Democracy Ranking

Democracy Ranking

Democracy Ranking is an independent initiative, whose organization (point of contact, the ″Democracy Ranking Association″) is located primarily in Vienna, Austria.[1][2] Democracy Ranking produces an annual global ranking of democracies. The applied conceptual formula, which measures the quality of democracy, integrates freedom and other characteristics of the political system with the performance of non-political dimensions (gender, economy, knowledge, health, and environment). Democracy Ranking has emphasized a broader understanding of democracy, creating a conceptual link between politics and the output and performance of society. The Democracy Ranking has compared several-year intervals, delivering ranking results, which show how ranking positions and score levels have developed recently. Referring to that information, a Democracy Improvement Ranking has been regularly released.



"The Democracy Ranking is interested in contributing to the global enhancement of the Quality of Democracy in a world-wide understanding and approach."[3]

Theory, conceptual formula and methodology

The Democracy Ranking initiative applies the following conceptual formula for defining democracy and measuring the quality of democracy:

Quality of Democracy = (freedom & other characteristics of the political system) & (performance of the non-political dimensions).[4]

This approach includes also the output of democracies. Democracy Ranking refers to countries (country-based democracies) with a population of one million or more and that are classified by Freedom House as "free" or at least as "partly free" (see also the Freedom House report).

The Democracy Ranking understands democracies multi-dimensionally. According to the ranking, democracy consists of six dimensions (one political, five non-political), with different weights for the overall quality of democracy. Their weights are distributed accordingly:

  1. politics (or the political system) 50%;
  2. gender (gender equality in socioeconomic and educational terms) 10%;
  3. economy (or the economic system) 10%;
  4. knowledge (knowledge society, research and education) 10%;
  5. health (or the health system and health status) 10%;
  6. and environment (environmental sustainability) 10%.[5]

The theoretical basis of the Democracy Ranking encourages a broader approach for explaining and measuring democracy while covering and integrating non-political dimensions. This is enabled by an understanding that democracy represents not only a concept of the political system, but also a concept that extends to society, and includes interfaces between politics, society and economy. Politics (policy) has or should have a responsibility for economic (socioeconomic) performance. Furthermore, there is also a need that democracy reflects the context of its (natural) environment.

Concepts of democracy turn out to be more demanding, the more they move from a mainly electoral democracy (emphasizing elections and political rights) to a liberal democracy (also encompassing civil liberties), and further extending to a liberal democracy of an advanced high quality. In that logic, the Democracy Ranking reflects a "demanding type" of democracy.

Methodically, the Democracy Ranking does not create new indicators, but relies on already existing indicators that are being released regularly by renowned international and/or private non-profit organizations. The Democracy Ranking draws on available indicators according to a distinct conceptual formula and sixfold dimensional structure, thus providing a theoretically based conceptual design (a basic concept) of how to combine and aggregate these indicators. Depending on the source, the content of the indicators varies, extending from peer review assessment (for example, on freedom) to indicators that capture performance (e.g., socioeconomic behavior). The Democracy Ranking initiative acknowledges the work of organizations such as Freedom House, the World Bank, and also the United Nations Development Program (more specifically the Human Development Index).

Reflections on the Democracy Ranking

The work of the Democracy Ranking is being reflected in academic discourse[6][7][8][9] and in coverage by international media.[10][11]

Outcome: Democracy Ranking 2009 scores

The Democracy Ranking[12] compares several-year intervals, revealing relative ranking positions as well as changes of score levels over time. Based on ranking results and their shifts, a Democracy Improvement Ranking[13] is being carried out, with a full result release. The Democracy Improvement Ranking places the emphasis on increases or decreases of the ranking scores of democracies.

See also



  1. ^ See "about us" of the Democracy Ranking
  2. ^ See contact details of the Democracy Ranking
  3. ^ Vision of the Democracy Ranking
  4. ^ Campbell, David F. J. (2008). The Basic Concept for the Democracy Ranking of the Quality of Democracy. Vienna: Democracy Ranking
  5. ^ Campbell, David F. J. / Miklós Sükösd (eds.) (2002). Feasibility Study for a Quality Ranking of Democracies. Vienna: Global Democracy Award
  6. ^ Romo, M. C. Felipe Reyes (2007). Transnacionalismo y participación política. Consideraciones teórico-metodológicas para el desarrollo de un sistema electoral con participación extraterritorial. Congresistas (No. 149-153)
  7. ^ Campbell, David F. J. / Thorsten D. Barth (2009). Wie können Demokratie und Demokratiequalität gemessen werden? Modelle, Demokratie-Indices und Länderbeispiele im globalen Vergleich. (How Can Democracy and the Quality of Democracy Be Measured? Models, Democracy Indices and Country-Based Case Studies in Global Comparison.) SWS-Rundschau 49 (2), 208-233
  8. ^ Jochem, Sven (2010). Wandel und Zukunftsaussichten des schwedisch-sozialdemokratischen Modells. (Change and Future Prospects of the Swedish Social Democratic Model.) Leviathan 38 (2), 227-249
  9. ^ Barth, Thorsten D. (2010). Konzeption, Messung und Rating der Demokratiequalität. Brasilien, Südafrika, Australien und die Russische Föderation 1997-2006. (Conception, Measurement and Rating of the Quality of Democracy. Brazil, South Africa, Australia, and the Russian Federation, 1997-2006.) Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller
  10. ^ "On Democracy Around the World" (2009, September 15), WNYC (New York public radio)
  11. ^ "Only democracy can clean up the planet. Save the ballot box and save the world" (2009, November 20), by Neil Reynolds, The Globe and Mail (Canada)
  12. ^ See Scores of the Democracy Ranking 2009
  13. ^ See Scores of the Democracy Improvement Ranking 2009

External links

Official links

Democracy Ranking reports

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Democracy and the Common Wealth — Democracy and the Common Wealth: Breaking the Stranglehold of the Special Interests   Author(s) Michael E. Arth …   Wikipedia

  • Portuguese transition to democracy — Portugal s experience with democracy before the Carnation Revolution of 1974 had not been particularly successful. Its First Republic lasted only sixteen years, from 1910 to 1926. Under the republic, parliamentary institutions worked poorly and… …   Wikipedia

  • Direct democracy — Part of the Politics series Democracy History · Vari …   Wikipedia

  • History of democracy — Part of the Politics series Democracy History · …   Wikipedia

  • Collaborative e-democracy — In a collaborative e democracy every citizen participates in the policy process, either indirectly by delegating proxy representatives to vote on their behalf within the different policy domains, or directly by voting on a particular issue (green …   Wikipedia

  • People's Party for Freedom and Democracy — Infobox Dutch Political Party party name = Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie party party wikicolourid = VVD leader = Mark Rutte partychair = Ivo Opstelten EKleader = Uri Rosenthal TKleader = Mark Rutte EPleader = Jules Maaten foundation =… …   Wikipedia

  • Christian Democracy (Italy, historical) — Infobox Political party foundation = 1942 dissolution = 1993 party name = Christian Democracy party name italian = Democrazia Cristiana party party status = Former Italian National Party colorcode = blue membership = 1,390,918 (1991) max:… …   Wikipedia

  • Webometrics Ranking of World Universities — The Webometrics Ranking of World Universities is an initiative to improve the presence of the academic and research institutions on the Web and to promote the open access publication of scientific results. The ranking started in 2004 and is based …   Wikipedia

  • E-Democracy — Unter E Democracy bzw. E Demokratie versteht man die Vereinfachung und Durchführung von Prozessen zur Information, Kommunikation und Transaktion innerhalb und zwischen Institutionen der Legislative, Bürgern, Unternehmen und weiteren staatlichen… …   Deutsch Wikipedia

  • United States Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on International Operations and Organizations, Democracy and Human Rights — The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on International Operations and Organizations, Democracy and Human Rights is one of seven subcommittees of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. JurisdictionThe Subcommittee on International Operations… …   Wikipedia