- National Economic Protectionism Association
NEPA Type Non-governmental organization Founded 1934 Location Francesca Towers, EDSA, Quezon City Key people Bayan dela Cruz, President Area served Philippines Focus Promotion of Filipino industries. Method Development initiative through program advocacy, policy reform and intervention, equitable distribution of resources and production, regional and rural economic development. Revenue zero Employees voluntary Motto Fostering the spirit of Filipino economic nationalism. Website http://www.nepa.net
National Economic Protectionism Association or NEPA as it is commonly called, is the oldest local non-government organization in the Philippines having been established in 1934. The non-government organization was established by Filipino industrialist with the intention of protecting domestic industries owned by Filipinos against dominion by foreign interest and competition. Through the years of its existence, it has gone a number of leadership changes and policy tack. During its heydays, its leaders were holding key positions in the government and were actively promoting Filipino industries. It holds office at Francesca Towers along EDSA in Diliman, Quezon City
- Early beginning
NEPA was established in 1934.
- NEPA in the Millennium
Currently, NEPA is under revitalization with massive mass organizing and networking with other Filipino organizations. From local organization of small-medium entrepreneurs (SMEs) and Filipino industrialists to inventors societies and producers. From a network of nationalist government officials and employees to ordinary Filipino consumers.
National Economic Protectionism Association (NEPA) The National Economic Protectionism Association (NEPA) is the oldest non-government organization (NGO) in the Philippines. It is a registered non-stock, non-profit private organization founded by 15 pioneering Filipino entrepreneurs and industrialists. NEPA has always been an active participant in the formulation of national economic policies. NEPA fosters the spirit of economic nationalism and national industrialization, and promotes the protection of Filipino interests in the country’s polity, economy, culture and environment. NEPA in History
Beginning. The crusade for political independence stimulated a parallel campaign for economic freedom in early 1900s. In 1903, Ang Bagong Katipunan was organized to promote “economic nationalism” and “economic self-sufficiency” among the Filipinos. The movement had a brief but colorful existence. Nevertheless, the flame of economic nationalism continue to spread as the people’s aspiration for national independence intensified in the 1920s.
The Chamber of Commerce of the Philippine Islands, composed of Filipino businessmen, carried on the movement after the demise of Bagong Katipunan. In 1926, the Chamber issued a manifesto entitled ”Ours First, Yours Later,” urging the people to patronize locally-made products.
Founding. NEPA was born out of the historic necessity to hasten the industrial development of the colony in preparation for its acquisition of independence under the Tydings-McDuffie Act, signed on March 24, 1934. Centuries of Spanish rule and three decades of “free trade” under the Americans made the Philippines dependent on the outside world on almost every manufactured commodity—from toothpicks to nails! In early 1934, the Chamber of Commerce created a committee tasked with promoting Filipino products on a more sustained basis. In August of that year, the Chamber sponsored the “Made-in-the-Philippines Week” to popularize local products. It also organized the National Congress of Filipino Businessmen.
On November 19, 1934, the Chamber’s initiative gave birth to NEPA in a founding meeting held at Club Filipino. The founders were: Antonio Brias, Salvador Araneta, Isaac Ampil, Florencio Reyes, Benito Razon, Arsenio N. Luz, Joaquin Elizalde, Leopoldo R. Aguinaldo, Vicente Villanueva, Toribio Teodoro, Gonzalo Puyat, Ramon J. Fernandez, Ciriaco Tuazon, Aurelio Periquet, Sr., and Primo Arambulo. Rise of a movement. Right after its founding, NEPA launched a nation-wide campaign to promote economic protectionism. Provincial, municipal and student chapters were created all over the country. Popular meetings and assemblies, attended by thousands of Filipinos, were held in different parts of the country. “NEPA” became a trademark and a symbol of pride of Philippine-made products. The war years. World War II disrupted the work of NEPA. However, the pre-war consciousness-raising efforts of NEPA regarding self-reliance made it easier for individual entrepreneurs and families to produce essential commodities out of locally available materials.
Post-war revival. NEPA was revived in late 1948 under the leadership of Senator Gil J. Puyat. In the 1950s, the entrepreneurs and firms associated with NEPA spearheaded the great industrial drive that developed around the program of import and foreign exchange controls. The rapid industrial transformation of the Philippines made her the envy of her Asian neighbors. During this period, NEPA founded the Home Industries Association of the Philippines, Filipino Inventors Society, Philippine Hatter's Association and Philippine Standards Association. The decade ended with NEPA becoming the main pillar of the “Filipino First” program of President Carlos P. Garcia. Difficulties of 1960s, crisis of the 1970s. The decade of the 1960s saw the Macapagal administration putting an end to the “Filipino First” policy. Decontrols, peso devaluation and open-door to foreign investors became the order of the day.
This policy reversal, formulated by the International Monetary Fund and implemented by a rising group of so-called technocrats, was continued in the first term of President Ferdinand E. Marcos. In the 1970s, the Philippines literally became an open economy—open to foreign capital, foreign loans and foreign economic advisers. Filipino capitalists were relegated to junior partners under the policy of labor-intensive, export-oriented, transnational-dependent industrialization. This induced economic slowdown, which was exacerbated by the floating of the US-dollar in August 1971. As a result, the Asian currencies collapsed.
NEPA and the 1980s. Against the backdrop of IMF-Word Bank domination of the economy, NEPA started redefining its role in the changed economic situation. On August 23, 1980, it organized the 1st Conference on Economic Independence, which reaffirmed that “political independence can only be meaningful in terms of the welfare of the whole nation, if our national economy is free from the control of foreign interests.” The Conference expressed grave concern over the “operation of the World Bank and other international financial institutions in the Philippines which primarily benefit transnational corporations and their home countries, to the detriment of Filipino businessmen, consumers, workers and peasants, and other sectors of our society.” The above theme was reiterated in the 2nd Conference on Economic Independence organized in December 1983, which was held in the midst of the worst economic crisis ever experienced by the country. The Conference called for a renewal of NEPA and its transformation, once again, into a nation-wide movement aimed at the promotion of genuine economic independence. In late 1984, NEPA gained another 50-year extension of its corporate life. Its leadership has declared its firm resolve to push NEPA once again in the struggle to promote economic nationalism so that the Filipino shall at last be the sole determinant and principal beneficiary of this nation's economic development.
The year 1986 saw the renaissance of a new NEPA. It fought for the protection of our national patrimony in the Constitutional Commission, a just debt re-scheduling scheme and capping of debt service, agrarian reform and import rationalization. NEPA stood for nationalist development and industrialization to fight massive poverty.
In mid-1986, NEPA launched its mass organization known as Kilusang Pilipino Muna which renewed the call for the patronage of Filipino-made products and services. The late 1980s saw NEPA initiating the organization of the Freedom from Debt Coalition (FDC) and the Movement for Nationalist Industrialization (MNI).
NEPA and the 1990s. NEPA once again bowed to be at the forefront of the struggle to promote and protect the economic interests of the Filipino people. In preparation for this renewed organizational vigor, NEPA conducted a series of workshop-meetings in 1991 which culminated in the adoption of the “NEPA Manifesto” better known in its title “NEPA Vision of Development – Capitalism and Nationalism: The Missing Partnership” on December 10, 1992.
This was capped by an operational planning workshop on December 29, 1992 which resulted in the adoption of the new NEPA organization system and the approval of several projects such as the revival of the Bureau of Economic Research, organization of the Information Resource Center, NEPA Training Center (which will be transformed later into the NEPA School of Business & Economics), Business Development & Management Center, NEPA Awards for Outstanding Entrepreneurs (first conducted in the 1970s), establishment of NEPA corporations and cooperatives, and the strengthening of NEPA Confederation by organizing city and municipal chapters, as well as faculty/student chapters in schools, colleges and universities throughout the country. In mid-1990s, NEPA renewed its campaign to promote economic nationalism and new protectionism. However, the spirited NEPA plan was never pursued. The association was eclipsed by the dreamlike economic upswing coupled with strong anti-protectionist campaign by elite business groups and bureaucrat capitalists. At that point in time, the government predicts that the Philippines will reach a "newly-industrialized country" (NIC) status by year 2000.
In October 1996, however, NEPA insisted that the economic ascent is a mercurial upsurge. NEPA declared firmly that “if we take a closer look at the more important economic indicators, the country is not dramatically improving. The balance of trade is rising, there is still massive unemployment and underemployment, the per capita income has not increased significantly as compared to GNP growth, and the purchasing power of the peso has been stifled.” NEPA re-echoed its fears that “unless certain economic fundamentals are changed, the l990s—like the l980s—might turn out to be another lost decade for the Philippines.” In mid-1997, the Asian currencies plunged deeper than the 1971 fall.
At the height of the 1998 presidential campaign, most candidates are still parroting the four-fold economic policies of indiscriminate globalization, unproductive liberalization, ineffective privatization and unwieldy deregulation. NEPA maintained that the continuity of these economic policies will perpetuate the economic crises the country have been experiencing since early 1970s. The economic decline in last three years of 1990’s confirmed NEPA’s prognostication.
NEPA experienced organizational hiatus in late 1990s and the year 2000. Its directorial board deserted and membership dwindled—saddled with economic downtrend combined with NEPA’s organizational inactivity and a silent debate on maintaining “protectionism” as its pivotal concern.
NEPA looks at the decade of 2000s. Looking closer at two important economic sectors in the current decade of 2000s, NEPA noted that the country’s manufacturing sector is not only sluggish, it continue to decline; while the agricultural sector remains uncompetitive with decreasing productivity, and worse, its sustainability is going down.
Economists of some presidentiables for the 2010 elections contend that development should focus on the service sector which employs 45% of the work force. NEPA pointed out that the growth of the service sector can only be sustained by accelerating the development of manufacturing industry and the rapid modernization of agriculture. NEPA, however, emphasized that the economy can only attain sustainable growth by balancing the development of agriculture, industrial manufacturing and service industry. The continuity of existing 30-year-old economic policies, NEPA maintained, will perpetuate the economic crises the country have been experiencing since early 1970s. NEPA also observed that all indicators show the next administration will continue to promote the interest of big businesses and multi-national corporations. NEPA believes this will kill local manufacturing industries, particularly the small and medium enterprises. And sooner, retail trade would be in the hands of foreign companies.
NEPA suggests that the next administration should critically analyze the current economic programs and development policies. The new president should creatively explore new economic programs that will promote the creation of domestic manufacturing enterprises, enhance the modernization of agriculture, and sustain the growth and quality of the service industries. Looking back, moving forward. During the first two years of the Aquino administration, its economists predicted the country would be an industrialized nation by the end of her term. Officials of the Ramos government made a more upbeat prediction: the status of a “newly-industrialized country” (NIC) for the Philippines by the year 2000. The Macapagal-Arroyo administration also made the same prediction using the label “Strong Republic”. [Industrialization (aka NIC-hood) means achieving an annual growth rate of at least 7-8 per cent throughout the decade. It also means halving the double-digit unemployment rate and raising the national per capita income from the subsistence level of $700 to a more decent $2,000 or more.] NEPA shares the aspiration for national industrialization, which has been completely forgotten by the presidency of Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. Moreover, NEPA wants the national march to industrialization to be measured not only in terms of the rising average per capita income but also, and more importantly, in the general reduction of absolute and relative poverty of the masses, estimated by various studies to be affecting between 65 to 80 per cent of the population.
NEPA is less optimistic that the nation will achieve the desired economic targets and the overall goal of industrialization beginning the year 2010 and onwards. In fact, NEPA fears that unless certain economic fundamentals are changed, the decade of 2010s ― like the 1980s, 1990s and 2000s ― might turn out (as usual) to be another lost decade for the Philippines. Finally, NEPA resolved: (1) to promote an alternative all-out industrialization based on economic Filipinism to achieve self-sufficiency and self-sustaining growth, (2) to oppose the imposition of the external forces that seek to dominate our economy and exploit our people and national resources; and (3) to promote a sense of nationalism among our people, a sense of belonging to each others, a sense of common purpose and common destiny, a national pride that make the improbable a reality... a Corporate Philippines or “Philippines, Inc.”
Major Policy Position
- Increased state investment in and promotion of local manufacturing, more state support for small and medium-size entrepreneurs in the form of increased and relaxed credit windows and technical support;
- Review of export processing charters with the view of putting into place stringent import substitution and technology transfer requirements for locators in various export processing zones in the country;
- Immediate suspension and review of all tariff reduction commitments that had negative impact on agriculture and local manufacturing industries;
- Immediate suspension of the automatic appropriations for debt service, a moratorium on payments to tainted loans public or private loans (with sovereign guarantees) and the implementation of a more rational debt payment mechanisms;
- Government assistance in the promotion and development of nationalist ideals among young entrepreneurs; and
- Creation of a body to formulate a national industrialization strategy.
List of Presidents
- Bayan dela Cruz 2010–Present
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Economic democracy — is a socioeconomic philosophy that suggests a shift in decision making power from a small minority of corporate shareholders to a larger majority of public stakeholders. There is no single definition or approach for economic democracy, but most… … Wikipedia
Economic Affairs — ▪ 2006 Introduction In 2005 rising U.S. deficits, tight monetary policies, and higher oil prices triggered by hurricane damage in the Gulf of Mexico were moderating influences on the world economy and on U.S. stock markets, but some other… … Universalium
Economic consequences of the 2006 Thai coup d'état — The 2006 Thailand coup d état took place on Tuesday 19 September, 2006, when the Royal Thai Army staged a coup against the government of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. The short term economic consequences have been relatively minor, resulting … Wikipedia
Economic history of the United Kingdom — The economic history of the United Kingdom deals with the history of the economy of the United Kingdom from the creation of the Kingdom of Great Britain on May 1st, 1707, with the political union of the Kingdom of England and the Kingdom of… … Wikipedia
Economic history of Britain — This is a history of the economy of the United Kingdom and of the countries that joined to form it in 1707 and 1801.Early historyIn Britain s earliest history agriculture was overwhelmingly dominant. The most important export was cassiterite,… … Wikipedia
National Party of Western Australia — The Nationals Western Australia Leader Brendon Grylls Party President Hon Colin Holt MLC … Wikipedia
Economic history of Spain — History of Spain caption=Spanish DoubloonThe Economic history of Spain covers the development of the Spanish economy over the course of its history. Ancient Era The prehistoric Iberians and Celts were some of the earliest groups in what is now… … Wikipedia
Economic globalization — Part of the Politics series on Neoliberalism … Wikipedia
National Centre Party (Ireland) — For the Irish Centre Party founded in 1919, see Stephen Gwynn. National Centre Party Leader Frank MacDermot Founded 1932 Dissolved 1933 Merged into Fine Gael … Wikipedia
National Extremism Tactical Co-ordination Unit — The National Extremism Tactical Co ordination Unit (NETCU) is a British police organization funded by, and reporting to, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) that coordinates police action against groups in the United Kingdom it… … Wikipedia