- Battle of Rorke's Drift
Battle of Rorke's Drift Part of the Anglo-Zulu War
The Defence of Rorke's Drift, by Alphonse de Neuville (1882)
Date 22 – 23 January 1879 Location Rorke's Drift, South Africa
Result Tactical British victory Belligerents British Empire Zulu Kingdom Commanders and leaders Lt. John Chard, VC
Lt. Gonville Bromhead, VC
Prince Dabulamanzi kaMpande Strength 139 to 141 British troops + 11 African and colonial troops + 4 civilians
One NNC company of 100 to 350 men
One NNH troop of about 100
4 Zulu regiments, 3,000 to 4,000 men:
iNdluyengwe ibutho: 500 to 700 men
uThulwana, iNdlondo, uDluko amabuthos: about 3,000 men
Casualties and losses 17 killed or mortally wounded 
15 others recorded wounded
NNH troop of about 100 men
NNC company of 100 to 350 men, and several civilians fled the station as the battle began.
351 confirmed killed
about 500 wounded
The Battle of Rorke's Drift, also known as the Defence of Rorke's Drift, was a battle in the Anglo-Zulu War. The defence of the mission station of Rorke's Drift, under the command of Lieutenant John Chard of the Royal Engineers, immediately followed the British Army's defeat at the Battle of Isandlwana on 22 January 1879, and continued into the following day, 23 January. Just over 150 British and colonial troops successfully defended the garrison against an intense assault by 3,000 to 4,000 Zulu warriors. The massive, but piecemeal, Zulu attacks on Rorke's Drift came very close to defeating the tiny garrison but were ultimately repelled. Eleven Victoria Crosses were awarded to the defenders, along with a number of other decorations and honours.
Rorke's Drift, known as kwaJim ("Jim's Land") in the Zulu language, was a mission station and the former trading post of James Rorke, an Irish trader. It was located near a drift, or ford, on the Buffalo (Mzinyathi) River, which at the time formed the border between the British colony of Natal and the Zulu kingdom. On 9 January 1879, the British No. 3 (Centre) Column, under Lord Chelmsford, arrived and encamped at the drift. On 11 January, the date the British ultimatum to the Zulus expired, the column crossed the river and encamped on the Zulu bank. A small force consisting of B Company, 2nd Battalion, 24th (2nd Warwickshire) Regiment of Foot (2nd/24th) under Lieutenant Gonville Bromhead was detailed to garrison the post, which had been turned into a supply depot and hospital under the overall command of Brevet Major Henry Spalding, 104th Foot, a member of Chelmsford's staff.
On 20 January, after reconnaissance patrolling and building of a track for its wagons, Chelmsford's column marched to Isandlwana, approximately 6 miles (9.7 km) to the east, leaving behind the small garrison. A large company of the 2nd/3rd Natal Native Contingent (NNC) under Captain William Stevenson was ordered to remain at the post to strengthen the garrison. This company numbered between 100 and 350 men. Captain Thomas Rainforth's G Company of the 1st/24th Foot was ordered to move up from its station at Helpmekaar, 10 miles (16 km) to the southeast, after its own relief arrived, to further fortify the drift. Later that evening a portion of the No. 2 Column under Brevet Colonel Anthony Durnford, late of the Royal Engineers, arrived at the drift and camped on the Zulu bank, where it remained through the next day.
Late on the evening of 21 January, Durnford was ordered to Isandlwana, as was a small detachment of No. 5 Field Company, Royal Engineers, commanded by Lieutenant John Chard, which had arrived on the 19th to repair the pontoons which bridged the Buffalo. Chard rode ahead of his detachment to Isandlwana on the morning of 22 January to clarify his orders, but was sent back to Rorke's Drift with only his wagon and its driver to construct defensive positions for the expected reinforcement company, passing Durnford's column en route in the opposite direction.
Sometime around noon on the 22nd, Major Spalding left the station for Helpmekaar to ascertain the whereabouts of Rainforth's G Company, which was now overdue. He left Chard in temporary command. Chard rode down to the drift itself where the engineer's camp was located. Soon thereafter, two survivors from Isandlwana – Lieutenant Gert Adendorff of the 1st/3rd NNC and a trooper from the Natal Carbineers – arrived bearing the news of the defeat and that a part of the Zulu impi was approaching the station.
Upon hearing this news, Chard, Bromhead, and another of the station's officers, Acting Assistant Commissary James Dalton (of the Commissariat and Transport Department), held a quick meeting to decide the best course of action - whether to attempt a retreat to Helpmekaar or to defend their current position. Dalton pointed out that a small column, travelling in open country and burdened with carts full of hospital patients, would be easily overtaken and defeated by a numerically superior Zulu force, and so it was soon agreed that the only acceptable course was to remain and fight.
Once the British officers decided to stay, Chard and Bromhead directed their men to make preparations to defend the station. With the garrison's some 400 men working quickly, a defensive perimeter was constructed out of mealie bags. This perimeter incorporated the storehouse, the hospital, and a stout stone kraal. The buildings were fortified, with loopholes (firing holes) knocked through the external walls and the external doors barricaded with furniture.
At about 3.30 pm, a mixed troop of about 100 Natal Native Horse (NNH) under Lieutenant Alfred Henderson arrived at the station after having retreated in good order from Isandlwana. They volunteered to picket the far side of the Oscarberg (Shiyane), the large hill that overlooked the station and from behind which the Zulus were expected to approach.
With the defences nearing completion and battle approaching, Chard had several hundred men available to him: Bromhead's B Company, Stevenson's large NNC company, Henderson's NNH troop, and various others (most of them hospital patients, but 'walking wounded') drawn from various British and colonial units. Adendorff also stayed, while the trooper who had ridden in with him galloped on to warn the garrison at Helpmekaar. The force was sufficient, in Chard's estimation, to fend off the Zulus. Chard posted the British soldiers around the perimeter, adding some of the more able patients, the 'casuals' and civilians, and those of the NNC who possessed firearms along the barricade. The rest of the NNC, armed only with spears, were posted outside the mealy bag and biscuit box barricade within the stone-walled cattle kraal.
The approaching Zulu force was vastly larger; the uDloko, uThulwana, inDlondo amabutho (regiments) of married men in their 30s and 40s and the inDlu-yengwe ibutho of young unmarried men mustered 3,000 to 4,000 warriors, none of them engaged during the battle at Isandlwana. This Zulu force was the 'loins' or reserve of the army at Isandlwana and is often referred to as the Undi Corps. It was directed to swing wide of the British left flank and pass west and south of Isandlwana hill itself positioning itself across the line of communication and retreat of the British and their colonial allies in order to prevent their escape back into Natal by way of ford of the Buffalo river leading to Rorke's Drift. By the time the Undi Corps reached Rorke's Drift at 4:30 pm they had fast-marched some 20 miles (30 km) from the morning encampment they had left around 8 am, they would spend almost the next eleven and a half hours continuously storming the British fortifications at Rorke's Drift.
Most Zulu warriors were armed with an iklwa (the Zulu refinement of the assegai thrusting spear) and a shield made of cowhide. The Zulu army drilled in the personal and tactical use and coordination of this weapons system. Some Zulus also had old muskets and antiquated rifles, though their marksmanship training was poor and the quality and supply of powder and shot dreadful as the Zulu attitude towards firearms was that: "The generality of Zulu warriors, however, would not have firearms - the arms of a coward, as they said, for they enable the poltroon to kill the brave without awaiting his attack." Even though their fire was not accurate, it was responsible for five of the seventeen British deaths at Rorke's Drift.
While the Undi Corps had been led by inkhosi kaMapitha at the Isandlwana battle, the command of the Undi Corps passed to Prince Dabulamanzi kaMpande (half-brother of Cetshwayo kaMpande, the Zulu king) when kaMapitha was wounded mopping up British fugitives from Isandlwana. Prince Dabulamanzi was considered rash and aggressive and this characterization was borne out by his violation of King Cetshwayo's order to act only in defence of Zululand against the invading British soldiers and not carry the war over the border into enemy territory. The Rorke's Drift attack was an unplanned raid rather than any organized counter-invasion, with many of the Undi Corps Zulus breaking off to raid other African kraals and homesteads while the main body advanced on Rorke's Drift.
At about 4:00 pm, Surgeon James Reynolds, Otto Witt - the Swedish missionary who ran the mission at Rorke's Drift - and army chaplain Reverend George Smith came down from the Oscarberg hillside with the news that a body of Zulus were fording the river to the southeast and were "no more than five minutes away". At this point, Witt decided to depart the station as his family lived in an isolated farmhouse about 30 km away and he wanted to be with them. Witt's native servant, Umkwelnantaba, left with him; so too did one of the hospital patients, Lieutenant Thomas Purvis of the 1st/3rd NNC.
At about 4:20 pm the battle began with Lieutenant Henderson's NNH troopers, stationed behind the Oscarberg, briefly engaging the vanguard of the main Zulu force. However, tired from the battle and retreat from Isandlwana and short of carbine ammunition, Henderson's men departed for Helpmekaar. Henderson himself reported to Lieutenant Chard that the enemy were close and that "his men would not obey his orders but were going off to Helpmekaar". Henderson then followed his departing men. Upon witnessing the withdrawal of Henderson's NNH troop, Captain Stevenson's NNC company abandoned the cattle kraal and fled, greatly reducing the strength of the defending garrison. Outraged that Stevenson and some of his colonial NCOs also fled from the barricades, a few British soldiers fired after them, killing Corporal William Anderson.
With the Zulus nearly at the station, the garrison now numbered between 154 and 156 men. Of these, only Bromhead's company could be considered a cohesive unit. Additionally, up to 39 of the men who were at the station were there as hospital patients, although only a handful of these were unable to take up arms. With fewer men, Chard realised the need to modify the defences, and gave orders for the construction of a biscuit-box wall through the middle of the post in order to make possible the abandonment of the hospital side of the station if the need arose.
At 4:30 pm, the Zulus rounded the Oscarberg and approached the south wall. Private Frederick Hitch, posted as lookout atop the storehouse, reported a column of 4,000–6,000 Zulus approaching. The Zulu vanguard, 600 men of the iNdluyengwe, attacked the south wall which joined the hospital and the storehouse. The British opened fire at 500 yards (460 m). The majority of the attacking Zulu force swept around to attack the north wall, while a few took cover and were either pinned by continuing British fire or retreated to the terraces of Oscarberg. There they began a harassing fire of their own. As this occurred, another Zulu force swept onto the hospital and north west wall. Those British on the barricades – including Dalton and Bromhead – were soon engaged in fierce hand to hand fighting. The British wall was too high for the Zulus to scale, so they resorted to crouching under the wall, trying to get hold of the defenders' rifles, slashing at British soldiers with assegai or firing their weapons through the wall. At places, they clambered over each others' bodies to drive the British off the walls, but were driven back.
Zulu fire, both from those under the wall and around Oscarberg, caused a few casualties and five of the 17 who were killed or mortally wounded in the action were struck while at the north wall.
Chard realized that the north wall, under almost constant Zulu attack, could not be held, and at 6:00 pm Chard pulled his men back into the yard, abandoning the front two rooms of the hospital in the process. The hospital was becoming untenable; the loopholes had become a liability, as rifles poked through were grabbed at by the Zulus – but if the holes were left empty Zulu warriors stuck their own weapons through to fire into the rooms. Among the soldiers assigned to the Hospital were Corporal William Wilson Allen and Privates Cole, Dunbar, Hitch, Horrigan, John Williams, Joseph Williams, Alfred Henry Hook, Robert Jones, and William Jones.
Privates Horrigan, John Williams and Joseph Williams and patients tried to hold a hospital entrance with carbines and fixed bayonets. Joseph Williams defended a small window, and 14 dead Zulus were found later beneath the window. As it became clear that the front of the building was being taken by the Zulus, John Williams began to hack a way of escape through the wall dividing the central room and a corner room in the back of the hospital. As he made a passable hole, the door into the central room came under furious attack from the Zulus, and he only had time to drag two bedridden patients out before the door gave way.
The corner room that John Williams had pulled the two patients to was occupied by Private Hook and another nine patients. John Williams hacked at the wall to the next room with his pick-axe, as Hook held off the Zulus. A fire fight erupted as the Zulus fired through the door and Hook returned fire - but not without an assegai striking his helmet and stunning him. Williams made the hole big enough to get into the next room, occupied only by patient Private Waters, and dragged the patients through. The last man out was Hook, who killed some Zulus who had knocked down the door before diving through the hole. John Williams once again went to work, spurred by the fact that the roof was now on fire, as Hook defended the hole and Waters continued to fire through a loophole. After fifty minutes, the hole was large enough to drag the patients through, and the men – save Privates Waters and Beckett, who hid in the wardrobe (Waters was wounded and Beckett died of assegai wounds) – were now in the last room, being defended by Privates Robert Jones and William Jones. From here, the patients clambered out through a window and then ran across the yard to the barricade.
Of the eleven patients, nine survived the trip, as did all the able-bodied men. According to James Henry Reynolds only four defenders were killed in the hospital: one was a member of the Natal Native Contingent with a broken leg; Sgt Maxfield and Private Jenkins who were ill with fever and refused to be moved; and a Private Adams who also refused to move. A Private Cole assigned to the hospital was killed when he ran outside. Reportedly Jenkins was also killed after being seized and stabbed; another Hospital patient killed was Trooper Hunter of the Natal Mounted Police. Among the hospital patients who escaped were a Corporal Mayer of the NNC; Bombardier Lewis of the Royal Artillery and Trooper Green of the Natal Mounted Police who was wounded in the thigh by a spent bullet. A Private Conley with a broken leg was pulled to safety by Hook, although Conley's leg was broken again in the process.
The evacuation of the hospital completed the shortening of the perimeter. As night fell, the Zulu attacks grew stronger. The cattle kraal came under renewed assault and was evacuated by 10:00 pm, leaving the remaining men in a small bastion around the storehouse. Throughout the night, the Zulus kept up a constant assault against the British positions; Zulu attacks only began to slacken after midnight, and finally ended by 2:00 am, instead being replaced by a constant harassing fire from the Zulu firearms - a fire that in turn only ended at 4:00 am. By that time Chard's force had lost 14 dead. Two others were mortally wounded and 8 more - including Dalton - were seriously wounded. Virtually every man had some kind of wound. They were all exhausted, having fought for the better part of ten hours, and were running low on ammunition. Of 20,000 rounds in reserve at the mission, only 900 remained.
As dawn broke, the British could see that the Zulus were gone; all that remained were the dead and severely wounded. Patrols were dispatched to scout the battlefield, recover rifles, and look for survivors, many of whom were executed when found. At roughly 7:00 am, an Impi of Zulus suddenly appeared, and the British manned their positions again. No attack materialized, as the Zulus had been on the move for six days prior to the battle and had not eaten properly for two. In their ranks were hundreds of wounded, and they were several days march from any supplies. Soon after their appearance, the Zulus left the way they had come.
Breakdown of British and colonial casualties:
- 1st/24th Foot: 4 killed or mortally wounded in action; 2 wounded
- 2nd/24th Foot: 9 killed or mortally wounded in action; 9 wounded
- Commissariat and Transport Department: 1 killed in action; 1 wounded
- Natal Mounted Police: 1 killed in action; 1 wounded
- 1st/3rd NNC: 1 killed in action
- 2nd/3rd NNC: 2 wounded
In addition, one member of Stevenson's 2nd/3rd NNC, Corporal William Anderson, was killed by British fire while fleeing the station just prior to the arrival of the Zulus.
Three hundred and fifty-one Zulu bodies were counted after the battle, but it has been estimated that at least 500 wounded and captured Zulus might have been massacred as well. Having witnessed the carnage at Isandlwana, the members of Chelmsford's relief force had no mercy for the captured, wounded Zulus they came across. Nor did the station's defenders. Trooper William James Clarke of the Natal Mounted Police described in his diary that "altogether we buried 375 Zulus and some wounded were thrown into the grave. Seeing the manner in which our wounded had been mutilated after being dragged from the hospital... we were very bitter and did not spare wounded Zulus". Samuel Pitt, who served as a private in B Company during the battle, told The Western Mail in 1914 that the official enemy death toll was too low: "We reckon we had accounted for 875, but the books will tell you 400 or 500". Lieutenant Horace Smith-Dorrien, a member of Chelmsford's staff, wrote that the day after the battle an improvised gallows was used "for hanging Zulus who were supposed to have behaved treacherously".
Victoria Crosses and Distinguished Conduct Medals
Eleven Victoria Crosses were awarded to the defenders of Rorke's Drift, seven of them to soldiers of the 2nd/24th Foot – the most ever received in a single action by one regiment (although not, as commonly thought, the most won in a single action or the most won in a day: 16 were won at the Battle of Inkerman, on 5 November 1854; 28 were won during the Second Relief of Lucknow, 14–22 November 1857). Four Distinguished Conduct Medals were also awarded. This high number of awards for bravery has been interpreted as a reaction to the earlier defeat at the Battle of Isandlwana: the extolling of the victory at Rorke's Drift drawing the public's attention away from the great defeat at Isandlwana and the fact that Lord Chelmsford and Bartle Frere had instigated the war without the approval of Her Majesty's Government. Certainly, Sir Garnet Wolseley, taking over as Commander-in-Chief from Lord Chelmsford later that year, was unimpressed with the awards made to the defenders of Rorke’s Drift, saying "it is monstrous making heroes of those who shut up in buildings at Rorke’s Drift, could not bolt, and fought like rats for their lives which they could not otherwise save". However, there is no doubting that many of the defenders of Rorke's Drift - and each of the 15 winners of the VC and the DCM - did indeed exhibit the attribute required in order to win those awards: that of conspicuous valour in the face of the enemy.
Awarded the Victoria Cross:
- Lieutenant John Rouse Merriott Chard, 5th Field Coy, Royal Engineers
- Lieutenant Gonville Bromhead; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Corporal William Wilson Allen; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Private Frederick Hitch; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Private Alfred Henry Hook; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Private Robert Jones; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Private William Jones; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Private John Williams; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Surgeon James Henry Reynolds; Army Medical Department
- Acting Assistant Commissary James Langley Dalton; Commissariat and Transport Department
- Corporal Christian Ferdinand Schiess; 2nd/3rd Natal Native Contingent
In 1879 there was no provision for the posthumous granting of the Victoria Cross, and so it could not be awarded to anyone who had died in performing an act of bravery. In light of this, an unofficial 'twelfth VC' may be added to those listed: Private Joseph Williams, B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot, who was killed during the fight in the hospital and for whom it was mentioned in despatches that "had he lived he would have been recommended for the Victoria Cross".
Awarded the Distinguished Conduct Medal:
- Gunner John Cantwell; N Batt, 5th Brig Royal Horse Artillery (demoted from bombardier wheeler the day before the battle)
- Private John William Roy; 1st/24th Foot
- Colour Sergeant Frank Edward Bourne; B Coy, 2nd/24th Foot
- Second Corporal Francis Attwood; Army Service Corps
On 15 January 1880, a submission for a DCM was also made for Private Michael McMahon (Army Hospital Corps). The submission was cancelled on 29 January 1880 for absence without leave and theft.
Depictions and dramatisations
The events surrounding the assault on Rorke's Drift were first dramatised by military painters, notably Elizabeth Butler and Alphonse de Neuville. Their work was vastly popular in their day among the citizens of the British empire.
The 1964 film Zulu is a depiction of the Battle of Rorke's Drift. The film received generally very positive reviews from the critics. Some details of the film's account have, however, been criticized as historically inaccurate (see also: Zulu (film)). For example, in the movie the regiment is called the South Wales Borderers but the unit was not in fact called that until 2 years after the battle, even though the regiment had been based at Brecon in South Wales since 1873. While most of the men of the 1/24 battalion were recruited from the industrial towns and agricultural classes of England, principally from Birmingham and adjacent southwest counties, only 10 soldiers of the 1/24 that fought in the battle were Welsh. Many of the soldiers of the junior battalion, the 2/24, were Welshmen. Of the 122 soldiers of the 24th Regiment present at the Battle of Rorke's Drift, 49 are known to have been of English nationality, 32 were Welsh, 16 were Irish, 1 was a Scot, and 3 were born overseas. The nationalities of the remaining 21 are unknown.
The battle of Rorke's Drift was given a chapter in military historian Victor Davis Hanson's book Carnage and Culture as one of several landmark battles demonstrating the superior effectiveness of Western military practices. In 1990 the game developer Impressions Games released a video game based on the historical battle. The battle was also featured by Mad Doc Software in its 2006 strategy game Empire Earth II: The Art of Supremacy as one of its "turning point" battle modes.
- ^ Knight , Ian. Zulu: Isandlwana and Rorke's Drift, 1992, pp.107-108.
- ^ Holme, Norman. The Noble 24th, Savannah Publications, ISBN 1902366042, 1999, p. 265-369, 383.
- ^ Whybra, Julian. England's Sons, Gift Ltd., 2004, pp.68-69.
- ^ Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996, ISBN 1 855 32 506 3. p.36, NNC included in garrison.
- ^ Estimates vary: Colenso, F.E..History of the Zulu War and Its Origin, London, 1880, p. 305, gives 3,000; Knight, Ian. The Zulu War 1879, Osprey, 2003,ISBN 1-84176-612-7, p.37, Knight gives: "in excess of 3,000"; Lock, Ron; Quantrill, Peter (2005). Zulu Victory: The Epic of Isandlwana and the Cover-up. Greenhill Books. pp. 231–232. ISBN 1853676454. gives 3,000, p.231; Morris, Donald R.. The Washing of the Spears, Da Capo Press, 1998, gives over 4,000.
- ^ Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996, ISBN 1 855 32 506 3, p. 23.
- ^ Porter, Whitworth (1889), South African Wars, 1847–1885, History of the Corps of Royal Engineers, II, London: Longmans, Green, and Co. p.33, "17 killed and 10 wounded.". (including one killed by 'friendly fire' while fleeing the garrison at start of the battle)
- ^ Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996, ISBN 1 855 32 506 3, p. 88, "First shots of the battle; the Natal Native Horse break before the oncoming Zulus ...".
- ^ Colenso, F.E..History of the Zulu War and Its Origin, London, 1880, p. 305
- ^ Lock, Ron; Quantrill, Peter (2005). Zulu Victory: The Epic of Isandlwana and the Cover-up. Greenhill Books. ISBN 1853676454. excerpt from private journal of Lieutenant Colonel John North Crealock, Crealock states "351 dead were found and 500 wounded".
- ^ Ian Knight, The Zulu War 1879, Osprey, 2003,ISBN 1-84176-612-7, p. 37.
- ^ Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996,ISBN 1 855 32 506 3, p.23, "The post was guarded by one company of 2/24 ... and a company of the NNC...".
- ^ Estimates vary: Thompson, Paul Singer. Black Soldiers of the Queen: the Natal Native Contingent in the Anglo-Zulu War, University of Alabama Press, 2006, ISBN 0-8173-5368-2 p.65, gives 100. Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996, ISBN 1 855 32 506 3, p. 27 gives 100 to 300. Knight, Ian. Greaves, Adrian, (ed.). Redcoats and Zulus, 2004, p. 116.
- ^ http://www.talana.co.za/html/map.html
- ^ Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996, ISBN 1 855 32 506 3, p. 25
- ^ Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996,ISBN 1 855 32 506 3, p. 28, "With 400 men to build them..."
- ^ Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996,ISBN 1 855 32 506 3, p.36.
- ^ Donald R. Morris The Washing of the Spears, Da Capo Press, 1998, p. 401
- ^ Donald R. Morris The Washing of the Spears, Da Capo Press, 1998, p.370, "played no part in the battle"
- ^ World History of Warfare, By Christon I. Archer University of Nebraska Press, 2002, ISBN 803244231941, p.462 "They had a national army of twenty-five thousand men equipped with cowhide shields, assegais and clubs. Lock, Ron; Quantrill, Peter (2005). Zulu Victory: The Epic of Isandlwana and the Cover-up. Greenhill Books, ISBN 1-85367-505-9, p.62, John Shepstone, Acting Secretary for Native Affairs at the time on the Zulu army - "Equipment: Each man carries his shield and assegais, and a kaross or blanket if he possesses one, he may also have a war dress of monkey skins or ox tails, this is all."
- ^ Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996,ISBN 1 855 32 506 3, p.33, 38, 39.
- ^ Bourquin, S.. Military History Journal, V.4, No.4, The Zulu Military Organization, South African Military History Society, ISSN 0026-4016, Dec. 1978.
- ^ Bourquin, S.. section 'War of 1879', subsection 'Weapons'
- ^ Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996, ISBN 1 855 32 506 3, p. 38, "Although the Zulu position was a commanding one - a squad of good shots armed with efficient rifles could have made Chard's position untenable within minutes -the Zulus were neither good shots, nor well armed."
- ^ Ian Knight, The Zulu War 1879, Osprey, 2003,ISBN 1-84176-612-7, p. 33.
- ^ Porter, Whitworth (1889), "Drawing, Rorke's Drift Post", History of the Corps of Royal Engineers, II, London: Longmans, Green, and Co, p. 31, http://books.google.com/books?id=FqdBAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA31, retrieved 2008-08-14
- ^ Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996, ISBN 1 855 32 506 3. p.36, and on p.88 this is described by Knight as "the first shots of the battle".
- ^ ^Morris, Donald R.. The Washing of the Spears, Da Capo Press, 1998, p. 401.
- ^ Chadwick, G.A. . Military History Journal, V.4, No.4, The Anglo-Zulu War of 1879, Isandlwana and Rorke's Drift, South African Military History Society, ISSN 0026-4016, Jan. 1979. "This reduced the strength of the defenders drastically..."
- ^ Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996, ISBN 1 855 32 506 3. p.45, Corporal Scammell of the NNC is noted as remaining.
- ^ Whybra, Julian. England's Son, Gift Ltd., 2004, gives the most up-to-date analysis of the numbers present at the Battle of Rorke's Drift. He counts 154 definite participants, with 2 others listed as "possibles".
- ^ Whybra, Julian. England's Son, Gift Ltd., 2004, pp. 65–67.
- ^ Porter, Whitworth , South African Wars, 1847–1885, History of the Corps of Royal Engineers, II, London: Longmans, Green, and Co. 1889, p. 31.
- ^ Private Henry Hook's account in The Royal Magazine 1905.
- ^ Machanik, Major (Dr) Felix. Military History Journal, V.4, No.6, Firepower and Firearms in the Zulu War of 1879, South African Military History Society, ISSN 0026-4016, Dec. 1979.
- ^ Private Henry Hook's account in The Royal Magazine 1905. Also Colenso and Crealocke.
- ^ Julian Whybra (2004) England's Sons pp. 62–64
- ^ Private Henry Hook's account in The Royal Magazine 1905. Also Colenso and Crealocke.
- ^ Lock, Ron; Quantrill, Peter (2005). Zulu Victory: The Epic of Isandlwana and the Cover-up. Greenhill Books. ISBN 1-85367-645-4, p. 232, ".. it is possible that all the Zulu wounded were put to death.".
- ^ Thompson, Paul Singer. Black soldiers of the queen: the Natal native contingent in the Anglo-Zulu War, University of Alabama Press, 2006, ISBN 0-8173-5368-2 p.69
- ^ Lock, Ron; Quantrill, Peter (2005). Zulu Victory: The Epic of Isandlwana and the Cover-up. Greenhill Books. pp. 231–232. ISBN 1853676454.
- ^ Lock, Ron; Quantrill, Peter (2005). Zulu Victory: The Epic of Isandlwana and the Cover-up. Greenhill Books. pp. 232. ISBN 1853676454.
- ^ Smith, David. Rorke's Drift,The Guardian 21 April 2009, gives "about 400 Zulus" killed.
- ^ Carroll, Rory. Legendary Battle of Anglo-Zulu War marred by brutal aftermath, The Guardian 29 April 2003
- ^ Lock, Ron; Quantrill, Peter (2005). Zulu Victory: The Epic of Isandlwana and the Cover-up. Greenhill Books. pp. 232. ISBN 1853676454.
- ^ London Gazette: . 2 May 1879. Retrieved 2007-11-28.
- ^ Edward M. Spiers, The Scottish Soldier and Empire, 1854-1902, Edinburgh University Press, 2006, p. 41. ISBN 978-0-7486-2354-9 Also: Ian Knight, Zulu War, Osprey, 2004, p. 9, "By late 1878 Frere had manipulated a diplomatic crisis with the Zulus..." F.E. Colenso, History of the Zulu War and Its Origin, London, 1880, pp. 261-262, "the terms...are evidently such as he (Cetshwayo) may not improbably refuse, even at the risk of war... to preclude you from incurring the delay...involved in consulting Her Majesty's Government upon a subject of so much importance as the terms..." Also: Ian Knight, Zulu War, Osprey, 2004, p. 11, "... an ultimatum with which, Frere knew, they could not possibly comply."
- ^ Whybra, Julian. England's Sons Gift Ltd., 2004, pp. 71-72.
- ^ Michael Snook, Like Wolves on the Fold (2006) pp.96-99
- ^ Julian Whybra (2004) England's Sons p. 72
- ^ Julian Whybra (2004) England's Sons p. 72
- ^ "Zulu: The True Story" by Dr. Saul David. British History in Depth, BBC. Accessed on 29 September 2011 at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/victorians/zulu_01.shtml
- ^ http://www.rrw.org.uk/museums/brecon/faq.htm
- ^ Lock, Ron; Quantrill, Peter (2005). Zulu Victory: The Epic of Isandlwana and the Cover-up. Greenhill Books. p. 37. ISBN 1853675059.
- ^ Norman Holme (1999) The Noble 24th p. 383
- Colenso, F.E..History of the Zulu War and Its Origin, London, 1880.
- Military Heritage discussed Rorke's Drift and the politics of the Victoria Cross (Roy Morris Jr., Military Heritage, August 2005, Volume 7, No. 1, p. 8).
- Greaves, Adrian, Rorke's Drift, Cassell, London, 2002.
- Lock, Ron; Quantrill, Peter. Zulu Victory: The Epic of Isandlwana and the Cover-up. Greenhill Books. 2005, ISBN 1-85367-645-4.
- Morris, Donald R. The Washing of the Spears: A History of the Rise of the Zulu Nation under Shaka and Its Fall in the Zulu War of 1879 Da Capo Press, 1998, ISBN 0306808668.
- Knight, Ian, Rorke's Drift 1879, "Pinned Like Rats in a Hole"; Osprey Campaign Series #41, Osprey Publishing 1996, ISBN 1 855 32 506 3.
- Porter, Whitworth (1889), "South African Wars, 1847–1885", History of the Corps of Royal Engineers, II, London: Longmans, Green, and Co, pp. 24–43, http://books.google.com/books?id=FqdBAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA24, retrieved 2008-08-14.
- Snook, Lt Col Mike, Like Wolves on the Fold: The Defence of Rorke's Drift. Greenhill Books, London, 2006. ISBN 1-85367-659-4.
- Thompson, Paul Singer. Black soldiers of the queen: the Natal native contingent in the Anglo-Zulu War, University of Alabama Press, 2006, ISBN 0-8173-5368-2.
- Whybra, Julian. England's Sons, Gift Ltd., 2004.
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
Rorke's Drift — Infobox Military Conflict conflict=Battle of Rorke s Drift partof=the Anglo Zulu War caption= date=22 January ndash; 23 January 1879 place=Rorke s Drift, South Africa result=British victory combatant1= combatant2=Zulu Kingdom commander1=John… … Wikipedia
Rorke’s Drift, Battle of — (1879) A minor but celebrated engagement of the Zulu War that followed quickly on the Zulu victory at Isandhlwana in January 1879. At a mission station by a ford of the Buffalo River 25 miles southeast of Dundee in South Africa, a British… … Encyclopedia of the Age of Imperialism, 1800–1914
Schlacht um Rorke’s Drift — Rorke’s Drift Teil von: Zulukrieg „Defense of Rorke’s Drift“ von … Deutsch Wikipedia
Bataille de Rorke's Drift — Bataille de Rorke s Drift, peinture d Alphonse de Neuville, 1880. Informations générales Date 22 janvier 23 janvier … Wikipédia en Français
Battles of Isandhlwana and Rorke's Drift — The battles of Isandhlwana and Rorke s Drift were two related engagements of the Zulu War: * the battle of Isandhlwana, January 22, 1879; * the battle of Rorke s Drift, January 22 to January 23, 1879 … Wikipedia
Isandhlwana and Rorke's Drift, Battles of — ▪ South African history (Jan. 22–23, 1879), the major battles of the Zulu War, in South Africa. At Isandhlwana, the British failure to defend their encampment led to the obliteration of an imperial force of about 1,700 men by more than… … Universalium
Drift — may mean: Contents 1 Film and literature 2 Geography 3 Industry … Wikipedia
Battle of Isandlwana — Infobox Military Conflict conflict=Battle of Isandlwana partof=the Anglo Zulu War caption=Depiction of the battle from the Illustrated London News date=22 January 1879 place=coord|28|21|32|S|30|39|9|E|display=inline,title|type:mountain Isandlwana … Wikipedia
Battle of Ulundi — Infobox Military Conflict conflict=Battle of Ulundi partof=Anglo Zulu War caption= The Burning of Ulundi date=July 4, 1879 place=Ulundi, South Africa result=Decisive British Victory combatant1= combatant2=Zulu Kingdom commander1=Lord Chelmsford… … Wikipedia
Battle of Blood River — Infobox Military Conflict conflict=Battle of Blood River, iMpi yaseNcome partof=the Great Trek caption=Voortrekker laager date=16 December, 1838 place=Blood/ Ncome river, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa casus= territory= result=Decisive Voortrekker… … Wikipedia