- Indonesian philosophy
Indonesian philosophy is generic designation for tradition of abstract speculation held by the people who inhabit the region now known as
Indonesia. Indonesian philosophy is expressed in living languages found in Indonesia (approximately 587 languages) and its national language Indonesian, comprising many diverse schools of thought receiving influences of Eastern and Western origins, besides its indigenous, original philosophical theme.
The term "Indonesian philosophy" originates from a title of book written by
M. Nasroen, [Professor emeritus, of Philosophy at Universitas Indonesia] in which he traced philosophical elements found in Indonesian culture. Since then, the term has been popular and inspired many later writers like Sunoto, Parmono, and Jakob Sumardjo. Sunoto began the nation's first philosophy department at Universitas Gajah Madain Yogyakarta.
Sunoto, Parmona, and Sumardjo defined the word "Indonesian philosophy" differently. Without clearly defining the word, M. Nasroen argued that Indonesian philosophy was neither Western nor Eastern. He pointed to core Indonesian concepts and practices such as "mupakat, pantun-pantun, Pancasila, hukum
adat, gotong-royong", and "kekeluargaan" (Nasroen 1967:14, 24, 25, 33, and 38). Sunoto (1987:ii) too, embraced a culturalist notion of Indonesian philosophy, calling it "the cultural richness of our own nation…contained in our own culture." Similarly, Parmono defined it as "thought or reflections…which are bound in" adat "as well as ethnic culture" (Parmono 1985:iii). Sumardjo wrote that the "philosophy of Indonesian people has never been conceived of. Their philosophical conceptions must be sought after and found out of what they have done. " He added, "Indonesian philosophy lies in their daily-life behavior and factual result of their activities. Philosophy of Indonesian people lies within their "pepatah-petitih, adat "houses", adat "ceremonies and rites, old myths, in their dress ornaments, their dances, the music they play, in their weapons, their social system, and so on" (Sumardjo 2003:113).
The writers above understand Indonesian philosophy as a part of
cultureand do not contrast philosophy to cultural studiesand anthropology. The Indonesian language initially had no word for philosophy as an entity separated from theology, art, and science. [Whether or not any of the other several hundred local languages possess the an abstract idea of philosophy has not yet been established.] Instead, Indonesians have a generic word, that is, "budaya" or "kebudayaan", which includes a totality of the manifestations of the life of a society. Philosophy, science, theology, religion, artand technologyare at once manifestations of a society’s life, which are included in the meaning of the word "budaya". Indonesians usually use word "budayawan" to call their philosophers(Alisjahbana 1977:6-7). Accordingly, to them, the scope of Indonesian philosophy only comprised those original notions of Indonesian cultural richness. This is understood by Ferry Hidayat, [Lecturer at Universitas Pembangunan Nasional 'Veteran' Jakarta, see also ] as "the poverty of the scope." If Indonesian philosophy only comprised those original ethnic philosophies, it would be very poor philosophy. Like other scholars, Ferry widens the scope of Indonesian philosophy so as to include the adapted and "indigenized" philosophy receiving influences of foreign philosophical traditions. This article employs the latter definition.
chools of thought
There are seven schools of thought developing in Indonesia. [Ferry Hidayat, "Pengantar Menuju Filsafat Indonesia", 2005, unpublished paper.] The categorization of schools is first based on the originality that a certain school contains (like "ethnic school"), secondly based on the influence of great world philosophies that a particular school absorbs and adapts to Indonesian philosophy (such as "Chinese school," "Indian school," "Islamic school," "Christian school," and "Western school"), and lastly based on a historical chronology (such as "the post-Soeharto school'). The following is a sketch of the Indonesian schools of thought and their main philosophers.
This school takes Indonesian ethnic philosophies as its source of inspiration. Its assumption is mythologies, legends, folklores, the way an ethnic group builds its house and holds its ceremonies, literature it keeps, the epics the ethnic group writes, all bases foundation of its philosophy. This 'philosophy' cannot change; it remains the same, from the beginning to the end of the world, and it is also 'the Good'. It guides every member of the group to the origin of group creation on earth (in Javanese, "sangkan") and the "telos" of the life the group reaches to (in Javanese, "paran"), so the member cannot go astray.
This school preserves Indonesian ethnic philosophies which are original, since the philosophies had been hold tight by ethnic members before they were encountered with later foreign philosophical traditions.
Most of the school’s proponents assume that today’s Indonesian people are in the position of being blind to their original values. Jakob Sumardjo, for instance, argued that most of today’s Indonesians "…forget to preserve their original values" and "…forgetting the past, forgetting the origin, they are like amnesiac people..." who "…ignore their own national history…" (Sumardjo 2003:23, 25). Consequently, they are ‘alienated’; estranged from ‘their mother cultures’ (Sumardjo 2003:53). The failure of Indonesian educational policy, to Jakob, is brought by this ‘blindness’ to Indonesian original culture (Sumardjo 2003:58). Therefore, the necessary task of this school of philosophy is to seek after, recall and revitalize the ethnic original values, since the values are ‘mothers’ ("lokalitas ialah ibu manusia") and people are ‘fathers’ of existence ("balita ialah bapak manusia") (Sumardjo 2003:22).
The following are some philosophical notions which this school advocates:
For this school of thought, "
adat" plays very important role. "Adat" is the main inspiration for ethnic philosophers, as it is the intellectual legacy which belongs to a particular ethnic group. "Adat" is inherited from an ethnic's forefathers to later generations of the ethnic group. Indonesians believe that "adat" is not a human creation, but the spirits and supernatural powers ruling the community. This "adat" is very different from what Englishmen call "tradition", "custom" or "convention" today. Its meaning is not simply wider, but more particularly goes far deeper. It includes everything Englishmen call "law" nowadays; and it goes much further than law in determining the needs and the actions of individuals and the community. It ordains the ceremonies of marriage, birth and death, the times and the methods for sowing rice, building a house, praying for rain, and many other things. Economics, politics, philosophy and art all come within its sphere. Indeed from one point of view, "adat" is simply a social expression of the community religion, in as much as it is not a human creation, and in its exercise men are still constantly watched over by the spirits and supernatural powers ruling community. Because the "adat" which regulates the entire life of the community is dominated by spirits and supernatural powers, that communal life is inevitably static and deeply conservative. Its roots lay in the obscurity of the past, when the ancestors laid down the adat once and for all, or as Minangkabaupeople say: "It doesn't crack with the heat or rot in the rain." In such an environment the word 'old' has a special significance, denoting something venerable, sacred, powerful and full of wisdom (Alisjahbana 1961:13-14).
Myths of Origin
Among intellectual legacy which the "adat" inherited to Indonesians is a set of myths of origin of creation. The myths are sung (and only recently written) in important ceremonies held on special occasions of birth, death, marriage,
harvest festival, and so on. The Dayak-Benuaq tribe of East Kalimantan, for example, has a set of myths known as "Temputn". This "Temputn" tells myths of origin of universe, world and sky, human and animal creation, plants, water, fire, rain, death, ancestor origin, and some social taboos (Michael Hopes & Karaakng 1997:1-19). According to "Temputn", far before humankind had been created, they were two families who inhabited the sky. Of the raw materials used by the ‘sky families’ to create the earth and the sky, finally the first human came into being. He was married to a woman, who was his own daughter, and had many children, some of whom later became "seniangs"--group of spirits who live in the heavens, responsible for the policing of the most important moral affairs and they are in charge of "adat" guardians. The "seniangs" can inflict punishments (curses) on the ‘incestuous’. Their children were not only the human race and spirits, but also animals like wildcats of the forest, bears, ancestor of deer, the pigs of the forest, forefathers of monkey, ancestor of bees, snakes, and many others (Michael Hopes & Karaakng 1997:29-41).
Pantun" is original kind of poem created by Indonesians. It is a four-line poem that consists of two parts; the first two lines are called as "sampiran" and the second two lines as "isi". The "sampiran" always provides an analogy for the "isi", and it symbolizes a macrocosmfor a microcosm. As the mythologywent, humankind was made of materials from which 'the sky families' created the sky and the world, and "pantun" reflects this belief very clearly. The "sampiran" represents 'the sky and the world', while the "isi" signifies 'the humankind'. Both between "sampiran" and "isi" there must be logical correspondence, as they both are symbols of harmony of the nature and humankind (Sumardjo 2002:296-324). Below is an example of "pantun":
:"Tujuh hari dalam hutan" || "Air tak minum, nasi tak makan" || "Sehari tiada pandang Tuan" || "Rasanya susut tubuh di badan"
The "sampiran" which says (in English) "seven days in deep forest || no drinking water, no eating rice" must have logical correspondence with the "isi", which says "no meeting you Sir in a day || feels like the body becomes thinner and thinner". The "sampiran" says about the suffering one can feel when he is in a deep forest in seven days without drink and food, while the "isi" says about the suffering one can feel when he does not meet in a day the lover he really longs or yearns for. The "sampiran", therefore, analogizes the "isi" in the suffering of the longing.
Pepatah" is like what Englishmen call " proverb" or " saying". "Pepatah" is included in the "adat" in the sense that it gives guidance and instruction to every member of a particular ethnic group to behave well to others in the community. It is believed that "pepatah" was created by ethnic ancestors inspired by supernatural powers and spirits (Nasroen 1967:27). The wording of "pepatah" is taken from nature, which means that all guidance for people's life must be derived from the laws of nature. The nature has its own laws and it is people's obligation to submit to it. As the myth of origintold, humans were parts of nature; they were made of it, so they had to live in total submission to its laws (Nasroen 1967:30).
Here are some examples of "pepatah": "dalam laut dapat diduga, dalam hati siapa tahu" (we can assume the depth of the sea, but we cannot assume what in people's heart is) teaches very clearly about the danger of assuming what in people's heart is, for the knowledge of it can only be obtained by asking to the people concerned, not by assuming; "ada gula, ada semut" (where there is sugar, there is ant) teaches
the law of causality, in which an effect can be taken place if there is a cause bringing it; "malu bertanya, sesat di jalan" (if you are shy of asking questions, you will get lost in your way) teaches the importance of asking questions in the process of seeking after knowledge, and the like.
"Adat" Social Structure
It has been stated above that not only did "adat" include tradition, custom, convention and law, but it also included a kind of social structure. The
social structurebound by a common "adat" was typified by small-scale communities of people in villages or of nomads wandering over a specific area. These communities were rather like miniature democratic republics. Their headmen were elected from the descendants of the oldest branch of the tribe, and they saw to the needs and interests of the community, assisted by a council of elders. Really important decisions were taken by collective deliberations, called as "mupakat". Naturally in a democracy of this type, in which a premium is put on unanimity of opinions, the position of the "balai" was extremely important. This was the building in which meetings and discussions were held. We can think them as the centers of social life within these small communities (Alisjahbana 1961:14-15).
The principal duty of the village government was to administer the "adat" handed down from generation to generation, and to settle any disputes that might arise. However, the actual scope of administration within this indigenous Indonesian society was very broad if one compared it to the scope of governmental activity today. it included the regulation of marriage ceremonies, crop cultivation, distribution of the harvest, division of legacies, etc., quite apart from attending to the daily needs of the community (Alisjahbana 1961:15).
Those books are on Indonesian ethnic philosophies:
*cite book | author=Lansing, Stephen. | title=Three Worlds of Bali | location=Westport | publisher=Praeger Publishers | year=1983 | id=ISBN 0-275-91720-7
*cite book | author=Errington, Frederick Karl. | title=Manners and Meaning in West Sumatra: The Social Context of Consciousness | location=New Haven | publisher=Yale University Press| year=1984 | id=ISBN 0-300-03159-9
*cite book | author=Eiseman Jr, Fred B. | title=Bali Sekala &Niskala: Vol. 1. Essays on Religion, Ritual, and Art | location=Berkeley and Singapore | publisher=PeriPlus Editions | year=1989 | id=ISBN 0-945971-05-2
*cite book | author=Wikan, Unni | title=Managing Turbulent Hearts: a Balinese Formula for Living | location=Chicago | publisher=University of Chicago Press | year=1990 | id=ISBN 0-226-89678-1 (U.S.A)
*cite book | author=Tol, Roger (et.al.) | title=Authority and Enterprise among the Peoples of North Sulawesi | location=Leiden | publisher=KITLV Press | year=2000 | id=ISBN 90-6718-145-5
*cite book | author= Mrázek, Jan | title= Phenomenology of a puppet theatre. Contemplations on the art of Javanese wayang kulit| location=Leiden | publisher=KITLV Press | year=2005 | id=ISBN 90-6718-252-4
philosophersremained to hold their original philosophies until the coming of Chinese migrants between 1122-222 BC who brought and introduced Taoismand Confucianismto them (Larope 1986:4). The two foreign philosophies and the local ones then diffused and penetrated; so mixed that they could not be dissolved (SarDesai 1989:9-13). One of the remnants of the diffused philosophy, which is still practiced by all Indonesians to date, is the Confucian notion of "hsiao" (Pinyin: 'Xiao', 孝; Indonesian: "menghormati orangtua"). The notion teaches that one must respect his parents above other things. He must prioritize his parents before he gives priority to others.
Chinese school seems to be exclusive, as it is only developed mostly by few Chinese ethnic members of Indonesia. Nevertheless, the
philosophyit contributed to Indonesian philosophical tradition is very significant. Sun Yat-senism, Maoism, and Neo-maoismare important philosophies that were widespread all over Indonesia in the early 1900’s, together with the great growth of Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) (Suryadinata 1990:15).
The main philosophers of this school, among others, are:
Tjoe Bou San, Kwee Hing Tjiat, Liem Koen Hian, Kwee Kek Beng, and Tan Ling Djie.
Those books are on Chinese contribution to Indonesian politico-philosophical tradition:
*cite book | author=Heidhues, Mary F. Somer. | title=Peranakan Chinese Politics in Indonesia | location=New York and Ithaca | publisher=Cornell University Press | year=1964 | id=
*cite book | author=Suryadinata, Leo. | title=Peranakan Chinese Politics in Java | location=Singapore | publisher=Institute of Southeast Asian Studies | year=1976 | id=ISBN 981-210-360-0
*cite book | author=Suryadinata, Leo. | title=The Political Thinking of The Indonesian Chinese 1900-1995 | location=Singapore | publisher=Singapore University Press | year=1997 | id=ISBN 9971-69-201-5
The diffusion of philosophies continued with the coming of
HinduBrahmans and Buddhists of Indian origin in between 322 BC-700 AD They introduced Hinduist and Buddhist cultures to the native, and the native reciprocated by synthesizing the two into a combined version, known as Tantrayana. This is clearly shown in the building of BorobudurTemple by Sailendra Dynasty in 800-850 A.D (SarDesai, 1989:44-47). Rabindranath Tagore, an Indian philosopher who visited Borobudur for the first time, admitted the temple as un-Indian, since the relics engraved on it represented workers dressed in native Javanese style. He also admitted that the native Javanese dances inspired of Indian epics were not similar to Indian dances, although those dances of the two countries sourced from the same Indian well. Hinduand Buddhism--two philosophies that contradict each other in India--as well as Javanese local philosophy were conciliated in Indonesia by the genius of Sambhara Suryawarana, Mpu Prapanca, and Mpu Tantular.
*cite book | author=Parkin, Harry. | title=Batak Fruit of Hindu| location=Madras | publisher=The Christian Literature Society | year=1978 | id=
*cite book | author=Zoetmulder, P.J. | title=Pantheism and monism in Javanese Suluk literature : Islamic and Indian mysticism in an Indonesian setting | location=Leiden | publisher=KITLV Press |year=1995|id=ISSN 0074-0470
10-century process of Indianization of Indonesia was rivaled by the coming of Persian
Sufismand Sufism has begun to root in the native philosophical discourse since the early 1400’s onwards. The widespread of Sufism was encouraged by the massive founding of Islamic kingdoms and sultanates in Indonesia (Nasr 1991:262). Kings and sultans like Sunan Giri, Sunan Gunungjati, Sunan Kudus, Sultan Trenggonoof Demak, Pakubuwana II, Pakubuwana IV, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasaof Banten, Sultan Alauddin Riayat Syah, Engku Hajji Muda Raja Abdallahto Raja Muhammad Yusufare "sufi-kings"; they learned Sufism from eminent Sufiteachers (Perpustakaan Nasional 2001:12-39).
Indonesiacan be divided to two schools: Ghazalism and Ibn Arabism. Ghazalism takes its main inspiration from Al-Ghazali’s teachings, whereas Ibn Arabism from Ibn Arabi’s doctrines. Sufis from Al-Ghazali line are Nuruddin Al-Raniri, Abdurrauf Al-Singkeli, Abd al-Shamad Al-Palimbangi, Syekh Yusuf Makassar, while from Ibn Arabi line are Hamzah Al-Fansuri, Al-Sumatrani, Syekh Siti Jenar, and so on (Nasr 1991:282-287).
Wahhabismwas also adopted by King Pakubuwono IVand Tuanku Imam Bonjol, whose necessary task of philosophy was to eradicate Sufism and encourage Qur'anteachings instead (Hamka 1971:62-64).
When Islamic modernism, whose program was to synthesize Islamic teachings and Western Enlightenment philosophy, begun by
Muhammad Abduhand Jamal al-din Al-Afghaniin Egypt in the end of 1800s, prevailed in all over Islamic world, Moslemsin Indonesia also adopted and adapted the modernism. This is clearly shown in the works of Syaikh Ahmad Khatib, Syaikh Thaher Djalaluddin, Abdul Karim Amrullah, Ahmad Dahlan, Mohammad Natsir, Oemar Said Tjokroaminoto, Agus Salim, Misbach, and so forth (Noor 1996:37).
*cite book | author=Al-Attas, Syed M. Naquib. | title=The Mysticism of Hamzah Fansuri | location=Kuala Lumpur | publisher=University of Malaya University Press | year=1970 | id=
*cite book | author=Drewes, G.W.J. | title=The Poems of Hamzah Fansuri | publisher =Dordrecht-Holland: Foris | year=1986 | id=
*cite book | author=Zoetmulder, P.J. | title=Pantheism and monism in Javanese Suluk literature : Islamic and Indian mysticism in an Indonesian setting | location=Leiden | publisher=KITLV Press |year=1995|id=ISSN 0074-0470
When the Dutch colonial government in Indonesia implemented ‘The Ethical Politics’ ("Politik Etis") in the early 1900’s, Dutch-style educational institutions mushroomed and were opened for native children of noble, feudal classes who wanted to work in colonial institutions. The Dutch-speaking schools taught
Western philosophyas their subjects of study, among which Enlightenment philosophywas taught very late to Indonesian natives after its 5-century emergence in Europe (Larope 1986:236-238). The alumni of the schools mostly continued their studies to European universities. They soon gathered as a newly emerging elite group in Indonesia who comprised the first generation of European-style intelligentsiaand later they advocated Western philosophy instead of their original ethnic philosophies.
The Western philosophy inspired most of modern Indonesian socio-political institutions. Indonesia’s
republicgovernment, its constitutionand distribution of power, its political parties and its long-term national economic planning were carried out on Western model. Even its ideology "Pancasila" (unlike what Soekarno always boasted it or what Soeharto later established) was inspired by Western ideals of humanism, social-democracy, and national socialism of Nazi, as clearly shown in the oration of BPUPKI members, a preparatory council of Indonesian independence in August, 1945 (Risalah Sidang 1995:10-79). This fact leads to a conclusion that ‘Modern Indonesia’ is founded on Western blueprint.
It is interesting to note that even though the elite embraced Western philosophy full-heartedly, they still felt the need to adapt the philosophy to Indonesian concrete, contemporary situation and use. For example
Soekarno, who adapted Western democracy to still-feudalistic-people situation so he came up with his famous "Guided Democracy" (Soekarno 1963:376). D.N. Aiditand Tan Malakaadapted Marxism- Leninismto Indonesian situation (Aidit 1964:i-iv; Malaka 2000:45-56) and Sutan Syahriradapted Social Democracyto Indonesian context (Rae 1993:46).
*cite book | author=Feith, Herbert. | title=The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia | location=Ithaca | publisher=Cornell University Press | year=1962 | id=
*cite book | author=Feith, Herbert, and Lance Castles (eds.). | title=Indonesian Political Thinking, 1945-1955| location=Ithaca | publisher=Cornell University Press | year=1970 | id=
*cite book | author=Brackman, Arnold C. | title=Indonesian Communism: A History | location=Westport | publisher=Greenwood Pub Group | year=1976 | id=ISBN 0-8371-8419-3
Together with the Western capitalist search for new colonies in the
East, Christianitycame to Indonesian peddlers in the mid of 15 century (Lubis 1990:78). First, Portuguese merchants, then Dutch capitalists who spread Catholicismand Calvinismrespectively. Francis Xavier, the first Spanish Catholic preacher to come, translated "Credo, Confession Generalis, Pater Noster, Ave Maria, Salve Regina", and "The Ten Commandments" into Malay between 1546 and 1547, through which Catholicism can be propagated among the native (Lubis 1990:85). Catholic churches were established and Indonesian Catholics crowded, but soon they were expelled or forced to convert to Calvinism by Dutch Calvinists who came to Indonesia around 1596. Dutch Reformed Churches were erected instead. Jan Pieterszoon Coen, one of Governor-General of VOC in 1618, was a good example of devout Calvinists. He put all Calvinist preachers (in Dutch, "Ziekentroosters") under his control (Lubis 1990:99).
Portuguese-style Catholic schools and Dutch-style Calvinist educational institutions were opened for Indonesian natives. Not only did they teach
theologyto the natives, but also Christian philosophy. One school later became thousands. There have been (and always are) private Catholic and Protestantuniversities in which Christian philosophy is taught in Indonesia nowadays. Missionaries and preachers of the West who got master’s degrees in philosophy from European universities came to lecture at Indonesian Christian universities (Hiorth 1987:4). From those universities graduated many who later mastered Christian philosophy, such as Nico Syukur Dister, J.B. Banawiratma, Robert J. Hardawiryana, JB.. Mangunwijaya, T.H. Sumartana, and so forth.
This school is mainly on the scene to criticize Soeharto’s socio-political policy during his presidency from 1966 to 1998. Its concern is
political philosophywhose main task is to seek alternatives to the corrupt regime. This school dared to challenge Soehartoafter his silencing all philosophers by violence. Before this, there had been some who opposed Soeharto in 1970’s, but they were brutally assaulted in the incidents "Peristiwa ITB Bandung1973" and "Peristiwa Malari 1974". Since then, philosophy could only be practiced in absentia or in secret; under the New Order, philosophy was repressed and reduced to ideas which officially supported the state. Philosophical praxiswas effectively banned. With regard to philosophy, Soeharto's era can be called an era of "philosophical opium," in which all kinds of philosophy from every branch and school could live but could not be practiced in reality. Philosophy was pacified: reduced to a mere academic exercise and constrained in its content. In its stead, Soeharto elevated pancasila as an official state ideology, one selectively tailored to meet the needs of the New Order (Hidayat 2004:49-55).
Despite repression, some intellectuals began to publicly dissent and philosophize. They were known as post-Soeharto philosophers, among which are:
Sri-Bintang Pamungkas, Budiman Sudjatmiko, Muchtar Pakpahan, Sri-Edi Swasono, and Pius Lustrilanang.
References in Indonesian
In chronological order
References in English
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.