Collector v. Day

Collector v. Day
Seal of the United States Supreme Court.svg
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued February 3, 1871
Decided April 3, 1871
Full case name The Collevtor v. Day
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Day stating that Congress did not have the right within their powers to impose a tax on state officials.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Nelson, joined by Chase, Clifford, Davis, Field, Miller, Strong, Swayne
Dissent Bradley

Collector v. Day, 78 U.S. 113 (1871), questioned the United States Federal government's ability to impose a tax upon the "salary of a judicial officer of the State." Even though this particular case favors state employees' rights, it was overruled in 1939 by Graves v. New York.[clarification needed] It is still important to Constitutional law because Judge Nelson's opinion gives us a clear statement of the doctrine of dual federalism.


Facts of the case

In 1864, various statutes passed by the United States Congress imposed a 5 percent tax on all personal incomes over $1000.[1] In 1866 and 1867, the tax collector for the internal revenue of the United States taxed Judge J.M. Day of the Court of Probate in Massachusetts. Since Judge Day believed this was not within the Federal governments rights, he paid the amount of $61.50 under protest and then proceeded to sue the Circuit Court to recover his charges. After Day won this case, the United States issued a writ of error which brought the case to the Supreme Court of the United States.


The plaintiff's main argument, in this case the Collector, claimed that the Federal Government of the United States is supreme in the area of taxation given to them in the U.S. Constitution. Specifically, they cite this right in the Constitution, "Under the general rules of taxation, every man and everything throughout the country (exports excepted) are subject to taxation in the discretion of Congress..." They argued that since the Judge works for his own salary from the state, but as a citizen of the United States, Judge Day should pay his taxes to support the Federal government. They believed that just because he worked for the state, he should not be exempted from his duties as an American citizen.

Judge J.M. Day, the county probate judge of Massachusetts, argued that the Federal government is stretching their limits by taxing an officer of the State. He claimed that these powers are not expressly given to them in the Constitution, and that the Collector is ultimately violating State power.

Supreme Court decision

Decided on April 3, 1871, in an 8 to 1 decision, the Supreme Court decided in favor of the Defendant, Judge Day. Justice Samuel Nelson delivered the opinion of the court and cites several court cases from the past, including McCulloch v. Maryland, Dobbins v. The Commission of Erie County, and Weston v. Charleston. Justice Nelson uses these examples to highlights the examples of federalism v. states powers. In his opinion, Nelson makes very clear that the national and state governments are part of one another but remain as "separate and distinct sovereignties, acting separately and independently of each other, within their respective spheres" [2]. He makes his opinion stronger by stating that since it is already in the Constitution that that state may not tax the national government, then it should be the same way that the Federal government my not hinder upon state taxes. Justice Nelson refers to this action as the doctrine of "reciprocal immunity." After reading his entire opinion, it is obvious that he and majority of the court based their opinions on anti-federalist point of views, which favor State rights and oppose a centralized controlling government.

In the dissenting opinion delivered by Justice Bradley, he claims that he sees no distinct difference between the national government and the state government taxing the officials of the state. He claims that since every citizen living in a state is in fact a part of the United States, the national government has the ability to tax the officials of the states. Justice Bradley does not agree with the defendant's idea that being an official of a particular state makes him exempt from the federal law. He believes that if the court gives the states this right of taxing their own officials, then what would stop them from furthering their powers? He sees the gray line that this decision could bring about. A thorough read of his dissent makes it clear that Justice Bradley bases his opinion from a federalist point of view.


  1. ^ Mason, Alpheus and Donald Stephenson. American Constitutional Law. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2009.
  2. ^ Mason, Alpheus and Donald Stephenson. American Constitutional Law. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2009.

External links

Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.

Look at other dictionaries:

  • Collector Car Appreciation Day — (CCAD) is an annual celebration to raise awareness of the role automotive restoration and collection plays in American society. The day was first recognized on July 9, 2010 due, in part, to U.S. Senate resolution S. Res 513, sponsored by Senators …   Wikipedia

  • Collector's Item (Twelfth Night album) — Collector s Item Compilation album by Twelfth Night Released 1991, reissued 2001 Recorded 19 …   Wikipedia

  • Collector (film) — Collector Directed by Anil C. Menon Produced by V. V. Sajan Abdul Azeez …   Wikipedia

  • Collector urchin — Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum …   Wikipedia

  • Collector's Item (Twelfth Night) — Infobox Album Name = Collector s Item Type = compilation album Artist = Twelfth Night Released = , reissued 2001 Recorded = 1981 1988 Genre = Neo progressive Length = 78.11 / 77.07 Label = Twelfth Night Producer = Twelfth Night Last album =… …   Wikipedia

  • Miramax Collector's Series — Collector s Series refers to a collection of DVDs released by Miramax Films. The series premiered on December 8, 1998 with the release of Good Will Hunting and features 30 films to date. Films in the Collection Film Title Year Director Bridget… …   Wikipedia

  • List of video game collector and limited editions — Computer and video game collector and limited editions (commonly referred to as CE and LE s) are video games packaged with bonus materials and enhancements not available in the standard release. Such bonuses can range from special packaging to… …   Wikipedia

  • A New Day Has Come — Infobox Album | Name = A New Day Has Come Type = Studio album Artist = Céline Dion Released = Start date|2002|3|22 Recorded = 2001 2002 Genre = Pop Length = 72:22 Label = Columbia, Epic Producer = Walter Afanasieff, Peer Astrom, Christian B.,… …   Wikipedia

  • Solar thermal collector — A solar thermal collector is a solar collector specifically intended to collect heat: that is, to absorb sunlight to provide heat. Although the term may be applied to simple solar hot water panels, it is usually used to denote more complex… …   Wikipedia

  • Solar collector — A solar collector is a device for extracting the energy of the sun not indirectly into a more usable or storable form. The energy in sunlight is in the form of electromagnetic radiation from the infrared (long) to the ultraviolet (short)… …   Wikipedia