- California Proposition 5 (2008)
- __TOC__California Proposition 5, or the Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act (or NORA) is an initiated state statute that has been certified to appear as a
ballot measureon the November 2008 ballot in California.
Provisions of the initiative
* Requires California to expand and increase funding and oversight for individualized treatment and rehabilitation programs for nonviolent drug offenders and parolees.
* Reduces criminal consequences of nonviolent drug offenses by mandating three-tiered probation with treatment and by providing for case dismissal and/or sealing of records after probation.
* Limits court’s authority to incarcerate offenders who violate probation or parole.
* Shortens parole for most drug offenses, including sales, and for nonviolent property crimes.
* Creates numerous divisions, boards, commissions, and reporting requirements regarding drug treatment and rehabilitation.
* Changes certain marijuana misdemeanors to infractions.
Fiscal impact analysis
According to the state of California, the initiative, if it passes, would lead to:
* Increased state costs that could exceed $1 billion annually primarily for expanding drug treatment and rehabilitation programs for offenders in state prisons, on parole, and in the community.
* Savings to the state that could exceed $1 billion annually due primarily to reduced prison and parole operating costs.
* Net savings on a one-time basis on capital outlay costs for prison facilities that could exceed $2.5 billion.
* Unknown net fiscal effect on expenditures for county operations and capital outlay.
The official proponent of the measure is Daniel Abrahamson.
Argument in favor of Prop 5
Notable arguments that have been made in favor of Prop 5 include:
* Prop 5 would reduce pressure on overcrowded and expensive prisons.
* Prop. 5 creates treatment options for young people with drug problems that do not exist under current law
* Voter-approved Proposition 36 provided treatment, not jail, for nonviolent drug users.
* One-third have completed treatment and became productive, tax-paying citizens.
* Since 2000, Prop. 36 has graduated 84,000 people and saved almost $2 billion."
Donors to the Prop 5 campaign
As of September 6, 2008, the five largest donors to the "Yes on 5" campaign are:
George Soros, $1,400,000; [ [http://data.sacbee.com/capalert/login.html?prv=http%3A//www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/015028.html "Sacramento Bee", "George Soros adds $400,000 to Yes on 5", September 3, 2008] ]
* Jacob Goldfield, $1,400,000.
* Bob Wilson, $700,000;
John Sperling, $500,000;
* The Drug Policy Alliance Network, $400,000. [ [http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1302707&session=2007&view=late1 "Details of $5,000+ donations"] ]
Path to Ballot
The petition drive conducted to qualify the measure for the fall ballot was conducted by Progressive Campaigns, Inc. at a cost of about $1.762 million. [ [http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1302707&session=2007&view=expenditures "Campaign expenditure details"] ]
* The People Against the Proposition 5 Deception is the official committee against the proposition. As of July 14, 2008, the group reports no financial activity. [ [http://cal-access.sos.ca.gov/Campaign/Committees/Detail.aspx?id=1308198&session=2007&view=received "People against the Prop 5 deception"] ]
* Actor Martin Sheen
* 32 District Attornies
* Former Governor Gray Davis
* Former Governor Pete Wilson
Arguments against Prop 5
Notable arguments that have been made against Prop 5 include:
* Proposition 5 has been called the "Drug Dealers’ Bill of Rights" because it shortens parole for methamphetamine dealers and other drug felons from 3 years to 6 months.
* This measure may provide a 'get-out-of-jail-free' card to many of those accused of other crimes by claiming drugs made them do it, letting them effectively escape criminal prosecution."
* Proposition 5 establishes two new bureaucracies with virtually no accountability, and which will cost hundreds of millions in taxpayer dollars.
* This a long law that changes many statutes that most voters will not even read in sufficient detail [ [http://www.sacbee.com/110/story/1284905.html "Sacramento Bee", "Our View: Judges believe Proposition 5's flaws are fatal", October 3, 2008] ]
* Addicted defendants will be permitted five violations of probation or treatment failures based on drug use, and judges will be unable to meaningfully intervene until the sixth violation.
Lawsuit to remove from ballot
Opponents of Proposition 5, including thirty-two district attorneys and former California governors Pete Wilson and Gray Davis petitioned the
California Supreme Courtto issue a preemptory writ of mandate to remove Proposition 5 from the November ballot. The lawsuit alleges that Proposition 5 attempts to alter the constitution via statute, which is unconstitutional. [ [http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/prop--campaign-files-state-supreme-court-remove-ballot/ "No on Prop 5 Campaign Files With State Supreme Court to Remove It From the Ballot", July 17, 2008] ] , [ [http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_9913485 "Calif. justices asked to reject drug initiative"] ]
The California Supreme Court declined to issue the preemptory writ. Generally, initiatives constitutionality are not reviewed until after a vote has passed and the initiative becomes law. [ [http://www.prop5yes.com/supreme-court-rejects-effort-to-strike-prop-5-from-ballot "California Supreme Court rejects efforts to strike prop 5 from ballot. "] ]
Editorial boards opposed
Los Angeles Times[ [http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-ed-5prop26-2008sep26,0,7072255.story "Los Angeles Times", "No on Proposition 9", September 26, 2008] ]
*The Pasadena Star News [ [http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/ci_10623643 "Pasadena Star News", "Dangerous Prop 5", September 2, 2008] ]
* [http://www.prop5yes.com/ Yes on Proposition 5]
* [http://www.NoOnProposition5.com No on Proposition 5]
* [http://www.voterguide.sos.ca.gov/title-sum/prop5-title-sum.htm California Voter's Guide for Proposition 5]
* [http://ag.ca.gov/cms_attachments/initiatives/pdfs/i751_07-0081_initiative.pdf Official Text of the Initiative]
* [http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/pend_sig/init_sample_1310.pdf Signatures pending validation]
* [http://www.californiapropositions.org/prop5.html CaliforniaPropositions.org Prop 5 information page]
* [http://calvoter.org/voter/elections/2008/general/props/prop5.html California Voter Online guide to Proposition 5]
* [http://www.smartvoter.org/2008/11/04/ca/state/prop/5/ Smart Voter Guide to Proposition 5]
* [http://www.sacbee.com/344/story/1202029.html Peter Schrag: Props. 5 and 8 will make waves nationally]
* [http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/2008/09/schrag_californ_7.html California Ballot Propositions May Start National Trend on Prisons and Rehabilitation of Drug Offenders and Same Sex Marriage]
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Look at other dictionaries:
California Proposition 2 (2008) — Proposition 2, the proposed Standards for Confining Farm Animals initiative statute, is a California ballot proposition in that state s general election on November 42008. The proposition would add a chapter to Division 20 of the California… … Wikipedia
California Proposition 8 (2008) — Proposition 8 is an initiative measure on the 2008 California General Election ballot titled Eliminates Right of Same Sex Couples to Marry.  [cite web|url=http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/280669/3/|title=LDS Donate Millions to Fight Gay… … Wikipedia
California Proposition 92 (2008) — California Proposition 92 was Californian ballot proposition that voters rejected on February 5, 2008. It was a state initiative that would have amended Proposition 98, which set a mandate for the minimum level of funding each year for elementary … Wikipedia
California Proposition 91 (2008) — California Proposition 91 was a failed proposal to amend the California Constitution to prohibit motor vehicle fuel sales taxes that are earmarked for transportation purposes from being retained in the state s general fund. The proposition… … Wikipedia
California Proposition 4 (2008) — Elections in California … Wikipedia
California Proposition 7 (2008) — TOC California Proposition 7, would, if approved, require California utilities to procure half of their power from renewable resources by 2025. In order to make that goal, levels of production of solar, wind and other renewable energy resources… … Wikipedia
California Proposition 11 (2008) — TOC California Proposition 11, also known as the Voters FIRST Act, is proposed as an amendment to the California Constitution through initiative. If enacted this initiative would have the following effect:* Changes authority for establishing… … Wikipedia
California Proposition 6 (2008) — TOC California Proposition 6, also known as the Safe Neighborhoods Act and The Runner Initiative, is a statutory initiative that will appear on the November 2008 ballot in California.Proposition 6 places additional penalties on gang related and… … Wikipedia
California Proposition 10 (2008) — TOC California Proposition 10, also known as the California Alternative Fuels Initiative, is an initiated state statute that will appear on the November 2008 ballot in California. Proposition 10 is one of two ballot initiatives focusing on… … Wikipedia
California Proposition 1A (2008) — Proposition 1A is a California ballot proposition and a bond measure that would fund the California High Speed Rail if approved by voters in the upcoming state election on November 4, 2008. History Originally known as the Safe, Reliable High… … Wikipedia