painted hand, felt those painted brushes. For a moment I left the actual world. For an instant I entered through the looking-glass of this painted reality, as though into another room.’ Realising that painting is an essential process for him, he experiments with oils, pigments and wax-resins in the laboratory. He would recount the pregnant silence that followed his grandfather's discovery of these in his laboratory cabinet: ‘My grandfather had also been expected to inherit an oil refinery in Düsseldorf.

He also had shown an early interest in painting. He was taken to a poor quarter of the town frequented by down-at-heel artists and writers, where his godparents impressed him with the grim correspondence between maler and "malheur".’ Studies technique from Cennino Cennini's "Il libro dell’arte" (1437), and Hilaire Hiler's "Notes on the Technique of Painting" (1934). Makes frequent visits to Dublin's Municipal and National Galleries, where the ‘deep humanity’ of Goya's "A Woman in a White Fichu" (‘La Moue’; National Gallery of Ireland) impresses him, as does El Greco's "St Francis Receiving the Stigmata" (1590-95; National Gallery of Ireland), depicted ‘within a white ectoplasmic cloud in which spirit has become paint, paint spirit.’ The metamorphic power of art will remain an enduring source of wonder throughout the artist's life: ‘Since painting first interested me, I have been drawn to a constant tradition which I think of as central to this old European art. This implies a peculiar use of oil paint; not to symbolise, not to describe the object, nor to realise an abstract image but rather to allow the paint, while insisting upon its own palpable nature, to reconstitute (if it will) the object of one's experience. In certain works of old masters, the paint (with its qualities of colour, tone and texture) has been transformed into the experienced object. Obversely the image of the object has become paint. This dichotomy, this tension pulls taut the nerves of insight. Reality is stripped down to a deeper layer and the ordinary is seen to be marvellous.’ Encouraged by his mother and with no formal training, le Brocquy left Ireland in 1938 to study the major European art collections in London, Paris, Venice and Geneva, the latter then exhibiting the [Prado collection during the Spanish Civil War. From this deep experience le Brocquy recalls his revelatory encounter with Velázquez's "Las Meninas " (1654; Museo del Prado): ‘There in front of this huge work stood a small group of fellow visitors, partially obscuring the figures in the painting. Suddenly I perceived that the ephemeral actuality of the viewers was less real than the painted image before them. I believe at that moment I became a painter.’ French nineteenth-century art impresses le Brocquy, in particular Degas (1834-1917), and Manet (1832-1883), in whose works he perceives the paint, rather than the subject matter, to be the prime reality. The great Spaniards El Greco (1541-1614), Velázquez (1599-1660), and Goya (1746-1828) are equally revered.

The art historian Anne Crookshank observes: ‘He was enthralled by Spanish painting and its influence has remained a feature of his work, where the precision of his tone values and his use of greys and whites, both very prominent factors in Spanish painting, are constantly important.' Le Brocquy's journeys abroad prove catalytic: ‘Alone among the great artists of the past, in these strange related cities, I became vividly aware for the first time of my Irish identity to which I have remained attached all my life ... From the very beginning their (the artist's) transcendent universality helped to protect this incipient painter from self-consciousness – from self-conscious nationalism, for instance, inducing picturesque images perhaps of Irish country folk dressed in the clothes of a preceding generation, or of thatched cottages arranged like dominoes under convenient hills; images no more respectable in themselves than the sterile Nazi Kultur, or indeed the ordained Marxist aesthetic of "social reality" with its own insistence on compulsively happy peasants ... For art is neither an instrument nor a convenience, but a secret logic of the imagination. It is another way of seeing, the whole sense and value of which lies in its autonomy, its distance from actuality, its otherness.' His return to Dublin coincided with the Irish Exhibition of Living Art, of which he is a founding-member, establishing an effective forum for contemporary art in Dublin in 1943. Emerging as an innovative and influential artist, in 1946 le Brocquy moved to London and became prominent in the contemporary art scene. Assessing the period, Maurice Collis writes in "Penguin Parade": 'He experienced in reality the dream of every young painter - to show and to be immediately acclaimed with enthusiasm. The half-dozen pictures hung at the [Leicester Galleries were sold along with some others hastily sent to reinforce them; among the purchasers was the Contemporary Art Society, an organisation that buys with a view to presentation to the Tate ... Later in 1946 he showed more pictures in the same gallery, on this occasion along with other Irish painters. Again the response of the public was instantaneous; the critics, too, for the first time took serious notice of him. His right course now was to have a one-man show as soon as possible. This was achieved in the spring of 1947, when some forty of his works were hung at the Gimpel Fils Gallery.'

Important developments

Le Brocquy's inquiry into the human condition is seminal to his motivation as a painter. This underlying concern has informed a number of significant developments. As Robert Clark has observed in "The Guardian" (6 May 2006): 'There's something reveric and poetic about the entire body of work, as is evidenced by Brocquy's frequent portraits of fellow Irish greats such as Oscar Wilde, W.B. Yeats and Samuel Beckett. Yet Brocquy's poetry is always rigorously painterly and visual. He never falls off into literary illustration or compositional melodrama. As Francis Bacon once remarked, Brocquy continues to be "obsessed by figuration outside and on the other side of illustration". And there is certainly a thematic otherness haunting all of his painterly and graphic work, whether it be the psychologically incisive portraits, ritualised figure gatherings, lyrical still-lifes or the long series of mist-drenched watercolour landscapes.'

Early works 1939-1945

Early works (1939–1945) incl. "Southern Window" (1939; coll. Dublin City Gallery The Hugh Lane), and "A Picnic", (1940; coll. Irish Museum of Modern Art, Beecher Collection), establish the artist's ongoing preoccupation with the inward isolation of the individual. Depicting three sitters withdrawn from one another around a bare tablecloth "A Picnic" is inspired by Degas’ "Bain de mer: petite fille peignée par sa bonne" (c.1877; Dublin City Gallery The Hugh Lane, Lane Bequest 1917), and ukiyo-e woodblock prints (in which the image is implied beyond the outer frame). The painting's almost surreal aspect heralds much of the artist's subsequent work. The critic Caoimhín Mac Giolla Léith observes: ‘For, in hindsight, the investigation of interpersonal relationships appears to have been destined from the start to be subordinated in le Brocquy's work to the exploration of the individual in isolation. ... A pronounced tendency toward solipsism is evident almost from the very beginning, as can be seen as early as 1940 in the painting entitled "A Picnic" in which three figures, far from enjoying the communal meal indicated by the work's title, turn moodily away from each other in melancholic introspection.’ Le Brocquy explains: ‘I now see that, in this work, I was already groping towards that invisible reality that lies within us – our most profound reality I imagine – the spirit, the inner consciousness of the individual human being.

Remarking on the precision, balance and resolution of his handling of paint, Anne Crookshank notes: ‘From the beginning le Brocquy had remarkable fluency and these early, academic paintings have a beauty and authority which is astonishing in view of his inexperience.’ Technical skill and dexterity, however, will be viewed with increasing suspicion by the artist who will come to value accidental discovery above all else: ‘Contrary to a generally held view, I think that painting is not in any direct sense a means of communication or a means of self-expression. For me at any rate, it is groping towards an image. When you are painting you are trying to discover, to uncover, to reveal. I sometimes think of the activity of painting as a kind of archaeology – an archaeology of the spirit. As in archaeology, accident continually plays an important part. The painter, like the archaeologist, is a watcher, a supervisor of accident; patiently disturbing the surface of things until significant accident becomes apparent, recognising it, conserving this as best he can while provoking further accident. In this way a whole image, a whatness, may with luck gradually emerge almost spontaneously. Thus, what counts in painting is, I believe, recognition of significant accident within a larger preoccupation and not dexterity and skill and calculated imposition.’ Assessing the artist's progress during this period, James White, later a Director of the National Gallery of Ireland (1964-80), writes in "Envoy": ‘The born artist, as Mr. Salkeld has suggested, must have some instinctive understanding of his materials and how to use them. Louis le Brocquy did not go to art school or sit at the feet of any living master to learn his craft. He learnt to paint, quite simply, by painting ... It must be remarked again that he was still only twenty-two; he had been handling brushes less than a year. A man who could go so far in that time might be expected to go a great deal further before long.’ On the outbreak of World War II, le Brocquy's small rented headland studio in Cap Martin, France, is requisitioned to install artillery facing Italy (September 1939). Moves to Saint Raphael, cutting his stay short before the invasion of France by German forces (May 1940).

Tinker paintings 1946-1948

remarks: 'They are lithe and hardy, sharp in feature, and capable of sudden calls on endurance from their uncertain way of life in a difficult climate. With them primitive emotions are easily aroused and expressed; their woman drink and fight as readily as their men, and bear children without halting the day's journey. Their aloofness, intractability, and fierce independence interested le Brocquy.

They are, he could see, outside of the closely organised life of the parish unit, looked on with mistrust and suspicion ... They become a symbol of the individual as opposed to organised, settled society ... For the creative worker they could represent the artist who deals in the unexpected and the unrecognised and who suffuses with meaning familiar things.' Armed with bicycle and sketchbook, the artist produces swiftly executed life-sketches depicting their unruly way of life. The art critic , in his symphonic series of paintings from "Lola de Valence" to "Le Balcon".

Matter, the painter's reference and subject, ceased to be expressed objectively as a self-evident solidity, and was now interpreted as the manifestation of a mysterious inner movement. The amorphous became crystalline, the opaque transparent, the static kinetic ... At the end of the long avenue of perspective we have reached conviction in surface: surface again may be exploited to state the conceptual, the metaphysical reality of matter; matter seen as it were from inside out. Today we peer forward in a fundamentally altered landscape. Glancing backwards from our new position, Byzantine, Romanesque and Gothic forms gain new reality for us. The tinker theme reaches its ultimate development with the so-called 'Apocalyptic' paintings. Dr. Brian Kennedy notes: 'In the late 1940s, as the politics of the cold war settled into place, le Brocquy, like many others, grew uneasy. "In those post-war, cold-war days", he has written, "we all of us walked in the fear of eventual nuclear disaster obliterating civilised life".' Paints "In Fear of Cain" (1948), an image of secreted violence, "Fearful World" (1948), a throwback to the terrors of primaeval times, and "The Human Child" (1948), alluding to W. B. Yeat's poem 'The Stolen Child': Come away, O human child! / To the waters and the wild / With a faery, hand in hand, / For the world's more full of weeping than you can understand. According to Alistair Smith 'Le Brocquy's "Man Creating Bird" of 1948 is the culmination of the Tinker series. It refers to Picasso's Harlequins or Pierrots, while also invoking a chilhood memory of a Kingfisher. The painting, an exuberant and decorative response to Picasso's work of the late 1930s, makes it clear that by this time le Brocquy, now resident in London, was working in an international style which bore only little resemblance to that of his Irish contemporaries.' The artist himself evokes the painting in stark terms: 'I remember having in mind the puppet, Petrouchka, who becomes human in Stravinsky's great ballet. But here it is the puppet, man, who is creating life. An unconscious forecast of the ominous genetic achievement half a century later

Grey Period 1950-1956

The Grey Period (1950–1956) incl. "A Family" (coll. National Gallery of Ireland) contemplated a stark human circumstance in the aftermath of the war. Embarks on the Grey Period "Family" paintings (c.1951-54), the third distinctive period in the artist's work. According to John Russell: 'In the early 1950s, above all, he came before us as a man who was looking for the image that would compound all other images. Anyone who was around at the time and concerned with what was called "post-war British art" will remember the painting called "A Family" (1951; National Gallery of Ireland).'

A Family

Widely acknowledged as the artist's Magnum opus from the period, the painting marks a shift in palette from the comparatively colourful work of the late forties to predominant whites and greys. John Berger writes in "Art News and Review": 'His style has developed and changed; his colours are pale and severe - the Family is mostly grey; his forms, in their movement both across and into the picture, are precise. This finesse implies - because le Brocquy's motive is always human - a tenderness which is not sentimental, and a sense of wonder which is exact; one thinks twice about the quite ordinary but in fact miraculous construction of any man's back, having looked at the father in the Family. Le Brocquy is completely free of contemporary tendency to cosmic megalomania. It has become pretentious to talk of an artist's humility, yet that is what distinguishes his work; his studies testify to his patience, and his final, large picture to his refusal to evade simple but difficult problems by relying on the grandiose cliché.' Conceived in the wake of World War II, the artist explains: 'I have always been fascinated by the horizontal monumentality of traditional Odalisque painting, the reclining woman depicted voluptuously by one Master after another throughout the history of European art - Titian's "Venus of Urbino", Velázquez' "Rokeby Venus" turning her back on the Spanish Court, Goya's "Maja" clothed and unclothed, Ingres' "Reclining Odalisque" in her seraglio and finally the great Olympia of Edouard Manet celebrating his favourite model, Victorine Meurent.

My own painting "A Family" was conceived in 1950 in very different circumstances in face of the atomic threat, social upheaval and refugees of World War II and its aftermath. The elements in its composition correspond in some ways to those of Olympia, if not to Manet's cool sensuality. The female figure in "A Family" may be seen to take on a very different significance. The man, replacing Manet's black servant with bouquet, sits alone. The bouquet is reduced to a mere wisp held by a child. The Olympian black cat in turn becomes white, ominously emerging from the sheets. This is how "A Family" appears to me today. Fifty years ago it was painted while contemplating a human condition stripped back to Palaeolithic circumstance under electric light bulbs. The painting will prompt " recently. Le Brocquy's stand and his subsequent development as an artist, however, won him the admiration and respect of intelligent opinion wherever his work has been shown. In great Britain he is accepted as one of the handful of really brilliant painters of this generation, while America in so far as she has had the opportunity to judge has reacted similarly. Despite the strictures of the "Evening Herald" it is satisfactory to note that the exhibition itself has been an outstanding success in every respect.'

White Period 1956-1966

: ‘There was from the very beginning a blanched look about many of his paintings: pure white light, pure white walls, pure white skin. Bone-white, chalk-white, almond-white were the adjectives that come to mind. Around the mid-1950s that whiteness, which had been simply a prevailing tonality, became the very element and substance of the paintings.’

Embarks on the ‘White Period’ Presence paintings (c.1956-66), the fourth distinctive period in the artist's work. The generic term is first attributed during the exhibition 50 Ans d’Art Moderne, Brussels, where it is remarked that in his latest work the human figure is no longer an abstraction drawn from living beings. Rather it has become a magic presence. The artist explains: ‘An essential break occurred, where I began to concentrate on a single image emerging from a canvas, in which the composition, in the conventional sense of the word, had been destroyed or ignored. Quite a painful decision, in fact. I had always based myself on being a traditional painter in that I maintained that composition was important; all that had to be thrown out.’ The artist adds: ‘Then, later, I had the idea of conjuring up images out of nothing, out of light, out of the depths of the blank canvas, as it were.’ According to Dr Brian Kennedy: ‘The theme which in its first phase was to occupy him for almost a decade, gradually became a vehicle of exploration for the whole of his later career.’ Alistair Smith writes: 'By the time he represented Ireland in the Venice Biennale of 1956, he had already abandoned the way of painting which had won him a major international prize there, and had embarked upon what was to become his most inventive series of works ... The triumphs of the period were considerable, with le Brocquy producing a body of work which was not only well-wrought and emotionally convincing, but also, for the first time, original, the sine qua non of modern art. This success was hard won, however. The establishment of a new subject-matter which dealt more directly with the spirit than with the body, and the recognition of a working method which admitted a force outside the artist's control. The artist meets the young Irish painter [Anne Madden in November 1956, to become his lifelong ever-present inspiration. Paints "Young Woman, Anne" (1957) belonging to a notable series of white-on-white compositions. Caoimhín Mac Giolla Léith notes: 'The title refers to le Brocquy's wife, the painter Anne Madden, who was seriously injured in a riding accident in the mid-1950s and had to undergo a series of painful operations on her spine. Le Brocquy remembers "being filled with an irrational anger at the aggressive implications of this surgical carpentry" and goes on to note that, quite apart from his personal feelings of anger, the spine literally continued to form the backbone of the ‘Presences.’ According to Alistair Smith: 'The fact that the painting mimicked the visual circumstances of the artist's life is important, but more important, if less tangible, were the emotions of the situation - the natural anxieties, apprehensions of mortality ... The voluptuous aspect of the female torsos, and the fact that wounding (as in surgery) is part of their subject matter, is clearly the result of the powerful mechanism of sublimation. Despite the origin of the work in his personal life, le Brocquy was alive to the more universal aspect of what was forming on his canvas ... His paintings quickly came to form a far more generalised statement on humanity, both male and female, both palpable and ethereal.'

The critic Michael Shepherd writes in "Art News and Review": 'A typical example of le Brocquy's current work is a large canvas covered with pure white ground, or occasionally modulated to a smooth silvery oriental grey ... The general effect is of a painter who is less interested in superficial individuality than in catching some evocation of generalised spirit, who inhabits a world in motion, and who brings a scrupulous delicacy to making of this insubstantial material a calm and composed object for contemplation.' John Russell observes in "The Sunday Times": 'In his beginnings he showed himself a witty observer of his fellow men, a born short-story teller or manager of the outward look of things. Gradually this dropped away; his palette, too, lightened until little was left but white, silver, and a rare stain of red ... "presences", he calls them, and the remarkable thing is that they are so undeniably present, and that so much of their predicament can be deciphered from the fragmentary evidence before us. He is a painter who never outstays the initial thrust of his ideas; his talent, an authentic one, is pushed to its limit in each phase and then he at once moves to the next one. This can be said of few painters

Head Series 1964-2006

– likeness is both a boon and an encumbrance. It grounds the image, but can also tie it to a formulaic restatement of familiar features. When the balance is right, le Brocquy manages to engender a feeling of tenuous, fugitive presence, providing a glimpse into the mysterious complexity of mental life and spirit. There is also a sense of cultural placement, not in the sense of merely iterating an Irish literary canon – though that is an obvious danger – but in terms of locating particular sensibilities and imaginations in terms of historically derived identity, a view of individual consciousness as extending forwards and backwards in time, in terms of genetic and other, more conscious influences.'

Procession Series 1984-1992

intended, but, as I see it, his gesture is ambiguous. When painting, I have no preconceptions. When I'm working, I learn from painting itself.'

Human Images 1996-2004

Since 1996 le Brocquy has embarked on a body of work entitled "Human Images", in an attempt to delve further into the earlier Presence series (c.1956-66). [Caoimhín Mac Giolla Léith observes: 'There are very few artists who have maintained as steadfast a commitment as Louis le Brocquy has over the past half a century to envisioning what it is to be an embodied human being adrift in an alienating world the true reality of which is likely to lie forever beyond our comprehension ... The principal similarity between the early 'Presences' and the torsos produced since 1996, according to the artist, is one of content in that the attempt is still to discover some kind of image of "our inner human reality - that impalpable thing we call in turn the spirit, the psyche, consciousness." The most obvious difference, on the other hand, between these two bodies of work is one of form, in that the 'phenomenon of whiteness', to use Richard Kearney's phrase, no longer exerts the same fascination. In the recent paintings the intense white grounds have been replaced by what le Brocquy characterises as 'grayish backgrounds or 'environments', initially composed of minute particles and later by a fractured texture from which the central figure is derived and into which it in turn diffuses in 'a substantial identity of surface and image'. According to Alistair Smith: 'The artist recognises the origins of these paintings in a work of 1971, Head with Open Mouth, but they also resemble, in their taut blend of abstraction and palpability, in their tender and fragile sense of being, the pictures of fruit which he made about the same time. One might think of them as still-life paintings of body parts; and as the still-life artist invests his flowers and fruit with a symbolism of growth and decay, we might expect le Brocquy's Human Images to carry the same meaning. What they seek to express, however, is something quite different ... Now he is attempting to convey the sensitivity of the mouth as a site where - like the other body parts - experience, life, enters the body, and he also shows us life emerging from the body.' The artist explains: ' [The] first so-called ‘orifice’ paintings took place in the ancestral head series from 1970 to ’72. In those earlier images the head image itself was reduced almost to the isolated image of an open mouth – and this I saw not as a sort of silent scream, but rather as an opening into the dark space of the interior being. At the same time I saw it ambivalently as an illusory black hole in the canvas with spatial implications not altogether unlike those of a physically slashed or punctured work by Lucio Fontana in his "Concetto Spatiale" series ... About six years ago [in 1996] I felt that I might further develop the idea of the ‘holed’ canvas, forming the image of an open mouth, to include other points of ‘entrance’ such as the eye, the ear and the navel. And, finally, the navel in particular – being literally central to the ‘Presence’ torsos – may well have been a factor in returning me to the earlier ‘Presence’ paintings.'

Homage Paintings 2005-2006

In 2005 the artist embarked on his "Homage Paintings". in the footsteps of Velazquez, and we encounter, once again, four ordinary apples and a knife that were first presented to us by Cézanne.'

Latest commission

, publicly presented to the National Portrait Gallery in October 2003 celebrating the re-opening of the National Portrait Collection. Referring to this work, le Brocquy says: 'In the past I have painted an extensive series of interiorised head images of artists such as Samuel Beckett and Francis Bacon, WB Yeats and Seamus Heaney whom I see as extraordinary instances of human consciousness. In more recent years, I have made a number of similar studies of Bono, whose spirit and whose radiant enery I admire so much. But a painting destined for the National Portrait Gallery presents a different challenge; to make a recognizable image of Bono's outward appearance, while attempting to portray what I conceive to be the wavelengths of his inner dynamism.'

Aidann Dunne remarks in "The Irish Times": 'In a way these portraits are a high cultural equivalent of Andy Warhol's silkscreen paintings of celebrity icons like Elvis Presley, Marilyn Monroe and Elizabeth Taylor. Both bodies of work emerged initially in the same decade, the 1960s, and they might be seen to converge in one of the most recent of le Brocquy's subjects, Bono. If Warhol were still around, Bono would surely be at the top of his to-do list. Yet there is clearly a tension between Warhol's infatuation with the vacuity of celebrity culture and le Brocquy's endorsement of the individual creative imagination. It comes down to a question of depth. For Warhol, everything is surface, whereas le Brocquy pledges allegiance to dense and complex layers of meaning, somehow bound up in the painted surface. Cultural Icons are, he implies, much more than depthless signs. But it's not as simple as that. His evocations of individual heads, living or dead, come with a rider. They are Studies towards an image of ..., and they occur in sequential multiples rather than single, definitive versions. Like Warhol, le Brocquy had realised that portraiture was a problematic genre by the mid-20th century. In attempting to embody a presence in paint while acknowledging that it was an unattainable goal, he signalled both his ambition and the current limits of that ambition. The subjects of his heads veer between virtual anonymity and iconic status. Ancestral Head, for example, is effectively anonymous but marks out the territory: not so much making a portrait per se as engaging in an "archaeology of the spirit". reconstructing not likeness but imaginative life. Throughout his long bouts of wrestling with his named subjects - a list that also includes Federico Garcia Lorca, Seamus Heaney, Francis Bacon and Pablo Picasso - likeness is both a boon and an encumbrance. It grounds the image, but can also tie it to a formulaic restatement of familiar features. When the balance is right, le Brocquy manages to engender a feeling of tenuous, fugitive presence, providing a glimpse into the mysterious complexity of mental life and spirit. There is also a sense of cultural placement, not in the sense of merely iterating an Irish literary canon - though that is an obvious danger - but in terms of locating particular sensibilities and imaginations in terms of historically derived identity, a view of individual consciousness as extending forwards and backwards in time, in terms of genetic and other, more conscious influences.'

Book illustration

Although probably best known and admired for his paintings, le Brocquy has never been afraid to venture beyond the canvas, The beauty of his vibrant tapestry designs and the intricately-detailed interpretations of "The Táin" legend, which he created to accompany the poet Thomas Kinsella's translation of that Irish epic, as well as designs for the stage, have demonstrated his remarkable virtuosity as an artist. "The Irish Times" (4 November 2006).

The Táin

Among the many collaborations with Irish writers, notably Samuel Beckett and Seamus Heaney, le Brocquy is perhaps best known for his lithographic brush drawings for Thomas Kinsella's renowned translation of the "Táin" in 1969, held to be the great Irish Livre d'Artiste of the twentieth century. Seamus Heaney writes in "" (1986)

Tapestry design

The artist's rejection of the practice of submitting paintings to be interpreted by weavers, 'laboriously translating paint scumbles into weft', leads him to join the Association des Peintres-Cartoniers de Tapisserie in France. Embarks on his second design, Garlanded Goat (1949-50), woven by Ronald Cruickshank at Dovecote Studios, Edinburgh Tapestry Company. Based on his painting Goat in Snow (1949-50; Leeds City Art Gallery), the motive is inspired by the ancient pagan ritual crowning of the animal at Puck Fair, Killorglin, Co. Kerry. Proclaimed by John Berger as unparalleled in the country: 'His decorative tapestry of a goat is the best I have seen produced by an English [sic] artist' the composition establishes le Brocquy's reputation in the medium. Designs Allegory (1950), the largest tapestry design to date woven by the historic seventeenth century workshop [Tabard Frères & Soeurs, Aubusson. Compositionally close to his paintings of the period, the design, however, is treated with a colourful gaiety and a monumentality well beyond its modest size. Allegorical allusions include a sun, a moon, the winding of a skein of wool, and the emergence of a child, asserting the artist's principle that in tapestry the theme or 'story' should, as in Ballet, be of the utmost simplicity.' Today the artist's tapestries are woven in the same historic region by the [Atelier René Duché, [Meilleur Ouvrier de France. The tapestry designs include "Travellers" 1948, "Garlanded Goat" (1949-50), "Allegory" (1950), the "Eden series" (1951-52), the "Inverted series" (1948-99), the "Táin" series (1969-2000, Irish Museum of Modern Art), the "Cúchulainn series" (1973-1999), and the "Garden series" (2000). Large-scale tapestry commissions include "Brendan the Navigator" (1963-64, UCD, Michael Smurfit School of Business, Dublin), "The Hosting of the Táin" (1970; Irish Museum of Modern Art), the "Massing of the Armies" (RTÉ, Dublin) and the monumental "Triumph of Cúchulainn" (National Gallery of Ireland, Millennium Wing).

Acclaim

In their editorial dated 4 November 2006 The "Irish Times" wrote:

Louis le Brocquy, the elder statesman of Irish art, is currently the subject of a number of celebratory exhibitions and events to mark his ninetieth birthday, not only in Ireland but also in Paris and London. The celebrations and accolades have been well-earned after more than seven decades during which this self-taught artist has come to be recognised both at home and internationally as the foremost Irish painter of the 20th century. It is half a century since he represented Ireland at the Venice Biennale, where he won a major prize for one of his most familiar works, "A Family", a key painting in le Brocquy's earlier Cubist style which now hangs in our National Gallery. It was not always so popular or acknowledged as an important work of art. The painter was accused of producing a "diabolical caricature" when it was first put on show in Dublin in the early 1950s; critics of the day found it repugnant and the Municipal Gallery of Modern Art turned it down. It was not the only time that the city disgraced itself in the rejection of significant work of art. Some measure of the appeal and stature of le Brocquy's work is reflected in the rise and rise of the prices he achieves in the art market - the latest record being for a watercolour at the recent Sotheby's sale of Irish art in London, where three le Brocquy works featured in the top ten prices. He is one of a few Irish artists whose work is represented in the collections of the most prestigious international museums such as the Guggenheim in New York and the Tate in London ... In recent years it has been as the creator of the "heads series" that le Brocquy has received most attention. The pared-down spectral renderings of the human head have become a central motif for the artist. Le Brocquy himself has eloquently referred to them as depictions of the isolation of the individual - an exploration that he shares with Beckett. For many of these paintings he has been drawn to subjects for whom the creative impulse has been at the centre of their lives, fellow artists and writers. His own creative impulses have added uniquely and richly to Irish art. '

Awards and positions

Visiting Instructor, Central School of Arts & Crafts, London (1947-54); co-founder Signa Design Consultants, 1954; Visiting Tutor, Royal College of Art, London (1955-58); Fellow, Society of Industrial Artists, London, 1960; Member, Irish Council of Design (1963-65); Inaugural Board Member, Kilkenny Design Workshops (1965-77); Fellow, Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce, London, 1974; Founder Board-Member, Irish Museum of Modern Art, Dublin, 1989-94.

*Premio Acquisto Internationale, Venice Biennale, 1956
*IMMA/Glen Dimplex award for a sustained contribution to the visual arts in Ireland, Dublin, 1998
*Chevalier de la Légion d'honneur, 1975
*Saoi, Aosdána, conferred by President Mary Robinson, 1994
*Officier de l'Ordre des Arts et des Lettres, 1996
*Officier de l'Ordre de la Couronne Belge, Belgium, 2001
*Litt.D. h.c., University of Dublin, 1962
*LL.D. h.c., University College, Dublin, 1988
*D.Phil. h.c., Dublin City University, 1999
*Doctor of the University, D.Univ. h.c., Queen's University, Belfast 2002
*D.Phil. h.c. Dublin Institute of Technology, 2004
*Honorary Associate, National College of Art and Design, Dublin, 2006.
*Honorary Freedom of the City of Dublin, 2007

External links

*http://www.lebrocquy.com/
* [http://www.artnet.com/awc/louis-le-brocquy.html Louis le Brocquy catalogue in artnet's "Artist Works Catalogues"]
*http://www.artfacts.net/index.php/pageType/artistInfo/artist/11106
*http://web.artprice.com/artistdetails.aspx?src=0&idarti=OTk5Mzc2MTA0MzU0OTUyLQ=